Abstract
The structural characteristics and solid-state fluorescence of coordination compounds formed between the fluorophore N-((3-pyridyl)methyl)-1,8-naphthalimide (3-pn) and a range of divalent metal halides, were investigated. Six new crystal structures, of the formula ML 2 X 2.solv, were obtained through the combination of the organic ligand L = 3-pn with the divalent metal halides CoX2 (X = Cl− or Br−) or ZnX2 (X = Cl− or Br−) in different solvents. It was found that solvent molecules are incorporated into all the structures, and that the same complex can incorporate different solvent molecules. The conformation of the complex molecule is determined by the solvent molecule incorporated into the structure. The fluorescence intensity is affected by the identity of the metal and halido ligand in the complex molecule, while the identity of the solvent molecule and the metal ion affects the emission wavelength. Thus, the solvent of crystallisation impacts on the solid-state fluorescence of the compounds, hence the same complex can be made to fluoresce at different wavelengths depending on the solvent of crystallisation.
Introduction
Fluorescent materials are of interest due to their potential applications as sensors in chemistry, medicine and engineering, and in solid-state lighting and displays [1, 2]. 1,8-Naphthalimide and its derivatives are known for their outstanding fluorescent properties [3]. Due to their chemical-, thermal- and photo-stability, 1,8-naphthalimide derivatives are considered to be one of the most important types of organic light emitting diode (OLED) emitter materials [4]. Applications of 1,8-naphthalimide derivatives also include fluorescent sensors [5], and they have been shown to exhibit selectivity in terms of binding ions [6], a desired property in sensing applications.
The 1,8-naphthalimide moiety is comprised of two aromatic rings connected to an electron deficient imide ring. The polarity of the molecule influences its packing in the solid state, with aromatic- and dipole interactions being important, due to the electron deficient nature of the fluorophore. Various stacking arrangements of the 1,8-naphthalimide portions are possible, with a relatively small energy difference between the different arrangements [7].
The incorporation of the 1,8-naphthalimide moiety into a coordination compound is of interest in the current study. To allow for coordination of the fluorophore to a metal ion, a “linker arm” is attached at the N-imide position of the 1,8-naphthalimide moiety. The 1,8-naphthalimide derivative designed to serve as ligand in this study, N-((3-pyridyl)methyl)-1,8-naphthalimide, abbreviated 3-pn, illustrated in Scheme 1, is an unsymmetric ligand with a donor group on only one side of the molecule, and consists of an aromatic 1,8-naphthalimide moiety and a pyridyl group, joined by a freely rotatable methylene linker, with the nitrogen atom of the pyridyl group functioning as coordination site.

Structure of N-((3-pyridyl)methyl)-1,8-naphthalimide, 3-pn.
1,8-Naphthalimide compounds containing a N-heterocyclic tether linker arm, like the 1,8-naphthalimide derivatives used in this study, are of specific interest due to their ability to exhibit dual fluorescence, which originates from charge transfer due to extended conjugation [8], [9], [10], [11].
Only two related structures of coordination compounds containing 3-pn as organic ligand, in combination with divalent metal halides, have been reported in the literature [Cambridge Structural Database [12] (CSD, Version 5.43, September 2022 update)]. These include the structures formed through the combination of 3-pn with ZnCl2 (CSD refcode UCASEZ [13]) and 3-pn with MnCl2 (CSD refcode UCASAV [13]). The coordination of 3-pn to ZnCl2 results in an isolated coordination complex [13], with the metal ion adopting a tetrahedral geometry, and coordinated to two 3-pn and two chlorido ligands. An acetonitrile molecule is also present in the asymmetric unit. However, the reaction of 3-pn with MnCl2 forms an octahedrally coordinated isolated complex [13] with the coordination sphere consisting of two 3-pn molecules, a methanol ligand, one terminal chlorido ligand and two bridging μ2-chlorido ligands around the Mn(II) ion. The crystal structure of the neutral organic ligand 3-pn has been reported in the literature (CSD refcodes WEZDUB [14] and WEZDUB01 [13]). Protonation of 3-pn results in a 3-picolinium 1,8-naphthalimide cation, 3-pn + , and the structures of this cation, combined with a perchlorate [14] or tetrachlorocuprate(II) [15] anion have been reported, with CSD refcodes WICBEQ and HATRIE respectively.
In the current study, the N-donor organic ligand 3-pn was combined with a range of divalent metal halides to form a series of coordination complexes, in order to construct fluorescent complexes. The coordination of organic ligands that are fluorophores to metal ions, may either enhance or quench the fluorescence of the fluorophore or affect the emission wavelength, depending on the identity of the metal ion [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. In the current family of compounds, the fluorophore was coordinated to both paramagnetic and diamagnetic metal ions to determine their effect on the solid-state fluorescence. To investigate the ability of the structures to incorporate solvent molecules, the self-assembly reactions were performed in a range of different solvents.
We report the crystal structures of six new coordination complexes prepared from the combination of 3-pn and divalent metal halides, including CoX2 (X = Cl−, Br−) and ZnX2 (X = Cl−, Br−), in different solvents, together with their fluorescence properties, with the aim of determining the effect of the metal ion, halido ion and solvent of crystallisation on the structural characteristics and fluorescence properties of the coordination compounds.
Experimental section
Chemicals and reagents
All chemicals were used as purchased without further purification: CoCl2 (98 %, Fluka), CoBr2 (98 %, Sigma Aldrich), ZnCl2 (99.9 %, Sigma Aldrich), ZnBr2 (99 %, Riedel de Haen), 3-(aminomethyl)pyridine (also known as 3-picolylamine) (99 %, Sigma Aldrich), 1,8-naphthalic anhydride (95 %, Sigma Aldrich), CH3OH (99 %, Merck), CHCl3 (99.9 %, Merck), THF (99.9 %, Merck) and CH3CN (99.8 %, Sigma Aldrich).
Synthesis
No attempts were made to optimise the yields of the reactions.
Synthesis of N-((3-pyridyl)methyl)-1,8-naphthalimide, 3-pn
This synthesis was adapted from a literature procedure reported by Sarma et al. [14] To a solution of 1,8-naphthalic anhydride (25.183 mmol, 5.0038 g) in THF (125 ml), 3-(aminomethyl)pyridine (24.969 mmol, 2.7002 g) was added dropwise at room temperature. The solution was stirred for 6 h to afford an off-white precipitate. The precipitate was filtered off and washed with 10 ml of THF, and recrystallized from DMF, a different solvent to the one given in the reference. Yield: 77 %. The experimental powder pattern of 3-pn was matched with the powder pattern calculated from the structures reported in the literature (CSD refcodes WEZDUB [14] and WEZDUB01 [13]) (see Supplementary Information Section 1).
Synthesis of dichloridobis(N-((3-pyridyl)methyl)-1,8-naphthalimide)cobalt(II)·methanol, 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 OH
N-((3-pyridyl)methyl)-1,8-naphthalimide (0.702 mmol, 0.2026 g) was dissolved in 10 ml CHCl3 and the solution was stirred for approximately 15 min in a vial. A buffer layer of CH3OH was carefully layered over the solution of the ligand. CoCl2 (0.650 mmol, 0.0844 g), dissolved in 10 ml CH3OH, was layered over the buffer layer. The vial was covered with a lid and the product was allowed to form at the interphase at room temperature. A batch of blue, plate-like crystals of 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 OH was harvested upon formation. Yield: 36 %.
Synthesis of dibromidobis(N-((3-pyridyl)methyl)-1,8-naphthalimide)cobalt(II)·methanol, 3-pnCoBr·CH 3 OH
N-((3-pyridyl)methyl)-1,8-naphthalimide (0.694 mmol, 0.2000 g) was dissolved in 10 ml CHCl3 and the solution was stirred for 15 min in a vial. A buffer layer of CH3OH was carefully layered over the solution of the ligand. CoBr2 (0.351 mmol, 0.0767 g), dissolved in 10 ml CH3OH, was layered over the buffer layer. The vial was closed with a lid and the product was allowed to form at the interphase at room temperature. A batch of blue, plate-like crystals of 3-pnCoBr·CH 3 OH was harvested upon formation. Yield: 23 %.
Synthesis of dichloridobis(N-((3-pyridyl)methyl)-1,8-naphthalimide)zinc(II)·methanol, 3-pnZnCl·CH 3 OH
N-((3-pyridyl)methyl)-1,8-naphthalimide (0.702 mmol, 0.2023 g) was dissolved in 10 ml CHCl3 and the solution was stirred for 15 min in a vial. A buffer layer of CH3OH was carefully layered over the solution of the ligand. ZnCl2 (0.350 mmol, 0.0478 g), dissolved in 10 ml CH3OH, was layered over the buffer layer. The vial was covered with a lid and the product was allowed to form at the interphase at room temperature. A batch of colourless, plate-like crystals of 3-pnZnCl·CH 3 OH was harvested upon formation. Yield: 36 %.
Synthesis of dibromidobis(N-((3-pyridyl)methyl)-1,8-naphthalimide)zinc(II)·methanol, 3-pnZnBr·CH 3 OH
N-((3-pyridyl)methyl)-1,8-naphthalimide (0.700 mmol, 0.2004 g) was dissolved in 10 ml CH3OH and the solution was stirred for 15 min. ZnBr2 (0.348 mmol, 0.0784 g), dissolved in 15 ml of CH3OH, was added dropwise to the ligand solution. The beaker was covered with a lid and the product was allowed to form slowly at room temperature. A batch of colourless, needle-like crystals of 3-pnZnBr·CH 3 OH was formed. Yield: 29 %.
Synthesis of dichloridobis(N-((3-pyridyl)methyl)-1,8-naphthalimide)cobalt(II)·acetonitrile, 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 CN
N-((3-pyridyl)methyl)-1,8-naphthalimide (0.698 mmol, 0.2013 g) was dissolved in 10 ml CHCl3 and the solution was stirred for about 15 min in a vial. A buffer layer of CH3CN was carefully layered over the solution of the ligand. CoCl2 (0.635 mmol, 0.0825 g), dissolved in 10 ml of CH3CN, was layered over the buffer layer. The vial was covered with a lid and the product was allowed to form at the interphase at room temperature. A batch of blue, plate-like crystals of 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 CN was harvested upon formation. Yield: 42 %.
Synthesis of dibromidobis(N-((3-pyridyl)methyl)-1,8-naphthalimide)zinc(II)·chloroform, 3-pnZnBr·CHCl 3
N-((3-pyridyl)methyl)-1,8-naphthalimide (0.703 mmol, 0.2027 g) was dissolved in 10 ml CHCl3 and the solution was stirred for a few minutes in a vial. A buffer layer of CH3OH was carefully layered over the solution of the ligand. ZnBr2 (0.347 mmol, 0.0782 g), dissolved in 10 ml CH3OH, was layered over the buffer layer. The vial was covered with a lid and the product was allowed to form at the interphase at room temperature. A batch of colourless, rod-like crystals of 3-pnZnBr·CHCl 3 was harvested upon formation. Yield: 31 %.
Instrumental studies
Single crystal X-ray diffraction
Single crystal X-ray diffraction data for structures 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 OH, 3-pnCoBr·CH 3 OH, 3-pnZnCl·CH 3 OH, 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 CN and 3-pnZnBr·CHCl 3 were collected on a Bruker D8 Venture diffractometer, with a Photon 100 CMOS detector, at 150(2) K, employing a combination of ϕ and ω scans. Monochromatic MoK-α radiation of wavelength 0.71073 Å, from an Iμs source, was used as the irradiation source. Cooling was achieved using an Oxford Cryogenics Cryostat. Data reduction was performed using the software SAINT+ [26] and absorption corrections were performed using SADABS [27] as part of the APEX II suite [28].
Single crystal X-ray diffraction data for structure 3-pnZnBr·CH 3 OH were collected on a Rigaku XtaLAB Synergy R diffractometer, with a HyPix CCD detector at 150(2) K using ω scans and a rotating-anode X-ray source. Monochromatic Mo radiation of wavelength 0.71073 Å, was employed as the irradiation source for this structure. Cooling was achieved using an Oxford Cryogenics Cryostat. Data reduction and absorption was carried out using the CrysAlisPro (Version 1.171.40.23a) software package [29].
All the crystal structures were solved either by direct methods or intrinsic phasing using SHELX-2013 [30], as part of the WinGX suite [31]. Structure refinements were done using SHELXL [32] in WinGX [31] as GUI. Graphics and publication material were generated using Mercury 3.5 [33] and PLATON [34]. In all the structures the hydrogen atoms were placed in calculated positions, with U iso(H) = 1.5U eq (parent atom).
Powder X-ray diffraction
Powder X-ray diffraction patterns were measured at room temperature on a Bruker D2 Phaser powder diffractometer, employing a Si low-background sample holder, and experimental powder patterns of bulk samples were compared with powder patterns calculated from single crystal structures using the software DiffractWD [35]. Calculated and experimental power patterns are included in Section 1 of the Supplementary Information Section.
Solid-state fluorescence spectra
The solid-state fluorescence spectra were collected at room temperature under ambient conditions employing a Horiba Fluoromax-4 spectrofluorometer, fitted with a xenon lamp light source and a photomultiplier detector. The optical system was a plane-grating Czery–Turner monochromator, with a wavelength range of 200–950 nm. A front entrance and exit slit of 5.00 nm band pass was used for both excitation and emission spectra. Ground samples of the coordination compounds and the organic ligand were sandwiched between two glass microscope slides, and measured at a 45° geometry. In order to minimise scattering caused by re-absorption of the emitted light, which may affect the solid-state spectra, the samples were prepared to be as thin as possible, while still being uniform [36].
Results and discussion
Crystallographic discussion of structures
Six new crystal structures containing 3-pn organic ligands and halido ligands coordinated to divalent metal cations were determined, as illustrated in Scheme 2. All the compounds were found to contain solvent molecules in the crystal structure. These solvent-containing structures will be abbreviated as 3-pnMX.solv as shown in Scheme 2, with 3-pn indicating the organic ligand, M the divalent metal ion, X the halido ligand and solv the solvent present in the structure. Note that the abbreviation does not indicate the relative stoichiometry of the components. The Zn-containing crystals were colourless as a result of the d10 metal ion configuration, while the blue colour of the Co-containing crystals are due to d-d transitions. The observed blue colour of the Co(II) complexes is typical for tetrahedral Co(II) complexes due to absorption in the red region of the visible spectrum, as a result of ligand field splitting [37].

Coordination compounds synthesised and characterised in this study.
The reaction of 3-pn with Co(II) and Zn(II) halides resulted in the formation of zero-dimensional coordination compounds of composition [ML 2 X 2].solv with L = 3-pn. In all the structures, the metal ion adopts a distorted tetrahedral geometry, with two halido ligands and two crystallographically independent 3-pn organic ligands coordinated to the metal ion. The complexes 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 OH, 3-pnCoBr·CH 3 OH, 3-pnZnCl·CH 3 OH and 3-pnZnBr·CH 3 OH were found to be isostructural and will be discussed together. Structures 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 CN and 3-pnZnBr·CHCl 3 are different from the structures in the isostructural family and from each other.
The crystallographic parameters of all the structures are listed in Table 1. Selected bond lengths, angles, torsion angles and other geometric parameters are listed in Table S2.1, and strong hydrogen bonding interactions in Table S2.2 in the Supplementary Information Section 2. The asymmetric units are illustrated in Fig. 1.
Crystallographic parameters and refinement results for compounds containing the organic ligand 3-pn.
Structure | 3-pnCoCl·CH3OH | 3-pnCoBr·CH3OH | 3-pnZnCl·CH3OH | 3-pnZnBr·CH3OH |
---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical formula | [CoCl2(C18H12N2O2)2]·0.29(CH3OH) | [CoBr2(C18H12N2O2)2]·0.40(CH3OH) | [ZnCl2(C18H12N2O2)2]·0.27(CH3OH) | [ZnBr2(C18H12N2O2)2]·0.33(CH3OH) |
Formula weight/g mol−1 | 715.52 | 803.63 | 721.47 | 807.19 |
Temperature/K | 150(2) | 150(2) | 150(2) | 150(2) |
Wavelength/Å | 0.71073 | 0.71073 | 0.71073 | 0.71073 |
Crystal system | Triclinic | Triclinic | Triclinic | Triclinic |
Space group |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Unit cell dimensions | ||||
|
||||
a/Å | 7.4520(11) | 7.4819(6) | 7.4602(6) | 7.4826(3) |
b/Å | 14.092(2) | 14.2034(10) | 14.0706(13) | 14.1943(7) |
c/Å | 15.084(2) | 15.1755(11) | 15.0992(15) | 15.1552(7) |
α/° | 80.948(5) | 81.937(2) | 80.935(4) | 82.025(4) |
β/° | 77.686(5) | 76.915(2) | 77.704(3) | 77.058(4) |
γ/° | 87.995(5) | 88.721(3) | 87.869(3) | 88.732(3) |
Volume/Å3 | 1528.3(4) | 1555.2(2) | 1529.2(2) | 1553.51(13) |
Z | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Density (calculated)/Mg/m3 | 1.556 | 1.716 | 1.567 | 1.726 |
Absorption coefficient/mm−1 | 0.787 | 3.171 | 1.029 | 3.412 |
F(000) | 732 | 804 | 737.6 | 806.4 |
Crystal size/mm3 | 0.070 × 0.320 × 0.480 | 0.101 × 0.135 × 0.169 | 0.113 × 0.138 × 0.218 | 0.018 × 0.018 × 0.120 |
Theta range for data collection/° | 2.80–26.46 | 2.78–26.46 | 2.79–26.53 | 1.865–28.620 |
Reflections collected | 44,810 | 46,299 | 45,187 | 16,939 |
Independent reflections | 6349 [R(int) = 0.0398] | 6488 [R(int) = 0.0448] | 6406 [R(int) = 0.1570] | 5562 [R(int) = 0.0735] |
Completeness to θ (%) | 99.9 | 99.9 | 99.9 | 99.9 |
Max. and min. transmission | 0.332 and 0.278 | 0.646 and 0.562 | 0.745 and 0.629 | 1.000 and 0.214 |
Data/restraints/parameters | 6349/1/444 | 6488/1/445 | 6406/1/416 | 5562/1/415 |
Goodness-of-fit on F 2 | 1.036 | 1.028 | 0.975 | 1.068 |
Final R indices [I > 2σ(I)] | R1 = 0.0309, wR2 = 0.0770 | R1 = 0.0282, wR2 = 0.0614 | R1 = 0.0333, wR2 = 0.0765 | R1 = 0.0668, wR2 = 0.1224 |
R indices (all data) | R1 = 0.0423, wR2 = 0.0815 | R1 = 0.0409, wR2 = 0.0657 | R1 = 0.0904, wR2 = 0.0842 | R1 = 0.1084, wR2 = 0.1338 |
Largest diff. peak and hole/e·Å−3 | 0.437 and −0.547 | 1.236 and −0.954 | 0.652 and −0.679 | 1.087 and −0.920 |
Structure | 3-pnCoCl·CH3CN | 3-pnZnBr·CHCl3 | ||
Empirical formula | [CoCl2(C18H12N2O2)2]·(CH3CN) | [ZnBr2(C18H12N2O2)2]·0.55(CHCl3) | ||
Formula weight/g mol−1 | 743.78 | 867.32 | ||
Temperature/K | 150(2) | 150(2) | ||
Wavelength/Å | 0.71073 | 0.71073 | ||
Crystal system | Monoclinic | Orthorhombic | ||
Space group | C2/c | Pnma | ||
|
||||
Unit cell dimensions | ||||
|
||||
a/Å | 10.4369(6) | 7.5281(7) | ||
b/Å | 11.0278(6) | 26.504(3) | ||
c/Å | 28.4861(19) | 16.891(2) | ||
α/° | 90 | 90 | ||
β/° | 94.699(3) | 90 | ||
γ/° | 90 | 90 | ||
Volume/Å3 | 3267.6(3) | 3370.2(6) | ||
Z | 4 | 4 | ||
Density (calculated)/Mg/m3 | 1.526 | 1.709 | ||
Absorption coefficient/mm−1 | 0.741 | 3.278 | ||
F(000) | 1532.4 | 1727.4 | ||
Crystal size/mm3 | 0.164 × 0.221 × 0.340 | 0.050 × 0.090 x 0.480 | ||
Theta range for data collection/° | 2.692–26.413 | 2.41 to 26.39 | ||
Reflections collected | 95,021 | 51,755 | ||
Independent reflections | 3373 [R(int) = 0.0736] | 3575 [R(int) = 0.0561] | ||
Completeness to θ (%) | 99.9 | 99.8 | ||
Max. and min. transmission | 0.7454 and 0.719 | 0.490 and 0.382 | ||
Data/restraints/parameters | 3373/45/250 | 3575/0/212 | ||
Goodness-of-fit on F 2 | 1.191 | 1.093 | ||
Final R indices [I > 2σ(I)] | R1 = 0.0613, wR2 = 0.1429 | R1 = 0.0556, wR2 = 0.1511 | ||
R indices (all data) | R1 = 0.0736, wR2 = 0.1499 | R1 = 0.0677, wR2 = 0.1614 | ||
Largest diff. Peak and hole/e·Å−3 | 0.35 and −1.06 | 2.541 and −2.843 |

Asymmetric units of structures (a) 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 OH (also a representative of the asymmetric unit of the isostructural structures 3-pnCoBr·CH 3 OH, 3-pnZnCl·CH 3 OH and 3-pnZnBr·CH 3 OH) (b) 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 CN and (c) 3-pnZnBr·CHCl 3 . Ellipsoids are drawn at the 50 % probability level.
Isostructural series: 3-pnCoCl·CH3OH, 3-pnCoBr·CH3OH, 3-pnZnCl·CH3OH and 3-pnZnBr·CH3OH
The structures 3-pnCoCl·CH
3
OH, 3-pnCoBr·CH
3
OH, 3-pnZnCl·CH
3
OH and 3-pnZnBr·CH
3
OH are isostructural, crystallising in the triclinic space group
Structure 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 OH will be discussed in detail, and is representative of the rest of the structures in the isostructural series. The crystallographically independent organic 3-pn ligands will be distinguished according to their pyridyl nitrogen atoms, with ligand 1 containing atom N(1) and ligand 2, atom N(3). The complex adopts a twisted conformation, with one of the 3-pn ligands, ligand 2, folding over, with the oxygen atom of the folded ligand accepting a hydrogen bond from a methanol solvent molecule, as shown in Fig. 2a. The second organic ligand, ligand 1, exhibits an extended conformation. The angle between the pyridyl plane and naphthalimide plane is indicative of the conformation of the 3-pn ligand. In the methanol-containing structures, this angle ranges from 71.89° to 72.92° for ligand 1, and from 62.55° to 63.72° for ligand 2, indicating the difference in conformation between ligand 1 and ligand 2.

(a) Complex 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 OH, illustrating the hydrogen bond between the methanol solvent molecule and the complex molecule. (b) Dimeric unit consisting of two complex molecules connected by aromatic interactions, and two methanol molecules. (c) Packing of methanol solvent molecules in cavities in the structure. (d) Layered structure of 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 OH viewed down the b-axis. (e) Aromatic stack in structure 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 OH showing aromatic interactions between the 13-membered rings. Note that structure 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 OH is representative of the structures in the isostructural series.
The M(II) ions display a distorted tetrahedral geometry with the N-M-N angle increasing when the halido ligand changes from chlorido to bromido while the X-M-X angle is mainly unaffected (see Table S2.1 for values).
A dimeric unit is formed between two complex molecules and two solvent molecules, as illustrated in Fig. 2b. Cavities containing the methanol solvent molecules are formed by complex molecules, as shown in Fig. 2c.
The packing diagram of structure 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 OH, viewed down the b-axis, is illustrated in Fig. 2d. A layered structure, consisting of alternating layers of stacked, interdigitated 1,8-naphthalimide groups and layers containing the pyridyl groups and the metal halido portion, is formed. The naphthtalimide moieties pack approximately parallel, forming a slipped stack, in which ligand 1 and ligand 2 alternate, with alternating centroid-to-centroid distances ranging from 71.89° to 72.94° for ligand 1 and from 62.55° to 63.72° for ligand 2 (see Table S2.1 in Supplementary Information Section 2), indicating weak interactions between aromatic groups, as illustrated in Fig. 2e.
Structure 3-pnCoCl·CH3CN
Structure 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 CN crystallises in space group C2/c and its asymmetric unit comprises one 3-pn ligand and one chlorido ligand coordinated to the Co(II) ion, as well as a very disordered acetonitrile molecule, as shown in Fig. 1. The chlorido ligand is disordered over two positions, with occupancies of 0.54 and 0.46, and the Co(II) metal ion is located on a two-fold rotation axis, which generates the rest of the molecule, as shown in Fig. 3a.
![Fig. 3:
(a) Complex molecule in structure 3-pnCoCl·CH
3
CN. (b) Packing of solvent and complex molecules in structure 3-pnCoCl·CH
3
CN. (c) Packing of structure 3-pnCoCl·CH
3
CN viewed down the a-axis. (d) Aromatic interactions between 3-pn groups in structure 3-pnCoCl·CH
3
CN. (e) Packing of structure UCASEZ [13] viewed down the a-axis.](/document/doi/10.1515/pac-2022-1115/asset/graphic/j_pac-2022-1115_fig_003.jpg)
(a) Complex molecule in structure 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 CN. (b) Packing of solvent and complex molecules in structure 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 CN. (c) Packing of structure 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 CN viewed down the a-axis. (d) Aromatic interactions between 3-pn groups in structure 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 CN. (e) Packing of structure UCASEZ [13] viewed down the a-axis.
The metal ion exhibits a distorted tetrahedral geometry with the Cl–Co–Cl angle having the largest value, while the N-M-N angle exhibits the smallest value. The CH3CN solvent molecules pack between the complex molecules in the structure. A layered structure is formed, as illustrated in Fig. 3b, c, with the CH3CN solvent molecules and metal halido portion of the complex comprising one type of layer, while the 3-pn portion of the complex molecules form a second type of layer. When viewed down the a-axis, the complexes in neighbouring layers alternate in orientation, as shown in Fig. 3c. The naphthalimide moieties pack approximately parallel, in a slipped stack, with the complexes zippered together by aromatic interactions, as illustrated in Fig. 3d. Centroid-to-centroid distances between the naphthalimide moieties alternate between 3.759 and 3.933 Å, indicating weak aromatic interactions between the naphthalimide groups.
The crystal structure of the ZnCl2 analogue of 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 CN has been reported in the literature, with CSD [12] reference code UCASEZ [13], and is isostructural to structure 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 CN, as illustrated in Fig. 3c, e.
Structure 3-pnZnBr·CHCl3
Structure 3-pnZnBr·CHCl 3 crystallises in space group Pnma and its asymmetric unit comprises half a Zn(II) metal centre, to which two half bromido ligands and a 3-pn ligand are coordinated, with the 3-pn ligand coordinating via the pyridyl nitrogen atom. The Zn(II) ion and bromido ligands lie on a mirror plane, and reflection across this mirror plane generates the rest of the complex molecule. Half a disordered chloroform solvent molecule is also present in the asymmetric unit, as shown in Fig. 1, with the carbon atom, one of the chlorine atoms and the hydrogen atom of the chloroform molecule located on a mirror plane. Reflection across the mirror plane generates the full chloroform molecule. The occupancy of the chloroform molecule was refined separately from the complex molecule, yielding an occupancy of 0.549(6).
Two 3-pn organic ligands and two bromido ligands are coordinated to the distorted tetrahedral metal ion, as shown in Fig. 4a. Due to the symmetry of the complex, the angle between the pyridyl plane and naphthalimide plane is the same for both 3-pn ligands, with a value of 56.95°.

(a) Complex molecule in structure 3-pnZnBr·CHCl 3 . (b) Dimeric unit consisting of two complex molecules and two solvent molecules. (c) Channel containing solvent molecules. (d) Alternating orientation of chloroform molecules in channel. (e) Packing diagram of structure 3-pnZnBr·CHCl 3 , viewed down the a-axis.
Two complex molecules and two chloroform solvent molecules pack to form a dimeric unit in which the two solvent molecules are encapsulated by the complex molecules, as shown in Fig. 4b. Packing of this dimeric unit along the a-direction results in channels formed by the complex molecules, with the solvent molecules contained in the channels, as illustrated in Fig. 4c. In a channel, neighbouring solvent molecules alternate in orientation, as illustrated in Fig. 4d. One of the bromido ligands coordinated to the Zn(II) ion is located on the inside of the channel, while the second bromido ligand points to the outside of the channel. Weak C–H … Br–Zn hydrogen bonding interactions are formed between the chloroform molecules and the halido ligands of the complex molecules on the channel surface.
Figure 4e shows the packing diagram of structure 3-pnZnBr·CHCl 3 as viewed down the a-axis, and illustrates the solvent-filled channels. The naphthalimide groups pack in layers, with the metal halide portion, pyridyl groups and solvent molecules packing in a second layer, resulting in a layered structure.
Discussion of 3-pnMX.solvent structures
In all six new complexes, solvent molecules were included in the crystal lattice. It was found that the same complex could crystallise with different solvent molecules in the crystal lattice, depending on the solvent of crystallisation employed, and that different conformations are adopted by these complexes, to accommodate the solvent molecules in the crystal structure.
A distorted tetrahedral geometry is displayed by all the metal centres, and the 1,8-naphthalimide portion of the coordinated ligands is fairly rigid, but rotational flexibility around the M−N bond and the methylene group allows the complexes a degree of conformational flexibility.
In general, all the complexes containing the same solvent form isostructural structures, and thus show a similar geometry, packing of the complex and packing of the solvent molecules. The same conformation is adopted by complex molecules in all the structures containing methanol solvent, namely structures 3-pnCoX·CH 3 OH and 3-pnZnX·CH 3 OH, with X = Cl− and Br−, as is evident from the overlay of the complex molecules as shown in Fig. 5a, The complex molecule in structure 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 CN, as well as the complex molecule in its ZnCl2 analogue, UCASEZ [13], adopt the same conformation, as illustrated by the overlay in Fig. 5b.
![Fig. 5:
(a) Overlay of 3-pnMX·CH
3
OH complex molecules. Red: M = Co, X = Cl, blue: M = Co, X = Br, green: M = Zn, X = Cl, black: M = Zn, X = Br. (b) Overlay of complex molecule in structure 3-pnCoCl·CH
3
CN and UCASEZ [13]. Red: 3-pnCoCl·CH
3
CN, black: complex in UCASEZ [13]. (c) overlay of complex molecule in UCASEZ [13] (green), 3-pnZnBr·CHCl
3
(red) and 3-pnZnBr·CH
3
OH (black).](/document/doi/10.1515/pac-2022-1115/asset/graphic/j_pac-2022-1115_fig_005.jpg)
(a) Overlay of 3-pnMX·CH 3 OH complex molecules. Red: M = Co, X = Cl, blue: M = Co, X = Br, green: M = Zn, X = Cl, black: M = Zn, X = Br. (b) Overlay of complex molecule in structure 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 CN and UCASEZ [13]. Red: 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 CN, black: complex in UCASEZ [13]. (c) overlay of complex molecule in UCASEZ [13] (green), 3-pnZnBr·CHCl 3 (red) and 3-pnZnBr·CH 3 OH (black).
Comparison of the conformations of these six complexes show that overall three different conformations are exhibited, as illustrated in Fig. 5c. The complexes in the methanol-containing structures exhibit a specific conformation, while the complexes in the acetonitrile-containing structures exhibit a second conformation, and the complex in the chloroform containing structure exhibits a third conformation. In the conformation of the complex adopted in the structure 3-pnZnBr.CHCl 3 , shown in red in Fig. 5c, the orientation of one of the 3-pn ligands is similar to the orientation of the ligand in the acetonitrile structures, however, overall geometry of the complex is different.
It can be concluded that the conformation of the complex molecule, and the packing in the solid state, can be controlled through the choice of solvent from which the complex is crystallised. This effect is independent from the identity of the metal halide component, since the same conformation and packing is displayed regardless of the MX2 portion of the complex, provided that the same solvent molecule is present in the structure, as can be seen in the family of structures 3-pnCoX·CH 3 OH and 3-pnZnX·CH 3 OH, with X = Cl− and Br−.
In addition, the same complex molecule can display different conformations to accommodate different solvent molecules into the structure, as evidenced when comparing the structures 3-pnZnBr·CH 3 OH and 3-pnZnBr·CHCl 3 .
Comparison with related literature structures
It is informative to compare the structures determined in this study with related structures reported in the literature, including the parent ligand 3-pn (WEZDUB [14], WEZDUB01 [13]) and the ZnCl2 analogue of 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 CN (UCASEZ [13]), which will be abbreviated 3-pnZnCl·CH 3 CN. Structures containing the protonated version of 3-pn, thus a 3-picolinium 1,8-naphthalimide cation (3-pn + ), will also be included in the comparison. These structures include the combination of 3-pn + with a tetrachlorocuprate(II) anion, with dichloromethane solvent (HATRIE [15]), abbreviated 3-pn + CuCl·CH 2 Cl 2 , and the perchlorate salt of 3-pn + (WICBEQ [14]), abbreviated 3-pn + ·ClO 4 .
Firstly, the comparison will focus on the 3-pn parent compound, as well as the 3-pn and 3-pn + portions of the structures reported here and in the literature. Table S2.2 lists the angle between the naphthalimide plane and the pyridyl plane, as well as the N naphthalimide–C–C–Cpyridyl torsion angles for the 3-pn moieties in the different structures. Where two 3-pn moieties are present in a structure, two values are listed. The angle between the naphthalimide plane and pyridyl plane ranges from 54.87° to 74.18° across the different structures. In the structures of the pure 3-pn ligand (WEZDUB [14], WEZDUB01 [13]), this angle has the largest value of 74°. The smallest angle between the planes (54.87°) is observed for one of the cations in structure 3-pn + ·ClO 4 (WICBEQ [14]). Thus, some variation in the conformation of the 3-pn moiety is observed across the different structures, with the 3-pn molecule showing the largest angle between the planes, which decreases on coordination or the formation of a 3-pn + cation.
Sarma et al. [14] used theoretical calculations to determine the N naphthalimide–C–C–Cpyridyl torsion angles of the most stable conformer of the isolated 3-pn molecule, and found them to be 47.0 and 131.3°. The experimental values of this angle listed in Table S2.2 for the different crystal structures show that the experimental torsion angles differ significantly from this theoretical value. As concluded by Sarma et al. [14], this indicates that non-covalent interactions play a significant role in determining the conformation of the 3-pn moiety.
Due to the presence of the naphthalimide portion and the pyridyl moiety, aromatic interactions are important non-covalent interactions in these structures, and are worth considering when comparing the structures. In the structure of 3-pn (WEZDUB [14]) pairs of 3-pn molecules interact through π–π interactions with a centroid-to-centroid distance of 3.686 Å, and edge-to-face C–H ⋯ π interactions (H ⋯ centroid distance 2.745 Å) to form a parallel fourfold aryl embrace (P4AE) [40] dimer, as illustrated in Fig. 6a. Neighbouring dimers pack to form a stack, with a centroid-to-centroid distance of 5.568 Å. A P4AE dimer is also formed in structure 3-pn + CuCl·CH 2 Cl 2 [15], as illustrated in Fig. 6b with a centroid-to-centroid distance of 4.015 Å and a H ⋯ centroid distance of 2.806 Å. Two single 3-pn + cations stack on both sides of the dimer, at centroid-to-centroid distance of 3.878 Å, with a disordered dichloromethane molecule completing the stack. This pattern repeats throughout the structure. In structure 3-pn + ·ClO 4 two crystallographically independent 3-pn + cations are present. One type of cation forms a centrosymmetric, head-to-tail dimer, with a centroid to centroid distance of 4.253 Å, with neighbouring dimers of the same cation stacking with a centroid-to-centroid distance of 5.851 Å, as illustrated in Fig. 6c. The second cation forms a head-to-tail centrosymmetric dimer, with a centroid-to-centroid distance of 3.600 Å, shown in Fig. 6d. In structures 3-pnZnCl·CH 3 CN (UCASEZ [13]) and 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 CN, the complex molecules pack in a head-to-tail fashion, forming a stack of naphthalimide moieties, shown in Fig. 6e with centroid-to-centroid distances alternating between 3.740 Å and 3.927 Å in structure 3-pnZnCl·CH 3 CN and values listed in Table S2.1 for structure 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 CN. In structure 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 OH, which is representative of the structures in the isostructural series, the twisted conformation of the molecule results in stacking of the naphthalimide groups, as illustrated in Fig. 6f, with alternating centroid-to-centroid distances listed in Table S2.1. In the stack, the planes of the naphthalimide groups are rotated by approximately 40°. The naphthalimide rings in structure 3-pnZnBr·CHCl 3 form a slipped stack, illustrated in Fig. 6g, with large centroid-to-centroid distances of 5.571 Å and 7.528 Å, where pairs of neighbouring naphthalimide moieties point in the same direction.
![Fig. 6:
Aromatic interactions in structures (a) 3-pn, (b) 3-pn
+
CuCl·CH
2
Cl
2
, (c) 3-pn
+
·ClO
4
(cation 1), (d) 3-pn
+
·ClO
4
(cation 2), (e) 3-pnZnCl·CH
3
CN (UCASEZ [13]), which is also representative of structure 3-pnCoCl·CH
3
CN, (f) 3-pnCoCl·CH
3
OH (which is also representative of the rest of the structures in the isostructural series) and (g) 3-pnZnBr·CHCl
3
.](/document/doi/10.1515/pac-2022-1115/asset/graphic/j_pac-2022-1115_fig_006.jpg)
Aromatic interactions in structures (a) 3-pn, (b) 3-pn + CuCl·CH 2 Cl 2 , (c) 3-pn + ·ClO 4 (cation 1), (d) 3-pn + ·ClO 4 (cation 2), (e) 3-pnZnCl·CH 3 CN (UCASEZ [13]), which is also representative of structure 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 CN, (f) 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 OH (which is also representative of the rest of the structures in the isostructural series) and (g) 3-pnZnBr·CHCl 3 .
Solid-state fluorescence studies
The solid-state fluorescence spectra of the ligand 3-pn and the coordination complexes were measured at room temperature under ambient conditions. The excitation wavelength was optimised for each compound and these wavelengths are listed in Table 2, together with the emission wavelengths. Fig. 7 shows the fluorescence spectra of all the complexes, as well as that of the 3-pn molecule.
Fluorescence excitation and emission wavelengths for 3-pn and the complexes.
Compound | Fluorescence excitation wavelength (nm) | Fluorescence emission wavelength(s) (nm) | Shift of emission maximum compared to 3-pn emission |
---|---|---|---|
3-Pn | 370 | 466 | – |
3-pnCoCl·CH3OH | 365 | 401/451 | Blue shift |
3-pnCoBr·CH3OH | 365 | 401/451 | Blue shift |
3-pnZnCl·CH3OH | 371 | 420/435 | Blue shift |
3-pnZnBr·CH3OH | 374 | 415/436 | Blue shift |
3-pnCoCl·CH3CN | 367 | 416 | Blue shift |
3-pnZnBr·CHCl3 | 363 | 401/422/455 | Blue shift |

Fluorescence spectra of the 3-pnMX.solv complexes, as well as the 3-pn molecule.
The ligand 3-pn exhibits a single broad emission band with a maximum emission peak at 466 nm, thus emitting in the blue region. The maximum emission peaks of all the complexes are blue shifted relative to that of the 3-pn molecule, and fall within the range of 401–455 nm, thus either in the violet or blue region of the visible spectrum.
It can be seen in Fig. 7 that compounds 3-pnZnCl·CH 3 OH and 3-pnZnBr·CH 3 OH show similar emission peaks, with the maximum emission wavelength falling in the region 435–436 nm, indicating emission in the violet region. A shoulder is observed in the emission spectra of 3-pnZnCl·CH 3 OH and 3-pnZnBr·CH 3 OH at 420 nm and 415 nm respectively. The complex 3-pnZnBr·CHCl 3 shows a maximum emission peak at 455 nm (blue region) and two shoulders, at 401 and 422 nm, respectively, and is the only complex that shows significant fluorescence enhancement relative to 3-pn. The rest of the Zn-containing complexes, 3-pnZnCl·CH 3 OH, 3-pnZnBr·CH 3 OH, 3-pnZnBr·DMF, show slight enhancement of emission intensity compared to 3-pn.
The fluorescence of complexes 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 CN, 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 OH and 3-pnCoBr·CH 3 OH is significantly quenched relative to that of 3-pn, with an emission maximum at 416 nm for 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 CN and 401 nm for both 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 OH and 3-pnCoBr·CH 3 OH, indicating emission in the violet region.
When a fluorophore is coordinated to a metal ion, charge transfer interactions may occur between the fluorophore and the metal ion, which may result in a shift of the emission maximum relative to that of the uncoordinated fluorophore. In addition, quenching or enhancement of the fluorescence of the complex may occur relative to that of the fluorophore. The identity of the coordinated metal ion determines which of these effects occur for a specific complex. Satellite ligands coordinated to the metal ion, for example the halido ligand in the current family of compounds, may also affect the emission intensity of the complex.
Rurack [41] reported that the fluorescence behaviour of complexes comprised of fluorophores coordinated to transition metal ions can be divided into three categories. Firstly complexes with lighter diamagnetic metal ions like Zn(II) often exhibit fluorescence enhancement relative to the fluorophore on its own. Secondly, complexes containing heavier diamagnetic ions such as Hg(II) exhibit weaker fluorescence, or fluorescence quenching, due to the heavy atom effect and thirdly complexes with paramagnetic ions show significant quenching due to the paramagnetic effect. This is attributed to charge transfer interactions between the metal ion and the fluorophore. When present, a halido ligand also has an effect on the intensity of the fluorescence of the complex, due to the heavy ion effect [42, 43], with a bromido ligand quenching the fluorescence more than a chlorido ligand [38, 39]. The observed fluorescence of the complexes in the current study can be explained through a combination of these factors.
The methanol containing compounds, which are all isostructural, differ only in the identity of their metal ions and halido ligands. The emission of 3-pnZnBr·CH 3 OH is slightly more quenched than that of 3-pnZnCl·CH 3 OH, due to the bromido ligand being heavier than the chlorido ligand, but both compounds show overall enhancement of fluorescence compared to 3-pn, due to coordination to the diamagnetic Zn(II) metal ion. The emission of 3-pnCoBr·CH 3 OH is quenched slightly more than that of 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 OH, due to the heavier bromido ligand, with the emission of both compounds significantly quenched relative to that of 3-pn and 3-pnZnX·CH 3 OH as a result of the paramagnetic Co(II) ion. All four methanol-containing compounds exhibit dual emission, as evidenced by the shoulders in their emission spectra. The emission maxima and shoulders in the spectra of the Co(II)-containing complexes appear at shorter and longer wavelengths respectively, compared to that of the Zn(II)-containing complexes, indicating that the identity of the metal ion also affects the emission wavelength, while the identity of the halido ion affects the emission intensity.
Two different structures, in which the [(3-pn)2ZnBr2] complex co-crystallises with two different solvent molecules, have been determined, namely structures 3-pnZnBr·CH 3 OH and 3-pnZnBr·CHCl 3 . In these structures, the organic ligand, metal ion and halido ligand remain constant, with only the identity of the solvent molecule changing, but, as indicated in the structural discussion, a change in the solvent molecule affects the conformation of the complex molecule as well as the packing of the molecules in the structure. Comparison of the fluorescence spectra of 3-pnZnBr·CH 3 OH and 3-pnZnBr·CHCl 3 shows that the 3-pnZnBr.solv compounds exhibit different solid-state fluorescence emission wavelengths, depending on the identity of the solvent molecule incorporated into the structure. 3-pnZnBr·CHCl 3 shows emission at the highest wavelength with an emission maximum at 455 nm, and 3-pnZnBr·CH 3 OH at 415 nm, thus, an emission wavelength change 40 nm occurs when changing the solvent from chloroform to methanol. The difference in fluorescence emission wavelengths in the 3-pnZnBr.solv complexes may be due to the different conformations adopted by the complexes in the structures [39, 44], or due to the difference in the packing of the molecules in the structures, since it is not always possible to separate conformation and packing effects, because the one influences the other. It can be concluded that a change in the solvent molecule incorporated into the structure brings about a change in the conformation of the complexes of 3-pn, and a change in the packing, which has a direct effect on the fluorescence emission wavelength. This means that the solvent of crystallisation of the 3-pnMX complexes can be used to tweak the emission wavelength of the compound obtained through self-assembly.
The same observation is made for the [(3-pn)2CoCl2] complex containing compounds 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 CN and 3-pnCoCl·CH 3 OH, with the compound showing an emission maximum at 416 nm when acetonitrile solvent molecules are incorporated into the crystal lattice, and at 401 nm when methanol is incorporated. In both the [(3-pn)2ZnBr2] and [(3-pn)2CoCl2] families, the methanol containing compounds have their emission maxima at a lower wavelength compared to the compounds containing other solvent molecules.
Conclusions
All six coordination complexes of 3-pn and metal halides of Co(II) and Zn(II) were found to have solvent molecules incorporated into the crystal lattice, with the conformational flexibility of the complexes allowing for the incorporation of a range of solvent molecules into the crystal lattice. It was also shown that different solvent molecules can be incorporated into the lattice of the same coordination complex, with the identity of the solvent molecule affecting the complex conformation as well as the crystal structure.
In general, the presence of paramagnetic Co(II) ions resulted in quenching of fluorescence emission relative to the parent fluorophore while the diamagnetic metal ion Zn(II) brings about fluorescence enhancement. In addition, the identity of the metal ion affects the emission wavelength, as observed in the methanol series of compounds. The halido ligands coordinated to the metal centre also affects the fluorescence intensity of the complex, with bromido ligands quenching more than chlorido ligands.
In compounds containing the same complexes but different solvent molecules, it was found that the identity of the solvent molecule affects the emission wavelength, due to the difference in complex conformation and packing, with methanol-containing compounds showing the lowest emission wavelength. This means that the choice of solvent of crystallisation can be used to tweak the fluorescence wavelength of these compounds.
Electronic supplementary information
CCDC 2221038–2221044 contains the crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/datarequest/cif.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr F. Malan for collecting single crystal data for the structures and acknowledge financial support from the University of Pretoria and the National Research Foundation (Grant No: 87659).
References
[1] A. K. Srivastava, A. Singh, L. Mishra. J. Phys. Chem. A 120, 4490 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.6b05355.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[2] S. Maniam, H. F. Higginbotham, T. D. M. Bell, S. J. Langford. Chem. Eur J. 25, 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201982961.Suche in Google Scholar
[3] M. A. Kobaisi, S. V. Bhosale, K. Latham, A. M. Raynor, S. V. Bhosale. Chem. Rev. 116, 11685 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00160.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[4] R.-F. Jin, S.-S. Tang, W.-D. Sun. Tetrahedron 70, 47 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2013.11.042.Suche in Google Scholar
[5] X. Cao, L. Meng, Z. Li, Y. Mao, H. Lan, L. Chen, Y. Fan, T. Yi. Langmuir 30, 11753 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/la503299j.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[6] J. K. Nath, J. B. Baruah. Inorg. Chem. Front. 1, 342 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4qi00028e.Suche in Google Scholar
[7] J. K. Nath, J. B. Baruah. CrystEngComm. 17, 8575 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ce01485a.Suche in Google Scholar
[8] J. K. Nath, J. B. Baruah. J. Fluoresc. 24, 649 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10895-014-1353-8.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[9] K. Ramasamy, S. Thambusamy. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem. 247, 632 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.03.043.Suche in Google Scholar
[10] S. Paudel, P. Nandhikonda, M. D. Heagy. J. Fluoresc. 19, 681 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10895-009-0462-2.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[11] P. Nandhikonda, M. D. Heagy. Org. Lett. 12, 4796 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/ol101760m.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[12] F. R. Allen. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B Struct. Sci. 58, 380 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1107/s0108768102003890.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[13] J. I. Lovitt, C. S. Hawes, A. D. Lynes, B. Haffner, M. E. Mobius, T. Gunnlaugsson. Inorg. Chem. Front. 4, 296 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c6qi00498a.Suche in Google Scholar
[14] R. J. Sarma, C. Tamuly, M. N. Barooah, J. B. Baruah. J. Mol. Struct. 829, 29 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2006.06.006.Suche in Google Scholar
[15] C. Tamuly, N. Barooah, A. S. Batsanov, R. Kataky, J. B. Baruah. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 8, 689 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2005.04.020.Suche in Google Scholar
[16] D. S. McClure. J. Chem. Phys. 20, 682 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1700516.Suche in Google Scholar
[17] T. L. Banfield, D. Husain. Trans. Faraday Soc. 65, 1985 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1039/tf9696501985.Suche in Google Scholar
[18] A. W. Varnes, R. B. Dodson, E. L. Wehry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 94, 946 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00758a037.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[19] T. R. Hesketh, M. T. Flanagan. Biochem. J. 147, 37 (1975), https://doi.org/10.1042/bj1470037.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[20] J. A. Kemlo, T. M. Shepherd. Chem. Phys. Lett. 47, 158 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(77)85329-3.Suche in Google Scholar
[21] A. Harriman. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 77, 1281 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1039/f29817701281.Suche in Google Scholar
[22] H. Masuhara, H. Shioyama, T. Saito, K. Hamada, S. Yasoshima, N. Mataga. J. Phys. Chem. 88, 5868 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1021/j150668a026.Suche in Google Scholar
[23] S. Jayaramanu, A. S. Verkman. Biophys. Chem. 85, 49 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-4622(00)00146-0.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[24] G. Wen, M. Z. Zhu, Z. Wang, X. M. Meng, H. Y. Hu, Q. X. Guo. Chin. J. Chem. 24, 1230 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/cjoc.200690229.Suche in Google Scholar
[25] J. S. Rupam, D. Kakali. New J. Chem. 39, 4375 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4nj01755b.Suche in Google Scholar
[26] Bruker. APEX II, Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA (2007).Suche in Google Scholar
[27] G. M. Sheldrick, SADABS, University of Göttingen, Germany (1996).Suche in Google Scholar
[28] Bruker. APEX II, Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA (2013).Suche in Google Scholar
[29] Rigaku Oxford Diffraction. CrysAlisPro Software System, Version 1.171.40.23a, Rigaku Corporation, Oxford, UK (2018).Suche in Google Scholar
[30] G. M. Sheldrick. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A: Found. Crystallogr. 64, 112 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1107/s0108767307043930.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[31] L. J. Farrugia. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 45, 849 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1107/s0021889812029111.Suche in Google Scholar
[32] G. M. Sheldrick. Acta Crystallogr. C: Struct. Chem. 71, 3 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1107/s2053229614024218.Suche in Google Scholar
[33] C. F. Macrae, P. R. Edgington, P. McCabe, E. Pidcock, G. P. Shields, R. Taylor, M. Towler, J. van de Streek. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 39, 453 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1107/s002188980600731x.Suche in Google Scholar
[34] A. L. Spek. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 65, 148 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1107/s090744490804362x.Suche in Google Scholar
[35] V. Vreshch. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 219 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1107/s0021889810044614.Suche in Google Scholar
[36] M. G. Lagorio, E. S. Román. J Chem. Educ. 79, 1362 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1021/ed079p1362.Suche in Google Scholar
[37] D. R. McMilin, R. C. Rosenbert, H. B. Gray. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 71, 4760 (1974), https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.71.12.4760.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[38] B. M. P. Beebeejaun-Boodoo, R. Erasmus, M. Rademeyer. CrystEngComm 20, 4875 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ce00292d.Suche in Google Scholar
[39] J. K. Nath, A. Mondal, A. K. Powell, J. B. Baruah. Cryst. Growth Des. 14, 4735 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1021/cg500882z.Suche in Google Scholar
[40] J. J. McKinnon, M. A. Spackman, A. S. Mitchell. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B Struct. Sci. 60, 627 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108768104020300.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[41] K. Rurack. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 57, 2161 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2008.04.047.Suche in Google Scholar
[42] T. Chattopadhyay, A. Banerjee, K. S. Banu, E. Suresh, M. Netahji, G. Birarda, E. Zangrando Polyhedron 27, 2452 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2008.04.047.Suche in Google Scholar
[43] C. D. Geddes. Meas. Si. Technol. 12, R53 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/12/9/201.Suche in Google Scholar
[44] M. Formica, V. Fusi, L. Florgi, M. Micheloni. Coord. Chem. Rev. 256, 170 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2011.09.010.Suche in Google Scholar
Supplementary Material
This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2022-1115).
© 2023 IUPAC & De Gruyter. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. For more information, please visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- In this issue
- Editorial
- Obituary for Professor Hugh Burrows, Scientific Editor of Pure and Applied Chemistry
- Preface
- The virtual conference on chemistry and its applications, VCCA-2022, 8–12 August 2022
- Conference papers
- Production and characterization of a bioflocculant produced by Proteus mirabilis AB 932526.1 and its application in wastewater treatment and dye removal
- Palladium-catalyzed activation of HnA–AHn bonds (AHn = CH3, NH2, OH, F)
- Mechanistic aspect for the atom transfer radical polymerization of itaconimide monomers with methyl methacrylate: a computational study
- A new freely-downloadable hands-on density-functional theory workbook using a freely-downloadable version of deMon2k
- Liquid phase selective oxidation of cyclohexane using gamma alumina doped manganese catalysts and ozone: an insight into reaction mechanism
- Exploring alkali metal cation⋯hydrogen interaction in the formation half sandwich complexes with cycloalkanes: a DFT approach
- Expanding the Australia Group’s chemical weapons precursors control list with a family-based approach
- Effect of solvent inclusion on the structures and solid-state fluorescence of coordination compounds of naphthalimide derivatives and metal halides
- Peripheral inflammation is associated with alterations in brain biochemistry and mood: evidence from in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study
- A framework for integrating safety and environmental impact in the conceptual design of chemical processes
- Recent applications of mechanochemistry in synthetic organic chemistry
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- In this issue
- Editorial
- Obituary for Professor Hugh Burrows, Scientific Editor of Pure and Applied Chemistry
- Preface
- The virtual conference on chemistry and its applications, VCCA-2022, 8–12 August 2022
- Conference papers
- Production and characterization of a bioflocculant produced by Proteus mirabilis AB 932526.1 and its application in wastewater treatment and dye removal
- Palladium-catalyzed activation of HnA–AHn bonds (AHn = CH3, NH2, OH, F)
- Mechanistic aspect for the atom transfer radical polymerization of itaconimide monomers with methyl methacrylate: a computational study
- A new freely-downloadable hands-on density-functional theory workbook using a freely-downloadable version of deMon2k
- Liquid phase selective oxidation of cyclohexane using gamma alumina doped manganese catalysts and ozone: an insight into reaction mechanism
- Exploring alkali metal cation⋯hydrogen interaction in the formation half sandwich complexes with cycloalkanes: a DFT approach
- Expanding the Australia Group’s chemical weapons precursors control list with a family-based approach
- Effect of solvent inclusion on the structures and solid-state fluorescence of coordination compounds of naphthalimide derivatives and metal halides
- Peripheral inflammation is associated with alterations in brain biochemistry and mood: evidence from in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study
- A framework for integrating safety and environmental impact in the conceptual design of chemical processes
- Recent applications of mechanochemistry in synthetic organic chemistry