Startseite Uranium concentrations and its isotopes in baby food of Iraq
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Uranium concentrations and its isotopes in baby food of Iraq

  • Farqad Abbas Taher und Ali Abid Abojassim ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 15. April 2024

Abstract

This study determines uranium concentrations and isotopes (238U, 235U, and 234U) in baby food samples collected from Iraqi markets using solid-state nuclear track detector technical (CR-39). Also, some radiological hazard parameters such as annual committed effective dose (E U) and risk of an excess cancer fatality per million persons (RECFPMP) for the same study samples were calculated using theoretical equations. The samples in the present study were classified into three varieties: cereals and cereal products, vegetables and fruits, and biscuits. The results show that the average uranium concentration (mg/kg or ppm) values in cereals and cereal products, vegetables and fruits, and biscuits were 0.71 ± 0.01, 0.81 ± 0.04, and 0.72 ± 0.031, respectively. At the same time, the average values of 238U, 235U, and 234U in all samples of the present study were 9.08 ±0.17 Bq/kg, 0.42 ± 0.0081 Bq/kg, and 9.33 ± 0.18 Bq/kg, respectively. The total average of E U (mSv/y) due to all uranium isotopes (238U, 235U, and 234U) in cereals and cereal products, vegetables and fruits, and biscuits were 0.042 ± 0.0006, 0.039 ± 0.001, and 0.034 ± 0.001, respectively. Moreover, it was found that the average values of RECFPMP were 0.159 ± 0.002 in cereals and cereal products samples, 0.154 ± 0.007 in vegetables and fruits samples, and 0.130 ± 0.005 in biscuits samples. Uranium concentrations and the total annual committed effective dose in all baby food samples comply with the worldwide limits approved by UNSCEAR, which state safe limitations (1.7 mg/kg) and (0.32 mSv/y), respectively. So, one may conclude that there is no danger of uranium concentrations in the case of baby consumption.


Corresponding author: Ali Abid Abojassim, Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Kufa, Al-Najaf, Iraq, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The principal author expressed gratitude to the other authors for their constructive comments, which improved and brought freshness to the work.

  1. Research ethics: All subjects gave their informed consent for inclusion before they participated in the study.

  2. Author contributions: Each author subscribes to conceiving and designing the analysis; Collected the data; Contributing data or analysis tools; Performed the analysis; Writing the manuscript.

  3. Competing interests: There is no competing interests.

  4. Research funding: There is no funding.

  5. Data availability: Data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

1. Abojassim, A. A.; Hashim, R. H.; Mahdi, N. S. Basics of Nuclear Radiation; B P International, 2021; p 86.10.9734/bpi/mono/978-93-5547-140-6Suche in Google Scholar

2. Al-Hamidawi, A. A. Measurement of Radon and Thoron Concentrations of Soil-Gas in Al-Kufa City Using RAD-7 Detector. Iraq. J. Phys. 2012, 10, 110.Suche in Google Scholar

3. UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation): Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes L, 2000.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Gupta, D. K.; Walther, C., Eds. In Uranium in Plants and the Environment; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Dahlkamp, F. J. Uranium Ore Deposits; Springer Science & Business Media 2013.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Whitaker, J. M.; McGirl, N. A.; Tucker, D.; Kapsimalis, A. P. Uranium Enrichment Plant Characteristics-A Training Manual For the IAEA (No. ORNL/TM-2019/1311); Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL): Oak Ridge, TN (United States), 2019.10.2172/1606938Suche in Google Scholar

7. Geipel, G. Uranium and Plant Metabolism: Measurement and Application; Springer International Publishing, 2021.10.1007/978-3-030-80815-0Suche in Google Scholar

8. Desideri, D.; Battisti, P.; Giardina, I.; Roselli, C.; Feduzi, L.; Gorietti, D.; Meli, M. A. Assessment of Radioactivity in Italian Baby Food. Food Chem. 2019, 279, 415; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.12.030.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Ahmed, A. Q.; Mohsen, A. A.; Al-Khayyat, A. N.; Abojassim, A. A.; Munim, R. R. Natural Radioactivity in Cerelac Baby Food Samples Commonly Used in Iraq. Plant Arch. 2019, 19, 1061.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Tucaković, I.; Karanović, G.; Coha, I.; Pavičić-Hamer, D.; Grahek, Ž. Radionuclides in Commercial Children’s Food Consumed in Croatia. Food Control 2023, 145, 109413; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109413.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Alasadi, L. A. Measurements and Mapping of Natural Radioactivity in the City of Najaf, Al-Najaf Governorate (Iraq), by Using Track Detector Cr-39 and Geographical Information System (GIS). In: AIP Conference Proceedings; AIP Publishing, 2024.10.1063/5.0195421Suche in Google Scholar

12. Rejah, B. K.; Aljanabi, A. T.; Fzaa, W. T.; Hussein, A. A.; Ali, A. H. Calculation of Concentrations and Transfer Factors of Uranium from Soil to Plants Using Nuclear Track Detector CR-39. In: Journal of Physics. Conference Series; IOP Publishing, Vol. 1178, 2019, p 012012.10.1088/1742-6596/1178/1/012012Suche in Google Scholar

13. Al-Baidhani, M. A. Determination of the Radioactivity in Soil and Water in Baghdad, Karbala and Basrah Samples. M.Sc Thesis, Al-Nahrain University, College of Science, 2006.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Jalil Lawi, D. Health Risk Study of Radioactivity and Heavy Metals in Medical Materials Derived from Plants. Ph.D. Thesis, Al-Mustansiriyah University, College of Science, Physics Department, 2023.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Wrenn, M. D.; Durbin, P. W.; Howard, B.; Lipsztein, J.; Rundo, J.; Still, E. T.; Willis, D. L. Metabolism of Ingested Uranium and Radium (No. CONF-8305260-1). United States, 1983.Suche in Google Scholar

16. International Commission on Radiological Protection: Age-dependent Doses to Members of the Public from Intake of Radionuclides: Part 5. Compilation of Ingestion and Inhalation Dose Coefficient. In: Annals ICRP; ICRP Publication, Vol. 26 (1), 1996; p 72.10.1016/S0146-6453(00)89192-7Suche in Google Scholar

17. Clarke, R. H.; Bines, W. Evolution of ICRP Recommendations-1977, 1990, and 2007. In Changes In Underlying Science and Protection Policy and Case Study of Their Impact on European and UK Domestic Regulation 2011, 2011.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Clement, C. H.; Eckerman, K.; Harrison, J.; Menzel, H. G. Compendium Of Dose Coefficients Based on ICRP Publication 60; International Commission on Radiological Protection 2012.10.1016/j.icrp.2012.06.038Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Rashid, N. S. A.; Yoshandi, T. M.; Majid, S. S. A. A.; Mohamed, F.; Siong, K. K. The Study of Equivalent Dose of Uranium in Long Bean (VU Sesquipedalis) and the Effect on Human. In AIP Conference Proceedings; AIP Publishing LLC.‏, Vol. 1704 (1), 2016; p 050013.10.1063/1.4940109Suche in Google Scholar

20. Mohsen, A. A. H.; Al-Khayyat, A. N.; Salman, A. Y.; Hh, H. Risk of an Excess Cancer Fatality Due to Ingestion of Uranium from Some Pharmaceuticals in Iraq. Prensa Med Argent 2020, 106, 1; https://doi.org/10.47275/0032-745x-169.Suche in Google Scholar

21. United Nations, Source and Effects of Ionizing Radiation: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiations. Report To the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes; United Nations Sales Publication: New York, E, Vol. 94.IX.2, 1993.10.18356/0300f937-enSuche in Google Scholar

22. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Effects Of Ionizing Radiation; Scientific Annexes E 2008; pp 203–204.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Mathews, G.; Nagaiah, N.; Kumar, M. K.; Ambika, M. R. Radiological and Chemical Toxicity Due to Ingestion of Uranium through Drinking Water in the Environment of Bangalore, India. J. Radiol. Prot. 2015, 35 (2), 447; https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/35/2/447.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Alharbi, N. S.; Akamsiei, R. M.; Almaiman, L. A.; AL-Samti, M. A.; Al-Mutairi, H. S.; Al-owais, B. S.; Alkhalaf, M. M.; Bineid, M. A. Occurrence and Dietary Exposure Assessment of Heavy Metals in Baby Foods in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023; https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3485.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Arigbede, O.; Olutona, G.; Dawodu, M. Dietary Intake and Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals from Selected Biscuit Brands in Nigeria. J. Heavy Met. Toxicity Dis. 2019, 4 (2), 1–15.Suche in Google Scholar

26. FAO/WHO. Fruit and Vegetables for Health: Report of Joint FAO/WHO Workshop; Kobe:Author, 2004.Suche in Google Scholar

27. Forte, M.; Rusconi, R.; Margini, C.; Abbate, G.; Maltese, S.; Badalamenti, P.; Bellinzona, S. Determination of Uranium Isotopes in Food and Environmental Samples by Different Techniques: a Comparison. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2001, 97 (4), 325–328; https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006681.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Carvalho, F. P.; Oliveira, J. M. Uranium Isotopes in the Balkan’s Environment and Foods Following the Use of Depleted Uranium in the War. Environ. Int. 2010, 36 (4), 352–360‏; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2010.02.003.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Pietrzak-Flis, Z.; Rosiak, L.; Suplinska, M. M.; Chrzanowski, E.; Dembinska, S. Daily Intakes of 238U, 234U, 232Th, 230Th, 228Th and 226Ra in the Adult Population of Central Poland. Sci. Total Environ. 2001, 273 (1–3), 163–169; https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-9697(00)00849-4.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2023-12-15
Accepted: 2024-03-26
Published Online: 2024-04-15
Published in Print: 2024-06-25

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 16.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ract-2023-0267/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen