Startseite Study on bubble morphology at interface of laser direct joint between carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic (CFRTP) and titanium alloy
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Study on bubble morphology at interface of laser direct joint between carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic (CFRTP) and titanium alloy

  • Hongyan Yang , Xiaohong Zhan EMAIL logo , Hengchang Bu , Wanping Ma und Feiyun Wang
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 16. September 2020
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Manuskript einreichen Informationen für Autor*innen
Journal of Polymer Engineering
Aus der Zeitschrift Journal of Polymer Engineering Band 40 Heft 10

Abstract

Laser direct joining of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic (CFRTP) composite plate and titanium alloy plate with a thickness of 2 mm was performed with swing laser. Numerous air bubble of submillimeter size were observed inside the fusion zone of CFRTP and titanium alloy at the cross section of the joints. The air bubble characteristics were analyzed based on the morphology and size, while the formation mechanism of air bubble was further elucidated according to the nucleation mode, nucleation site and nucleation position. The results demonstrated that the nucleation modes of air bubble are substantially divided into homogeneous nucleation and heterogeneous nucleation, which is related to the nucleation sites. The nucleation mode presents a crucial factor influencing the position and morphology of air bubble. In addition, the air bubble characteristics are also determined by the clamp pressure and resin flow. The final morphology of air bubble is primarily represented by four typical types.

Keywords: air bubble; CFRTP; laser direct joining; microgroove; titanium alloy
Corresponding author: Xiaohong Zhan, College of Material Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, 211106, China, E-mail:

Funding source: The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Award Identifier / Grant number: NP2018461

  1. Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This research is financially supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, no. NP2018461.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Zhou, Y., Zeng, W. D., Yu, H. Mater. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. Mater. Properties Microstruct. Processing 2005, 393, 204–212; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.10.016.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Zhisho, Z. J. Aeronautical Mater. 2014, 34, 44–50. https://doi.org/10.11868/j.issn.1005-5053.2014.4.00.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Molitor, P., Barron, V., Young, T. M. Int. J. Adhesion Adhes. 2001, 21, 129–136; https://doi.org/10.1016/s0143-7496(00)00044-0.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Gao, Q., Li, Y., Wang, H. Appl. Compos. Mater. 2019, 26, 1087–1099; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-019-09768-4.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Lionetto, F., Mele, C., Leo, P. Compos. B Eng. 2018, 144, 134–42; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.026.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Lionetto, F., Morillas, M. D., Pappada, S. Compos. Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2018, 104, 32–40; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.10.021.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Nagatsuka, K. Q. J. Jpn. Weld. Soc. 2018, 87, 33–38; https://doi.org/10.2207/jjws.87.33.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Buffa, G., Baffari, D., Campanella, D. Procedia Manuf. 2016, 5, 319–331; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2016.08.028.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Tanaka, K., Teramura, T., Katayama, T. WIT Trans. Built Environ. 2016, 391–401. https://doi.org/10.2495/HPSM160371.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Arai, S., Kawahito, Y., Katayama, S. Mater. Des. 2014, 59, 448–453; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.018.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Jung, K., Kawahito, Y., Katayama, S. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Technol. 2014, 1, 43–48; https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-014-0007-2.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Hussein, F. I., Akman, E., Oztoprak, B. G. Optic Laser Technol. 2013, 49, 143–152; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2012.12.028.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Jung, K., Kawahito, Y., Takahashi, M. Mater. Des. 2013, 47, 179–188; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.015.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Lambiase, F., Genna, S., Lambiase, F., Genna, S. Optic Laser Technol. 2017, 88, 205–214; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2016.09.028.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Rodriguez-vidal, E., Sanz, C., Lambarri, J. Optic Laser Technol. 2018, 104, 73–82; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.02.003.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Jiao, J., Xu, Z., Wang, Q. Optic Laser Technol. 2018, 103, 170–176; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.01.023.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Huang, Y., Meng, X., Xie, Y. Compos. Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2018, 112, 328–336; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.06.027.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Feistauer, E., Santos, J., Amancio, F. Welding in the world Le Soudage Dans Le Monde, 2020, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-020-00927-x.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Kawahito, Y., Niwa, Y., Katayama, S. Weld. Int. 2014, 28, 107–113; https://doi.org/10.1080/09507116.2012.715883.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Wahba, M., Kawahito, Y., Katayama, S. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2011, 211, 1166–1174; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.01.021.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Jiao, J., Jia, S., Xu, Z. Compos. B Eng. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106911.Suche in Google Scholar

22. Li, Y., Bu, H., Yang, H. J. Manuf. Process. 2020, 50, 366–379; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.12.023.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Yan, M., Tian, X., Peng, G. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2018, 165, 140–147; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.06.023.Suche in Google Scholar

24. Katayama, S., Kawahito, Y. Scripta Mater. 2008, 59, 1247–1250; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.08.026.Suche in Google Scholar

25. Wang, H., Chen, Y., Guo, Z. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9030411.Suche in Google Scholar

26. Fu, T., Ma, Y., Funfschilling, D. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2009, 64, 2392–2400; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2009.02.022.Suche in Google Scholar

27. Li, X., Lu, F., Cui, H. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2014, 72, 241–254; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5609-x.Suche in Google Scholar

28. Zhang, Q., Wang, T., Yao, Z. Materialia. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2018.09.030.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-05-08
Accepted: 2020-07-25
Published Online: 2020-09-16
Published in Print: 2020-11-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Material properties
  3. Compatibility of energetic plasticizers with the triblock copolymer of polypropylene glycol-glycidyl azide polymer-polypropylene glycol (PPG-GAP-PPG)
  4. Simultaneous improvement of mechanical and conductive properties of poly(amide-imide) composites using carbon nano-materials with different morphologies
  5. Thermal and mechanical behavior of SBR/devulcanized waste tire rubber blends using mechano–chemical and microwave methods
  6. Preparation and assembly
  7. Development and characterization of ethyl cellulose nanosponges for sustained release of brigatinib for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer
  8. Polysulfone nanofiltration membranes enriched with functionalized graphene oxide for dye removal from wastewater
  9. Zn(II)-selective poly (vinyl chloride) (PVC) membrane electrode based on Schiff base ligand 2-benzoylpyridine semicarbazone as an ionophore
  10. Effectiveness assessment of TiO2-Al2O3 nano-mixture as a filler material for improvement of packaging performance of PLA nanocomposite films
  11. Boron nitride nanoplatelets as two-dimensional thermal fillers in epoxy composites: new scenarios at very low filler loadings
  12. Engineering and processing
  13. Study on bubble morphology at interface of laser direct joint between carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic (CFRTP) and titanium alloy
  14. Robust parameter search for IC tray injection molding using regrind resin
https://doi.org/10.1515/polyeng-2020-0112
Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel
air bubble; CFRTP; laser direct joining; microgroove; titanium alloy

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Material properties
  3. Compatibility of energetic plasticizers with the triblock copolymer of polypropylene glycol-glycidyl azide polymer-polypropylene glycol (PPG-GAP-PPG)
  4. Simultaneous improvement of mechanical and conductive properties of poly(amide-imide) composites using carbon nano-materials with different morphologies
  5. Thermal and mechanical behavior of SBR/devulcanized waste tire rubber blends using mechano–chemical and microwave methods
  6. Preparation and assembly
  7. Development and characterization of ethyl cellulose nanosponges for sustained release of brigatinib for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer
  8. Polysulfone nanofiltration membranes enriched with functionalized graphene oxide for dye removal from wastewater
  9. Zn(II)-selective poly (vinyl chloride) (PVC) membrane electrode based on Schiff base ligand 2-benzoylpyridine semicarbazone as an ionophore
  10. Effectiveness assessment of TiO2-Al2O3 nano-mixture as a filler material for improvement of packaging performance of PLA nanocomposite films
  11. Boron nitride nanoplatelets as two-dimensional thermal fillers in epoxy composites: new scenarios at very low filler loadings
  12. Engineering and processing
  13. Study on bubble morphology at interface of laser direct joint between carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic (CFRTP) and titanium alloy
  14. Robust parameter search for IC tray injection molding using regrind resin
Jetzt anmelden und 20% sparen
Institutioneller Zugang
Wie funktioniert Authentifizierung?
Haben Sie eine Idee, wie wir unsere Website verbessern können?
Bitte schreiben Sie uns.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Heruntergeladen am 24.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2020-0112/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen