Home Effects of infill pattern and density on wear performance of FDM-printed acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene parts
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Effects of infill pattern and density on wear performance of FDM-printed acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene parts

  • Sencer Sureyya Karabeyoglu EMAIL logo , Olcay Eksi ORCID logo , Pasa Yaman ORCID logo and Bedri Onur Kucukyildirim ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: October 6, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene test specimens were additively manufactured by fused deposition method to investigate the effects of infill pattern and density on wear rate, coefficient of friction, wear mechanisms, and microscopic wear characterization. The surface morphology of specimens was characterized using a scanning electron microscope. Under constant parameters of applied load, sliding speed, and sliding time, wear tests were carried out at room temperature. The study revealed that a grid pattern of high infill density and a honeycomb pattern of low infill density showed the lowest wear rate and lowest coefficient of friction compared to the rectilinear pattern. Infill pattern and density affected the wear rate behavior of specimens directly. Moreover, adhesion between additively manufactured layers along with surface texture affects the wear behavior and wear rate. Increasing infill density allowed poor cooling of previously built layers. Longer process time results in rough surfaces.


Corresponding author: Sencer Sureyya Karabeyoglu, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kirklareli University, Kirklareli, 39100, Turkey, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

We thank Yildiz Technical University – Advanced Materials Research Group (YTU-AMRG) for all contributions made in the course of the study.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Gibson, I., Rosen, D. W., Stucker, B. Additive Manufacturing Technologies; Springer: US, 2010.10.1007/978-1-4419-1120-9Search in Google Scholar

2. Ingole, D. S., Deshmukh, T. R., Kuthe, A. M., Ashtankar, K. M. Build orientation analysis for minimum cost determination in FDM. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 2011, 225, 1925–1938; https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405411413694.Search in Google Scholar

3. Nath, S. D., Nilufar, S. An overview of additive manufacturing of polymers and associated composites. Polymers 2020, 12, 1–33; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12112719.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Nabipour, M., Akhoundi, B. An experimental study of FDM parameters effects on tensile strength, density, and production time of ABS/Cu composites. J. Elastomers Plastics 2020, 53, 146–164; https://doi.org/10.1177/0095244320916838.Search in Google Scholar

5. Collinson, D. W., Kolluru, P. V., Windheim, N. V., Brinson, L. C. Distribution of rubber particles in the weld zone of fused filament fabricated acrylonitrile butadiene styrene and the impact on weld strength. Addit. Manuf. 2021, 41, 101964; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.101964.Search in Google Scholar

6. Kameshwari Devi, S. H., Hatna, S. The effect of styrene maleic anhydride compatibilizer on the performance of polycarbonate/acrylonitrile butadiene styrene blends. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 46, 2510–2514; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.531.Search in Google Scholar

7. Sharma, V., Kapoor, S., Goyal, M., Jindal, P. Enhancement of the mechanical properties of graphene based acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) nanocomposite. Mater. Today 2020, 28, 1744–1747; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.155.Search in Google Scholar

8. Ziemian, C., Sharma, M., Ziemian, S. Anisotropic mechanical properties of graphene based acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) nanocomposite. In Mechanical Engineering; Gokcek, M., Ed. IntechOpen: Shanghai, 2012; pp. 159–180. https://doi.org/10.5772/34233.Search in Google Scholar

9. Sudeepan, J., Kumar, K., Barman, T. K., Sahoo, P. Study of mechanical and tribological properties of ABS/clay polymer composite using taguchi optimization method. J. Manuf. Technol. Res. 2018, 6, 153–175.Search in Google Scholar

10. Ma, L., Zhang, Y., Meng, Y., Anusonti-Inthra, P., Wang, S. Preparing cellulose nanocrystal/acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene nanocomposites using the master-batch method. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 125, 352–359; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.02.062.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Cirmad, H., Tirkes, S., Tayfun, U. Evaluation of flammability, thermal stability and mechanical behavior of expandable graphite-reinforced acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene terpolymer. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2021. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10973-021-10656-y (accessed Oct 01, 2021), in preparation.10.1007/s10973-021-10656-ySearch in Google Scholar

12. Kulich, D. M., Gaggar, S. K., Lowry, V., Stepien, R. Acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene polymers. In Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology; Kroschwitz, J. I., Mark, H. F., Eds. John Wiley & Sons Inc: New Jersey, 2001; pp. 174–203.10.1002/0471440264.pst011Search in Google Scholar

13. Begum, S. A., Rane, A. V., Kanny, K. Applications of compatibilized polymer blends in automobile industry. In Compatibilization of Polymer Blends; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2020; pp. 563–593; https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-816006-0.00020-7.Search in Google Scholar

14. Singh, J., Chawla, K., Singh, R. Applications of thermoplastic polymers in 3D printing. In Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-820352-1.00010-9.Search in Google Scholar

15. Sood, A. K., Equbal, A., Toppo, V., Ohdar, R. K., Mahapatra, S. S. An investigation on sliding wear of FDM built parts. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2012, 5, 48–54; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2011.08.003.Search in Google Scholar

16. Amiruddin, H., Bin Abdollah, M. F., Norashid, N. A. Comparative study of the tribological behaviour of 3D-printed and moulded ABS under lubricated condition. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6; https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab2152.Search in Google Scholar

17. Srinivasan, R., Babu, B. S., Rani, V. U., Suganthi, M., Dheenasagar, R. Comparision of tribological behaviour for parts fabricated through fused deposition modelling (FDM) process on abs and 20% carbon fibre PLA. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 27, 1780–1786.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.689Search in Google Scholar

18. Bankupalli, N., Rao, D. S., Krishna, T. S. V. Effect of process parameters and butadiene content on friction and wear behaviour of ABS components. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 41, 416–421.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.808Search in Google Scholar

19. Dangnan, F., Espejo, C., Liskiewicz, T., Gester, M., Neville, A. Friction and wear of additive manufactured polymers in dry contact. J. Manuf. Process. 2020, 59, 238–247; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.09.051.Search in Google Scholar

20. Dave, H. K., Patadiya, N. H., Prajapati, A. R., Rajpurohit, S. R. Effect of infill pattern and infill density at varying part orientation on tensile properties of fused deposition modeling-printed poly-lactic acid part. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2019, 235, 1811–1827; https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406219856383.Search in Google Scholar

21. Gunsekaran, K. N., Aravinth, V., Kumaran, C. B. M., Madhankumar, K., Kumar, S. P. Investigation of mechanical properties of PLA printed materials under varying infill density. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 45, 1849–1856.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.041Search in Google Scholar

22. Ranganathan, S., Kumar, K. S., Gopal, S., Pradeep, C. The Effect of Print Orientation and Infill Density for 3d Printing on Mechanical and Tribological Properties. Technical Paper for SAE International Conference on Advances in Design, Materials, Manufacturing and Surface Engineering for Mobility: Chennai, India, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-28-0411.Search in Google Scholar

23. Boparai, K. S., Singh, R., Singh, H. Wear behavior of FDM parts fabricated by composite material feed stock filament. Rapid Prototyp. J. 2021, 22, 350–357.10.1108/RPJ-06-2014-0076Search in Google Scholar

24. Standard Test Method for Wear Testing with a Pin-on-Disk Apparatus: ASTM G99-17; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

25. Tamburrino, F., Graziosi, S., Bordegoni, M. The influence of slicing parameters on the multi-material adhesion mechanisms of FDM printed parts: an explanatory study. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2019, 14, 316–322; https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2019.1607758.Search in Google Scholar

26. Liparoti, S., Sofia, D., Romano, A., Marra, F., Pantani, R. Fused filament deposition of PLA: the role of interlayer adhesion in the mechanical properties. Polymers 2021, 13, 399; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13030399.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2021-07-05
Accepted: 2021-09-24
Published Online: 2021-10-06
Published in Print: 2021-11-25

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 3.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2021-0192/html
Scroll to top button