Titulis oppida capta legam: Storia di un ‘τόπος elegiaco’ da Gallo ad Ovidio

Bibliografia

R. D. Anderson/P. J. Parsons/R. G. M. Nisbet, “Elegiacs by Gallus from Qaṣr Ibrîm”, JRS 69, 1979, 125–155.10.2307/299064Suche in Google Scholar

G. Ballaira, “Per l’autenticità del papiro di C. Cornelio Gallo”, Paideia 42, 1987, 47–54.Suche in Google Scholar

A. Barchiesi, “Notizie sul ‘nuovo Gallo’”, A&R 26, 1981, 153–166.Suche in Google Scholar

H. Bardon, “Les élégies de Cornélius Gallus”, Latomus 8, 1949, 217–228.Suche in Google Scholar

J. Blänsdorf, “Der Gallus-Papyrus – eine Fälschung?”, ZPE 67, 1993, 43–50.Suche in Google Scholar

F. Brunhölzl, “Der sogenannte Galluspapyrus von Kasr Ibrim”, CodMan 10, 1984, 33–37.Suche in Google Scholar

F. Cairns, Sextus Propertius. The Augustan Elegist, Cambridge 2006.Suche in Google Scholar

–, Generic Composition in Greek and Roman Poetry, Ann Arbor ¹⁸2007.Suche in Google Scholar

M. Capasso/P. Radiciotti, Il ritorno di Cornelio Gallo – Il papiro di Qaṣr Ibrîm venticinque anni dopo, Lecce 2004.Suche in Google Scholar

E. Courtney, The Fragmentary Latin Poets, ed. with comm., Oxford 1993.10.1093/oseo/instance.00076637Suche in Google Scholar

G. Cresci Marrone, Ecumene augustea. Una politica per il consenso, Roma 1993.Suche in Google Scholar

F. Cupaiuolo, “La decima ecloga di Virgilio, un problema sempre aperto”, C&S 20, 1981, 50–59.Suche in Google Scholar

G. Danesi Marioni, “Una reminiscenza di Cornelio Gallo nella Consolatio ad Liviam e il tema del trionfo negli elegiaci”, in: V. Tandoi (ed.), Disiecti membra poetae. Studi di poesia latina in frammenti II, Foggia 1985, 93–98.Suche in Google Scholar

G. D’Anna, Virgilio. Saggi critici, Roma 1989.Suche in Google Scholar

I. M. L. M. Du Quesnay, “From Polyphemus to Corydon: Virgil, Eclogue 2 and the Idylls of Theocritus”, in: D. West/T. Woodman (edd.), Creative imitation and Latin literature, Cambridge 1979, 35–70.10.1017/CBO9780511659171.004Suche in Google Scholar

P. Gagliardi, “Per la datazione dei versi di Gallo da Qaṣr Ibrim”, ZPE 171, 2009, 45–63.Suche in Google Scholar

–, “Tandem fecerunt carmina Musae. Sui vv. 6–7 del papiro di Gallo”, Prometheus 36, 2010, 55–86.Suche in Google Scholar

–, “Carmina domina digna: riflessioni sul ruolo della domina nel papiro di Gallo”, MH 69, 2012, 156–176.Suche in Google Scholar

–, Commento alla decima ecloga di Virgilio, Hildesheim/Zürich/New York 2014.Suche in Google Scholar

G. Geraci, Genesi della provincia romana d’Egitto, Bologna 1983.Suche in Google Scholar

G. Giangrande, “An Alleged Fragment of Gallus”, QUCC 34, 1980, 141–153 (= Scripta Minora Alexandrina, 4, Amsterdam 1985, 501–513).10.2307/20538645Suche in Google Scholar

–, “On the Alleged Fragment of Gallus”, in: G. Giangrande (ed.), Corolla Londiniensis, I, Amsterdam 1981, 41–44.Suche in Google Scholar

–, “On the Pseudo-Gallus”, in G. Giangrande (ed.), Corolla Londiniensis, II, Amsterdam 1982, 83–93 (= Giangrande 1982a).Suche in Google Scholar

–, “Hellenistic Features in the Pseudo-Gallus”, in: G. Giangrande (ed.), Corolla Londiniensis, II, Amsterdam 1982, 99–108 (= Giangrande 1982b).Suche in Google Scholar

J. Gómez Pallarès, “The «Reading of Monuments» in Cornelius Gallus’ Fragment”, Philologus 149, 2005, 104–109.10.1524/phil.2005.149.1.104Suche in Google Scholar

A. S. Hollis, Fragments of Roman Poetry, c. 60 BC – AD 20, Oxford/New York 2007.Suche in Google Scholar

G. O. Hutchinson, “Notes on the New Gallus”, ZPE 41, 1981, 37–41.10.1002/phbl.19810370221Suche in Google Scholar

S. T. Kelly, “The Gallus quotation in Virgil’s tenth eclogue”, Vergilius 23, 1977, 17–20.Suche in Google Scholar

B. Luiselli, Studi sulla poesia bucolica, Cagliari 1967.Suche in Google Scholar

A. Luther, “Templa deorum fixa – zum historischen Hintergrund der Gallus–Fragmente aus Qaṣr Ibrîm”, APF 48, 2002, 29–41.10.1515/apf.2002.48.1.29Suche in Google Scholar

S. Mazzarino, “Un nuovo epigramma di Gallus e l’antica «lettura epigrafica» (Un problema di datazione)”, Quad. catanesi di studi classici e medievali 2–3, 1980, 7–50.Suche in Google Scholar

–, “L’iscrizione latina nella trilingue di Philae e i carmi di Gallus scoperti a Qaṣr Ibrîm”, RhM 125, 1982, 312–337.Suche in Google Scholar

J. F. Miller, “Propertius 2,1 and the New Gallus Papyrus”, ZPE 44, 1981, 173–176.Suche in Google Scholar

P. A. Miller, Subjecting Verses: Latin Love Elegy and the Emergence of the Real, Princeton 2004.10.1515/9781400825936Suche in Google Scholar

A. M. Morelli, “Rassegna sul nuovo Gallo”, in: V. Tandoi (ed.), Disiecti membra poetae, Studi di poesia latina in frammenti II, Foggia 1985, 140–183.Suche in Google Scholar

–, “Sulla genuinità del papiro di Gallo”, in: V. Tandoi (ed.), Disiecti membra poetae, Studi di poesia latina in frammenti III, Foggia 1988, 104–119.Suche in Google Scholar

S. Naughton, “On the Syntax of the Pseudo-Gallus”, in: G. Giangrande (ed.), Corolla Londiniensis, I, Amsterdam 1981, 111–112.Suche in Google Scholar

J. K. Newman, “De novo Galli fragmento in Nubia eruto”, Latinitas 28, 1980, 83–94.Suche in Google Scholar

L. Nicastri, Cornelio Gallo e l’elegia ellenistico-romana, Napoli 1984.Suche in Google Scholar

–, “Dalla topica all’ermeneutica. Una risposta a G. Giangrande sul ‘nuovo Gallo’”, GIF 47, 1995, 175–200.Suche in Google Scholar

G. Petersmann, “Cornelius Gallus und der Papyrus von Qaṣr Ibrîm”, ANRW II 30.3, 1983, 1649–1655.10.1515/9783110847048-004Suche in Google Scholar

P. Pinotti, L’elegia latina. Storia di una forma poetica, Roma 2002.Suche in Google Scholar

M. C. J. Putnam, “Propertius and the New Gallus Fragment”, ZPE 39, 1980, 49–56.Suche in Google Scholar

D. O. Ross, Background to Augustan Poetry: Gallus, Elegy and Rome, Cambridge 1975.Suche in Google Scholar

F. Sbordone, “Note al probabile frammento elegiaco di Cornelio Gallo”, RAAN 57, 1982, 57–66.Suche in Google Scholar

H. Schoonhoven, “... si parua licet componere magnis (A Note on the New Gallus Papyrus, 11.3–5)”, ZPE 53, 1983, 76–78.Suche in Google Scholar

J. Van Sickle, “Style and Imitation in the New Gallus”, QUCC 38, 1981, 115–124 (= Van Sickle 1981a).10.2307/20538695Suche in Google Scholar

–, “Neget quis carmina Gallo?”, QUCC 38, 1981, 125–127 (= Van Sickle 1981b).10.2307/20538696Suche in Google Scholar

G. Silagi, “Definitives zu Gallus”, Rechtshistorisches Journal 19, 1999, 357–373.Suche in Google Scholar

F. Skutsch, Aus Vergils Frühzeit, Leipzig 1901.Suche in Google Scholar

–, Gallus und Vergil, Leipzig 1906.Suche in Google Scholar

W. Stroh, “Die Ursprünge der römischen Liebeselegie”, Poetica 15, 1983, 205–246.10.30965/25890530-0150304001Suche in Google Scholar

F. Verducci, “On the Sequence of Gallus’ Epigrams: Molles Elegi, Vasta Triumphi Pondera”, QUCC 45, 1984, 119–136.10.2307/20538812Suche in Google Scholar

R. Whitaker, “Apropos of the New Gallus Fragment”, AClass 24, 1981, 87–96.Suche in Google Scholar

L. P. Wilkinson, “Propertius III 4”, Studi in onore di L. Castiglioni, Firenze 1960, 1091–1103.Suche in Google Scholar

I. C. Yardley, “Gallus in Eclogue 10: Quotation or Adaptation?”, Vergilius 26, 1980, 48–51.Suche in Google Scholar