Frequency effects and markedness in phonotactics
-
Paula Orzechowska
und
Paulina Zydorowicz
Abstract
In this paper, we take up the challenge of exploring the relationship between markedness and frequency in phonotactics. The study is based on word-initial and word-final consonant clusters in Polish and English. The aim of this study is threefold. First, we establish logarithmic frequencies for word-initial and final consonant clusters compiled from two resources, a dictionary (or paradigm) and a written corpus. Second, we examine the preferability status of clusters in three frequency bands (high, mid, low) in terms of two phonotactic principles, i.e. sonority and Net Auditory Distance. Finally, we test the correlations between degrees of markedness and frequency. The present paper extends our previous studies on comparative Polish–English phonotactics, where markedness and frequency constitute the core of the analysis. The study shows that there is no relationship between cluster markedness and its frequency. As to frequencies, Polish and English differ from each other with respect to the distribution of clusters in the dictionary list, while the disproportions are neutralized in usage.
The GZipf formula: GZipf = value for word i, ci = word’s raw frequency, n = size of the dataset.
References
Bargiełówna, M. 1950. “Grupy fonemów spółgłoskowych współczesnej polszczyzny kulturalnej” [Consonant phoneme clusters in modern cultured Polish]. Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego 10. 1–25.Suche in Google Scholar
Bartnicka-Dąbkowska, B. and R. Sinielnikoff. 1999. Słownik podstawowy języka polskiego dla cudzoziemców [A basic Polish dictionary for foreigners] Kielce: Wydawnictwo Takt.Suche in Google Scholar
Battistella, E. L. 1990. Markedness: The evaluative superstructure of language Albany: State University of New York Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Bybee, J. 2003. Phonology and language use Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Clements, G.N. 1990. “The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification”. In: Kingston, J. and M.E. Beckman (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology (Vol. 1: Between the grammar and physics of speech Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 283–333.10.1017/CBO9780511627736.017Suche in Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A. 2014. Gimson’s pronunciation of English London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203784969Suche in Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. 2006. Markedness: Reduction and preservation in phonology Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486388Suche in Google Scholar
Dobrogowska, K. 1984. “Śródgłosowe grupy spółgłosek w polskich tekstach popularnonaukowych” [Word-internal consonant clusters in Polish popular science texts]. Polonica 10. 15–34.Suche in Google Scholar
Dobrogowska, K. 1990. “Word internal consonant clusters in Polish artistic prose”. Studia Phonetica Posnaniensia 2. 43–67.Suche in Google Scholar
Dobrogowska, K. 1992. “Word initial and word final consonant clusters in Polish popular science text and in artistic prose”. Studia Phonetica Posnaniensia 3. 47–121.Suche in Google Scholar
Dressler, W.U. and K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk. 2006. “Proposing morphonotactics”. Rivista di Linguistica 18(2). 249–266.Suche in Google Scholar
Dressler, W.U., W. Mayerthaler, O. Panagl and W.U. Wurzel. 1987. “Introduction”. In: Dressler. W.U. (ed.), Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology. Philadelphia: Benjamins. 3–24.10.1075/slcs.10Suche in Google Scholar
Dukiewicz, L. 1980. “Rodzaje i częstość występowania nagłosowych grup fonemów typu CC(V)-, CCC(V)- i CCCC(V)- w polskich tekstach prasowych” [Types and frequencies of word-initial phoneme clusters of the types CC(V)-, CCC(V)- i CCCC(V)- in Polish press texts]. Lětopis Instituta za Serbski Ludospyt 27(2). 142–157.Suche in Google Scholar
Dukiewicz, L. 1985. “Nagłosowe grupy spółgłosek w polskich tekstach popularnonaukowych i prasowych” [Word-initial consonant clusters in Polish popular science and press texts]. Studia Gramatyczne 6. 17–34.Suche in Google Scholar
Dunaj, B. 1985. Grupy spółgłoskowe współczesnej polszczyzny mówionej [Consonant clusters in modern spoken Polish]. Warszawa: Polska Akademia Nauk.Suche in Google Scholar
Dunaj, B. 1986. “Wygłosowe grupy spółgłoskowe współczesnej polszczyzny mówionej” [Word-final consonant clusters in modern spoken Polish]. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego: Prace Językoznawcze 82. 103–117.Suche in Google Scholar
Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. 2009. “NP extension: B&B phonotactics”. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 45(1). 55–71.10.2478/v10010-009-0011-9Suche in Google Scholar
Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. 2014. “Explaining phonotactics using NAD”. Language Sciences 46. 6–17.10.1016/j.langsci.2014.06.003Suche in Google Scholar
Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K., P. Wierzchoń, M. Jankowski, P. Orzechowska, P. Zydorowicz and D. Pietrala. 2012. Phonotactics and morphonotactics of Polish and English: description, tools and applications. (Unpublished research project report, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.)Suche in Google Scholar
Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K., P. Zydorowicz and M. Jankowski. 2013. “English morphonotactics: A Corpus Study”. The Phonetician. A Publication of ISPhS International Society of Phonetic Sciences 107–108. 53–67.Suche in Google Scholar
Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K., D. Pietrala and G. Aperliński. 2014. “The NAD Phonotactic Calculator – an online tool to calculate cluster preference in English, Polish and other languages”. <http://wa.amu.edu.pl/nadcalc/> (Accessed 20 Jul 2017.)Suche in Google Scholar
Foley, J. 1972. “Rule precursors and phonological change by meta-rule”. In: Stockwell, R. and R. Macauley (ed.), Linguistic change and generative theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 96–100.Suche in Google Scholar
Goad, H. 2011. “The representation of sC clusters”. In: Van Oostendorp, M., C. Ewen, E. Hume and K. Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 898–923.Suche in Google Scholar
Goad, H. 2012. “sC Clusters are (almost always) coda-initial”. The Linguistic Review 29(3). 335–373.10.1515/tlr-2012-0013Suche in Google Scholar
Hornby, A.S. 1974. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English London: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1941. Kindersprache, Aphasie, und Allgemeine Lautgesetze Uppsala: Almqvist och Wiksel.Suche in Google Scholar
Kaye, J. 1992. “Do you believe in magic? The story of s+C sequences”. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 2. 293–313.Suche in Google Scholar
Lagefoged, P. 2011. A Course in Phonetics Boston: Thomson Higher Education.Suche in Google Scholar
Maddieson, I. 2013. “Syllable Structure”. In: Dryer, M.S. and M. Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at <http://wals.info/chapter/12> Last accessed on 15 Dec 2017.)Suche in Google Scholar
Madejowa, M. 1990. “Modern Polish linguistic norms with reference to the pronunciation of consonant clusters”. Studia Phonetica Posnaniensia 2. 69–105.Suche in Google Scholar
Marecka, M. and K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk. 2014. “Evaluating models of phonotactic constraints on the basis of sC cluster acquisition data”. Language Sciences 46. 37–47.10.1016/j.langsci.2014.06.002Suche in Google Scholar
Mitton, R. 1992. “A description of a computer-usable dictionary file based on the Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English.” <http://coral.lili.unibielefeld.de/Classes/Winter98/ExPhon/SynthDBNotes/synthdbnotes/node18.html> (Last accessed 19 May 2014.)Suche in Google Scholar
Orzechowska, P. 2009. “Morphonotactics in English and Polish. A dictionary- and corpus-based study of word-final consonant clusters”. (PhD dissertation, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.)Suche in Google Scholar
Orzechowska, P. 2012. “Effects of morphology on the syllables structure”. In: Stolz, T., N. Nau and C. Stroh (eds.), Monosyllables: From phonology to typology Berlin: Akademie Verlag. 93–113.10.1524/9783050060354.91Suche in Google Scholar
Orzechowska, P. and R. Wiese. 2015. “Preferences and variation in word-initial phonotactics: A multi-dimensional evaluation of German and Polish”. Folia Linguistica 49. 439–486.10.1515/flin-2015-0016Suche in Google Scholar
Parker, S. (ed.). 2012. The sonority controversy Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110261523Suche in Google Scholar
Rice, K. 2007. “Markedness in phonology”. In: De Lacy, P. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of phonology Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 79–97.10.1017/CBO9780511486371.005Suche in Google Scholar
Roach, P. 2006. English phonetics and phonology: A practical course Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Rochoń, M. 2000. Optimality in complexity: The case of Polish consonant clusters. Studia Grammatica 48.) Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar
Schreier, D. 2005. Consonant change in English worldwide: Synchrony meets diachrony Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230513327Suche in Google Scholar
Selkirk, E.O. 1984. “On the major class features and syllable theory”. In: Aronoff, M. and R.T. Oehrle (eds.), Language sound structure Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Śledziński, D. 2005. Indeks zbitek spółgłoskowych języka polskiego z przykładami [An index of Polish consonant clusters with examples]. (Unpublished index, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań: Instytut Językoznawstwa.)Suche in Google Scholar
Sobkowiak, W. 2006. “PDI revisited: Lexical cooccurrence of phonetic difficulty codes”. In: Sobkowiak W. and E. Waniek-Klimczak (eds.), Dydaktyka fonetyki języka obcego. Neofilologia VIII. Zeszyty naukowe Państwowej Wyższej Szkoły Zawodowej w PłockuProceedings of the Fifth Phonetics in FLT Conference Soczewka, 25–27 Apr 2005. Płock: Wydawnictwo Państwowej Wyższej Szkoły Zawodowej. 225–238.Suche in Google Scholar
Trnka, B. 1966. A phonological analysis of present-day standard English. Alabama: University of Alabama Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N.S. 1969. Principles of phonology Berkeley: University of California Press. [Reprint of: Grundzüge der Phonologie 1939. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 7.]Suche in Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. 1988. Preference laws for syllable structure and the explanation of sound change Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110849608Suche in Google Scholar
Zydorowicz, P., P. Orzechowska, M. Jankowski, K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, P. Wierzchoń and D. Pietrala. 2016. Phonotactics and morphonotactics of Polish and English: Description, tools and applications Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Suche in Google Scholar
Zydorowicz, P. and P. Orzechowska. 2017. “The study of Polish phonotactics: Measures of phonotactic preferability”. Studies in Polish Linguistics 12(2). 97121.10.4467/23005920SPL.17.005.7023Suche in Google Scholar
© 2019 Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- A comparative investigation of metadiscourse in English and Persian architectural research articles
- When grammar clashes: Negotiation of guilt and innocence in courtroom discourse
- Against a clausal ellipsis account of all stripping strings in Spanish
- Using corpus linguistic techniques in (critical) discourse studies reduces but does not remove bias: Evidence from an Arabic corpus about refugees
- The effect of individual epistemological factors on attitudes to nonstandard language use in native speakers of Polish
- Frequency effects and markedness in phonotactics
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- A comparative investigation of metadiscourse in English and Persian architectural research articles
- When grammar clashes: Negotiation of guilt and innocence in courtroom discourse
- Against a clausal ellipsis account of all stripping strings in Spanish
- Using corpus linguistic techniques in (critical) discourse studies reduces but does not remove bias: Evidence from an Arabic corpus about refugees
- The effect of individual epistemological factors on attitudes to nonstandard language use in native speakers of Polish
- Frequency effects and markedness in phonotactics
