Home Physical Sciences Determination of uranium and thorium concentrations in thorium ore sample using artificial neural network and comparison with net area peak method
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Determination of uranium and thorium concentrations in thorium ore sample using artificial neural network and comparison with net area peak method

  • Seyedeh Zahra Islami rad EMAIL logo and Reza Gholipour Peyvandi
Published/Copyright: May 24, 2018

Abstract

In order to determine favorable and different elements in soil, the rapid and accurate methods are required. In this research, simultaneous prediction of thorium and uranium in soil samples was performed via gamma spectrometry. Then, the acquired data were analyzed with artificial neural network (ANN) and net area peak (NAP). Natural soil samples obtained from thorium ore consisting of thorium and uranium were used to train models (ANN and NAP). The techniques were evaluated with respect to prediction ability of uranium and thorium concentrations and robustness. Using proposed ANN and NAP methods, the thorium concentration was predicted with mean relative error percentage less than 8.27% and 9.30%, respectively. Also, uranium concentration just was determined with ANN because the NAP method cannot measure uranium concentration. The performance of the neural network model and NAP technique were compared with the acquired empirical data. The results showed that the neural network can more accurately predict the thorium and uranium concentrations in soil samples.

References

1. Jain, V. K., Pandya, R. A., Pillai, S. G., Shrivastav, P. S.: Simultaneous preconcentration of uranium(VI) and thorium(IV) from aqueous solutions using a chelating calix[4]arene anchored chloromethylated polystyrene solid phase Pandya. Talanta 70, 257 (2006).10.1016/j.talanta.2006.02.032Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Aydin, F. A., Soylak, M.: Solid phase extraction and preconcentration of uranium(VI) and thorium(IV) on Duolite XAD761 prior to their inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometric determination. Talanta 72, 187 (2007).10.1016/j.talanta.2006.10.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Maheswari, M. A., Subramanian, M. S.: Selective enrichment of U(VI), Th(IV) and La(III) from high acidic streams using a new chelating ion-exchange polymeric matrix. Talanta 64, 202 (2004).10.1016/j.talanta.2004.02.029Search in Google Scholar

4. Esaka, F., Magara, M., Sakurai, D., Miyamoto, Y., Lee, C. G., Kimura, T.: Isotope ratio analysis of individual sub-micrometer plutonium particles with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Talanta 83, 569 (2010).10.1016/j.talanta.2010.10.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Kumar, R., Yadav, J. R., Rao, D. D., Chand, L.: Determination of uranium isotopes in urine samples from radiation workers using 232U tracer, anion-exchange resin and alpha-spectrometry. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 279, 787 (2009).10.1007/s10967-008-7358-5Search in Google Scholar

6. Smodis, B., Benedik, J.: In: G. A. Aycik (Ed.), New Techniques for the Detection of Nuclear and Radioactive Agents (2009), Springer, Dordrecht, p. 49.10.1007/978-1-4020-9600-6_4Search in Google Scholar

7. Mihaylova, V., Todorov, B., Djingova, R.: Determination of uranium and thorium in soil and plants by ICP-MS. Case study of Buhovo region. Chim. Anal. 66, 513 (2013).10.7546/CR-2013-66-4-13101331-6Search in Google Scholar

8. van der Loeff, M. R., Sarin, M. M., Baskaran, M., Benitez-Nelson, C., Buesseler, K. O., Charette, M., Dai, M., Gustafsson, Ö., Masque, P., Morris, P. J., Orlandini, K., Rodriguezy Baena, A., Savoye, N., Schmidt, S., Turnewitsch, R., Vöge, I., Waples, J. T.: A review of present techniques and methodological advances in analyzing 234Th inaquatic system. Marine Chem. 100, 190 (2006).10.1016/j.marchem.2005.10.012Search in Google Scholar

9. Zheng, Y., Weinman, B., Cronin, T., Fleisher, M. Q., Anderson, R. F.: A rapid procedure for the determination of thorium, uranium, cadmium and molybdenum in small sediment samples by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry: application in Chesapeake Bay. Appl. Geochem. 18, 539 (2003).10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00119-1Search in Google Scholar

10. Alexandre, T., Bueno, M.: Classification of some species, genera and families of plants by x-ray spectrometry. X-ray Spectrom. 35, 257 (2006).10.1002/xrs.900Search in Google Scholar

11. Enrich, C., Boeykens, S., Caracciolo, N., Vazquez, G. C.: Honey characterization by total reflection x-ray fluorescence: evaluation of environmental quality and risk for the human health. X-ray Spectrom. 36, 215 (2007).10.1002/xrs.944Search in Google Scholar

12. Khayatzadeh Mahani, M., Chaloosi, M., Khanchi, A. R., Ghannadi Maragheh, M., Salimi, B., Asgharizadeh, F.: A new method for simultaneous determination of 226Ra and uranium in aqueous samples by liquid scintillation using chemometrics. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 275, 427 (2008).10.1007/s10967-007-7041-2Search in Google Scholar

13. Kaniu, M. I., Angeyo, K. H., Mwala, A. K., Mwangi, F. K.: Energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence and scattering assessment of soil quality via partial least squares and artificial neural networks analytical modeling approaches. Talanta 98, 236 (2012).10.1016/j.talanta.2012.06.081Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Taylor, J. G.: Neural Networks and Their Applications (1996), John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Brighton.Search in Google Scholar

15. Gallant, A. R., White, H.: On learning the derivatives of an unknown mapping with multilayer feed forward networks. Neural Netw. 5, 129 (1992).10.1016/S0893-6080(05)80011-5Search in Google Scholar

16. White, M., Hagan, T., Menhaj, M.: Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 5, 989 (1994).10.1109/72.329697Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Demuth, H., Beale, M., Hagan, M. Neural Network Toolbox TM 6, User’s Guide (2008), The Math Works, Massachusetts.Search in Google Scholar

18. Zaknich, A.: Neural Networks for Intelligent Signal Processing (2003), World Scientific Pub Co. Inc., Toh Tuck Link.10.1142/5220Search in Google Scholar

19. Bisht, D. C. S., Jangid, A.: Discharge modeling using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Tech. 31, 99 (2011).Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-09-19
Accepted: 2017-10-26
Published Online: 2018-05-24
Published in Print: 2018-08-28

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ract-2017-2880/html
Scroll to top button