Abstract
This study discusses the sharing of research data through the Repositori Ilmiah Nasional, the Indonesian national scientific repository, which is managed by the Center for Scientific Data and Documentation, Indonesian Institute of Sciences (Pusat Dokumentasi dan Informasi Ilmiah, Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia, known by the abbreviation PDDI-LIPI). The purpose of this study is to describe the process of research data sharing and identify supporting factors and obstacles faced in that process. This study uses a qualitative approach, with a case study method. Data collection techniques included field observations and observations on the repository system; semi-structured interviews with several informants, including researchers as well as development and librarian teams; and, analysis of policy documents and guidelines. Through these investigations, we discovered that while the Center has developed a new DataVerse repository system to enable research data sharing, there are still several issues that impede the repository from meeting institutional goals for increased data access. There is a need for additional training and socialization of researchers, to encourage and motivate them to share their research data through this service. Additionally, staff members need to gain competence in the management and curation of data. Researchers and librarians involved in research data sharing activities still face various obstacles in the areas of policy, service visibility, and promotion. This research is expected to increase the awareness of researchers, librarians, and repository development teams about each other’s needs and to aid them in collaborating with each other to optimize the sharing of research of data through the repository.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by Hibah PITMA B 2019 funded by DRPM Universitas Indonesia No. NKB-0987/UN2.R3.1/HKP.05.00/2019.
6 Appendix
6.1 Interview Guides
Note: The interview guides were originally made and administered in Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian Language).
Informant A
Name?
Position and Affiliation?
Length of Work?
To what extent do you know about RIN LIPI?
Existing research data in PDDI-LIPI (Types and Amount)?
The benefits of research data sharing?
Research data sharing rationales for the researcher?
Research data sharing methods of PDDI-LIPI researchers?
Five key factors to ensure success of research data sharing?
Potential barriers to sharing research data?
The difference between RIN-LIPI and other institutional repositories?
RIN-LIPI establishment rationale(s)?
Division of responsibilities in managing RIN-LIPI?
Training and socialization that have been done related to research data sharing?
Are the researchers involved in the repository policy formulation process?
Any recommendation(s) to develop RIN-LIPI?
Informants B and C
Name?
Position and Affiliation?
Length of Work?
To what extent do you know about RIN LIPI?
The benefits of research data sharing?
In your opinion, what are the research data sharing rationales for the researcher?
Role of the librarian in the process of sharing research data and developing the RIN system?
Training that you have obtained and followed related to research data sharing?
Is the librarian involved in the repository policy formulation process?
Any recommendation(s) to develop RIN-LIPI?
References
Australian National Data Service. “Data Citation.” https://www.ands.org.au/working-with-data/citation-and-identifiers/data-citation (accessed 4/12/2020).Search in Google Scholar
Borgman, Christine L. “Research Data: Who Will Share What, with Whom, When, and Why?” (October 1, 2010). RatSWD Working Paper, no. 161. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1714427 (accessed 04/13/2020).10.2139/ssrn.1714427Search in Google Scholar
Corti, Louise, Veerle Van den Eynden, Libby Bishop, and Matthew Woolard. Managing and Sharing Research Data: A Guide to Good Practice. London: SAGE Publications, 2014.Search in Google Scholar
Dataverse Project, “Dataset + File Management,” http://guides.dataverse.org/en/latest/user/dataset-management.html (accessed 04/13/2020).Search in Google Scholar
Jones, Catherine. Institutional Repositories: Content and Culture in an Open Access Environment. Oxford, UK: Chandos Publishing, 2007.10.1533/9781780631110Search in Google Scholar
King, Gary. “An Introduction to the Dataverse Network as an Infrastructure for Data Sharing.” Sociological Methods & Research 36.2 (2007): 173–199.10.1177/0049124107306660Search in Google Scholar
Kroes, Neelie. “Opening Science Through e-Infrastructures.” Transcript of speech given at European Federation of Academies of Sciences and Humanities, Rome, Italy, April 11, 2012. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_12_258 (accessed 04/12/2020).Search in Google Scholar
Marlina, Ekawati, Slamet Riyanto, and Yaniasih. “Peran pusat dokumentasi dan informasi dalam pengelolaan data penelitian” (“The Roles of Documentation and Information Center in the Management of Research Data”). Konferensi Internasional Peran Science Mapping dalam Pengembangan Ilmu Pengetahuan di Indonesia (International Conference on Science Mapping and the Development of Science). Bulaksumur Yogyakarta, Universitas Gadjah Mada, April 20–21, 2016.Search in Google Scholar
Pampel, Heinz, and Dallmeier-Tiessen, Sünje. “Open Research Data: From Vision to Practice.” In Opening Science: The Evolving Guide on How the Internet is Changing Research, Collaboration, and Scholarly Publishing, edited by Sönke Bartling and Sascha Friesike, 213–224. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2014.10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_14Search in Google Scholar
Peng, Roger D. “Reproducible Research In Computational Science.” Science 334.6060 (2011): 1226–1227.10.1126/science.1213847Search in Google Scholar
Pennock, Maureen, and Stuart Lewis. “Institutional Repositories: The New University Challenge.” ALISS Quarterly 2.3 (2007): 19–22.Search in Google Scholar
Pusat Data dan Dokumentasi Ilmiah, Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (PDDI-LIPI). “Petunjuk Teknis Pengguna: Pengelolaan Data Ilmiah Melalui Sistem Repositori Ilmiah Nasional” (“User’s Technical Guidance: Research Data Management through National Scientific Repository System”), March, 2019. http://rin.lipi.go.id (accessed May 4, 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Uzwyshyn, Ray. “Research Data Repositories: The What, When, Why, and How.” Infotoday.com (April 2016): 18–21.Search in Google Scholar
Uzwyshyn, Ray. “Developing and Implementing an Online Research Data Repository for Your University or College Campus.” Presentation given at University of San Diego Digital Initiatives Symposium (San Diego, California, May 1–2, 2017). https://digital.sandiego.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1090&context=symposium (accessed 04/13/2020).Search in Google Scholar
Van den Eynden, Veerle, and Libby Bishop. Incentives and Motivations for Sharing Research Data: A Researcher’s Perspective. Bristol, UK: Knowledge Exchange, 2014.Search in Google Scholar
Van den Eynden, Veerle, Louise Corti, Matthew Woollard, Libby Bishop, and Laurence Horton. Managing and Sharing Data: Best Practice for Researchers. 3rd ed. Essex: UK Data Archive, University of Essex, 2011.Search in Google Scholar
Wissik, Tanja, and Matej Ďurčo. “Research Data Workflows: From Research Data Lifecycle Models to Institutional Solutions.” In Selected Papers from the CLARIN Annual Conference 2015, Wrocław, Poland, October 14–16, 2015, 94–107. Linköping, Sweden: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2015.Search in Google Scholar
©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- From the Editor, Karen F. Gracy
- Feature Articles
- Scalable Born Digital Ingest Workflows for Limited Resources: A Case Study for First Steps in Digital Preservation
- The Indonesian National Scientific Repository: A Case Study of Research Data Sharing
- Exploring the Impediments to Digitization and Digital Preservation of Cultural Heritage Resources: A Selective Review
- Book Reviews
- Data Wrangler’s Handbook: Simple Tools for Powerful Results
- Digital Curation Projects Made Easy: A Step-by-Step Guide for Libraries, Archives, and Museums
- The Preservation Management Handbook: A 21st Century Guide for Libraries, Archives, and Museums.
- A Matter of Facts: The Value of Evidence in an Information Age
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- From the Editor, Karen F. Gracy
- Feature Articles
- Scalable Born Digital Ingest Workflows for Limited Resources: A Case Study for First Steps in Digital Preservation
- The Indonesian National Scientific Repository: A Case Study of Research Data Sharing
- Exploring the Impediments to Digitization and Digital Preservation of Cultural Heritage Resources: A Selective Review
- Book Reviews
- Data Wrangler’s Handbook: Simple Tools for Powerful Results
- Digital Curation Projects Made Easy: A Step-by-Step Guide for Libraries, Archives, and Museums
- The Preservation Management Handbook: A 21st Century Guide for Libraries, Archives, and Museums.
- A Matter of Facts: The Value of Evidence in an Information Age