Home The effect of filler loading and APTES treatment on the performance of PSf/SBA-15 mixed matrix membranes
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The effect of filler loading and APTES treatment on the performance of PSf/SBA-15 mixed matrix membranes

  • Gholamhossein Vatankhah and Babak Aminshahidy EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 9, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The fabrication of mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) is of particular importance due to their advantages over neat membranes. The performance of MMMs is a function of the type and fraction of the nanoparticles in the membrane. Moreover, the proper interaction of the polymer and nanoparticles affects the MMMs performance. In this study polysulfone (PSf)/SBA-15 mesoporous silicas MMMs were prepared and their performance was evaluated for CO2/CH4 gas separation. SBA-15 mesoporous silicas were previously synthesized and functionalized with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane by post-synthesis treatment. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, field emission scanning electron microscopy, N2 adsorption–desorption, and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller analysis was applied to examine the functional groups, morphology, and textural properties of the unmodified and modified mesoporous silica in the prepared membrane, respectively. The effects of modified and unmodified SBA-15 particle loading were investigated for the gas separation performance of PSf/SBA-15 membranes. The experimental results illustrate that a higher modified mesoporous silica loading leads to an increase in gas permeance and gas pair selectivity. The highest increase in permeability and selectivity was related to the incorporation of S2 and AP-S2 into the PSf matrix, respectively.


Corresponding author: Babak Aminshahidy, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Azadi Square, PO Box 9177948974, Mashhad, Iran, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: The authors would like to express their appreciation for the financial support received from Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Scholes, C. A., Kentish, S. E., Stevens, G. W. Carbon dioxide separation through polymeric membrane systems for flue gas applications. Recent Pat. Chem. Eng. 2008, 1, 52; https://doi.org/10.2174/2211334710801010052.Search in Google Scholar

2. Brunetti, A., Scura, F., Barbieri, G., Drioli, E. Membrane technologies for CO2 separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 359, 115–125; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.11.040.Search in Google Scholar

3. Robeson, L. M. Correlation of separation factor versus permeability for polymeric membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1991, 62, 165; https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(91)80060-j.Search in Google Scholar

4. Robeson, L. M. The upper bound revisited. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 320, 390–400; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.030.Search in Google Scholar

5. Zhang, Y., Tong, Y., Li, X., Guo, Sh., Zhang, H., Chen, X., Cai, K., Cheng, L., He, W. Pebax mixed-matrix membrane with highly dispersed ZIF-8@CNTs to enhance CO2/N2 separation. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 18566–18575; https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c00493.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Wong, K., Jawad, Z. A., Chin, B. L. F. A polyethylene glycol (PEG) – polyethersulfone (PES)/multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) polymer blend mixed matrix membrane for CO2/N2 separation. J. Polym. Res. 2021, 28, 6; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-020-02361-5.Search in Google Scholar

7. Moustafa, M. Z., Mohammad, K. H., Majeda, K., Mariam, A. M., Sergei, N. A review on recent advances in CO2 separation using zeolite and zeolite-like materials as adsorbents and fillers in mixed matrix membranes (MMMs). Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 2021, 6, 100091; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceja.2021.100091.Search in Google Scholar

8. Salahshoori, I., Seyfaee, A., Babapoor, A., Neville, F., Moreno-Atanasio, R. Evaluation of the effect of silica nanoparticles, temperature and pressure on the performance of PSF/PEG/SiO2 mixed matrix membranes: a molecular dynamics simulation (MD) and design of experiments (DOE) study. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 333, 115957; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2021.115957.Search in Google Scholar

9. Li, Y., Dongfeng, L., Hongxia, G., Shuai, W., Tiexin, Z., Yunling, L., Fangyuan, G., Xiaogang, Z. High-performance carbonized ZIF-8-doped hybrid carbon molecular sieve membrane for CO2/N2 separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2022, 655, 120610.10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120610Search in Google Scholar

10. Han, S. H., Kim, G. W., Jung, C. H., Lee, Y. M. Control of pore characteristics in carbon molecular sieve membranes (CMSM) using organic/inorganic hybrid materials. Desalination 2008, 233, 88–95; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.09.030.Search in Google Scholar

11. Zornoza, B., Joaristi, A. M., Crespo, P. S., Tellez, C., Coronas, J., Gascon, J., Kapteijn, F. Functionalized flexible MOFs as fillers in mixed matrix membranes for highly selective separation of CO2 from CH4 at elevated pressures. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 9522–9524; https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cc13431k.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Yapeng, S., Shanshan, W., Zhenggong, W., Xiangyu, B., Menghui, H., Yatao, Z., Jian, J. Mixed matrix membranes with highly dispersed MOF nanoparticles for improved gas separation. Separ. Purif. Technol. 2021, 277, 119449; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119449.Search in Google Scholar

13. Kim, S., Marand, E. High permeability nano-composite membranes based on mesoporous MCM-41 nanoparticles in a polysulfone matrix. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2008, 114, 129–136; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.12.028.Search in Google Scholar

14. Jomekian, A., Pakizeh, M., Shafiee, A. R., Mansoori, S. A. A. Fabrication or preparation and characterization of new modified MCM-41/PSf nanocomposite membrane coated by PDMS. Separ. Purif. Technol. 2011, 80, 556–565; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.06.011.Search in Google Scholar

15. Weng, T. H., Tseng, H. H., Wey, M. Y. Fabrication and characterization of poly(phenylene oxide)/SBA-15/carbon molecule sieve multilayer mixed matrix membrane for gas separation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 6971–6983; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.04.024.Search in Google Scholar

16. Weng, T. H., Tseng, H. H., Wey, M. Y. Effect of SBA-15 texture on the gas separation characteristics of SBA-15/polymer multilayer mixed matrix membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 369, 550–559; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.12.039.Search in Google Scholar

17. Rahmat, N., Abdullah, A. Z., Mohamed, A. R. Review: mesoporous Santa Barbara amorphous-15, types, synthesis and its applications towards bio-refinery production. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 2010, 7, 1579–1586; https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2010.1579.1586.Search in Google Scholar

18. Johansson, E. M., Ballem, M. A., Cordoba, J. M., Oden, M. Rapid synthesis of SBA-15 rods with variable lengths, widths, and tunable large pores. Langmuir 2011, 27, 4994–4999; https://doi.org/10.1021/la104864d.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. ALOthman, Z. A. A review: fundamental aspects of silicate mesoporous materials. Materials 2012, 5, 2874–2902; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma5122874.Search in Google Scholar

20. Pechar, T. W., Kim, S., Vaughan, B., Marand, E., Tsapatsis, M., Jeong, H. K., Cornelius, C. J. Fabrication and characterization of polyimide–zeolite L mixed matrix membranes for gas separations. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 277, 195–202; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.10.029.Search in Google Scholar

21. Wang, X., Lin, K. S. K., Chan, J. C. C., Cheng, S. Direct synthesis and catalytic applications of ordered large pore amino propyl-functionalized SBA-15 mesoporous materials. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 1763–1769; https://doi.org/10.1021/jp045798d.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Laghaei, M., Sadeghi, M., Ghalei, B., Shahrooz, M. The role of compatibility between polymeric matrix and silane coupling agents on the performance of mixed matrix membranes: polyethersulfone/MCM-41. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 513, 20–32; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.04.039.Search in Google Scholar

23. Ahmadi, E., Dehghannejad, N., Hashemikia, S., Ghasemnejad, M., Tabebordbar, H. Synthesis and surface modification of mesoporous silica nanoparticles and its application as carriers for sustained drug delivery. Drug Deliv. 2014, 21, 164–172; https://doi.org/10.3109/10717544.2013.838715.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Miricioiu, M. G., Iacob, C., Nechifor, G., Niculescu, V. C. High selective mixed membranes based on mesoporous MCM-41 and MCM-41-NH2 particles in a polysulfone matrix. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 332; https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.00332.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Suhail, F., Batool, M., Shah, A. T., Tabassum, S., Khan, A. L., Gilani, M. A. Highly CO2 selective mixed matrix membranes of polysulfone based on hetaryl modified SBA-16 particles. Separ. Purif. Technol. 2021, 258, 117999; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117999.Search in Google Scholar

26. Zhao, D., Huo, Q., Feng, J., Chmelka, B. F., Stucky, G. D. Nonionic triblock and star diblock copolymer and oligomeric surfactant syntheses of highly ordered, hydrothermally stable, mesoporous silica structures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6024–6036; https://doi.org/10.1021/ja974025i.Search in Google Scholar

27. Sabri, A. A., Albayati, T. M., Alazawi, R. A. Synthesis of ordered mesoporous SBA-15 and its adsorption of methylene blue. Kor. J. Chem. Eng. 2015, 32, 1835–1841, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-014-0390-y.Search in Google Scholar

28. Brunauer, S., Emmett, P. H., Teller, E. Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1938, 60, 309–319; https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01269a023.Search in Google Scholar

29. Barrett, E. P., Joyner, L. G., Halenda, P. P. The determination of pore volume and area distributions in porous substances. I. Computations from nitrogen isotherms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73, 373–380; https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01145a126.Search in Google Scholar

30. Hosseinkhani, O., Kargari, A., Sanaeepur, H. Facilitated transport of CO2 through Co(II)-SEPDM ionomer membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 469, 151–161; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.06.021.Search in Google Scholar

31. Maria, A. S., Zhao, X. S. Functionalization of SBA-15 with APTES and characterization of functionalized materials. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 12650–12657; https://doi.org/10.1021/jp035877+.10.1021/jp035877+Search in Google Scholar

32. Anunziata, O. A., Beltramone, A. R., Martinez, M. L., Belon, L. L. Synthesis and characterization of SBA-3, SBA-15, and SBA-1 nanostructured catalytic materials. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007, 315, 184–190; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2007.06.033.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Albayati, T. M. N., Wilkinson, S. E., Garforth, A. A., Doyle, A. M. Heterogeneous alkane reactions over nanoporous catalysts. Transp. Porous Media 2014, 104, 315–333; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-014-0336-1.Search in Google Scholar

34. Posudievsky, O. Y., Telbiz, G. M., Rossokhaty, V. K. Effect of solvent nature on liquid-phase self-assembly of MEH-PPV/MCM-41 guest–host composites. J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16, 2485–2489; https://doi.org/10.1039/b518380d.Search in Google Scholar

35. Sakamoto, Y., Nagata, K., Yogo, K., Yamada, K. Preparation and CO2 separation properties of amine-modified mesoporous silica membranes. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2007, 101, 303–311; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2006.11.007.Search in Google Scholar

36. Kim, S., Ida, J., Guliants, V. V., Lin, Y. S. Tailoring surface properties of MCM-48 silica by bonding 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane for selective adsorption of carbon dioxide. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 6287–6293; https://doi.org/10.1021/jp045634x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Reid, B. D., Ruiz-Trevino, F. A., Musselman, I. H., Balkus, K. J., Ferraris, J. P. Gas permeability properties of polysulfone membranes containing the mesoporous molecular sieve MCM-41. Chem. Mater. 2001, 13, 2366–2373; https://doi.org/10.1021/cm000931+.10.1021/cm000931+Search in Google Scholar

38. Kim, S., Marand, E., Ida, J., Guliants, V. V. Polysulfone and mesoporous molecular sieve MCM-48 mixed matrix membranes for gas separation. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 1149–1155; https://doi.org/10.1021/cm052305o.Search in Google Scholar

39. Waheed, N., Mushtaq, A., Tabassum, S., Gilani, M. A., Ilyas, A., Ashraf, F., Jamal, Y., Bilad, M. R., Khan, A. U., Khan, A. L. Mixed matrix membranes based on polysulfone and rice husk extracted silica for CO2 separation. Separ. Purif. Technol. 2016, 170, 122–129; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.06.035.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-06-22
Accepted: 2022-09-28
Published Online: 2022-12-09
Published in Print: 2023-02-23

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2022-0144/html
Scroll to top button