Startseite Erosion characteristics of Teflon under different operating conditions
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Erosion characteristics of Teflon under different operating conditions

  • Uttam Kumar Debnath , Mohammad Asaduzzaman Chowdhury EMAIL logo , Dewan Muhammad Nuruzzaman , Md. Mostafizur Rahman , Biplov Kumar Roy , Md. Arefin Kowser und Md. Monirul Islam
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 1. April 2015
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The present study investigated the solid particle erosion characteristics of Teflon under different impingement angles (15–90°), impact velocities (30–50 m/s), erodent sizes (300–600 μm) and stand-off distances (15–25 mm) at ambient temperature. The Teflon showed ductile erosion behavior exhibited a peak erosion rate at a 30° impact angle. The design of experiments approach utilizing Taguchi’s orthogonal arrays was applied to test the specimens on a compressed air jet type erosion test rig. Erosion efficiency (η) values were 0.29–16.7%, which indicates micro-plugging, plastic deformation and micro-cutting action as dominating erosion mechanisms. The experimental results are closer to the theoretical model. An optimal parameter combination was determined, which leads to minimization of erosion rate. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on the measured data and signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios. A mathematical correlation, consistent with the experimental observations, is proposed as a predictive equation for estimation of erosion rate of tested material. The morphology of erodent surfaces was examined by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Possible erosion mechanisms are discussed.


Corresponding author: Mohammad Asaduzzaman Chowdhury, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dhaka University of Engineering and Technology, Gazipur, Gazipur-1700, Bangladesh, e-mail:

References

[1] Barkoula NM, Karger-Kocsis J. J. Mater. Sci. 2002, 37, 3807–3820.10.1023/A:1019633515481Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Thai CM, Tsuda K, Hojo H. J. Test. Eval. 1981, 9, 359–365.10.1520/JTE11239JSuche in Google Scholar

[3] Walley SM, Field JE, Yennadhiou P. Wear 1984, 100, 263–280.10.1016/0043-1648(84)90016-4Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Friedrich K. J. Mater. Sci. 1986, 21, 3317–3332.10.1007/BF00553375Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Arena1 G, Friedrich K, Acierno D, Padenko E, Russo P, Filippone G, Wagner J. eXPRESS Polym. Lett. 2015, 9, 166–176.10.3144/expresspolymlett.2015.18Suche in Google Scholar

[6] John Rajesh J, Bijwe J, Tewari US, Venkataraman B. Wear 2001, 249, 702–714.10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00695-0Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Walley SM, Field JE. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 1987, A321, 277–303.10.1098/rsta.1987.0016Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Miyazaki N, Takeda N. Mater. 1993, 27, 21–31.10.1177/002199839302700102Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Miyazaki N, Hamao T. J. Compos Mater. 1994, 28, 871–883.10.1177/002199839402800905Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Harsha AP, Tewari US, Venkataraman B. Wear 2003, 254, 693–712.10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00143-1Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Barkoula NM, Karger-Kocsis J. Wear 2002, 252, 80–87.10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00855-9Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Tewari US, Harsha AP, Hager AM, Friedrich K. Wear 2002, 252, 992–1000.10.1016/S0043-1648(02)00063-7Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Häger A, Friedrich K, Dzenis YA, Paipetis SA. Proceedings of the ICCM-10, Canada Wood Head Publishing Ltd.: Cambridge, 1995, pp 155–162.Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Bagci M, Imrek H, Khalfan OM. J. Tribol. 2015, 137, 011602–011627.10.1115/1.4028226Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Fang L, Sun K, Cen Q. TriboTest 2007, 13,195–206.10.1002/tt.44Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Pool KV, Dharan CKH, Finnie I. Wear 1986, 107, 1–12.10.1016/0043-1648(86)90043-8Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Roy M, Vishwanathan B, Sundararajan G. Wear 1994, 171, 149–161.10.1016/0043-1648(94)90358-1Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Zahavi J, Schmitt GF Jr. Wear 1981, 71, 179–190.10.1016/0043-1648(81)90337-9Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Hutchings IM. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 1992, 25, A212–A221.10.1088/0022-3727/25/1A/033Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Tilly GP, Sage W. Wear 1970, 16, 447–465.10.1016/0043-1648(70)90171-7Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Sundararajan G, Roy M. Tribol. Int. 1997, 30, 339–359.10.1016/S0301-679X(96)00064-3Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Heuer V, Walter G, Hutchings IM. Wear 1999, 225–229, 493–501.10.1016/S0043-1648(98)00373-1Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Mondal DP, Das S, Jha AK, Yegneswaran AH. Wear 1998, 223, 131–138.10.1016/S0043-1648(98)00278-6Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Dundar M, Inal OT. Wear 1999, 224, 226–235.10.1016/S0043-1648(98)00346-9Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Amirthan G, Udayakumar A, Prasad B, Balasubramanian M. Wear 2010, 268, 145–152.10.1016/j.wear.2009.07.007Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Sinmazcelik T, Sari N. Polym. Compos. 2010, 31, 985–994.10.1002/pc.20883Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Kumar S, Satapathy BK, Patnaik A. Mater. Des. 2011, 32, 2260–2268.10.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.019Suche in Google Scholar

[28] Lynn RS, Wong KK, Clark HM. Wear 1991, 149, 55–71.10.1016/0043-1648(91)90364-ZSuche in Google Scholar

[29] Clark HM, Hartwich RB. Wear 2000, 248, 147–161.10.1016/S0043-1648(00)00556-1Suche in Google Scholar

[30] Arjula S, Harsha AP. Polym. Test 2006, 25, 188–196.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.10.009Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Sundararajan G, Roy M, Venkataraman B. Wear 1990, 140, 369–381.10.1016/0043-1648(90)90096-SSuche in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-12-2
Accepted: 2015-2-20
Published Online: 2015-4-1
Published in Print: 2015-11-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Heruntergeladen am 3.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2014-0359/pdf?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen