Carboxylic acid modified pH-responsive composite polymer particles
-
Nur E. Jannat
,
M.A. Rahman
Abstract
pH-responsive polymers are attracting much interest from researchers because of their wide application potentials in areas like biosensor, bioseparator, bioreactor, biocatalysis, drug delivery, and water treatments. In this investigation a two-step process is evaluated to prepare carboxyl(–COOH) functional submicrometer-sized pH-responsive composite polymer particles. First, submicrometer-sized polystyrene (PS) particles are prepared by a modified conventional dispersion polymerization. In the second step, PS/poly(methacrylic acid-acrylamide-ethylene glycol dimethacrylate) [PS/P(MAA-AAm-EGDMA)] composite polymer particles are synthesized by seeded co-polymerization of methacrylic acid, acrylamide, and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate in the presence of PS seed particles. The size distributions and morphologies analyzed by electron micrographs suggested that seeded copolymerization smoothly occurred without formation of any secondary tiny copolymer particles. The surface composition and functionality are confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and proton nuclear magnetic resonance. The hydrodynamic diameter increased with the increase in pH values as part of the carboxyl groups are deprotonated, which favored the swelling of copolymer layer formed around the surface of PS particles. The adsorption of cationic and anionic surfactants at two different pH values showed that adsorption of cationic surfactant is favored at higher pH value whereas that of anionic surfactant is favored at lower pH value.
Acknowledgments
HA is grateful to the Central Science Laboratory of Rajshahi University for providing instrument support.
References
[1] Schmaljohann D. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2006, 58, 1655–1670.10.1016/j.addr.2006.09.020Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[2] Kumar A, Srivastava A, Galaev IY, Mattiasson B. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007, 32, 1205–1237.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.003Suche in Google Scholar
[3] Gil ES, Hudson SM. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2004, 29, 1173–1222.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.08.003Suche in Google Scholar
[4] Motornov M, Roiter Y, Tokarev I, Minko S. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010, 35, 174–211.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.10.004Suche in Google Scholar
[5] Stuart MAC, Huck WTS, Genzer J, Muller M, Ober C, Stamm M, Sukhorukov GB, Szleifer I, Tsukruk VV, Urban M, Winnik F, Zauscher S, Luzinov I, Minko S. Nature Mater. 2010, 9, 101–113.10.1038/nmat2614Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[6] Roy SG, Kumar A, De P. Polymer 2016, 85, 1–9.10.1016/j.polymer.2016.01.021Suche in Google Scholar
[7] Jiang F, Chen S, Cao Z, Wang G. Polymer 2016, 83, 85–91.10.1016/j.polymer.2015.12.027Suche in Google Scholar
[8] Sentoukas T, Pispas S. J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem. 2018, 56, 1962–1977.10.1002/pola.29082Suche in Google Scholar
[9] Chuang C-Y, Don T-M, Chiu W-Y. J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem. 2009, 47, 2798–2810.10.1002/pola.23369Suche in Google Scholar
[10] McConnell MD, Kraeutler MJ, Yang S, Composto RJ. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 603–609.10.1021/nl903636rSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
[11] Rasool N, Yasin T, Heng JYY, Akhter Z. Polymer 2010, 51, 1687–1693.10.1016/j.polymer.2010.02.013Suche in Google Scholar
[12] Li Y, Hu Z, Chen Y. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1997, 63, 1173–1178.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970228)63:9<1173::AID-APP9>3.0.CO;2-ESuche in Google Scholar
[13] Luo C, Liu Y, Li Z. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 8101–8108.10.1021/ma1015227Suche in Google Scholar
[14] Ma Y, Zhang G, Li L, Yu H, Liu J, Wang C, Chu Y, Zhuo R, Jian X. J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem. 2016, 54, 879–888.10.1002/pola.27930Suche in Google Scholar
[15] Wakebayashi D, Nishiyama N, Itaka K, Miyata K, Yamasaki Y, Harada A. Biomacromolecules 2004, 5, 2128–2136.10.1021/bm040009jSuche in Google Scholar
[16] Schoener CA, Hutson HN, Peppas NA. Polym. Int. 2012, 61, 874–879.10.1002/pi.4219Suche in Google Scholar
[17] Ahmad H, Nurunnabi M, Rahman MM, Kumar K, Tauer K, Minami H, Gafur MA. Colloids Surf. A 2014, 459, 39–47.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.06.038Suche in Google Scholar
[18] Qin Y, Wang L, Zhao C, Chen D, Ma Y, Yang W. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 16690–16698.10.1021/acsami.6b04199Suche in Google Scholar
[19] Wang X, Shi Y, Graff RW, Lee D, Gao H. Polymer 2015, 72, 361–367.10.1016/j.polymer.2014.12.056Suche in Google Scholar
[20] Li G, Zhang G, Sun R, Wong C-P. Polymer 2016, 107, 332–340.10.1016/j.polymer.2016.11.037Suche in Google Scholar
[21] Dong L, Agarwal AK, Beebe DJ, Jiang H. Nature 2006, 442, 551–554.10.1038/nature05024Suche in Google Scholar
[22] Li YM, Jiang T, Lv Y, Wu Y, He F, Zhuo RX. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 2015, 132, 54–61.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.04.066Suche in Google Scholar
[23] Hu J, Miura S, Na K, Bae YH. J. Control. Release 2013, 172, 69–76.10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.08.007Suche in Google Scholar
[24] Gao GH, Li Y, Lee DS. J. Control. Release 2013, 169, 180–184.10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.11.012Suche in Google Scholar
[25] Mano BJF. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2008, 10, 515–527.10.1002/adem.200700355Suche in Google Scholar
[26] Stubbs M, McSheehy PMJ, Griffiths JR, Bashford CL. Mol. Med. Today 2000, 6, 15–19.10.1016/S1357-4310(99)01615-9Suche in Google Scholar
[27] Vaupel P, Kalinowski F, Okunieff P. Cancer Res. 1989, 49, 6449–6465.Suche in Google Scholar
[28] Tian L, Bae YH. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 2012, 99, 116–126.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.10.039Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[29] Zhang K, Wu XY. Biomaterials 2004, 25, 5281–5291.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.12.032Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[30] Alam MA, Miah MAJ, Ahmad H. Colloids Polym. Sci. 2007, 285, 715–720.10.1007/s00396-006-1638-9Suche in Google Scholar
[31] Serrano-Medina A, Cornejo-Bravo JM, Licea-Claverie A. J. Colloids Interface Sci. 2012, 369, 82–90.10.1016/j.jcis.2011.12.045Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[32] Falireas PG, Vamvakaki M. Polymer 2017, 130, 50–60.10.1016/j.polymer.2017.09.068Suche in Google Scholar
[33] Pourjavadi A, Tehrani ZM, Jokar S. Polymer 2015, 76, 52–61.10.1016/j.polymer.2015.08.050Suche in Google Scholar
[34] Li D, He Q, Cui Y, Li J. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 412–417.10.1021/cm062290+Suche in Google Scholar
[35] Liu R, Liao P, Liu J, Feng P. Langmuir 2011, 27, 3095–3099.10.1021/la104973jSuche in Google Scholar
[36] Fujii S, Suzaki M, Armes SP, Dupin D, Hamasaki S, Aono K, Nakamura Y. Langmuir 2011, 27, 8067–8074.10.1021/la201317bSuche in Google Scholar
[37] Ku K, Lee YJ, Yi G-R, Jang SG, Schmidt BVKJ, Liao K, Klinger D, Hawker CJ, Kim BJ. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 9276–9285.10.1021/acs.macromol.7b02365Suche in Google Scholar
[38] Rajput P, Sharma A. J. Pharmacol. Med. Chem. 2018, 2, 22–31.Suche in Google Scholar
[39] Brazel CS, Peppas NA. J. Control. Release 1996, 39, 57–64.10.1016/0168-3659(95)00134-4Suche in Google Scholar
[40] Park JG, Kim JW, Oh SG, Suh KD. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 87, 420–424.10.1002/app.11430Suche in Google Scholar
[41] Debnath MK, Rahman MA, Minami H, Rahman MM, Alam MA, Sharafat MK, Hossain MK, Ahmad H. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47524.10.1002/app.47524Suche in Google Scholar
[42] Pavia DL, Lampman GM, Kriz GS, Vyvyan JA. Introduction to Spectroscopy, 4th ed., Hartcourt Brace College: New York, 2013.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Material properties
- Banana and plantain fiber-reinforced polymer composites
- Characterizations of PMMA-based polymer electrolyte membranes with Al2O3
- Effects of grafting parameters on the properties of proton exchange membranes based on sulfo-functionalized porous silicon for micro direct methanol fuel cells
- The effect of surface modification of PMMA/chitosan composites on improving adsorption properties for chelating Pb2+
- Characterization of organic solar cells using semiconducting polymers with different bandgaps
- Hindered phenol-mediated damping of polyacrylate rubber: effect of hydrogen bonding strength on the damping properties
- Correlation between fiber orientation distribution and mechanical anisotropy in glass-fiber-reinforced composite materials
- Preparation and assembly
- Replacement of sodium alginate polymer, urea and sodium bicarbonate in the conventional reactive printing of cellulosic cotton
- Carboxylic acid modified pH-responsive composite polymer particles
- Synthesis of SiO2 nanoparticle from bamboo leaf and its incorporation in PDMS membrane to enhance its separation properties
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Material properties
- Banana and plantain fiber-reinforced polymer composites
- Characterizations of PMMA-based polymer electrolyte membranes with Al2O3
- Effects of grafting parameters on the properties of proton exchange membranes based on sulfo-functionalized porous silicon for micro direct methanol fuel cells
- The effect of surface modification of PMMA/chitosan composites on improving adsorption properties for chelating Pb2+
- Characterization of organic solar cells using semiconducting polymers with different bandgaps
- Hindered phenol-mediated damping of polyacrylate rubber: effect of hydrogen bonding strength on the damping properties
- Correlation between fiber orientation distribution and mechanical anisotropy in glass-fiber-reinforced composite materials
- Preparation and assembly
- Replacement of sodium alginate polymer, urea and sodium bicarbonate in the conventional reactive printing of cellulosic cotton
- Carboxylic acid modified pH-responsive composite polymer particles
- Synthesis of SiO2 nanoparticle from bamboo leaf and its incorporation in PDMS membrane to enhance its separation properties
