Between feature mapping and thematic prominence: Old english se-demonstratives and pronouns in discourse

References

Abbott, B. 2001. “Definiteness and identification in English”. In Németh, T. (ed.), Pragmatics in 2000: Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference, Vol. 2. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association. 1–15.Search in Google Scholar

Abney, S. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. (PhD dissertation.) .<http://www.vinartus.net/spa/87a.pdf> (Last accessed 14 March 2015.)Search in Google Scholar

Aboh, E.O, N. Corver, M. Dyakonova and M. van Koppen. 2010. “DP-internal information structure: Some introductory remarks”. Lingua 120. 782–801.10.1016/j.lingua.2009.02.010Search in Google Scholar

Abraham, W. 2007. “Discourse binding: DP and pronouns in German, Dutch and English”. In Stark, E., E. Leiss and W. Abraham (eds.), Nominal determination: Typology, context constraints, and historical emergence. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 21–48.10.1075/slcs.89.04abrSearch in Google Scholar

Adger, D. 2003. Core syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199243709.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Alexiadou, A., L. Haegeman and M. Stavrou. 2007. Noun phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110207491Search in Google Scholar

Allen, C.L. 2012. “Why a determiner? The possessive + determiner + adjective construction in Old English”. In Los, B, M.J. Lopez-Couso and A. Meurman-Sollin (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English. New York: Oxford University Press. 245–270.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860210.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

Allen, C.L. 2006. “Possessives and determiners in Old English”. In Nevalainen, T., J. Klemola and M. Laitinen (eds.), Types of variation: Diachronic, dialectal and typological interfaces. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 149–170.10.1075/slcs.76.09allSearch in Google Scholar

Andrew, S.O. 1936. “Relative and demonstrative pronouns in Old English”. Language 12(4). 283–293.10.2307/409154Search in Google Scholar

Bartnik, A. 2011. Noun phrase structure in Old English. Quantifiers and other functional projections. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.Search in Google Scholar

Bech, K. and C.M. Salvesen. 2014. “Preverbal word order in Old English and Old French”. In Bech, K. and K. G. Eide, (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in Germanic and Romance languages. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 233–269.10.1075/la.213.09becSearch in Google Scholar

Beghelli, F. and T. Stowell. 1994. “The direction of quantifier movement”. Generative Linguistics in the Old World (GLOW) Newsletter 32. 56–57.Search in Google Scholar

Bellmann, G. 1989. “Zur Metakommunikation der Pronomenwervendung” [On meta-communication of the use of pronouns]. In Frisch, R., E. Koller, W. Wegstein, N.R. Wolf (eds.), Würzburger Arbeitstagung 1986. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann. 335–351.Search in Google Scholar

Benincà, P. and C. Poletto. 2004. “A detailed map of the left periphery of medieval Romance”. In Zanuttini, R., H. Campos, E. Herburger and P. H. Portner (eds.), Crosslinguistic research in syntax and semantics: Negation, tense and clausal architecture. Washington: Georgtown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Birner, B. and G. Ward. 1994. “Uniqueness, familiarity, and the definite article in English”. In Gahl, S., A. Dolbey and C. Johnson (eds.), Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 93–102.10.3765/bls.v20i1.1479Search in Google Scholar

Blake, B. J. 1994. Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Boeckx, C. 2008. Bare syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bonet, E. 1991. Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance. (PhD dissertation, MIT.)Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Ž. 2013. “Principles and parameters theory and Minimalism”. In den Dikken, M. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of generative syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 95–121.10.1017/CBO9780511804571.007Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Ž. 2011. “On unvalued uninterpretable features”. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society Annual Meeting 39. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.Search in Google Scholar

Boucher, P. 2003. “Determiner phrases in Old and Modern French”. In Coene, M. and Y. D’hulst (eds.), From NP to DP, Vol. 1: The syntax and semantics of noun phrases. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 47–69.10.1075/la.55.03bouSearch in Google Scholar

Breban, T. 2012. “Functional shifts and the development of English determiners”. In Meurman-Solin, A., M. Jose Lopez-Couso and B. Los (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 271–300.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860210.003.0012Search in Google Scholar

Brody, M. 1997. “Perfect Chains.” In Haegeman, L. (ed.), Elements of grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 139–168.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_3Search in Google Scholar

Brunner, K. 1963. An outline of Middle English grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Cegłowski, P. 2017. The internal structure of nominal expressions. Reflections on extractability, fronting and phasehood. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2008. “On phases”. In Freidin, R., C.P. Otero and M.L. Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 134–166.10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2001. “Derivation by phase”. In Kenstowicz, M. (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 1–53.10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of language. Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. Holland: Foris Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Christophersen, P. 1939. The articles: A study of their theory and use in English. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Search in Google Scholar

Citko, B. 2014. Phase theory. An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139644037Search in Google Scholar

Crisma, P. 2011. “The emergence of the definite article in English. A contact-induced change?”. In Sleeman, P. and H. Perridon (eds.), The noun phrase in Romance and Germanic: Structure, variation, and change. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 175–192.10.1075/la.171.13criSearch in Google Scholar

Déchaîne, R.-M. and M. Wiltschko. 2002. “Decomposing pronouns”. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 409–442.10.1162/002438902760168554Search in Google Scholar

Dehé, N. 2014. Parentheticals in spoken English: The syntax-prosody relation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139032391Search in Google Scholar

Diessel, H. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, function and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/tsl.42Search in Google Scholar

Egg, M. 2007. “The syntax and semantics of relative clause modification”. In Simanan, K., M. de Rijke, R. Scha and R. van Son (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. 49–56.Search in Google Scholar

Elbourne, P. 2000. “E-type pronouns as definite articles”. In Billerey, R., and B.D. Lillehaugen (eds.), WCCFL 19 proceedings. Somerville: Cascadilla Press. 83–96.Search in Google Scholar

Enç, M. 1991. “The semantics of specificity”. Linguistic Inquiry 22. 1–25.Search in Google Scholar

Epstein, R. 2011. “The distal demonstrative as discourse marker in Beowulf”. English Language and Linguistics 15(1). 113–135.10.1017/S1360674310000304Search in Google Scholar

Fortuny, J. 2008. The emergence of order in syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/la.119Search in Google Scholar

Frascarelli, M. and R. Hinterhölz. 2007. “Types of topics in German and Italian”. In Schwabe, K. and S. Winkler (eds.), On information structure, meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 87–116.10.1075/la.100.07fraSearch in Google Scholar

Freidin, R., C.P. Otero and M.L. Zubizarreta (eds.). 2008. Foundational issues in linguistic theory. Cambridge: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gallego, A. 2010. Phase theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/la.152Search in Google Scholar

Geoghegan, S.G. 1975. “Relative clauses in Old, Middle and New English”. Working Papers in Linguistics 18. 30–71.Search in Google Scholar

Giorgi, A. and F. Pianesi. 1997. Tense and aspect: From semantics to morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195091922.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Giusti, G. 2005.“At the left periphery of the Romanian noun phrase”. In Coene, M. and L. Tasmowski (eds.), On space and time in language. Cluj: Clusium. 23–49.Search in Google Scholar

Greenberg, J. 1978. “How does a language acquire gender markers?”. In Greenberg, J., C. Ferguson and E. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of human language, Vol. 3. Stanford: Stanford University Press.47–82.Search in Google Scholar

Gundel, J.K. 2003. “Information structure and referential giveness/newness: How much belongs in the grammar?”. In Müller, S. (ed.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications.122–142.10.21248/hpsg.2003.8Search in Google Scholar

Haeberli, E. 2002. “Inflectional morphology and the loss of V2 in English”. In Light-foot, D. (ed.), Syntactic effects of morphological change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 88–106.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199250691.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Heim, I. and A. Kratzer. 2000. Semantics in generative grammar. Malden: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Heringa, H. 2011. Appositional constructions. (PhD dissertation, University of Groning-en.)Search in Google Scholar

Himmelmann, N. 1997. Deiktion, Artikel, Nominalphrase: Zur Emergenz syntaktischer Struktur [Deixis, article, nominal phrase: On the emergence of the syntactic structure]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783110929621Search in Google Scholar

Hockett, C. 1958. A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1958.tb00870.xSearch in Google Scholar

Hornstein, N., J. Nunes and K. K. Grohmann. 2005. Understanding minimalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511840678Search in Google Scholar

Howe, S. 1996. The personal pronouns in the Germanic languages. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110819205Search in Google Scholar

Huddleston, R.D. and G.K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530Search in Google Scholar

Jakielaszek, J. 2011. Blind merge. Strengthening the no tampering condition. Warszawa: Wydział Polonistyki Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.Search in Google Scholar

Josefsson, G. 2013. Gender in Scandinavian: On the gender systems in Mainland Scandinavian, with focus on Swedish <http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001966/current.pdf> (Last accessed 09 May 2019.)Search in Google Scholar

Jurczyk, R. 2017. “The loss of grammatical gender and case features between Old and Early Middle English: Its impact on simple demonstratives and topic shift”. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 52(2). 203–250.10.1515/stap-2017-0008Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, R. S. 2000. Parameters and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195102352.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kempf, Z. 2007. Próba teorii przypadków. Część 2 [The test of the theory of Cases. Part 2]. Opole: Uniwersytet Opolski.Search in Google Scholar

Kida, I. 2014. A corpus-based dynamic approach to para-hypotaxis: Implications for diachronic corpus linguistic analysis. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.Search in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, P. 2002. “Disjoint reference and the typology of pronouns”. In Kaufmann, I. and B. Stiebels (eds.), More than words. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. 179–226.10.1515/9783050081274-008Search in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, P. 1998. “Partitive case and aspect”. In Butt, M. and W. Geuder (eds.), The projection of arguments. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 265–307.Search in Google Scholar

Kiss, K.É. 2002. “The EPP in a topic-prominent language”. In Svenonius, P. (ed.), Subjects, expletives and the EPP. New York: Oxford University Press. 107–124.10.1093/oso/9780195142242.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Kuroda, S. 1992. Japanese syntax and semantics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-2789-9Search in Google Scholar

Lambrecht, K. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620607Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, R.W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lasnik, H. 2008. “On the development of case theory: Triumphs and challenges”. In Freidin, R., C.P. Otero and M. L. Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 17–42.10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Lasnik, H. and T. Stowell. 1991. “Weakest crossover”. Linguistic Inquiry 22. 687–720.Search in Google Scholar

Lichtenberk, F. 1994. “Reflexives and reciprocals”. In Asher, R.E. and J.M.Y. Simpson (eds.), The encyclopaedia of language and linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon Press. 3504–3509.Search in Google Scholar

Longobardi, G. 2008. “Reference to individuals, person, and the variety of mapping parameters”. In Müller, H.H., A. Klinge (eds.), Essays on nominal determination: From morphology to discourse management. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 189–211.10.1075/slcs.99.11lonSearch in Google Scholar

Longobardi, G. 1994. “Reference and proper names”. Linguistic & Inquiry 25. 609–665.Search in Google Scholar

Los, B. 2012. “The loss of verb-second and the switch from bounded to unbounded systems”. In Meurman-Solin, A., M. Jose Lopez-Couso and B. Los (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 21–46.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860210.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Los, B. and A. Van Kemenade. 2018. “Syntax and the morphology of deixis: The loss of demonstratives and paratactic clause linking”. In Coniglio, M., A. Murphy, E. Schlachter, T. Veenstra (eds.), Atypical demonstratives: Syntax, semantics and pragmatics. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. 127–157.10.1515/9783110560299-005Search in Google Scholar

Lyons, C. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511605789Search in Google Scholar

Megerdoomian, K. 2008. “Parallel nominal and verbal projections”. In Freidin, R., C.P. Otero and M.L. Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 73–104.10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Meurman-Solin, A. 2004. “Towards a variationist typology of clausal connectives: methodological considerations”. In Dossena, M., E. Lass (eds.), Methods and data in English historical dialectology. Bern: Peter Lang. 171–198.Search in Google Scholar

Milićev, T. 2014. “Weak demonstratives in Old English”. In Prćić, T., M. Marković, V. Gordić Petković, P. Novakov, Z. Paunović, I. Đurić Paunović, A. Halas, B. Jakovljević (eds.), Zbornik u čast Draginje Pervaz: Engleski jezik i anlgofone književnosti u teoriji i praksi. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet. 323–337.Search in Google Scholar

Millar, R. M. 2016. “At the forefront of linguistic change: The noun phrase morphology of the Lindisfarne Gospels”. In Fernandéz Cuesta, J. and S. M. Pons-Sanz (eds.), The Old English gloss to the Lindisfarne Gospels. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 153–168.10.1515/9783110449105-011Search in Google Scholar

Millar, R.M. 2000. System collapse system rebirth: The demonstrative pronouns of English and the rise of the definite article 950–1350. Bern: Peter Lang AG.Search in Google Scholar

Neeleman, A. and F. Weerman. 2001. Flexible syntax: A theory of case and argument. Dordrecht: Kluwe Academic Publisher.Search in Google Scholar

Paladian, M. 2003. “Apposition”. Investigationes Linguisticae, Vol. 10. Poznań.10.14746/il.2004.10.5Search in Google Scholar

Penning, G.E. 1875. A history of the reflexive pronouns in the English language. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, D. and E. Torrego. 2007. “The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features”. In Karimi, S., V. Samiian and W.K. Williams (eds.), Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 262–294.10.1075/la.101.14pesSearch in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, D. and E. Torrego. 2001. “T-to-C movement: Causes and consequences”. In Kenstowicz, M. (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 355–426.10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0014Search in Google Scholar

Pielecha, S. 2014. “Reflexivity in Old English”. Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies 23(2). 53–62.Search in Google Scholar

Postal, P. 1966. “On so-called ‘pronouns’ in English”. In Dinneen, F. (ed.), Report on the seventeenth annual round table meeting on linguistics and language studies. Washington: Georgetown University Press. 177–206.Search in Google Scholar

Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech and J. Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Prince, E.F. 1992. “The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information status”. In Thompson, S. and W. Mann (eds.), Discourse description: Diverse analyses of a fundraising text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 295–325.10.1075/pbns.16.12priSearch in Google Scholar

Radford, A. 2004. Minimalist syntax: Exploring the structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511811319Search in Google Scholar

Ramchand, G.C. 1993. “Verbal nouns and event structure in Scottish Gaelic”. In Lahiri, U. and A. Wyner (eds.), Salt III. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 162–181.10.3765/salt.v3i0.3120Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, I. 2010. “A deletion analysis of null subjects”. In Biberauer, T., A. Holmberg, I. Roberts and M. Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory. New York: Cambridge University Press. 58–87.10.1017/CBO9780511770784.002Search in Google Scholar

Sheehan, M. and W. Hinzen. 2011. “Moving towards the edge”. <http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001300> (Last accessed 15 May 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Szabolcsi, A. 1984. “The possessor that ran away from home”. The Linguistic Review 3(1). 69–102.10.1515/tlir.1983.3.1.89Search in Google Scholar

Tappe, H.T. 1990. Determiner phrases and agreement in German. (MA thesis.)Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, A. and S. Pintzuk. 2012. “The effect of information structure on object position in Old English”. In Meurman-Solin, A., M. Jose Lopez-Couso and B. Los (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 47–65.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860210.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, E. 1992. “Syntax”. In Hogg, R. (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language I; Old English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 168–289.10.1017/CHOL9780521264747.005Search in Google Scholar

Tse, K. 2012. The grammaticalization of K(case): grammaticalization and ‘lateral’ grammaticalization. (Unpublished manuscript.) 1–73.Search in Google Scholar

Van Gelderen, E. 2013. “The diachrony of pronouns and demonstratives”. In Lohndal, T. (ed.), In search of universal grammar: From Old Norse to Zoque. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 195–218.10.1075/la.202.13gelSearch in Google Scholar

Van Gelderen, E. 2011. The linguistic cycle: Language change and the language faculty. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Van Gelderen, E. 2003. Scrambling unscrambled. (PhD dissertation, University of Leiden.)Search in Google Scholar

Van Gelderen, E. 2000. A history of English reflexive pronouns; person, self and inter-pretability. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/la.39Search in Google Scholar

Van Kemenade, T. 1987. Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of English. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110882308Search in Google Scholar

Von Stutterheim, C. and M. Carroll. 2005. “Subjektwahl und Topikkontinuität im Deutschen und Englischen” [Subject selection and topic continuity in German and English]. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 35. 7–27.10.1007/BF03379441Search in Google Scholar

Vergnaud, J-R. 2008. “Letter to Noam Chomsky and Howard Lasnik on ‘Filters and Control’”, April 17, 1977. In Freidin, R., C.P. Otero, M. L. Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 3–16.10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Watanabe, A. 2009. “A parametric shift in the D-system in Early Middle English: Relativization, articles, adjectival inflection, and indeterminates”. In Crisma, P. and G. Longobardi (eds.), Historical syntax and linguistic theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 358–374.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199560547.003.0021Search in Google Scholar

Wiltschko, M. 1998. “On the syntax and semantics of (relative) pronouns and determiners”. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2. 143–181.10.1023/A:1009719229992Search in Google Scholar

Wood, J. 2007. “Demonstratives and possessives”. In Stark, E., E. Leiss and W. Abraham (eds.), Nominal determination: Typology, context constraints, and historical emergence. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 339–361.10.1075/slcs.89.18wooSearch in Google Scholar

Wood, J. 2003. Definiteness and number: Determiner phrase and number phrase in the history of English. (PhD doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University.)Search in Google Scholar

Zeiljstra, H. 2012. “There is only one way to agree”. The Linguistic Review 29(3). 491–539.10.1515/tlr-2012-0017Search in Google Scholar