An experimental investigation on the influence of pore foaming agent particle size on cell morphology, hydrophobicity, and acoustic performance of open cell poly (vinylidene fluoride) polymeric foams
Abstract
Globally, the development of porous structured materials has been receiving incredible responses for various high-performance engineering applications. Piezoelectric cellular foams have recently attracted the attention of researchers to emerging applications of acoustic sensors, low-frequency hydrophones, and energy-harvesting devices. As pore morphology is closely related to the shape and the size of the pore-foaming agent, it is necessary to address the influence of particle size of the foaming agent on cell morphology to expand their application area. Hence, this research article establishes the impact of particle size of pore foaming agents on pore morphology, hydrophobicity, and acoustic characteristics of open-cell polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) based piezoelectric cellular composites. Open-cell PVDF cellular composites have been fabricated using the template removal method with sodium chloride (NaCl) as a sacrificial templating agent in three different particle sizes: larger, medium, and finer. Based on the experimental results, it can be stated that the particle size of the templating agents dramatically influences the pore morphology, hydrophobicity, and acoustics performance of the PVDF foam samples. The PVDF foams possessing medium pore size have exhibited a maximum sound absorption coefficient of 0.89 at a frequency range of 1,000–1,500 Hz, indicating that PVDF foams have great potential for noise-controlling applications.
Acknowledgments
The authors are very grateful to VIT University for providing a seed fund and well-equipped laboratories for conducting the experimental work.
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: D M N: methodology, experimentation and validation, J S: conceptualization, supervision, validation. The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved it for submission.
-
Competing interests: The authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest in publishing the article.
-
Research funding: The authors have not received any external funding to publish the current article.
-
Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.
References
1. Zhao, X. S. Novel Porous Materials for Emerging Applications. J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16 (7), 623–625. https://doi.org/10.1039/b600327n.Search in Google Scholar
2. Zhao, D.; Zhao, T. Pore Engineering for High Performance Porous Materials. ACS Cent. Sci. 2023, 9 (8), 1499–1503. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.3c00916.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
3. Day, G. S.; Drake, H. F.; Zhou, H.; Ryder, M. R. Evolution of Porous Materials from Ancient Remedies to Modern Frameworks. Commun. Chem. 2021, 2–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-021-00549-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
4. Rashidi, S.; Esfahani, J. A.; Rashidi, A. A Review on the Applications of Porous Materials in Solar Energy Systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 73 (February), 1198–1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.028.Search in Google Scholar
5. Nivedhitha, D. M. Polyvinylidene Fluoride, an Advanced Futuristic Smart Polymer Material. A Compr. Rev. 2022, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.5914.Search in Google Scholar
6. Nivedhitha, D. M.; Jeyanthi, S. Polyvinylidene Fluoride – An Advanced Smart Polymer for Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Applications – A Novel Review. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2023, 34 (6), 1781–1806. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.6015.Search in Google Scholar
7. Budtova, T.; Lokki, T.; Malakooti, S.; Rege, A.; Lu, H.; Milow, B.; Vapaavuori, J.; Vivod, S. L. Acoustic Properties of Aerogels: Current Status and Prospects. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2023, 25 (6). https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202201137.Search in Google Scholar
8. Wu, L.; Li, Y.; Fu, Z.; Su, B. L. Hierarchically Structured Porous Materials: Synthesis Strategies and Applications in Energy Storage. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2020, 7 (11), 1667–1701. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa183.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
9. Selvaraj, V. K.; Subramanian, J. A Comparative Study of Smart Polyurethane Foam Using RSM and COMSOL Multiphysics for Acoustical Applications: From Materials to Component. J. Porous Mater. 2022, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-022-01362-7.Search in Google Scholar
10. Arenas, J. P.; Crocker, M. J. Recent Trends in Porous Sound-Absorbing Materials. Sound Vib 2010, 44 (7), 12–17.Search in Google Scholar
11. Cao, L.; Fu, Q.; Si, Y.; Ding, B.; Yu, J. Porous Materials for Sound Absorption. Compos. Commun. 2018, 10 (May), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2018.05.001.Search in Google Scholar
12. Elbidi, M.; Resul, M. F. M. G.; Rashid, S. A.; Salleh, M. A. M. Preparation of Eco-Friendly Mesoporous Expanded Graphite for Oil Sorption. J. Porous Mater. 2023, 30 (4), 1359–1368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-023-01428-0.Search in Google Scholar
13. Kuczmarski, M. A.; Johnston, J. C. Acoustic Absorption in Porous Materials; Nasa Aeronautics and Space Administration, Glenn Research Centre: Cleveland, Ohio, 2011; pp 1–20.Search in Google Scholar
14. Selvaraj, V. K.; Subramanian, J.; Gupta, M.; Gayen, M.; Mailan Chinnapandi, L. B. An Experimental Investigation on Acoustical Properties of Organic PU Foam Reinforced with Nanoparticles Fabricated by Hydrothermal Reduction Technique to Emerging Applications. J. Inst. Eng. Ser. D 2020, 101 (2), 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-020-00238-x.Search in Google Scholar
15. Michailidis, N.; Tsouknidas, A.; Lefebvre, L. P.; Hipke, T.; Kanetake, N. Production, Characterization, and Applications of Porous Materials. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2014, 2014, 2–4. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/263129.Search in Google Scholar
16. Ghaffari Mosanenzadeh, S.; Naguib, H. E.; Park, C. B.; Atalla, N. Design and Development of Novel Bio-Based Functionally Graded Foams for Enhanced Acoustic Capabilities. J. Mater. Sci. 2015, 50 (3), 1248–1256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8681-6.Search in Google Scholar
17. Nguyen, T. H.; Nguyen, V. V.; Nguyen, N. T.; Nguyen, T.; Nguyen, T. V. T.; Ngo, H. L.; Huynh, L. T. N.; Tran, T. N.; Ho, T. T. N.; Nguyen, T. T.; Le, V. H. Preparation, Characterization and CDI Application of KOH-Activated Porous Waste-Corn-Stalk-Based Carbon Aerogel. J. Porous Mater. 2023, 30 (4), 1183–1193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-022-01411-1.Search in Google Scholar
18. Peng, L.; Lei, L.; Liu, Y.; Du, L. Improved Mechanical and Sound Absorption Properties of Open Cell Silicone Rubber Foam with Nacl as the Pore-Forming Agent. Mater. (Basel). 2021, 14 (1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14010195.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
19. Li, N.; Chang, Z.; Zhao, X.; Xiao, C. The Effect of Casting Solution Composition on Surface Structure and Performance of Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride)/Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (PVDF/MWCNTs) Hybrid Membranes Prepared via Vapor Induced Phase Separation. J. Polym. Eng. 2017, 37 (4), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1515/polyeng-2016-0124.Search in Google Scholar
20. Zalite, V.; Locs, J.; Vempere, D.; Berzina-Cimdina, L. The Effect of Pore Forming Agent Particle Size on the Porosity, Microstructure and In Vitro Studies of Hydroxyapatite Ceramics. Key Eng. Mater. 2012, 493–494, 277–280. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.493-494.277.Search in Google Scholar
21. Tateishi, J.; Nishiwaki, T.; Sukumaran, S. K.; Sugimoto, M. Effect of the Particle Diameter of the Chemical Foaming Agent on the Foaming Process and the Cellular Structure of One-Shot Compression Molded Polyethylene Foams. J. Polym. Eng. 2018, 38 (1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1515/polyeng-2016-0411.Search in Google Scholar
22. Mosanenzadeh, S. G.; Naguib, H. E.; Park, C. B.; Atalla, N. Development of Polylactide Open-Cell Foams with Bimodal Structure for High-Acoustic Absorption. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014, 131 (7), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.39518.Search in Google Scholar
23. Dasyam, A.; Xue, Y.; Bolton, J. S.; Sharma, B. Effect of Particle Size on Sound Absorption Behavior of Granular Aerogel Agglomerates. J. Non. Cryst. Solids 2022, 598 (September). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.121942.Search in Google Scholar
24. Thulasikanth, V.; Padmanabhan, R. Processing of Aluminium/Fly Ash Composite Foams for Sustainable Green Products. J. Porous Mater. 2023, 30 (2), 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-022-01360-9.Search in Google Scholar
25. Guo, Z.; Ma, D.; Yuan, X.; Dong, X. Effect of TiH2 Particle Size on Aluminum Foam Pore Structure. In International Conference on Advanced Engineering Materials and Technology; Atlantis Press: Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2015; pp 54–58.10.2991/icaemt-15.2015.11Search in Google Scholar
26. Wegener, M.; Bauer, S. Microstorms in Cellular Polymers: A Route to Soft Piezoelectric Transducer Materials with Engineered Macroscopic Dipoles. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2005, 6 (6), 1014–1025. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.200400517.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
27. Nivedhitha, D. M.; Jeyanthi, S.; Venkatraman, P.; Viswapriyan, A. S.; Nishaanth, S. G.; Manoranjith, S. Materials Today : Proceedings Polyvinylidene Fluoride as an Advanced Polymer for Multifunctional Applications- a Review. Mater. Today Proc. 2023, 2024, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.08.226.Search in Google Scholar
28. Viator, J. A.; Pestorius, F. M. Investigating Trends in Acoustics Research from 1970–1999. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2001, 109 (5), 1779–1783. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1366711.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
29. Zhai, Z.; Feng, L.; Zhou, S.; Li, G.; Lou, H.; Liu, Z. Influence of Micron Size Aluminum Particles on the Aging Properties and Wear Resistance of Epoxy Resin. Coatings 2017, 37 (4), 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1515/polyeng-2016-0032.Search in Google Scholar
30. Figueroa, J.; Staruch, M. Acoustic Energy Harvesting of Piezoelectric Ceramic Composites. Energies 2022, 15 (10). https://doi.org/10.3390/en15103734.Search in Google Scholar
31. Campo-Valera, M.; Asorey-Cacheda, R.; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, I.; Villó-Pérez, I. Characterization of a Piezoelectric Acoustic Sensor Fabricated for Low-Frequency Applications: A Comparative Study of Three Methods. Sensors 2023, 23 (5). https://doi.org/10.3390/s23052742.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
32. Saxena, P.; Shukla, P. A Comprehensive Review on Fundamental Properties and Applications of Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride) (PVDF). Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2021, 4 (1), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-021-00217-0.Search in Google Scholar
33. Xie, L.; Wang, G.; Jiang, C.; Yu, F.; Zhao, X. Properties and Applications of Flexible Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride)-Based Piezoelectric Materials. Crystals 2021, 11 (6), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11060644.Search in Google Scholar
34. Wu, L.; Jin, Z.; Liu, Y.; Ning, H.; Liu, X.; Alamusi, A.; Hu, N. Recent Advances in the Preparation of PVDF-Based Piezoelectric Materials. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2022, 11 (1), 1386–1407. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2022-0082.Search in Google Scholar
35. Suh, K. W.; Park, C. P.; Maurer, M. J.; Tusim, M. H.; De Genova, R.; Broos, R.; Sophiea, D. P. Lightweight Cellular Plastics. Adv. Mater. 2000, 12 (23), 1779–1789. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4095(200012)12:23<1779::AID-ADMA1779>3.0.CO;2-3.10.1002/1521-4095(200012)12:23<1779::AID-ADMA1779>3.0.CO;2-3Search in Google Scholar
36. Mohamed, A. M.; Yao, K.; Yousry, Y. M.; Chen, S.; Wang, J.; Ramakrishna, S. Open-Cell Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride) Foams with Polar Phase for Enhanced Airborne Sound Absorption. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018, 113 (9). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5048336.Search in Google Scholar
37. Statharas, E. C.; Yao, K.; Rahimabady, M.; Mohamed, A. M.; Tay, F. E. H. Polyurethane/Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride)/MWCNT Composite Foam for Broadband Airborne Sound Absorption. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136 (33), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.47868.Search in Google Scholar
38. Rahimabady, M.; Statharas, E. C.; Yao, K.; Sharifzadeh Mirshekarloo, M.; Chen, S.; Tay, F. E. H. Hybrid Local Piezoelectric and Conductive Functions for High Performance Airborne Sound Absorption. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 111 (24). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5010743.Search in Google Scholar
39. Mohamed, A. M.; Yao, K.; Yousry, Y. M.; Wang, J.; Ramakrishna, S. Open-Cell P(VDF-TrFE)/MWCNT Nanocomposite Foams with Local Piezoelectric and Conductive Effects for Passive Airborne Sound Absorption. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 127 (21). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5140213.Search in Google Scholar
40. Chen, S.; Lei, S.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, T. The Influence of Microstructure on Sound Absorption of Polyurethane Foams through Numerical Simulation. Macromol. Theory Simul. 2021, 30 (5), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/mats.202000075.Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Material Properties
- Effect of epoxidized soybean oil on melting behavior of poly(l-lactic acid) and poly(d-lactic acid) blends after isothermal crystallization
- An experimental investigation on the influence of pore foaming agent particle size on cell morphology, hydrophobicity, and acoustic performance of open cell poly (vinylidene fluoride) polymeric foams
- Reinforcement of recycled polypropylene by nano lanthana with improved thermal, mechanical and antimicrobial properties
- Microstructure-mechanical property relationships of polymer nanocomposite reinforced with lyophilized montmorillonite/carbon nanotubes hybrid particles
- Preparation and Assembly
- Preparation and dynamic simulation of a hemin reversible associated copolymer with self-healing properties
- Molecularly imprinted polymer for the selective removal of direct violet 51 from wastewater: synthesis, characterization, and environmental applications
- Engineering and Processing
- Comparative analysis of 3D-printed and freeze-dried biodegradable gelatin methacrylate/ poly‐ε‐caprolactone- polyethylene glycol-poly‐ε‐caprolactone (GelMA/PCL-PEG-PCL) hydrogels for bone applications
- Thermally conductive and electrically insulated DGEBA-epoxy nano-composite fabricated by integrating GO/h-BN and rGO/h-BN hybrid for thermal management applications: a comparative analysis
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Material Properties
- Effect of epoxidized soybean oil on melting behavior of poly(l-lactic acid) and poly(d-lactic acid) blends after isothermal crystallization
- An experimental investigation on the influence of pore foaming agent particle size on cell morphology, hydrophobicity, and acoustic performance of open cell poly (vinylidene fluoride) polymeric foams
- Reinforcement of recycled polypropylene by nano lanthana with improved thermal, mechanical and antimicrobial properties
- Microstructure-mechanical property relationships of polymer nanocomposite reinforced with lyophilized montmorillonite/carbon nanotubes hybrid particles
- Preparation and Assembly
- Preparation and dynamic simulation of a hemin reversible associated copolymer with self-healing properties
- Molecularly imprinted polymer for the selective removal of direct violet 51 from wastewater: synthesis, characterization, and environmental applications
- Engineering and Processing
- Comparative analysis of 3D-printed and freeze-dried biodegradable gelatin methacrylate/ poly‐ε‐caprolactone- polyethylene glycol-poly‐ε‐caprolactone (GelMA/PCL-PEG-PCL) hydrogels for bone applications
- Thermally conductive and electrically insulated DGEBA-epoxy nano-composite fabricated by integrating GO/h-BN and rGO/h-BN hybrid for thermal management applications: a comparative analysis