Home Linguistics & Semiotics The role of lexical context and language experience in the perception of foreign-accented segments
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The role of lexical context and language experience in the perception of foreign-accented segments

  • Rubén Pérez-Ramón EMAIL logo , María Luisa García Lecumberri and Martin Cooke
Published/Copyright: July 26, 2023

Abstract

When faced with intelligibility problems, listeners resort to contextual information. The present study explores the use of lexical context by listeners when identifying segments with various degrees of foreign accent. Native English listeners identified words into which a single Spanish-accented segment from a 5-step continuum had been inserted. Listeners also identified vowel-consonant or consonant-vowel sequences containing the same accented segments. While lexical context helped, the lexical advantage was largely independent of degree of foreign accent, with a slight benefit only for the most accented consonants. To examine the influence of listeners’ first language on the usefulness of lexical context, a second experiment was carried out with Spanish, Japanese and Czech non-native listeners. As was the case for native listeners, there was little evidence that a lexical context helps more for foreign-accented than native segments. Normalised for word familiarity, overall non-native identification patterns were comparable to native listeners’ perceptions. Listeners’ first language phonetic inventory had an effect on identification levels, particularly in the case of vowels. Lexical context benefits for vowel identification can be explained by their generally less categorical processing, their realisational variability in English, and symbol mapping issues.


Corresponding author: Rubén Pérez-Ramón, Waseda University, Shinjuku City, Japan; and University of the Basque Country, Leioa, Spain, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: FFI2012-31579

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Spanish MINECO project DIACEX (FFI2012-31579). The authors thank Dr. B. Beinhoff and her team at Anglia Ruskin University, Dr. J. Volin and his team at Charles University and Professor M. Kondo and her team at Waseda University for their help in providing experimental facilities and recruiting English, Czech and Japanese participants respectively.

References

Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48.10.18637/jss.v067.i01Search in Google Scholar

Beep. 2019. Beep dictionary: Phonemic transcriptions of over 250,000 English words (British English pronunciations). Available at: http://svr-www.eng.cam.ac.uk/comp.speech/Section1/Lexical/beep.html.Search in Google Scholar

Behrman, Alison & Ali Akhund. 2013. The influence of semantic context on the perception of Spanish-accented American English. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 56(5). 1567–1578.10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0192)Search in Google Scholar

Bent, Tessa & Ann R. Bradlow. 2003. The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 114(3). 1600–1610. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1603234.Search in Google Scholar

Bent, Tessa, Ann R. Bradlow & Bruce L. Smith. 2007. Segmental errors in different word positions and their effects on intelligibility of non-native speech. In Language experience in second language speech learning, 331–347.10.1075/lllt.17.28benSearch in Google Scholar

Bent, Tessa, Rachael Frush Holt, Katherine Miller & Emma Libersky. 2019. Sentence context facilitation for children’s and adults’ recognition of native-and nonnative-accented speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 62(2). 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_jslhr-h-18-0273.Search in Google Scholar

Bieber, Rebecca E. & Sandra Gordon-Salant. 2022. Semantic context and stimulus variability independently affect rapid adaptation to non-native English speech in young adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 151(1). 242–255. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0009170.Search in Google Scholar

Bosman, Arie Jan. 1989. Speech perception by the hearing impaired. University of Utrecht Doctoral Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Caffarra, Sendy, Elissa Michell & Clara D. Martin. 2018. The impact of foreign accent on irony interpretation. PLoS One 13(8). e0200939. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200939.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Hsueh Chu. 2011. Judgments of intelligibility and foreign accent by listeners of different language backgrounds. Journal of Asia TEFL 8(4). 61–83.Search in Google Scholar

Council of Europe, Council for Cultural Co-operation, Education Committee & Modern Languages Division. 2001. Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cooke, Martin, María Luisa García Lecumberri, Odette Scharenborg & Wim A. van Dommelen. 2010. Language-independent processing in speech perception: A study of English consonant identification in 8 European languages. Speech Communication 52. 954–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2010.04.004.Search in Google Scholar

Cruttenden, Alan. 2014. Gimson’s pronunciation of English. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203784969Search in Google Scholar

Cutler, Anne. 2012. Native listening: Language experience and the recognition of spoken words. Cambridge: Mit Press.10.7551/mitpress/9012.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Cutler, Anne, Andrea Weber, Roel Smits & Nicole Cooper. 2004. Patterns of English phoneme confusions by native and non-native listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116(6). 3668–3678. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1810292.Search in Google Scholar

Cutler, Anne, Roel Smits & Nicole Cooper. 2005. Vowel perception: Effects of non-native language vs. non-native dialect. Speech Communication 47(1–2). 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2005.02.001.Search in Google Scholar

Ernestus, Mirjam, Harald Baayen & Rob Schreuder. 2002. The recognition of reduced word forms. Brain and Language 81(1–3). 162–173. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2514.Search in Google Scholar

Fayer, Joan M. & Emily Krasinski. 1987. Native and nonnative judgments of intelligibility and irritation. Language Learning 37(3). 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1987.tb00573.x.Search in Google Scholar

Flege, James Emil. 1984. The detection of French accent by American listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76(3). 692–707. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.391256.Search in Google Scholar

Flege, James Emil, Naoyuki Takagi & Virginia Mann. 1996. Lexical familiarity and English‐language experience affect Japanese adults’ perception of/ɹ/and/l. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99(2). 1161–1173. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.414884.Search in Google Scholar

Flege, James E., David Birdsong, Ellen Bialystok, Molly Mack, Hyekyung Sung & Kimiko Tsukada. 2006. Degree of foreign accent in English sentences produced by Korean children and adults. Journal of Phonetics 34(2). 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.05.001.Search in Google Scholar

Fox, John & Sanford Weisberg. 2018. An R companion to applied regression. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.10.32614/CRAN.package.carDataSearch in Google Scholar

Fry, Dennis B., Arthur S. Abramson, Peter D. Eimas & Alvin M. Liberman. 1962. The identification and discrimination of synthetic vowels. Language and Speech 5(4). 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096200500401.Search in Google Scholar

Gordon-Salant, Sandra, Grace H. Yeni-Komshian, Rebecca E. Bieber, David A. Jara Ureta, Maya S. Freund & Peter J. Fitzgibbons. 2019. Effects of listener age and native language experience on recognition of accented and unaccented English words. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 62(4S). 1131–1143. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_jslhr-h-ascc7-18-0122.Search in Google Scholar

Guirao, Miguelina & Carlos Rafael Luis. 1982. Identification of Japanese syllables by Spanish-speaking listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan 3(1). 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1250/ast.3.21.Search in Google Scholar

Ganong, William F. 1980. Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 6(1). 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.6.1.110.Search in Google Scholar

García, Lecumberri, María Luisa, Roberto Barra Chicote, Rubén Pérez Ramón, Junichi Yamagishi & Martin Cooke. 2014. Generating segmental foreign accent.10.21437/Interspeech.2014-324Search in Google Scholar

Hahn, Laura D. 2004. Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. Tesol Quarterly 38(2). 201–223. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588378.Search in Google Scholar

Hardman, Jocelyn. 2014. Accentedness and intelligibility of Mandarin-accented English for Chinese, Koreans and Americans. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech.Search in Google Scholar

Hisagi, Miwako, Eve Higby, Mike Zandona, Justin Kent, Daniela Castillo, Ingrid Davidovich & Valerie L. Shafer. 2020. Perceptual discrimination measure of non-native phoneme perception in early and late Spanish-English & Japanese-English bilinguals. In Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 179ASA, Vol. 42, 060013. Acoustical Society of America.10.1121/2.0001424Search in Google Scholar

Hualde, José Ignacio. 2005. The sounds of Spanish with audio CD. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Imai, Satomi, Amanda C. Walley & James E. Flege. 2005. Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition of native and Spanish-accented words by native English and Spanish listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117(2). 896–907. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1823291.Search in Google Scholar

Inceoglu, Solène. 2022. Language experience and subjective word familiarity on the multimodal perception of non-native vowels. Language and Speech 65(1). 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830921998723.Search in Google Scholar

Janse, Esther & Patti Adank. 2012. Predicting foreign-accent adaptation in older adults. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 65(8). 1563–1585. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.658822.Search in Google Scholar

Jenkins, Jennifer. 2000. The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, Christian & Jacob Thøgersen. 2017. Foreign accent, cognitive load and intelligibility of EMI lectures. Nordic Journal of English Studies 16(3). 107–137. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.414.Search in Google Scholar

Kang, Okim, Donald Rubin & Lucy Pickering. 2010. Suprasegmental measures of accentedness and judgments of language learner proficiency in oral English. The Modern Language Journal 94(4). 554–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01091.x.Search in Google Scholar

Kronrod, Yakov, Emily Coppess & Naomi Feldman. 2012. A unified model of categorical effects in consonant and vowel perception. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society, Vol. 34, 629–634.Search in Google Scholar

Lenth, Russell, Henrik. Singmann, Jonathon Love, Paul Buerkner & Maxime Herve. 2018. Emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version, Vol. 1, 3.Search in Google Scholar

Mattys, Sven L., Lucy M. Carroll, Carrie K.W. Li & Sonia L.Y. Chan. 2010. Effects of energetic and informational masking on speech segmentation by native and non-native speakers. Speech Communication 52(11–12). 887–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2010.01.005.Search in Google Scholar

Mattys, Sven L., Matthew H. Davis, Ann R. Bradlow & Sophie K. Scott. 2012. Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review. Language & Cognitive Processes 27(7–8). 953–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.705006.Search in Google Scholar

Mora, Joan C. 2005. Lexical knowledge effects on the discrimination of non-native phonemic contrasts in words and nonwords by Spanish/Catalan bilingual learners of English. In ISCA workshop on plasticity in speech perception.Search in Google Scholar

Munro, Murray J. 2008. Foreign accent and speech intelligibility. In Phonology and second language acquisition, Vol. 5, 193–218.10.1075/sibil.36.10munSearch in Google Scholar

Munro, Murray J. & Tracey M. Derwing. 1995. Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning 45(1). 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x.Search in Google Scholar

Munro, Murray J. & Tracey M. Derwing. 2001. Modeling perceptions of the accentedness and comprehensibility of L2 speech: The role of speaking rate. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23(4). 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263101004016.Search in Google Scholar

Munro, Murray J. & Tracey M. Derwing. 2020. Foreign accent, comprehensibility and intelligibility, redux. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 6(3). 283–309. https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.20038.mun.Search in Google Scholar

Norris, Dennis, James M. McQueen & Anne Cutler. 2003. Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology 47(2). 204–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0285(03)00006-9.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez-Ramón, Rubén, Martin Cooke & María Luisa García Lecumberri. 2020. Is segmental foreign accent perceived categorically? Speech Communication 117. 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2020.01.003.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez-Ramón, Rubén, María Luisa García Lecumberri & Martin Cooke. 2022a. Foreign accent strength and intelligibility at the segmental level. Speech Communication 137. 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2022.01.005.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez-Ramón, Rubén, Martin Cooke & María Luisa García Lecumberri. 2022b. Generating iso-accented stimuli for second language research: Methodology and a dataset for Spanish-accented English. In Proceedings of the annual conference of the international speech communication association, INTERSPEECH, 1846–1850.10.21437/Interspeech.2022-850Search in Google Scholar

Pinet, Melanie, Paul Iverson & Mark Huckvale. 2011. Second-language experience and speech-in-noise recognition: Effects of talker–listener accent similarity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 130(3). 1653–1662. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3613698.Search in Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/.Search in Google Scholar

Sawada, Erina. 2019. The effect of word familiarity and lexical neighbourhood on L2 speech perception. ICU Working Papers in Linguistics (ICUWPL) 6, 49–57.Search in Google Scholar

Shi, Lu-Feng & Laura L. Koenig. 2016. Relative weighting of semantic and syntactic cues in native and non-native listeners’ recognition of English sentences. Ear and Hearing 37(4). 424–433. https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000000271.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Larry E. & John A. Bisazza. 1982. The comprehensibility of three varieties of English for college students in seven countries 1. Language and Learning 32(2). 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1982.tb00971.x.Search in Google Scholar

Stibbard, Richard M. & Jeong-In Lee. 2006. Evidence against the mismatched interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit hypothesis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120(1). 433–442. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2203595.Search in Google Scholar

Stringer, Louise & Paul Iverson. 2019. Accent intelligibility differences in noise across native and nonnative accents: Effects of talker–listener pairing at acoustic–phonetic and lexical levels. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 62(7). 2213–2226. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_jslhr-s-17-0414.Search in Google Scholar

Tajima, Keiichi, Robert Port & Jonathan Dalby. 1997. Effects of temporal correction on intelligibility of foreign-accented English. Journal of Phonetics 25(1). 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0031.Search in Google Scholar

Van Maastricht, Lieke, Tim Zee, Emiel Krahmer & Marc Swerts. 2021. The interplay of prosodic cues in the L2: How intonation, rhythm, and speech rate in speech by Spanish learners of Dutch contribute to L1 Dutch perceptions of accentedness and comprehensibility. Speech Communication 133. 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2020.04.003.Search in Google Scholar

Wells, John C. 1982. Accents of English: Volume 1, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611759Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-12-07
Accepted: 2023-05-08
Published Online: 2023-07-26
Published in Print: 2023-09-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 13.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psicl-2022-1090/pdf
Scroll to top button