Home Process intensification and digital twin – the potential for the energy transition in process industries
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Process intensification and digital twin – the potential for the energy transition in process industries

  • Thien An Huynh ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Edwin Zondervan
Published/Copyright: June 2, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The work defines and discusses process intensification (PI) and digital twin (DT) as potential tools to accelerate the energy transition through their applications in the process industries. The PI technologies take advantage of innovative principles in equipment design and control to improve the physical process, while the DT offers the virtual model of the plant as an environment for production optimization. The effects of both tools on the energy transition are evaluated not only from the point of applications but also from the possibility of implementation and barriers in process industries. Although they are beneficial, the deployment of PI and DT requires not only infrastructure and capital investment but the knowledge and cooperation of different levels of plant personnel. Besides review of individual implementation, this work explores the concept of combining PI and DT which can make them the enabler of each other and bring a breakthrough in optimization of process design and control.


Corresponding author: Thien An Huynh, Sustainable Process Technology Group, Faculty of Science and Technology (TNW), University of Twente, Meander, kamer 216, Postbus 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, the Netherlands, E-mail:

  1. Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Reay, D, Ramshaw, C, Harvey, A. Chapter 1 - a brief history of process intensification. In: Reay, D, Ramshaw, C, Harvey, A, editors. Process intensification, 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2013:1–25 pp.10.1016/B978-0-08-098304-2.00001-8Search in Google Scholar

2. Zondervan, E, Almeida-Rivera, C, Camarda, KV. 2. Performance products in a challenging environment. In: Product-driven process design: from molecule to enterprise. De Gruyter; 2020:9–88 pp.10.1515/9783110570137-002Search in Google Scholar

3. Kiss, AA. Process intensification technologies for biodiesel production - reactive separation processes, 1st ed. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, Cham; 2014:103 p. XV.10.1007/978-3-319-03554-3_1Search in Google Scholar

4. Dubé, MA, Tremblay, AY, Liu, J. Biodiesel production using a membrane reactor. Bioresour Technol 2007;98:639–47.10.1016/j.biortech.2006.02.019Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Kiss, AA. Novel catalytic reactive distillation processes for a sustainable chemical industry. Top Catal 2019;62:1132–48, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-018-1052-9.Search in Google Scholar

6. Kim, Y-h, Park, LK, Yiacoumi, S, Tsouris, C. Modular chemical process intensification: a review. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng 2017;8:359–80, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060816-101354.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Grieves, M, Vickers, J. Digital twin: mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In: Kahlen, FJFS, Alves, A, editors. Transdisciplinary perspectives on complex systems. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, Cham; 2017:85–113 pp.10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4Search in Google Scholar

8. Wang, Y, Wang, X, Liu, A. Digital twin-driven supply chain planning. Procedia CIRP 2020;93:198–203, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.04.154.Search in Google Scholar

9. Tao, F, Zhang, H, Liu, A, Nee, AYC. Digital twin in industry: state-of-the-art. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 2019;15:2405–15, https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2018.2873186.Search in Google Scholar

10. VanDerHorn, E, Mahadevan, S. Digital twin: generalization, characterization and implementation. Decis Support Syst 2021;145:113524, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2021.113524.Search in Google Scholar

11. Cimino, C, Negri, E, Fumagalli, L. Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing. Comput Ind 2019;113:103130, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.103130.Search in Google Scholar

12. Safdarnejad, SM, Tuttle, JF, Powell, KM. Development of a roadmap for dynamic process intensification by using a dynamic, data-driven optimization approach. Chem Eng Process - Process Intensif 2019;140:100–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2019.04.002.Search in Google Scholar

13. ERPI. European roadmap for process intensification. The Hague: Ministry of Economic Affairs; 2008. https://efce.info/efce_media/-p-531-EGOTEC-3ef8934e4edb103417aa50afced7096f.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

14. Sitter, S, Chen, Q, Grossmann, IE. An overview of process intensification methods. Curr Opin Chem Eng 2019;25:87–94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2018.12.006.Search in Google Scholar

15. Abdulrahman, I, Máša, V, Teng, SY. Process intensification in the oil and gas industry: a technological framework. Chem Eng Process - Process Intensif 2021;159:108208, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2020.108208.Search in Google Scholar

16. Harmsen, J, Verkerk, M. 16 Intensified ethanol production by cyclic distillation. In: Process intensification: breakthrough in design, industrial innovation practices, and education. De Gruyter; 2020:176–87 pp.10.1515/9783110657357-016Search in Google Scholar

17. Yildirim, Ö, Kiss, AA, Kenig, EY. Dividing wall columns in chemical process industry: a review on current activities. Separ Purif Technol 2011;80:403–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.05.009.Search in Google Scholar

18. Kiss, AA, Pragt, JJ, van Strien, CJG. Reactive dividing-wall columns - defying equilibrium restrictions. Chem Prod Process Model 2009, https://doi.org/10.2202/1934-2659.1365.Search in Google Scholar

19. Maleta, VN, Kiss, AA, Taran, VM, Maleta, BV. Understanding process intensification in cyclic distillation systems. Chem Eng Process: Process Intensif 2011;50:655–64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2011.04.002.Search in Google Scholar

20. Wiessner, FG. Basics and industrial applications of pressure swing adsorption (PSA), the modern way to separate gas. Gas Separ Purif 1988;2:115–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-4214(88)80026-4.Search in Google Scholar

21. Tondeur, D, Wankat, PC. Gas purification by pressure swing adsorption. Separ Purif Methods 1985;14:157–212, https://doi.org/10.1080/03602548508068420.Search in Google Scholar

22. Fahim, MA, Alsahhaf, TA, Elkilani, A. Chapter 11 - hydrogen production. In: Fahim, MA, Alsahhaf, TA, Elkilani, A, editors. Fundamentals of petroleum refining. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2010:285–302 pp.10.1016/B978-0-444-52785-1.00011-5Search in Google Scholar

23. Marcinek, A, Guderian, J, Bathen, D. Process intensification of the high-purity nitrogen production in twin-bed pressure swing adsorption plants. Adsorption 2021;27:937–52, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-020-00291-8.Search in Google Scholar

24. Rodrigues, AE, Pereira, C, Minceva, M, Pais, LS, Ribeiro, AM, Ribeiro, A, et al.. Chapter 1 - principles of simulated moving bed. In: Rodrigues, AE, Pereira, C, Minceva, M, Pais, LS, Ribeiro, AM, Ribeiro, A, et al.., editors. Simulated moving bed technology. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2015:1–30 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-802024-1.00001-XSearch in Google Scholar

25. Migliorini, C, Fillinger, M, Mazzotti, M, Morbidelli, M. Analysis of simulated moving-bed reactors. Chem Eng Sci 1999;54:2475–80, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2509(98)00487-4.Search in Google Scholar

26. Shi, Q, Gonçalves, JC, Ferreira, AFP, Rodrigues, AE. Simulated moving bed reactor for p-xylene production: modeling, simulation, and optimization. Chem Eng Sci 2020;225:115802, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2020.115802.Search in Google Scholar

27. Keil, FJ. Process intensification. Rev Chem Eng 2018;34:135–200, https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2017-0085.Search in Google Scholar

28. Kiss, AA. Process intensification: industrial applications. In: Process Intensification in Chemical Engineering: Design Optimization and Control. Netherlands: Springer; 2016.10.1007/978-3-319-28392-0_8Search in Google Scholar

29. van der Schaaf, J, Schouten, JC. High-gravity and high-shear gas–liquid contactors for the chemical process industry. Curr Opin Chem Eng 2011;1:84–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2011.08.005.Search in Google Scholar

30. Reay, D, Ramshaw, C, Harvey, A. Chapter 5 - reactors. In: Reay, D, Ramshaw, C, Harvey, A, editors. Process intensification, 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2013:121–204 pp.10.1016/B978-0-08-098304-2.00005-5Search in Google Scholar

31. Reay, D, Ramshaw, C, Harvey, A. Chapter 8 - application areas – petrochemicals and fine chemicals. In: Reay, D, Ramshaw, C, Harvey, A, editors. Process intensification, 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2013:259–321 pp.10.1016/B978-0-08-098304-2.00008-0Search in Google Scholar

32. Berg, J. SPINID. Green Process Synth 2014;3:77–9, https://doi.org/10.1515/gps-2013-0099.Search in Google Scholar

33. Thakur, RK, Vial, C, Nigam, KDP, Nauman, EB, Djelveh, G. Static mixers in the process industries—a review. Chem Eng Res Des 2003;81:787–826, https://doi.org/10.1205/026387603322302968.Search in Google Scholar

34. Bayer, T, Himmler, K. Mixing and organic chemistry. Chem Eng Technol 2005;28:285–9, https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.200407121.Search in Google Scholar

35. Hayes, RE, Cornejo, I. Multi-scale modelling of monolith reactors: a 30-year perspective from 1990 to 2020. Can J Chem Eng 2021;99:2589–606, https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.24144.Search in Google Scholar

36. Zamaniyan, A, Mortazavi, Y, Khodadadi, AA, Manafi, H. Tube fitted bulk monolithic catalyst as novel structured reactor for gas–solid reactions. Appl Catal Gen 2010;385:214–23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2010.07.014.Search in Google Scholar

37. Baharudin, L, Indera, LAA, Watson, MJ, Yip, ACK. Process intensification in multifunctional reactors: a review of multi-functionality by catalytic structures, internals, operating modes, and unit integrations. Chem Eng Process - Process Intensif 2021;168:108561, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2021.108561.Search in Google Scholar

38. Schubert, K, Brandner, J, Fichtner, M, Linder, G, Schygulla, U, Wenka, A. Microstructure devices for applications in thermal and chemical process engineering. Microscale Thermophys Eng 2001;5:17–39, https://doi.org/10.1080/108939501300005358.Search in Google Scholar

39. Neuberg, S, Keller, S, O’Connell, M, Schürer, J, Thiele, R, Zapf, R, et al.. Effect of oxygen addition on the water–gas shift reaction over Pt/CeO2 catalysts in microchannels – results from catalyst testing and reactor performance in the kW scale. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2014;39:18120–7, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.05.084.Search in Google Scholar

40. Yao, X, Zhang, Y, Du, L, Liu, J, Yao, J. Review of the applications of microreactors. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2015;47:519–39, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.078.Search in Google Scholar

41. Alzate, CAC, Sanchez, MO, Pisarenko, Y. Reactive separation for process intensification and sustainability, 1st ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2019.10.1201/9780429300387-1Search in Google Scholar

42. Krishna, R. Reactive separations: more ways to skin a cat. Chem Eng Sci 2002;57:1491–504, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2509(02)00020-9.Search in Google Scholar

43. Sharma, N, Singh, K. Control of reactive distillation column: a review. Int J Chem React Eng 2010, https://doi.org/10.2202/1542-6580.2260.Search in Google Scholar

44. Shah, MR, Kiss, AA, Zondervan, E, de Haan, AB. Evaluation of configuration alternatives for multi-product polyester synthesis by reactive distillation. Comput Chem Eng 2013;52:10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2013.01.008.Search in Google Scholar

45. Novita, FJ, Lee, H-Y, Lee, M. Self-heat recuperative dividing wall column for enhancing the energy efficiency of the reactive distillation process in the formic acid production process. Chem Eng Process: Process Intensif 2015;97:144–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2015.09.007.Search in Google Scholar

46. Wieszczycka, K. Reactive extraction at liquid–liquid systems. Phys Sci Rev 2018, https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2017-0141.Search in Google Scholar

47. Djas, M, Henczka, M. Reactive extraction of carboxylic acids using organic solvents and supercritical fluids: a review. Separ Purif Technol 2018;201:106–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.02.010.Search in Google Scholar

48. Mederos-Nieto, FS, Santoyo-López, AO, Hernández-Altamirano, R, Mena-Cervantes, VY, Trejo-Zárraga, F, Centeno-Nolasco, G, et al.. Renewable fuels production from the hydrotreating over NiMo/γ-Al2O3 catalyst of castor oil methyl esters obtained by reactive extraction. Fuel 2021;285:119168, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119168.Search in Google Scholar

49. Basile, A, Falco, MD, Centi, G, Iaquaniello, G. Membrane reactor engineering: applications for a greener process industry. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons; 2016.10.1002/9781118906842Search in Google Scholar

50. Basile, A, Paola, LD, Hai, Fl, Piemonte, V. Membrane reactors for energy applications and basic chemical production. Amsterdam: Woodhead Publishing; 2015.Search in Google Scholar

51. Perno, M, Hvam, L, Haug, A. Implementation of digital twins in the process industry: a systematic literature review of enablers and barriers. Comput Ind 2022;134:103558, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2021.103558.Search in Google Scholar

52. Kockmann, N. Digital methods and tools for chemical equipment and plants. React Chem Eng 2019;4:1522–9, https://doi.org/10.1039/c9re00017h.Search in Google Scholar

53. Semeraro, C, Lezoche, M, Panetto, H, Dassisti, M. Digital twin paradigm: a systematic literature review. Comput Ind 2021;130:103469, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2021.103469.Search in Google Scholar

54. Novák, P, Vyskočil, J, Wally, B. The digital twin as a core component for industry 4.0 smart production planning. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2020;53:10803–9.10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.2865Search in Google Scholar

55. Lee, J, Cameron, I, Hassall, M. Improving process safety: what roles for Digitalization and Industry 4.0? Process Saf Environ Protect 2019;132:325–39, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.10.021.Search in Google Scholar

56. Errandonea, I, Beltrán, S, Arrizabalaga, S. Digital Twin for maintenance: a literature review. Comput Ind 2020;123:103316, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103316.Search in Google Scholar

57. Wen, Y, Fashiar Rahman, M, Xu, H, Tseng, TLB. Recent advances and trends of predictive maintenance from data-driven machine prognostics perspective. Measurement 2022;187:110276, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110276.Search in Google Scholar

58. Ahmad, R, Kamaruddin, S. An overview of time-based and condition-based maintenance in industrial application. Comput Ind Eng 2012;63:135–49, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2012.02.002.Search in Google Scholar

59. Damant, L, Forsyth, A, Farcas, R, Voigtländer, M, Singh, S, Fan, IS, editors, et al.. Exploring the transition from preventive maintenance to predictive maintenance within ERP systems by utilising digital twins. Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2021.10.3233/ATDE210095Search in Google Scholar

60. Min, Q, Lu, Y, Liu, Z, Su, C, Wang, B. Machine learning based digital twin framework for production optimization in petrochemical industry. Int J Inf Manag 2019;49:502–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.020.Search in Google Scholar

61. Shen, F, Ren, SS, Zhang, XY, Luo, HW, Feng, CM. A digital twin-based approach for optimization and prediction of oil and gas production. Math Probl Eng 2021;2021:3062841, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3062841.Search in Google Scholar

62. Sierla, S, Azangoo, M, Rainio, K, Papakonstantinou, N, Fay, A, Honkamaa, P, et al.. Roadmap to semi-automatic generation of digital twins for brownfield process plants. J Ind Inf Integrat 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2021.100282.Search in Google Scholar

63. Örs, E, Schmidt, R, Mighani, M, Shalaby, M, editors. A conceptual framework for AI-based operational digital twin in chemical process engineering. In: 2020 IEEE international conference on engineering, technology and innovation (ICE/ITMC), 2020, 15–17 June; 2020.10.1109/ICE/ITMC49519.2020.9198575Search in Google Scholar

64. Aglave, R, Nixon, J, Lusty, J. Using simulation and digitalization for modular process intensification. Chem Eng Prog 2019;2019:45.Search in Google Scholar

65. Pistikopoulos, EN, Tian, Y, Bindlish, R. Operability and control in process intensification and modular design: challenges and opportunities. AIChE J 2021;67:e17204, https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.17204.Search in Google Scholar

66. López-Guajardo, EA, Delgado-Licona, F, Álvarez, AJ, Nigam, KDP, Montesinos-Castellanos, A, Morales-Menendez, R. Process intensification 4.0: a new approach for attaining new, sustainable and circular processes enabled by machine learning. Chem Eng Process - Process Intensif 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2021.108671. In press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-06-02

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Synthesis and application of organotellurium compounds
  4. Tellurium-based chemical sensors
  5. Synthesis of antiviral drugs by using carbon–carbon and carbon–heteroatom bond formation under greener conditions
  6. Green protocols for Tsuji–Trost allylation: an overview
  7. Chemistry of tellurium containing macrocycles
  8. Tellurium-induced cyclization of olefinic compounds
  9. Latest developments on the synthesis of bioactive organotellurium scaffolds
  10. Tellurium-based solar cells
  11. Semiconductor characteristics of tellurium and its implementations
  12. Tellurium based materials for nonlinear optical applications
  13. Pharmaceutical cocrystal consisting of ascorbic acid with p-aminobenzoic acid and paracetamol
  14. Carbocatalysis: a metal free green avenue towards carbon–carbon/heteroatom bond construction
  15. Physico-chemical and nutraceutical properties of Cola lepidota seed oil
  16. Cyclohexane oxidation using advanced oxidation processes with metals and metal oxides as catalysts: a review
  17. Optimization of electrolysis and carbon capture processes for sustainable production of chemicals through Power-to-X
  18. Tellurium-induced functional group activation
  19. Synthesis, characterization, and theoretical investigation of 4-chloro-6(phenylamino)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)asmino-4-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)thiazol-5-yl-diazenyl)phenyl as potential SARS-CoV-2 agent
  20. Process intensification and digital twin – the potential for the energy transition in process industries
  21. Photovoltaic properties of novel reactive azobenzoquinolines: experimental and theoretical investigations
  22. Accessing the environmental impact of tellurium metal
  23. Membrane-based processes in essential oils production
  24. Development of future-proof supply concepts for sector-coupled district heating systems based on scenario-analysis
  25. Educators’ reflections on the teaching and learning of the periodic table of elements at the upper secondary level: a case study
  26. Optimization of hydrogen supply from renewable electricity including cavern storage
  27. A short review on cancer therapeutics
  28. The role of bioprocess systems engineering in extracting chemicals and energy from microalgae
  29. The topology of crystalline matter
  30. Characterization of lignocellulosic S. persica fibre and its composites: a review
  31. Constructing a framework for selecting natural fibres as reinforcements composites based on grey relational analysis
  32. Polybutylene succinate (PBS)/natural fiber green composites: melt blending processes and tensile properties
  33. The properties of 3D printed poly (lactic acid) (PLA)/poly (butylene-adipate-terephthalate) (PBAT) blend and oil palm empty fruit bunch (EFB) reinforced PLA/PBAT composites used in fused deposition modelling (FDM) 3D printing
  34. Thermal properties of wood flour reinforced polyamide 6 biocomposites by twin screw extrusion
  35. Manufacturing defects and interfacial adhesion of Arenga Pinnata and kenaf fibre reinforced fibreglass/kevlar hybrid composite in boat construction application
  36. Wettability of keruing (Dipterocarpus spp.) wood after weathering under tropical climate
  37. Simultaneous remediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon and heavy metals in wastewater with zerovalent iron-titanium oxide nanoparticles (ZVI-TiO2)
Downloaded on 19.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psr-2022-0058/html
Scroll to top button