Ibuprofen loaded nano-ethanolic liposomes carbopol gel system: in vitro characterization and anti-inflammatory efficacy assessment in Wistar rats
Abstract
The objective of the present study was to develop and characterize nano-ethanolic liposomes (NEL) for transdermal delivery of ibuprofen (IBU). The NEL for transdermal delivery of IBU were prepared by thin film hydration technique and evaluated for vesicle size, shape, entrapment efficiency, transdermal flux, and in vivo anti-inflammatory activity in Wistar rats. The NEL optimized formulation (NEL-Opt) presented vesicle sizes of 32.85±1.98 nm and entrapment efficiency of 86.40±0.55% with improved transdermal flux. The presence of ethanol and flexibility of NEL could be the reasons for better permeation enhancement of IBU via rat’s skin. In vivo anti-inflammatory study of IBU-loaded NEL-Opt gel showed significant reduction (41.18%) of edema in carrageenan-induced rat paw edema as compared to conventional gel of IBU, where reduction of edema was found to be 12.50%. Our results suggest that developed NEL formulations are efficient systems for transdermal IBU delivery against inflammation. The stability study confirmed that the NEL-Opt gel formulation was considerably stable at refrigerator temperature. Our results concluded that NEL are an efficient carrier for transdermal delivery of IBU.
Acknowledgments
Atefeh Afshar Moghaddam is grateful to JAGSONPAL Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Faridabad, India) for providing a gift sample of IBU. Gratitude is also extended to Lipoid Company (GmbH, Germany) for proving a gift sample of Phospholipon® 90 G for pursuing this research work.
Conflict of interest statement: All authors have approved the final manuscript, and the authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
[1] Prausnitz MR, Mitragotri S, Langer R. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2004, 3, 115–124.10.1038/nrd1304Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[2] Schoellhammer CM, Blankschtein D, Langer R. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2014, 11, 393–407.10.1517/17425247.2014.875528Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[3] Zakir F, Vaidya B, Goyal AK, Malik B, Vyas SP. Drug Deliv. 2010, 17, 238–248.10.3109/10717541003680981Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[4] Marwah H, Garg T, Goyal AK, Rath G. Drug Deliv. 2016, 23, 564–578.10.3109/10717544.2014.935532Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[5] Sinico C, Fadda AM. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2009, 6, 813–825.10.1517/17425240903071029Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[6] Elsayed MM, Abdallah OY, Naggar VF, Khalafallah NM. Int. J. Pharm. 2007, 332, 1–16.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.12.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[7] Schafer-Korting M, Mehnert W, Korting HC. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2007, 59, 427–443.10.1016/j.addr.2007.04.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[8] Dubey V, Mishra D, Nahar M, Jain V, Jain NK. Nanomedicine 2010, 6, 590–596.10.1016/j.nano.2010.01.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[9] Dubey V, Mishra D, Jain NK. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2007, 67, 398–405.10.1016/j.ejpb.2007.03.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[10] Dubey V, Mishra D, Dutta T, Nahar M, Saraf DK, Jain NK. J. Control Release 2007, 123, 148–154.10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.08.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[11] Touitou E, Alkabes M, Dayan N, Eliaz M. Pharm. Res. 1997, 14, 305–306.Search in Google Scholar
[12] Touitou E, Godin B, Dayan N, Weiss C, Piliponsky A, Levi-Schaffer F. Biomaterials 2001, 22, 3053–3059.10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00052-7Search in Google Scholar
[13] Bendas ER, Tadros MI. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2007, 8, E107.10.1208/pt0804107Search in Google Scholar
[14] Verma P, Pathak K. Nanomedicine 2012, 8, 489–496.10.1016/j.nano.2011.07.004Search in Google Scholar
[15] Verma P, Pathak K. J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res. 2010, 1, 274–282.10.4103/0110-5558.72415Search in Google Scholar
[16] Chen J, Jiang QD, Wu YM, Liu P, Yao JH, Lu Q, Zhang H, Duan JA. Molecules 2015, 20, 18219–18236.10.3390/molecules201018219Search in Google Scholar
[17] Hu L, Hu Q, Yang J. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2014, 17, 760–766.Search in Google Scholar
[18] Kuchari E, Han S, Karlowicz-Bodalska K, Miskiewicz K, Kutycka E. Acta Pol. Pharm. 2014, 71, 687–690.Search in Google Scholar
[19] Luo L, Patel A, Sinko B, Bell M, Wibawa J, Hadgraft J, Lane ME. Int. J. Pharm. 2016, 505, 14–19.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.03.043Search in Google Scholar
[20] Balazs B, Vizseralek G, Berko S, Budai-Szucs M, Kelemen A, Sinko B, Takacs-Novak K, Szabo-Revesz P, Csanyi E. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 105, 1134–1140.10.1016/S0022-3549(15)00172-0Search in Google Scholar
[21] Yi QF, Yan J, Tang SY, Huang H, Kang LY. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2016, 42, 1086–1093.10.3109/03639045.2015.1107095Search in Google Scholar
[22] Abioye AO, Issah S, Kola-Mustapha AT. Int. J. Pharm. 2015, 490, 112–130.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.05.030Search in Google Scholar
[23] Beetge E, du Plessis J, Muller DG, Goosen C, van Rensburg FJ. Int. J. Pharm. 2000, 193, 261–264.10.1016/S0378-5173(99)00340-3Search in Google Scholar
[24] Gaur PK, Mishra S, Purohit S, Kumar Y, Bhandari A. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2014, 42, 323–330.10.3109/21691401.2013.827119Search in Google Scholar
[25] Gaur PK, Bajpai M, Mishra S, Verma A. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2016, 44, 370–375.10.3109/21691401.2014.953631Search in Google Scholar
[26] Shi Y, Xu S, Dong A, Zhang J. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2013, 24, 333–341.10.1007/s10856-012-4805-1Search in Google Scholar
[27] Khan NR, Khan GM, Wahab A, Khan AR, Hussain A, Nawaz A, Akhlaq M. Pharmazie 2011, 66, 849–852.Search in Google Scholar
[28] Hetal T, Bindesh P, Sneha T. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res. 2010, 4, 203–223.Search in Google Scholar
[29] Chourasia MK, Kang L, Chan SY. Results Pharma. Sci. 2011, 1, 60–67.10.1016/j.rinphs.2011.10.002Search in Google Scholar
[30] Godin B, Touitou E, Rubinstein E, Athamna A, Athamna M. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2005, 55, 989–994.10.1093/jac/dki125Search in Google Scholar
[31] Dayan N, Touitou E. Biomaterials 2000, 21, 1879–1885.10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00063-6Search in Google Scholar
[32] Dragicevic-Curic N, Scheglmann D, Albrecht V, Fahr A. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2009, 74, 114–122.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.07.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[33] Meng S, Chen Z, Yang L, Zhang W, Liu D, Guo J, Guan Y, Li J. Int. J. Nanomedicine 2013, 8, 3051–3060.10.2147/IJN.S46748Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[34] Herkenne C, Naik A, Kalia YN, Hadgraft J, Guy RH. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2007, 127, 135–142.10.1038/sj.jid.5700491Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[35] Ramos Payan M, Bello Lopez MA, Fernandez-Torres R, Perez Bernal JL, Callejon Mochon M. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 653, 184–190.10.1016/j.aca.2009.09.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[36] Barupal AK, Gupta V, Ramteke S. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2010, 72, 582–586.10.4103/0250-474X.78524Search in Google Scholar
[37] Maheshwari RG, Tekade RK, Sharma PA, Darwhekar G, Tyagi A, Patel RP, Jain DK. Saudi Pharm. J. 2012, 20, 161–170.10.1016/j.jsps.2011.10.001Search in Google Scholar
[38] Arellano A, Santoyo S, Martin C, Ygartua P. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 1999, 7, 129–135.10.1016/S0928-0987(98)00010-4Search in Google Scholar
[39] Khan MA, Pandit J, Sultana Y, Sultana S, Ali A, Aqil M, Chauhan M. Drug Deliv. 2015, 22, 795–802.10.3109/10717544.2014.902146Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[40] Sharma R, Shrestha A, Thapa P, Shrestha R. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2014, 5, 204–212.Search in Google Scholar
[41] Draize JH, Woodard G, Calvery HO. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1944, 82, 377–390.Search in Google Scholar
[42] Lodzki M, Godin B, Rakou L, Mechoulam R, Gallily R, Touitou E. J. Control Release 2003, 93, 377–387.10.1016/j.jconrel.2003.09.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[43] Narala A, Veerabrahma K. J. Pharmaceut. 2013, Article ID 265741, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/265741.10.1155/2013/265741Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[44] Watkinson RM, Herkenne C, Guy RH, Hadgraft J, Oliveira G, Lane ME. Skin Pharmacol. Physiol. 2009, 22, 15–21.10.1159/000183922Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[45] Winter CA, Risley EA, Nuss GW. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1963, 141, 369–376.Search in Google Scholar
[46] Ghanbarzadeh S, Arami S. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 616810.10.1155/2013/616810Search in Google Scholar
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Material properties
- Influence of particle size of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) on barrier property against agglomeration of homogenized microcrystalline cellulose (HMCC) in iPP/HMCC composites
- An investigation of the impact of an amino-ended hyperbranched polymer as a new type of modifier on the compatibility of PLA/PBAT blends
- Study on the adhesive properties of reactive liquid rubber toughened epoxy-clay hybrid nanocomposites
- Morphology, rheology and biodegradation of oxo-degradable polypropylene/polylactide blends
- Long term hydrothermal effect on the mechanical and thermo-mechanical properties of carbon nanofiber doped epoxy composites
- Long term accelerated aging investigation of an epoxy/silica nanocomposite for high voltage insulation
- Mechanical and morphological properties of modified halloysite nanotube filled ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer nanocomposites
- Evaluation of polypropylene hybrid composites containing glass fiber and basalt powder
- Preparation and assembly
- Ibuprofen loaded nano-ethanolic liposomes carbopol gel system: in vitro characterization and anti-inflammatory efficacy assessment in Wistar rats
- Preparation of oriented bacterial cellulose nanofibers by flowing medium-assisted biosynthesis and influence of flowing velocity
- Engineering and processing
- Thin-wall injection molding of high-density polyethylene for infrared radiation system lenses
- Replication of micro-structured injection molds using physical vapor deposition coating and dynamic laser mold tempering
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Material properties
- Influence of particle size of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) on barrier property against agglomeration of homogenized microcrystalline cellulose (HMCC) in iPP/HMCC composites
- An investigation of the impact of an amino-ended hyperbranched polymer as a new type of modifier on the compatibility of PLA/PBAT blends
- Study on the adhesive properties of reactive liquid rubber toughened epoxy-clay hybrid nanocomposites
- Morphology, rheology and biodegradation of oxo-degradable polypropylene/polylactide blends
- Long term hydrothermal effect on the mechanical and thermo-mechanical properties of carbon nanofiber doped epoxy composites
- Long term accelerated aging investigation of an epoxy/silica nanocomposite for high voltage insulation
- Mechanical and morphological properties of modified halloysite nanotube filled ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer nanocomposites
- Evaluation of polypropylene hybrid composites containing glass fiber and basalt powder
- Preparation and assembly
- Ibuprofen loaded nano-ethanolic liposomes carbopol gel system: in vitro characterization and anti-inflammatory efficacy assessment in Wistar rats
- Preparation of oriented bacterial cellulose nanofibers by flowing medium-assisted biosynthesis and influence of flowing velocity
- Engineering and processing
- Thin-wall injection molding of high-density polyethylene for infrared radiation system lenses
- Replication of micro-structured injection molds using physical vapor deposition coating and dynamic laser mold tempering