Home Evolution of heavy ions (He2+, H+) radiolytic yield of molecular hydrogen vs. “Track-Segment” LET values
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Evolution of heavy ions (He2+, H+) radiolytic yield of molecular hydrogen vs. “Track-Segment” LET values

  • Francis Crumière , Johan Vandenborre EMAIL logo , Guillaume Blain , Ferid Haddad and Massoud Fattahi
Published/Copyright: January 18, 2017

Abstract

Ionizing radiation’s effects onto water molecules lead to the ionization and/or the excitation of them. Then, these phenomena are followed by the formation of radicals and molecular products. The linear energy transfer (LET), which defines the energy deposition density along the radiation length, is different according to the nature of ionizing particles. Thus, the values of radiolytic yields, defined as the number of radical and molecular products formed or consumed by unit of deposited energy, evolve according to this parameter. This work consists in following the evolution of radiolytic yield of molecular hydrogen and ferric ions according to the “Track-Segment” LET of ionizing particles (protons, helions). Concerning G(Fe3+) values, it seems that the energy deposited into the Bragg peak does not play the main role for the Fe3+ radiolytic formation, whereas for the G(H2) it is the case with a component around 40% of the Bragg peak in the dihydrogen production. Therefore, as main results of this work, for high energetic Helion and Proton beams, the G(Fe3+) values, which can be used for further dosimetry studies for example during the α radiolysis experiments, and the primary g(H2) values for the Track-Segment LET, which can be used to determine the dihydrogen production by α-emitters, are published.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge ARRONAX staffs for the efficient performing of irradiation runs onto the cyclotron facility. This work has been supported in part by a grant from the French National Agency for Research called “Investissements d’′Avenir”, Equipex ArronaxPlus n°ANR-11-EQPX-0004.

References

1. Buxton, G. V.: The radiation chemistry of liquid water: principles and applications. In: A.M.a.Y.H. Dekker (Ed.), Charged particle and photon interactions with matter – chemical, physicochemical and biological consequences with applications, (2004), New York, USA.10.1201/9780203913284.ch12Search in Google Scholar

2. Hochanadel, C. J.: Effects of cobalt g-radiation on water and aqueous solutions. J. Phys. Chem. 56, 587 (1952).10.1021/j150497a008Search in Google Scholar

3. LaVerne, J. A., Pimblott, S. M.: New mechanism for H2 formation in water. J. Phys. Chem. A 104, 9820 (2000).10.1021/jp002893nSearch in Google Scholar

4. LaVerne, J. A., Ryan, M. R., Mu, T.: Hydrogen production in the radiolysis of bromide solutions. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 78, 1148 (2009).10.1016/j.radphyschem.2009.07.001Search in Google Scholar

5. Pastina, B., LaVerne, J. A.: Effect of molecular hydrogen on hydrogen peroxide in water radiolysis. J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 9316 (2001).10.1021/jp012245jSearch in Google Scholar

6. Domae, M., Katsumura, Y., Ishigure, K., Byakov, V. M.: Modeling of primary chemical processes of water radiolysis and simulation by spur diffusion model. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 48, 487 (1996).10.1016/0969-806X(96)00060-6Search in Google Scholar

7. Faraggi, M.: On the molecular hydrogen formation in the gamma radiolysis of water and aqueous solutions. Int. J. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 5, 197 (1973).10.1016/0020-7055(73)90042-9Search in Google Scholar

8. Faraggi, M., Desalos, J.: Effect of positively charged ions on the molecular hydrogen yield in the radiolysis of aqueous solutions. Int. J. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1, 335 (1969).10.1016/0020-7055(69)90031-XSearch in Google Scholar

9. Ghormley, J. A., Hochanadel, C. J.: The yields of hydrogen and hydrogen peroxide in the irradiation of oxygen saturated water with cobalt g-rays. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 76, 3351 (1954).10.1021/ja01641a085Search in Google Scholar

10. Hamill, W. H.: Model for the radiolysis of water. J. Phys. Chem. 73, 1341 (1969).10.1021/j100725a027Search in Google Scholar

11. Hayon, E., Moreau, M.: Reaction mechanism leading to the formation of molecular hydrogen in the radiation chemistry of water. J. Phys. Chem. 69, 4058 (1965).10.1021/j100782a002Search in Google Scholar

12. Mahlman, H. A.: The direct effect in the radiolysis of aqueous Sodium Nitrate solutions. J. Phys. Chem. 67, 1466 (1963).10.1021/j100801a015Search in Google Scholar

13. Pastina, B., LaVerne, J. A.: Hydrogen peroxide production in the radiolysis of water with heavy ions. J. Phys. Chem. A 103, 1592 (1999).10.1021/jp984433oSearch in Google Scholar

14. Peled, E., Czapski, G.: Molecular hydrogen formation (GH2) in the radiation chemistry of aqueous solutions. J. Phys. Chem. 74, 2903 (1970).10.1021/j100709a010Search in Google Scholar

15. Schwarz, H. A.: The effect of solutes on the molecular yields in the radiolysis of aqueous solutions1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77, 4960 (1955).10.1021/ja01624a004Search in Google Scholar

16. Schwarz, H. A.: Applications of the spur diffusion model to the radiation chemistry of aqueous solutions. J. Phys. Chem. 73, 1928 (1969).10.1021/j100726a047Search in Google Scholar

17. Schwarz, H. A., Losee, J. P., Allen, A. O.: Hydrogen yields in the radiolysis of aqueous solutions1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 76, 4693 (1954).10.1021/ja01647a059Search in Google Scholar

18. Anderson, A. R., Hart, E. J.: Molecular product and free radical yields in the decomposition of water by protons, deuterons, and helium ions. Radiat. Res. 14, 689 (1961).10.2307/3571010Search in Google Scholar

19. Appleby, A., Schwarz, H. A.: Radical and molecular yields in water irradiated by g-rays and heavy ions. J. Phys. Chem. 73, 1937 (1969).10.1021/j100726a048Search in Google Scholar

20. Allen, A. O.: The radiation chemistry of water and aqueous solutions. In: D. V. Nostrand (Ed.), (1961), Princeton, USA.Search in Google Scholar

21. Crumière, F., Vandenborre, J., Essehli, R., Blain, G., Barbet, J., Fattahi, M.: LET effects on the hydrogen production induced by the radiolysis of pure water. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 82, 74 (2013).10.1016/j.radphyschem.2012.07.010Search in Google Scholar

22. Hatano, Y., Katsumura, Y., Mozumder, A.: Charged particle and photon interactions with matter (2011). CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA.10.1201/b10389Search in Google Scholar

23. Wishart, J., Rao, B.: Recent trends in radiation chemistry (2010). World Scientific, New Jersey, USA.10.1142/7413Search in Google Scholar

24. Fricke, H., Hart, E. J.: Chemical dosimetry, radiation dosimetry. F. H. Attix, W. C. Roesch (Eds.), (1966) Academic Press, New York, USA.Search in Google Scholar

25. Ziegler, J. F., Ziegler, M. D., Biersack, J. P.: SRIM the stopping and range of ions in matter. NIMB. 268, 1818 (2010).10.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.091Search in Google Scholar

26. Pimblott, S. M., LaVerne, J. A.: Effects of track structure on the ion radiolysis of the fricke dosimeter. J. Phys. Chem. A 106, 9420 (2002).10.1021/jp020830uSearch in Google Scholar

27. Magee, J. L., Chatterjee, A.: Track reactions of radiation chemistry. In: G. R. Freeman (Ed.), (1987) John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-6-3
Accepted: 2016-11-22
Published Online: 2017-1-18
Published in Print: 2017-5-24

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ract-2016-2636/html
Scroll to top button