Home Modern analytical approach in biopolymer characterization
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Modern analytical approach in biopolymer characterization

  • Gunasekaran Priya , Natarajan Shanthi , Sundaramoorthy Pavithra , Soundararajan Sangeetha , Subbiah Murugesan and Shanmugasundaram Shyamalagowri EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 27, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Biopolymers have received a lot of interest recently, and academic and industrial research on biopolymers has been refocused. These biopolymers comprise naturally occurring substances as well as artificial substances created from naturally occurring monomers. Plastics have the potential to be replaced by biopolymers because they are hazardous to the environment and rely on nonrenewable resources like petroleum for production. Due to the overwhelming interest in biopolymers, characterization tools and processes have emerged as crucial components in biopolymer research to examine and enhance the characteristics and functionality of materials based on biopolymers. When evaluating the performance of these bio-nanocomposites, using the right tools for characterization is crucial. This review concentrated on high-level analytical methods for characterizing biopolymers, biopolymer-based composites, and their derivatives structurally, physically, and chemically. The most common analytical instrument methods based on microscopy (Optical, laser scanning confocal, scanning tunneling, scanning probe, differential dynamic, scanning, and transmission electron) and spectroscopy (Fourier transform infrared, X-ray diffraction, and Raman). The use of these tools for characterization in current research studies is also highlighted in order to demonstrate how the biopolymer under study might be used in various applications.


Corresponding author: Shanmugasundaram Shyamalagowri, P.G. and Research Department of Botany, Pachaiyappas College, Chennai, 600030, Tamil Nadu, India, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge all those involved to support this paper.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: No funding was sourced for this work.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors state no conflict of interest.

References

1. George, A, Sanjay, MR, Srisuk, R, Parameswaranpillai, J, Siengchin, S. A comprehensive review on chemical properties and applications of biopolymers and their composites. Int J Biol Macromol 2020;154:329–38.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.120Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Sabín López, A, Paredes Ramos, M, Herrero, R, López Vilarinõ, JM. Synthesis of magnetic green nanoparticle-Molecular imprinted polymers with emerging contaminants templates. J Environ Chem Eng 2020;8:103889.10.1016/j.jece.2020.103889Search in Google Scholar

3. Kumar, P, Sandeep, K, Alavi, S, Truong, VD. Analytical techniques for structural characterization of biopolymer- based nanocomposites. In: Polymers for packaging applications. New Jersey: Apple Academic Press Inc; 2014:307–33 pp.10.1201/b17388-17Search in Google Scholar

4. Dassanayake, RS, Acharya, S, Abidi, N. Biopolymer-based materials from polysaccharides: properties, processing, characterization and sorption applications. In: Advanced sorption process applications. London: IntechOpen; 2019:1–24 pp.10.5772/intechopen.80898Search in Google Scholar

5. Hassan, ME, Bai, J, Dou, DQ. Biopolymers; Definition, classification and applications. Egypt J Chem 2019;62:1725–37.10.21608/ejchem.2019.6967.1580Search in Google Scholar

6. Jiao, Y, Torquato, S. Quantitative characterization of the microstructure and transport properties of biopolymer networks. Phys Biol 2012;9:036009.10.1088/1478-3975/9/3/036009Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Udayakumar, GP, Muthusamy, S, Selvaganesh, B, Sivarajasekar, N, Rambabu, K, Banat, F, et al.. Biopolymers and composites: properties, characterization and their applications in food, medical and pharmaceutical industries. J Environ Chem Eng 2021;9:1–22.10.1016/j.jece.2021.105322Search in Google Scholar

8. Venkateshaiah, A, Padil, VVT, Nagalakshmaiah, M, Waclawek, S, Černík, M, Varma, RS. Microscopic techniques for the analysis of micro and nanostructures of biopolymers and their derivatives. Polymers 2020;12:1–34.10.3390/polym12030512Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Cerbino, R, Giavazzi, F, Helgeson, ME. Differential dynamic microscopy for the characterization of polymer systems. J Polym Sci 2022;60:1079–89.10.1002/pol.20210217Search in Google Scholar

10. Aria, M, Cuccurullo, C. bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr 2017;11:959–75.10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007Search in Google Scholar

11. Okoro, AM, Oladele, IO, Khoathane, MC. Synthesis and characterization of the mechanical properties of high-density polyethylene based composites reinforced with animal fibers. Leonardo J Sci 2016;29:99–112.Search in Google Scholar

12. Rahman, MA, De Santis, D, Spagnoli, G, Ramorino, G, Penco, M, Phuong, VT. Biocomposites based on lignin and plasticized poly(L -lactic acid). J Appl Polym Sci 2013;129:202–14.10.1002/app.38705Search in Google Scholar

13. Rajeshkumar, L. Biodegradable polymer blends and composites from renewable resources. In: Biodegradable polymers, blends and composites. United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing; 2021:527–49 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-823791-5.00015-6Search in Google Scholar

14. Taib, NAAB, Rahman, MR, Huda, D, Kuok, KK, Hamdan, S, Bakri, MK, et al.. A review on poly lactic acid (PLA) as a biodegradable polymer. Polym Bull 2022;80:1179–213.10.1007/s00289-022-04160-ySearch in Google Scholar

15. Gan, PG, Sam, ST, Abdullah, MFB, Omar, MF. Thermal properties of nanocellulose-reinforced composites: a review. J Appl Polym Sci 2020;137:48544.10.1002/app.48544Search in Google Scholar

16. Gleadall, A. Mechanical properties of biodegradable polymers for medical applications. Modelling degradation of bioresorbable polymeric medical devices. Woodhead Publishing, United Kingdom; 2015:163–99 pp.10.1533/9781782420255.2.163Search in Google Scholar

17. Aaliya, B, Sunooj, KV, Lackner, M. Biopolymer composites: a review. Int J Biobased Plast 2021;3:40–84.10.1080/24759651.2021.1881214Search in Google Scholar

18. Behera, A, Patel, S, Priyadarshini, M. Fiber-reinforced metal matrix nanocomposites. Fiber-reinforced nanocomposites: fundamentals and applications. United Kingdom: Elsevier; 2020:147–56 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-819904-6.00007-4Search in Google Scholar

19. Coelho de Carvalho Benini, KC, Voorwald, HJC, Cioffi, MOH, Milanese, AC, Ornaghi, HL. Characterization of a new lignocellulosic fiber from Brazil: imperata brasiliensis (Brazilian satintail) as an alternative source for nanocellulose extraction. J Nat Fibers 2017;14:112–25.10.1080/15440478.2016.1167647Search in Google Scholar

20. Namsheer, K, Rout, CS. Conducting polymers: a comprehensive review on recent advances in synthesis, properties and applications. RSC Adv 2021;11:5659–97.10.1039/D0RA07800JSearch in Google Scholar

21. Hayes, BS, Gammon, LM. Optical microscopy of fiber-reinforced composites. Optical microscopy of fiber-reinforced composites. United States of America: ASM International; 2010.10.31399/asm.tb.omfrc.9781627083492Search in Google Scholar

22. Malheiro, VN, Caridade, SG, Alves, NM, Mano, JF. New poly(ε-caprolactone)/chitosan blend fibers for tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater 2010;6:418–28.10.1016/j.actbio.2009.07.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Shazali, NAH, Zaidi, NE, Ariffin, H, Abdullah, LC, Ghaemi, F, Abdullah, JM, et al.. Characterization and cellular internalization of Spherical Cellulose Nanocrystals (CNC) into normal and cancerous fibroblasts. Materials 2019;12:3251.10.3390/ma12193251Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Zammarano, M, Maupin, PH, Sung, LP, Gilman, JW, McCarthy, ED, Kim, YS, et al.. Revealing the interface in polymer nanocomposites. ACS Nano 2011;5:3391–9.10.1021/nn102951nSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Asgharzadeh, P, Birkhold, AI, Özdemir, B, Reski, R, Röhrle, O. Biopolymer segmentation from CLSM microscopy images using a convolutional neural network. PAMM 2021;20:1–3.10.1002/pamm.202000188Search in Google Scholar

26. Spence, JCH. High-resolution electron microscopy. UK: Oxford University Press; 2013.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668632.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

27. Phinichka, N, Kaenthong, S. Regenerated cellulose from high alpha cellulose pulp of steam-exploded sugarcane bagasse. J Mater Res Technol 2018;7:55–65.10.1016/j.jmrt.2017.04.003Search in Google Scholar

28. Saari, H, Fuentes, C, Sjöö, M, Rayner, M, Wahlgren, M. Production of starch nanoparticles by dissolution and non-solvent precipitation for use in food-grade Pickering emulsions. Carbohydr Polym 2017;157:558–66.10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Padil, VVT, Senan, C, Waclawek, S, Černík, M, Agarwal, S, Varma, RS. Bioplastic fibers from gum Arabic for greener food wrapping applications. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 2019;7:5900–11.10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05896Search in Google Scholar

30. Sujka, M, Jamroz, J. Ultrasound-treated starch: SEM and TEM imaging, and functional behaviour. Food Hydrocolloids 2013;31:413–9.10.1016/j.foodhyd.2012.11.027Search in Google Scholar

31. Yusof, YM, Shukur, MF, Illias, HA, Kadir, MFZ. Conductivity and electrical properties of corn starch-chitosan blend biopolymer electrolyte incorporated with ammonium iodide. Phys Scr 2014;89:035701.10.1088/0031-8949/89/03/035701Search in Google Scholar

32. Saleh, TA, Rana, A. Surface-modified biopolymer as an environment-friendly shale inhibitor and swelling control agent. J Mol Liq 2021;342:117275.10.1016/j.molliq.2021.117275Search in Google Scholar

33. Ghasemi, AH, Farazin, A, Mohammadimehr, M, Naeimi, H. Fabrication and characterization of biopolymers with antibacterial nanoparticles and Calendula officinalis flower extract as an active ingredient for modern hydrogel wound dressings. Mater Today Commun 2022;31:103513.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103513Search in Google Scholar

34. Sosiati, H, Wijayanti, DA, Triyana, K, Kamiel, B. Morphology and crystallinity of sisal nanocellulose after sonication. AIP Conf Proc 2017;1877:1–7.10.1063/1.4999859Search in Google Scholar

35. Ma, Z, Yao, J, Wang, Y, Jia, J, Liu, F, Liu, X. Polysaccharide-based delivery system for curcumin: fabrication and characterization of carboxymethylated corn fiber gum/chitosan biopolymer particles. Food Hydrocolloids 2022;125:107367.10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107367Search in Google Scholar

36. Karoutsos, V. Scanning probe microscopy: instrumentation and applications on thin films and magnetic multilayers. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2009;9:6783–98.10.1166/jnn.2009.1474Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Raigoza, AF, Dugger, JW, Webb, LJ. Review: recent advances and current challenges in scanning probe microscopy of biomolecular surfaces and interfaces. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2013;5:9249–61.10.1021/am4018048Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Teckentrup, J, Al-Hammood, O, Steffens, T, Bednarz, H, Walhorn, V, Niehaus, K, et al.. Comparative analysis of different xanthan samples by atomic force microscopy. J Biotechnol 2017;257:2–8.10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.11.032Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Le Troëdec, M, Rachini, A, Peyratout, C, Rossignol, S, Max, E, Kaftan, O, et al.. Influence of chemical treatments on adhesion properties of hemp fibres. J Colloid Interface Sci 2011;356:303–10.10.1016/j.jcis.2010.12.066Search in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Nagalakshmaiah, M, Kissi, NE, Mortha, G, Dufresne, A. Structural investigation of cellulose nanocrystals extracted from chili leftover and their reinforcement in cariflex-IR rubber latex. Carbohydr Polym 2015;136:945–54.10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.09.096Search in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Lee, I, Evans, BR, Foston, M, Ragauskas, AJ. Silicon cantilever functionalization for cellulose-specific chemical force imaging of switchgrass. Anal Methods 2015;7:4541–5.10.1039/C5AY00455ASearch in Google Scholar

42. Jaiswal, MK, Banerjee, R, Pradhan, P, Bahadur, D. Thermal behavior of magnetically modalized poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-chitosan based nanohydrogel. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2010;81:185–94.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.07.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Fathiraja, P, Gopalrajan, S, Karunanithi, M, Nagarajan, M, Obaiah, MC, Durairaj, S, et al.. Response surface methodology model to optimize concentration of agar, alginate and carrageenan for the improved properties of biopolymer film. Polym Bull 2022;79:6211–37.10.1007/s00289-021-03797-5Search in Google Scholar

44. Zhang, YZ. Size and arrangement of elementary fibrils in crystalline cellulose studied with scanning tunneling microscopy. J Vac Sci Technol B Microelectron Nanom Struct 1997;15:1502.10.1116/1.589483Search in Google Scholar

45. Abdullah, OG, Aziz, BK, Aziz, SB, Suhail, MH. Surfaces modification of methylcellulose: cobalt nitrate polymer electrolyte by sulfurated hydrogen gas treatment. J Appl Polym Sci 2018;135:46676.10.1002/app.46676Search in Google Scholar

46. Abdel-Kareem, O, Abdel-Rahim, H, Ezzat, I, Essa, DM. Evaluating the use of chitosan coated Ag nano-SeO2 composite in consolidation of Funeral Shroud from the Egyptian Museum of Cairo. J Cult Herit 2015;16:486–95.10.1016/j.culher.2014.09.016Search in Google Scholar

47. Burla, F, Sentjabrskaja, T, Pletikapic, G, Van Beugen, J, Koenderink, GH. Particle diffusion in extracellular hydrogels. Soft Matter 2020;16:1366–76.10.1039/C9SM01837ASearch in Google Scholar PubMed

48. Anderson, SJ, Matsuda, C, Garamella, J, Peddireddy, KR, Robertson-Anderson, RM, McGorty, R. Filament rigidity vies with mesh size in determining anomalous diffusion in cytoskeleton. Biomacromolecules 2019;20:4380–8.10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01057Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

49. Giavazzi, F, Cerbino, R. Digital Fourier microscopy for soft matter dynamics. J Opt 2014;16:083001.10.1088/2040-8978/16/8/083001Search in Google Scholar

50. Cerbino, R. Quantitative optical microscopy of colloids: the legacy of Jean Perrin. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 2018;34:47–58.10.1016/j.cocis.2018.03.003Search in Google Scholar

51. Franco-Bacca, AP, Cervantes-Alvarez, F, Macías, JD, Castro-Betancur, JA, Pérez-Blanco, RJ, Giraldo Osorio, OH, et al.. Heat transfer in cassava starch biopolymers: effect of the addition of borax. Polymers 2021;13:4106.10.3390/polym13234106Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

52. Dome, K, Podgorbunskikh, E, Bychkov, A, Lomovsky, O. Changes in the crystallinity degree of starch having different types of crystal structure after mechanical pretreatment. Polymers 2020;12:641.10.3390/polym12030641Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

53. Lopez-Rubio, A, Flanagan, BM, Gilbert, EP, Gidley, MJ. A novel approach for calculating starch crystallinity and its correlation with double helix content: a combined XRD and NMR study. Biopolymers 2008;89:761–8.10.1002/bip.21005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

54. Ratnayake, WS, Jackson, DS. A new insight into the gelatinization process of native starches. Carbohydr Polym 2007;67:511–29.10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.06.025Search in Google Scholar

55. Jamróz, E, Janik, M, Juszczak, L, Kruk, T, Kulawik, P, Szuwarzyński, M, et al.. Composite biopolymer films based on a polyelectrolyte complex of furcellaran and chitosan. Carbohydr Polym 2021;274:118627.10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118627Search in Google Scholar PubMed

56. Schmitt, T, Kajave, N, Cai, HH, Gu, L, Albanna, M, Kishore, V. In vitro characterization of xeno-free clinically relevant human collagen and its applicability in cell-laden 3D bioprinting. J Biomater Appl 2021;35:912–23.10.1177/0885328220959162Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

57. Benwood, C, Chrenek, J, Kirsch, RL, Masri, NZ, Richards, H, Teetzen, K, et al.. Natural biomaterials and their use as bioinks for printing tissues. Bioengineering 2021;8:1–19.10.3390/bioengineering8020027Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

58. Marzi, J, Fuhrmann, E, Brauchle, E, Singer, V, Pfannstiel, J, Schmidt, I, et al.. Non-invasive three-dimensional cell analysis in bioinks by Raman imaging. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2022;14:30455–65.10.1021/acsami.1c24463Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

59. Tsiklin, IL, Pugachev, EI, Kolsanov, AV, Timchenko, EV, Boltovskaya, VV, Timchenko, PE, et al.. Biopolymer material from human spongiosa for regenerative medicine application. Polymers 2022;14:941.10.3390/polym14050941Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

60. Li, KY, Zhang, XR, Huang, GQ, Teng, J, Guo, LP, Li, XD, et al.. Complexation between ovalbumin and gum Arabic in high total biopolymer concentrations and the emulsifying ability of the complexes. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 2022;642:128624.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.128624Search in Google Scholar

61. Aziz, SB, Nofal, MM, Abdulwahid, RT, Kadir, MFZ, Hadi, JM, Hessien, MM, et al.. Impedance, FTIR and transport properties of plasticized proton conducting biopolymer electrolyte based on chitosan for electrochemical device application. Results Phys 2021;29:104770.10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104770Search in Google Scholar

62. Jothi, MA, Vanitha, D, Nallamuthu, N, Sundaramahalingam, K. Optical and dielectric characterization of biopolymer pectin based electrolytes with NaCl. J Elastomers Plast 2022;54:800–14.10.1177/00952443221087380Search in Google Scholar

63. Warren, FJ, Gidley, MJ, Flanagan, BM. Infrared spectroscopy as a tool to characterise starch ordered structure - a joint FTIR-ATR, NMR, XRD and DSC study. Carbohydr Polym 2016;139:35–42.10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.11.066Search in Google Scholar PubMed

64. Malviya, R, Sundram, S, Fuloria, S, Subramaniyan, V, Sathasivam, KV, Azad, AK, et al.. Evaluation and characterization of tamarind gum polysaccharide: the biopolymer. Polymers 2021;13:1–18.10.3390/polym13183023Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

65. Satsum, A, Busayaporn, W, Rungswang, W, Soontaranon, S, Thumanu, K, Wanapu, C, et al.. Structural and mechanical properties of biodegradable poly(lactic acid) and pectin composites: using bionucleating agent to improve crystallization behavior. Polym J 2022;54:921–30.10.1038/s41428-022-00637-9Search in Google Scholar

66. Hernández-Varela, JD, Chanona-Pérez, JJ, Resendis-Hernández, P, Gonzalez Victoriano, L, Méndez-Méndez, JV, Cárdenas-Pérez, S, et al.. Development and characterization of biopolymers films mechanically reinforced with garlic skin waste for fabrication of compostable dishes. Food Hydrocolloids 2022;124:107252.10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107252Search in Google Scholar

67. Abubakar Abdulkadir, B, Ojur Dennis, J, Abdullahi Adam, A, Mudassir Hassan, Y, Shamsuri, NA, Shukur, MF, et al.. Preparation and characterization of solid biopolymer electrolytes based on polyvinyl alcohol/cellulose acetate blend doped with potassium carbonate (K2CO3) salt. J Electroanal Chem 2022;919:116539.10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116539Search in Google Scholar

68. Maheshwari, T, Tamilarasan, K, Selvasekarapandian, S, Chitra, R, Muthukrishnan, M. Synthesis and characterization of Dextran, poly (vinyl alcohol) blend biopolymer electrolytes with NH4NO3, for electrochemical applications. Int J Green Energy 2022;19:314–30.10.1080/15435075.2021.1946811Search in Google Scholar

69. Baptista, S, Torres, CAV, Sevrin, C, Grandfils, C, Reis, MA, Freitas, F. Extraction of the bacterial extracellular polysaccharide FucoPol by membrane-based methods: efficiency and impact on biopolymer properties. Polymers 2022;14:390.10.3390/polym14030390Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

70. Tarchoun, AF, Trache, D, Klapötke, TM, Abdelaziz, A, Derradji, M, Bekhouche, S. Chemical design and characterization of cellulosic derivatives containing high-nitrogen functional groups: towards the next generation of energetic biopolymers. Def Technol 2022;18:537–46.10.1016/j.dt.2021.03.009Search in Google Scholar

71. Sharma, P, Ahuja, A, Dilsad Izrayeel, AM, Samyn, P, Rastogi, VK. Physicochemical and thermal characterization of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) films incorporating thyme essential oil for active packaging of white bread. Food Control 2022;133:108688.10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108688Search in Google Scholar

72. Shafqat, A, Al-Zaqri, N, Tahir, A, Alsalme, A. Synthesis and characterization of starch based bioplatics using varying plant-based ingredients, plasticizers and natural fillers. Saudi J Biol Sci 2021;28:1739–49.10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.12.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

73. Rizal, S, Alfatah, T, Abdul Khalil, HPS, Mistar, EM, Abdullah, CK, Olaiya, FG, et al.. Properties and characterization of lignin nanoparticles functionalized in macroalgae biopolymer films. Nanomaterials 2021;11:1–21.10.3390/nano11030637Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

74. Sutay Kocabaş, D, Erkoç Akçelik, M, Bahçegül, E, Özbek, HN. Bulgur bran as a biopolymer source: production and characterization of nanocellulose-reinforced hemicellulose-based biodegradable films with decreased water solubility. Ind Crops Prod 2021;171:113847.10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113847Search in Google Scholar

75. Abotbina, W, Sapuan, SM, Sultan, MTH, Alkbir, MFM, Ilyas, RA. Development and characterization of cornstarch-based bioplastics packaging film using a combination of different plasticizers. Polymers 2021;13:3487.10.3390/polym13203487Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

76. Almasi, L, Radi, M, Amiri, S, McClements, DJ. Fabrication and characterization of antimicrobial biopolymer films containing essential oil-loaded microemulsions or nanoemulsions. Food Hydrocoll 2021;117.10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106733Search in Google Scholar

77. Irbe, I, Filipova, I, Skute, M, Zajakina, A, Spunde, K, Juhna, T. Characterization of novel biopolymer blend mycocel from plant cellulose and fungal fibers. Polymers 2021;13:1086.10.3390/polym13071086Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

78. Motas, JG, Gorji, NE, Nedelcu, D, Brabazon, D, Quadrini, F. XPS, SEM, DSC and nanoindentation characterization of silver nanoparticle-coated biopolymer pellets. Appl Sci 2021;11:7706.10.3390/app11167706Search in Google Scholar

79. Kopperi, H, Amulya, K, Venkata Mohan, S. Simultaneous biosynthesis of bacterial polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS): process optimization and Scale-up. Bioresour Technol 2021;341:125735.10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125735Search in Google Scholar PubMed

80. Iftikhar, R, Ansari, A, Siddiqui, NN, Hussain, F, Aman, A. Structural elucidation and cytotoxic analysis of a fructan based biopolymer produced extracellularly by Zymomonas mobilis KIBGE-IB14. Carbohydr Res 2021;499:108223.10.1016/j.carres.2020.108223Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2022-11-15
Accepted: 2022-12-21
Published Online: 2023-02-27

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Modern analytical approach in biopolymer characterization
  4. Development of nanocellulose fiber reinforced starch biopolymer composites: a review
  5. Recent developments in sago starch thermoplastic bio-composites
  6. Mechanical degradation of sugar palm crystalline nanocellulose reinforced thermoplastic sugar palm starch (TPS)/poly (lactic acid) (PLA) blend bionanocomposites in aqueous environments
  7. Computational design of the novel building blocks for the metal-organic frameworks based on the organic ligand protected Cu4 cluster
  8. Highly functional nanocellulose-reinforced thermoplastic starch-based nanocomposites
  9. Spectral peak areas do not vary according to spectral averaging scheme used in functional MRS experiments at 3 T with interleaved visual stimulation
  10. Triterpenoids of antibacterial extracts from the leaves of Bersama abyssinica Fresen (Francoaceae)
  11. Immediate effects of atrazine application on soil organic carbon and selected macronutrients and amelioration by sawdust biochar pretreatment
  12. Process configuration of combined ozonolysis and anaerobic digestion for wastewater treatment
  13. Concentration levels and risk assessment of organochlorine and organophosphate pesticide residue in selected cereals and legumes sold in Anambra State, south-eastern Nigeria
  14. XRD and cytotoxicity assay of submitted nanomaterial industrial samples in the Philippines
  15. Comparative study of the photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline under visible light irradiation using Bi24O31Br11-anchored carbonaceous and silicates catalyst support
  16. Xanthoangelol, geranilated chalcone compound, isolation from pudau leaves (Artocarpus kemando Miq.) as antibacterial and anticancer
  17. Barley thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose
  18. Integration of chemo- and bio-catalysis to intensify bioprocesses
  19. Fabrication of starch-based packaging materials
  20. Potato thermoplastic starch nanocomposite films reinforced with nanocellulose
  21. Review on sago thermoplastic starch composite films reinforced with nanocellulose
  22. Wheat thermoplastic starch composite films reinforced with nanocellulose
  23. Synergistic effect in bimetallic gold catalysts: recent trends and prospects
  24. Simultaneous removal of methylene blue, copper Cu(II), and cadmium Cd(II) from synthetic wastewater using fennel-based adsorbents
  25. The investigation of the physical properties of an electrical porcelain insulator manufactured from locally sourced materials
  26. Concentration evaluation and risk assessment of pesticide residues in selected vegetables sold in major markets of Port Harcourt South-South Nigeria
  27. Detection of iodine in aqueous extract of plants through modified Mohr’s method
  28. Exploration of bioactive compounds from Mangifera indica (Mango) as probable inhibitors of thymidylate synthase and nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-Κb) in colorectal cancer management
  29. A new sphingoid derivative from Acacia hockii De Wild (Fabaceae) with antimicrobial and insecticidal properties
  30. Protection of wood against bio-attack and research of new effective and environmental friendly fungicides
  31. Computational investigation of Arbutus serratifolia Salisb molecules as new potential SARS-CoV-2 inhibitors
  32. Exploring the solvation of water molecules around radioactive elements in nuclear waste water treatment
Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psr-2022-0216/html
Scroll to top button