References

Abraham, W. 1988. “Vorbemerkungen zur Modalpartikelsyntax im Deutschen”. Linguistische Berichte 118. 443–465.Suche in Google Scholar

Abraham, W. 1991. “Discourse particles in German: How does their illocutive force come about?” In: Abraham, W. (ed.), Discourse particles. Descriptive and theoretical investigations on the logical, syntactic, and pragmatic properties of discourse particles in German. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 203–252.10.1075/pbns.12.08abrSuche in Google Scholar

Abraham, W. 2017a. “Modalpartikel und Mirativeffekte”. In: Abraham, W., Y. Fujunawa, E. Leiss and S. Tanaka (eds.), Grammatische Funktionen aus Sicht der japanischen und deutschen Germanistik. Hamburg: Buske. 75−108.Suche in Google Scholar

Abraham, W. 2017b. “Modal particles and Verum focus. New corollaries”. In: Fedriani, C. and A. Sansò (eds.), Pragmatic markers, discourse markers and modal particles. What do we know and where do we go from here? Amsterdam: Benjamins. 171–202.10.1075/slcs.186.07abrSuche in Google Scholar

Altenberg, B. 1984. “Causal linking in spoken and written English”. Studia Linguistica 38. 20−69.10.1111/j.1467-9582.1984.tb00734.xSuche in Google Scholar

Bayer, J. 2012. “From modal particle to interrogative marker: a study of German den”. In: Brugé, L. et al. (eds.), Functional heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 13–26.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199746736.003.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Bayer, J. and H.-G. Obenauer. 2011. “Discourse particles, clause structure, and question types”. The Linguistic Review 28(4). 449–491.10.1515/tlir.2011.013Suche in Google Scholar

Belloni, S. 1991. Grammatica Veneta. Battaglia Terme: Editrice La Galiverna.Suche in Google Scholar

Bianchi, V. 2006. “On the syntax of personal arguments”. Lingua 116. 2023–2067.10.1016/j.lingua.2005.05.002Suche in Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, A. 2011. “German and Italian modal particles and clause structure”. The Linguistic Review 28. 493–531.10.1515/tlir.2011.014Suche in Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, A. 2015. “Italian verb-based discourse particles in a comparative perspective”. In: Bayer, J., R. Hinterhölzl and A. Trotzke (eds.), Discourse-oriented syntax. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 71–91.10.1075/la.226.04carSuche in Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, A. and M. Starke. 1999. “The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns”. In: van Riemsdijk, H. (ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 145–233.10.1515/9783110804010.145Suche in Google Scholar

Cinque, G. 1991. “Mica: note di sintassi e pragmatica”. In: Cinque, G. (ed.), Teoria linguistica e sintassi italiana. Bologna: Il Mulino. 311−323.Suche in Google Scholar

Coniglio, M. 2008. “Modal particles in Italian”. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 18. 91–129.Suche in Google Scholar

Coniglio, M. 2011. Die Syntax der deutschen Modalpartikeln: Ihre Distribution und Lizensierung in Haupt- und Nebensätzen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.10.1524/9783050053578Suche in Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, E. 1996. “Intonation and clause combining in discourse: The case of ‘because’”. Pragmatics 6. 389−426.10.1075/prag.6.3.04couSuche in Google Scholar

D’Hertefelt, S., A. Van Linden and J.-C. Verstraete. 2012. “A typology of complement insubordination in Dutch”. Studies in Language 36. 123−153.10.1075/sl.36.1.04verSuche in Google Scholar

Erman, B. 2001. “Pragmatic markers revisited with a focus on you know in adult and adolescent talk”. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 1337−1359.10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00066-7Suche in Google Scholar

Ford, C.E. 1993. Grammar in interaction: Adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554278Suche in Google Scholar

Frana, I. and K. Rawlins. 2016. “Italian mica in assertions and questions”. In: Bade, N., P. Berezovskaya and A. Schöller (eds.), Proceedings of SuB 20, 234–251 (https://semanticsarchive.net/sub2015/SeparateArticles/Frana-Rawlins-SuB20.pdf)Suche in Google Scholar

Giannakidou, A. 2000. “Negative... concord?” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18(3). 457–523.10.1023/A:1006477315705Suche in Google Scholar

Giannakidou, A. 2002. “Licensing and sensitivity in polarity items: From downward entailment to nonveridicality”. In: Andronis, M., A. Pycha and K. Yoshimura (eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society 38. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society. 29–53.Suche in Google Scholar

Gohl, C. & Susanne Günthner. 1999. “Grammatikalisierung von weil als Diskursmarker in der gesprochenen Sprache”. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 29. 1−37.10.1515/zfsw.1999.18.1.39Suche in Google Scholar

Haegeman, L. 2002. “Anchoring to speaker, adverbial clauses and the structure of CP”. Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 2. 117−180.Suche in Google Scholar

Haegeman, L. 2003. “Conditional clauses: External and internal syntax”. Mind and Language 18. 317−339.10.1111/1468-0017.00230Suche in Google Scholar

Haegeman, L. 2004. “The syntax of adverbial clauses and its consequences for topicalization”. In: Coene, M., G. de Cuyper and Y. D’Hulst (eds.), Current studies in comparative romance linguistics. Antwerp: Universiteit Antwerpen. 61−90.Suche in Google Scholar

Haegeman, L. 2006. “Argument fronting in English, Romance CLLD and the Left Periphery”. In: Campos, H., E. Herburger, P. Portner and R. Zanuttini (eds.), Negation, tense, and clausal architecture: Cross-linguistic investigations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University. 27−52.Suche in Google Scholar

Haegeman, L. 2007. “Operator movement and topicalisation in adverbial clauses”. Folia Linguistica 41. 279−325.10.1515/flin.41.3-4.279Suche in Google Scholar

Haegeman, L. 2010. “The internal syntax of adverbial clauses”. Lingua 120. 628−648.10.1016/j.lingua.2008.07.007Suche in Google Scholar

Haegeman, L. 2012. Adverbial clauses, main clause phenomena, and composition of the left periphery. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199858774.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Haegeman, L. and V. Hill. 2013. “The syntacticization of discourse”. In: Folli, R. et al. (eds.), Syntax and its limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press: Oxford. 370–390.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0018Suche in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, M. 2004. “Coordinating constructions: An overview”. In: Haspelmath, M. (ed.), Coordinating constructions. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 3−39.10.1075/tsl.58Suche in Google Scholar

Hooper, J. and S. Thompson. 1973. “On the applicability of root transformations”. Linguistic Inquiry 4. 465–497.Suche in Google Scholar

Hunt, K.W. 1966. “Recent measures in syntactic development”. Elementary English, 43(7). 732−739.Suche in Google Scholar

Jespersen, O. 1917. Negation in English and other languages. Copenhagen: Høst.Suche in Google Scholar

Larson, R. and M. Sawada. 2012. “Root transformations and quantificational structure”. In Aelbrecht, L., L. Haegeman and R. Nye (eds.), Main clause phenomena: New horizons. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 47−78.10.1075/la.190.03larSuche in Google Scholar

O’Donnell, R.C., W.J. Griffin and R.C. Norris. 1967. Syntax of kindergarten and elementary school children: A transformational analysis. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Suche in Google Scholar

Penello, N. and P. Chinellato. 2008. “Le dinamiche della distribuzione di ciò in Veneto. Breve saggio di microvariazione”. In: Marcato, G. (ed.), L’Italia dei dialetti. Proceedings of the Dialectology Meeting of Sappada/Plodn 2007. Padova: Unipress. 111–118.Suche in Google Scholar

Platzack, C. 1998. “A visibility condition for the C-domain”. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 61. 53–99.Suche in Google Scholar

Reis, M. 1997. “Zum syntaktischen Status unselbständiger Verbzweit-Sätze”. In: Dürscheid, C., K.-H. Ramers and M. Schwarz (eds.), Sprache im Fokus. Festschrift für Heinz Vater zum 65. Geburtstag. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 121−144.Suche in Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. 1997. “The fine structure of the left periphery”. In: Haegeman, L. (ed.), Elements of grammar. A handbook in generative syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 281−337.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7Suche in Google Scholar

Schleppegrell, M.J. 1991. Paratactic ‘because’. Journal of Pragmatics 16. 323−337.10.1016/0378-2166(91)90085-CSuche in Google Scholar

Schiffrin, D. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611841Suche in Google Scholar

Schourup, L. 1985. Common discourse particles in English conversation. New York: Garland.Suche in Google Scholar

Stenström, A. 1998. “From sentence to discourse: Cos (because) in teenage talk”. In: Jucker, A. and Y. Ziv (eds.), Discourse markers. Descriptions and Theory. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 127−146.10.1075/pbns.57.08steSuche in Google Scholar

Sweetser, E. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620904Suche in Google Scholar

Townsend, D.J. and T. Gordon Bever. 1977. Main and subordinate clauses: A study in figure and ground. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Suche in Google Scholar

Zimmermann, M. 2004. “Zum Wohl: Diskurspartikeln als Satztypmodifikatoren”. Linguistische Berichte 199. 1–35.Suche in Google Scholar

Zimmermann, M. 2008. “Discourse particles in the left periphery”. In: Cook, P. et al. (eds.), Dislocated elements in discourse. Oxford: Routledge. 200–231.Suche in Google Scholar

Zimmermann, M. 2011. “Discourse particles”. In: von Heusinger, K., C. Maienborn & P. Portner (eds.), Semantics. An international handbook of natural language meaning; Vol. 2 (HSK 33.2). Berlin: de Gruyter. 2012–2038.Suche in Google Scholar