Home Glossary of terms used in biochar research (IUPAC Technical Report)
Article Open Access

Glossary of terms used in biochar research (IUPAC Technical Report)

  • Fotis Bilias , Divine Damertey Sewu ORCID logo , Seung Han Woo , Ioannis Anastopoulos ORCID logo , Frank Verheijen , Johannes Lehmann , Wenceslau Geraldes Teixeira , Dionisios Gasparatos , Kathleen Draper and Dimitrios Kalderis ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 1, 2024

Abstract

Biochar is the solid carbonaceous product of biomass pyrolysis. The properties of biochar depend on the biomass feedstock as well as the pyrolysis temperature and time. Therefore, biochars with different properties and functionalities can be produced. Biochar research has been intensive in the past 15 years, focusing mainly on soil applications, wastewater treatment, and contaminant remediation. However, a formal definition of biochar and related terms is missing, which hinders the standardization of scientific results worldwide and the scaling-up of research at the industrial level. Furthermore, an official terminology may promote the development of a harmonized legal framework for biochar production and applications, both at regional and national levels. This glossary of terms consists of 178 scientifically sound definitions of the most commonly used terms in biochar research. The definitions of this glossary are interconnected, allowing the reader to further explore the synergies between terms. The distribution of terms reflects the multidisciplinarity of biochar research: chemistry, material science and engineering, and soil science are the main disciplines represented here. The list of terms is by no means exhaustive and the strategic objective of this effort is to develop a dynamic document in which more terms will be added in the future, and the existing ones will be refined, as biochar research evolves.

1 Introduction

Biochar is a carbon rich, solid material resulting from the pyrolysis of biomass under dioxygen-free or dioxygen-limited conditions at temperatures between 300 and 800 °C. During pyrolysis, the lignocellulosic components of biomass, cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin undergo depolymerization, fragmentation, and cross-linking at specific temperatures resulting in solid (biochar), liquid, and gaseous products [1, 2]. The liquid products consist of bio-oil, whereas the gaseous products are carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, hydrogen, and lower molecular weight hydrocarbons.

The type of biomass, pyrolysis temperature, and heating rates are the main factors that determine biochar properties such as fixed carbon, mineral phases, surface area, porosity and pore size distribution, alkalinity, electrical conductivity, and cation-exchange capacity. The carbon mass in biochars may vary between 50 and 90 %, followed by lower contents of oxygen and hydrogen. Due to its highly variable and customizable surface chemistry, biochar offers great potential in a variety of engineering applications, some of which have yet to be discovered. Although most research is directed toward the application of biochar to soils, there are several other biochar properties that render it a suitable candidate for non-agricultural applications.

Efficient management of bio-degradable waste fractions, such as animal manure and agricultural waste, has been a major problem throughout the world [2]. Especially in developing countries, lack of modernization in farming and processing of agricultural products leads to the disposal of large quantities of waste. Technical, financial, and social constraints further increase the quantities that remain unexploited. Production of biochar through pyrolysis offers a sustainable solution for such waste, with respect to volume reduction, bioenergy exploitation, and added-value materials [2].

Biochar research is highly interdisciplinary – from the use of analytical techniques for its characterization to the development and evaluation of its multiple applications. Two of the main challenges toward a wider and large-scale use of biochar are standardization and regulation. Each biochar batch can be different from the other; even two made one after the other may vary if the process conditions and/or feedstock properties differ slightly. Developing regulations (national or international) for the production, characterization, and applications of biochar is hindered by the lack of standardization both in terms of procedures as well as terminology.

Over the past 20 years, the published literature on biochar has been steadily increasing and expanding in nature. Between 2000 and 2006, there were 12 publications on biochar, investigating the use of the material as a precursor for activated carbon and as a soil amendment. In 2023 alone, there were 5682 published works, dealing with over 20 distinctly different biochar applications (Scopus search, keyword: biochar).

The objective of this study was to provide clear, precise, and comprehensive definitions for terms related to the rapidly developing area of biochar research and application. Due to the interdisciplinary nature of research, the glossary will act as a reference document for the intended stakeholders from different backgrounds and as an introduction to biochar for a wider audience. It will also enhance the efforts for standardization of biochar production, characterization, and applications. This glossary outlines the definition of terms most frequently encountered in the field of biochar research. A Scopus literature search was performed (years 2010–2023) based on the two major aspects of biochar research: production and applications. The following keywords were used, alone or combined: biochar, biomass, pyrolysis, circular bio-economy, carbonization, carbon, soil amendment, carbon storage, greenhouse gases emissions, climate change mitigation, adsorption, soil remediation, wastewater treatment. From the results obtained, the highly cited research articles and review papers were studied and assessed. Then, a list of potential terms was compiled and discussed between authors. As soon as the list was finalized, the IUPAC Gold Book was consulted to determine terms already defined [3]. The definitions of some terms were obtained from highly cited publications, whereas others are defined for the first time. The terms are arranged in alphabetical order with italicized entries defined elsewhere in this document.

2 Glossary of terms

  1. abiotic stress

The negative impact on plants, trees, and soil microbiome not associated with living organisms [4]. Abiotic stress originates from naturally occurring, often intangible and inanimate factors such as intense sunlight, temperature, or wind that may cause harm to plants, trees, and soil microbiome. The most common abiotic stress factors include high winds, extreme temperatures, low water and nutrient availability, floods, chemical pollution, and natural disasters such as wildfires [5].

  1. absorption

The process of one material (absorbate) being retained by another (absorbent); this may be the physical solution of a gas, liquid, or solid in a liquid, attachment of molecules of a gas, vapor, liquid, or dissolved substance to a solid surface by physical forces [6].

  1. acid soil

Soil with a pH value below 7 [7].

See soil pH.

  1. active adsorption site

See active site.

  1. active site

Phase interface sites that, due to surface forces, have effective increase in the amount concentration of particular adsorbates [8, 9].

  1. adsorbate

A molecular species of gas, dissolved substance, or liquid which adheres to or is adsorbed in an extremely thin surface layer of a solid substance [10].

See adsorption, adsorbent.

  1. adsorbent

A condensed phase at the surface of which adsorption may occur [11].

See adsorption, adsorbate.

  1. adsorption

An increase in the concentration of an adsorbate at an interface of a condensed phase (adsorbent) and a liquid or gaseous layer due to the operation of surface forces [12].

See adsorbent, adsorbate.

  1. adsorption capacity

For strongly adsorbed solutes of limited solubility, the value of the mass of adsorbed substance reached in a saturated solution is called the adsorption capacity of the adsorbent for a specific solute; its value depends also, in general, on the nature and, in the case of more than two components, on the relative composition of the bulk liquid [13].

Note: Commonly determined by fitting isotherm equations to adsorption isotherm data and reported as mass mg of adsorbate by mass g of biochar [14]. It is influenced by properties of the biochar such as particle size, surface area, surface functional group composition and specifically degree of surface oxidation and hydrophobicity [15], solution pH, dosage of the adsorbent, competitive adsorbates, electrolyte content of the solution, and temperature [16].

See adsorption, adsorbent, Langmuir isotherm.

  1. adsorption kinetics

An experimental process followed by mathematical calculation to determine the true equilibration time and the optimal contact time for adsorption processes [17]. It provides insights on how the adsorbate uptake rate from either the gas or liquid phase controls the residence time of the adsorbate at the solution interface [18].

Note 1: To assess experimentally obtained kinetics data, adsorption kinetic models have been developed based on two main classifications, namely, reaction-based or diffusion-based models [18, 19].

Note 2: Reaction-based models describe the rate of adsorbate-adsorbent interactions and include commonly known and widely applied Lagergren pseudo-first and pseudo-second order models. The diffusion-based models however describe the diffusive transport of adsorbates from the bulk solution into pore networks and active sites of the biochar and includes the Weber and Morris’ intraparticle diffusion model and the Boyd’s model [19, 20].

See adsorption, adsorbent, adsorption kinetics, Boyd’s model, Lagergren pseudo-first order kinetics model, Lagergren pseudo-second order kinetics model.

  1. adsorption isotherm

Relationship between the amount, number, or mass of a substance adsorbed and the composition of the bulk phase (or the partial pressure in the gas phase) under equilibrium conditions at constant temperature [21].

See Dubinin–Radushkevich isotherm, Freundlich isotherm, Langmuir isotherm, Redlich–Peterson isotherm, Sips isotherm.

  1. adsorption mechanism

The series of steps and/or interactions by which the uptake of adsorbate from either a gas or liquid phase onto the surface and/or pores of the adsorbent takes place.

Note 1: It usually includes four general steps, namely, (i) bulk diffusion, (ii) film diffusion transport/external mass transfer/boundary layer diffusion, (iii) intra-particle/pore diffusion, and (iv) adsorption.

Note 2: The adsorption step requires further analysis to elucidate the type or series of interactions responsible for the sorption. These may include but are not limited to micropore filling, capillary condensation, electrostatic attractions or repulsions, cation/anion exchanges, C–π cation interactions, π–π interactions, Yoshida H-bonding, dipole–dipole H-bonding and n–π interactions, complexation, and/or precipitation [16, 17].

See adsorption, adsorbate, adsorbent.

  1. adsorption performance

The amount of adsorbate adsorbed on the adsorbent’s surface at equilibrium or the proportion of removed adsorbate from solution [16].

See adsorption, adsorbate, adsorbent.

  1. adsorption selectivity

The relative strength of adsorption of different adsorbate molecules depending on the relative magnitudes of the polarizability, dipole moment, and quadrupole moment of each [16].

See adsorption, adsorbate, adsorbent.

  1. adsorption site

The volume element or location on the surface of biochar where adsorbates can be adsorbed [9].

See adsorption, adsorbate, adsorbent.

  1. adsorption thermodynamics

A mathematical description of the effects of temperature/heat changes on the adsorption process and subsequent elucidation of the mechanism (physisorption or chemisorption), spontaneity, and endothermicity or exothermicity of the adsorption process. A plot of ln K c against the inverse of temperature, T (K), using the linear form of the Van’t Hoff equation yields a gradient and an intercept for computing the thermodynamic parameters.

ln K c = r H R ( 1 T ) + r S R

where K c is the equilibrium constant; ∆r H , J mol−1, is the enthalpy change; r S , J mol−1 K−1, is the entropy change; R, J mol−1 K−1, is the universal gas constant; and T, K, is the temperature.

Note 1: To assess the spontaneity of adsorption, the Gibb’s energy change, r G (J mol−1) is calculated from: r G = R T ln K c

Note 2: Values of K c can be obtained from adsorption isotherm constants or the partition coefficient [11].

Note 3: Values of Δr H for physisorption usually are below 80 kJ mol−1, whereas values greater than 80 kJ mol−1 indicate chemisorption [22].

See adsorption, adsorbate, adsorbent.

  1. alkaline soil

Soil with a pH value higher than 7 [7].

See soil pH.

  1. amazonian Dark Earth

See Terra Preta soil.

  1. anion exchange capacity

The sum total of exchangeable anions that a material can adsorb. Expressed as centimoles or millimoles of charge per kilogram of adsorbing material (e.g., soil, clay, or biochar).

  1. arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

Soil-born fungi (Glomeromycota), obligate symbionts of a very wide range of plant species. The symbioses are biotrophic and normally mutualistic, the long-term compatible interactions being based largely on bidirectional nutrient transfer between the symbionts. The plant provides photosynthetic carbon to the fungus and the fungus supplies nutrients with poor mobility in soil, particularly phosphorus, sulfur and micronutrients. However, there is more to the symbiosis, as it is also known to suppress losses to pathogens, provide drought and salt resistance, may increase soil aggregation and increase resistance to potentially toxic elements [23, 24]. The interactions of biochar with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi depend on biochar type, application rate, soil type, crop type and are still under investigation.

Note: Although biochar may interact with many other soil microbes [25], arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi interactions are emphasized, since the majority of biochar research is focused on those.

  1. aromaticity (of biochar)

The concept of spatial and electronic structure of cyclic molecular systems displaying the effects of cyclic electron delocalization which provide for their enhanced thermodynamic stability (relative to acyclic structural analogs) and tendency to retain the structural type in the course of chemical transformations. A quantitative assessment of the degree of aromaticity is given by the value of the resonance energy. It may also be evaluated by the energies of relevant isodesmic and homodesmotic reactions. Along with energetic criteria of aromaticity, important and complementary are also a structural criterion (the lesser the alternation of bond lengths in the rings, the greater is the aromaticity of the molecule) and a magnetic criterion (existence of the diamagnetic ring current induced in a conjugated cyclic molecule by an external magnetic field and manifested by an exaltation and anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility) [26].

Note: The extent to which the C in biochar has been transformed into energetically stable aromatic ring structures contributes decisively to both fate and reactivity of biochar in the environment [27].

See Biochar persistence.

  1. available water

The amount of soil water per unit volume available to plants, calculated as the difference between in situ field capacity and the permanent wilting point [7].

Note: Available water in soil-biochar mixtures is not always increased by addition of biochar, as the outcome is contingent on the biochar application rate and the specific soil type. In sandy soils, biochar is able to reduce permanent wilting points and increase the amount of water available at all levels of water content [28].

See field capacity.

  1. binary adsorption system

A multi-component system with two types of adsorbates.

See adsorption, adsorbate.

  1. binding site

A specific region (atom, functional group) on the external surface or pore walls of biochar that is capable of entering into an interaction with an adsorbate [29].

  1. biochar

Α solid, multi-functional, porous carbonaceous product of agricultural biomass pyrolysis in the temperature range of 350 to 1000 °C in the absence of or under limited oxygen. The initial feedstock properties and processing conditions (heating rate, final pyrolysis temperature, residence time, pyrolysis equipment type) largely control the yield and physicochemical properties of biochar. The hydrogen-to-organic carbon (H/Corg) and oxygen-to-organic carbon (O/Corg) ratios of the as-prepared biochar should be below 0.7 and below 0.4, respectively. Biochar is used in a wide range of applications, including but not limited to soil conditioning and remediation, anaerobic digestion of organic wastes, composting, potable water and wastewater treatment, as an additive to animal feed and in composite building materials.

  1. biochar-based catalyst

An engineered biochar where biochar acts as an eco-friendly and versatile catalyst support for applications in areas such as soil remediation, water filtration, chemical synthesis, biofuel production, and catalytic degradation of pollutants [30].

  1. biochar half-life (t 1/2)

The time required for biochar to decompose to half of its original quantity [31], under environmental (temperature, moisture, microorganisms) and other conditions related to the specific biochar application.

  1. biochar amendment

See biochar soil amendment.

  1. biochar charging

The process of adding macro- and micro-nutrients to biochar before soil application. Commonly, this is achieved by mixing it with urine, compost, and manure from livestock.

Note: Not to be confused with biochar activation, typically used to describe the high temperature process of increasing the porosity of carbonaceous materials by using steam, carbon dioxide, or inorganic salts.

See biochar inoculation.

  1. biochar-coated seeds

Seeds covered in biochar particles. Using biochar-coated seeds, increases the retention of water and nutrients around the seeds and surrounding soil. Coating the seeds prior to planting can dramatically reduce the need for high frequency saturation watering in the period immediately following planting and can also increase plant growth and sustain plant life [32].

  1. biochar composite

The product of biochar and one or more additives, with the purpose of combining the advantageous properties of each material and consequently achieving better performance in a specific application.

  1. biochar inoculation

The process of adding beneficial aerobic microbes and other microorganisms to the biochar surface and pores.

Note: Not to be confused with biochar activation, typically used to describe the high temperature process of increasing the porosity of carbonaceous materials by using steam, carbon dioxide or inorganic salts.

See biochar charging, enriched biochar.

  1. biochar soil amendment

The application of biochar to a soil with the intention to improve one or more soil properties, functions, or ecosystem services such as carbon sequestration.

See soil carbon sequestration.

  1. biochar persistence

The duration that biochar remains in the environment in its original form, typically measured as half-life or mean residence time. Biochar persistence is a result of both the molecular composition of the biochar material itself as well as the environmental conditions, such as soil climate and composition (texture, mineral, and mineralogy composition), content of plant-derived organic matter, and microbial population composition [33]. The upper H/Corg limit of 0.7 is imposed to assure abundant fused aromatic ring structures and to distinguish biochar from the raw feedstocks or from other materials which are only partially or deficiently carbonized [34].

Note: Persistence does not mean that biochar is stationary: biochar may still move through the soil or in aquifers without being decomposed, oxidized, or mineralized [33].

  1. biochar pH

The numeric value expressing the pH of a 1:10 w/v biochar/distilled water solution after mechanical shaking for 1 h at 25 °C and allowing the suspension to stand for 30 min [35]. Most ligno-cellulosic biomasses result in alkaline biochars, although acid and/or neutral biochars are occasionally reported [36].

See soil pH.

  1. biochar sustainability policy

A framework comprising a set of concepts, commitments and action plans toward optimizing environmental, societal and economic aspects of biochar production and application, as agreed between all interested parties (society, industry, and government) [31]. This policy forms part of the European Biochar Certificate.

See European Biochar Certificate, International Biochar Initiative (IBI) Certification Program.

  1. biocoal

The product of biomass torrefaction. Not to be confused with biochar, since biocoal is exclusively used as an energy source. Compared to the raw biomass, biocoal has the advantages of improved energy density, more homogeneous composition, increased hydrophobicity and grindability [37].

See torrefaction (of biomass).

  1. biomass

Material produced by the growth of microorganisms, plants, or animals [38].

  1. biotic stress

The negative impact on plants, trees and beneficial microorganism populations in soil, caused by other living organisms, including fungi, bacteria, viruses, parasites, weeds, insects, and other native or cultivated plants [39, 40].

See abiotic stress.

  1. black carbon

The pyrogenic carbon materials dispersed in the environment from wildfires and fossil fuel combustion [39]. The term should be taken to refer to the entire material, not just the fused ring fraction or the C atom. The use of this term is discouraged (or should be used only if absolutely necessary and in the context described here), to avoid confusion with “Black C”. “Black C” spelled with “C” and not “carbon” refers to the C atom, and not to the material that also contains H, O, N, and ash minerals. Black carbon should also not be confused with “carbon black”, which is an industrially manufactured colloidal carbon material in the form of spheres and of their fused aggregates with sizes below 1000 nm [41].

  1. boundary layer

The stagnant region (film) around the adsorbent where properties vary from that in the bulk fluid.

  1. boundary layer diffusion

See film diffusion transport.

  1. Boyd’s model

A diffusion-based model for adsorption kinetics analysis that assumes that the key resistance to adsorption resides in the boundary layer surrounding the adsorbent. In Boyd’s model, the boundary condition requires the adsorbed concentration to be constant and equal to the adsorbed concentration at equilibrium [20, 42]. The external diffusion processes were characterized by the time dependence −log(1−F), where F is the equilibrium degree in the system calculated by the following equation:

F = q t q e

where q t is the adsorbed substance amount per sorbent mass unit at the moment of time t, and q e the adsorbed substance amount per sorbent mass unit in the equilibrium state (q e mg g−1). The sorption limitation by intra-diffusion processes was determined by the FB t dependence, where B t is the dimensionless Boyd parameter (t corresponds to time) calculated by the following equation:

B t = 0.4977 ln ( 1 F )

See adsorption.

  1. buffering capacity (soil)

The ability of solid phase soil materials to resist changes in ion concentration in the aqueous solution phase. Can be expressed as ΔC sC l where C s represents the concentration of ions on the solid phase in equilibrium with C l, the concentration of ions in the liquid solution phase. Includes pH buffering as well as the buffering of other ionic and molecular components [7]. The buffering capacity is affected by the presence and types of clay, organic matter and other colloidal constituents [35]. Some biochars may act as a short-term pH buffer.

See soil pH.

  1. bulk density

The dry mass of soil or biochar per unit bulk volume. The bulk volume is determined before the sample (soil, biochar, or soil plus biochar) is dried.

  1. bulk solution transport

The movement of the adsorbate through the bulk liquid to the boundary layer of fixed film of liquid surrounding the adsorbent [43].

  1. capillary condensation

In porous solids, it is the process of multilayer adsorption as vapor proceeds to the point at which pore spaces are filled with liquid separated from the gas phase by menisci. The concept loses its sense when the dimensions of the pores are so small that the term meniscus ceases to have a physical significance [44].

  1. carbon abatement

The reduction of the amount of carbon dioxide that results from some action, process or intervention. For example, in a slow pyrolysis-based biochar production system, a carbon abatement equivalent to 0.76 ton of CO2 per ton of feedstock processed was achieved under a conservative soil half-life of 240 years and 29 % biochar mass yield [45, 46].

See climate change mitigation, carbon footprint.

  1. carbon cycle

The sequence of transformations whereby carbon dioxide is fixed in living organisms by photosynthesis or by chemosynthesis, liberated by respiration and by the death and decomposition of the fixing organism, or used by heterotrophic species, and ultimately returned to its original state.

  1. carbon footprint

A quantification of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions during the life cycle of the product. It is being increasingly applied for multiple purposes, such as: to communicate the carbon footprint to customers, to facilitate the development and implementation of GHG management strategies across product life cycles, to identify potential opportunities for GHG mitigation along the supply chain, to track performance and progress in reducing GHG emissions over time and to assist the consumer in the selection of products with the least climate change impact [47].

See carbon abatement, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, climate change mitigation.

  1. carbon storage (carbon stock)

The quantity of carbon held within a “pool” at a specific time, meaning a reservoir or system which has the capacity to accumulate or release carbon [48].

Note: examples of carbon pools are living biomass (including above and below ground biomass), dead organic matter (including dead wood and litter) and soils.

See carbon abatement, climate change mitigation.

  1. carbon capture

The process of capturing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions to reduce the amounts of CO2 entering the atmosphere and to minimize the associated global warming and ocean acidification effects [49].

See carbon abatement, climate change mitigation.

  1. cation exchange capacity

The maximum number of moles of adsorbed positive charge that can be desorbed from unit mass of a material under given conditions of temperature, pressure, solution composition, and material-solution mass ratio [50]. Expressed in millimoles of charge per kilogram (mmol(+) kg−1) of material.

  1. cellulose

A linear polysaccharide consisting of monomeric units of anhydro-D-glucose units. Cellulose is a major component of lignocellulosic biomass, along with hemi-cellulose and lignin. The pyrolysis of cellulose mainly occurs between 315 and 400 °C [51, 52].

See lignin, hemi-cellulose.

  1. chemical activation (of biochar)

The treatment of biochar with a chemical activation agent (e.g., potassium hydroxide, phosphoric acid, or zinc chloride), followed by heating at a temperature of 450 to 700 °C in an activation kiln in order to increase its porosity. The activated biochar is then washed with water to remove the residues from the activation agent. The filtrate is passed to a chemical recovery unit for recycling [53].

See physical activation (of biochar).

  1. chemical adsorption

See chemisorption.

  1. chemisorption

Adsorption which results from chemical bond formation (strong interaction) between the adsorbent and the adsorbate in a monolayer on the surface [54].

See adsorption, adsorbate, adsorbent.

  1. circular economy

Α model of production and consumption, which involves sharing, leasing, reusing, repairing, refurbishing, and recycling existing materials and products as long as possible. In this way, the life cycle of products is extended.

Note: Circular bio-economy encompasses the production of renewable biological resources and the conversion of these resources and waste streams into value added products, such as food, feed, bio-based products, and bioenergy [55].

  1. clayey soil

(i) Texture group consisting of sandy clay, silty clay, and clay soil textures. (ii) Family particle-size class for soils with 35 % or more clay and below 35 % rock fragments in upper subsoil horizons [7].

See soil texture, soil separates.

  1. climate change mitigation

A human intervention to reduce the sources or enhance the sinks of greenhouse gases.

Note: Climate change mitigation policies also include human interventions to reduce the sources of other substances which may contribute directly or indirectly to limiting climate change, including, for example, the reduction of particulate matter (PM) emissions that can directly alter the radiation balance (e.g., black carbon) or measures that control emissions of carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides (NO x ), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and other pollutants that can alter the concentration of tropospheric ozone (O3) which has an indirect effect on the climate [56].

See carbon abatement, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

  1. climate smart agriculture (CSA)

An approach to developing the technical, policy, and investment conditions to achieve sustainable agricultural development for food security under climate change. CSA integrates the three dimensions of sustainable development (economic, social, and environmental) by jointly addressing food security and climate challenges [57]. It is composed of three main pillars:

  1. sustainably increasing agricultural productivity and incomes

  2. adapting and building resilience to climate change

  3. reducing and/or removing greenhouse gases emissions, where possible

See carbon abatement, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

  1. competitive adsorption

The solute-solute competition for active adsorption sites on biochar in multi-component systems [58].

See adsorption, adsorbate, adsorbent.

  1. complexation

Formation of multi-atom structures with specific metal-ligand interactions which include chelation and co-ordination. It may be surface (outer) or inner sphere complexation [19].

Note 1: The binding mechanism depends on the affinity of the metals to the ligands on the surface of the biochar and this is the case for transition metals with partially filled d-orbitals [59].

Note 2: Oxygen-containing functional groups on the surface/pores of biochar are effective at binding metals via complexation and is generally true for biochar from low temperature pyrolysis [19].

See chemisorption.

  1. contaminant immobilization

The process of using biochar to reduce the mobility of harmful and toxic mobile adsorbates (contaminants) as part of environmental remediation measures.

See environmental remediation, adsorption.

  1. Cπ–cation interactions

Electrostatic interactions between the aromatic rings of carbonaceous materials (adsorbent) and cations (adsorbate) [11].

  1. dark earth soil

See Terra Preta soil.

  1. decolorization (by using biochar)

Color removal via adsorption and/or catalytic degradation by biochar of color-laden wastewaters or effluents principally from dyeing operations and tannery and Kraft bleaching processes.

  1. desertification

Land degradation in arid, semi-arid, and dry sub-humid areas resulting from various factors, including climatic variations and human activities [60]. It is accompanied by a reduction in the natural potential and fertility of the land and a decrease in surface and ground water resources.

See soil erosion.

  1. designer biochar

See engineered biochar, functionalized biochar.

  1. desorption

A phenomenon in which a substance in an adsorbed state is released from the bulk or surface of a material. It is the opposite of adsorption [61].

See adsorption, adsorbate, adsorbent.

  1. dipole–dipole H-bonding

Occurs between the hydroxyl or amine groups (H-donor) of the biochar’s surface and electronegative atoms such as O and F in the adsorbate structure [62].

  1. Dubinin–Radushkevich (DR) isotherm

An adsorption isotherm that factors in the effect by the porous structure of the adsorbent and generally expresses the adsorption mechanism with a Gaussian energy distribution onto heterogeneous surfaces [63, 64].

q e = q DR e K DR ε 2

ln q e = K DR ε 2 + ln q DR

where

ε = R T ln ( C s C e )

q e, mg g−1, is the adsorption capacity of biochar at equilibrium with the adsorbate (the subscript e stands for equilibrium).

q DR, mg g−1, is the theoretical isotherm saturation capacity; K DR, mol2 kJ−2, is a constant related to sorption energy; ε, J mol−1, is the Polanyi potential; C s, mg L−1, is the saturation solubility mass concentration; C e, mg L−1, is the equilibrium mass concentration of adsorbate; R, J mol−1 K−1, is the gas constant; and T, K, is the temperature.

Note 1: Normally fits well for adsorption systems with high solute activities and intermediate concentration ranges.

Note 2: The magnitude of ε can facilitate distinguishing between physical (less than 8 kJ mol−1), ion exchange (8–16 kJ mol−1) and chemical adsorption (exceeds 16 kJ mol−1) for the system under consideration [22, 63].

Note 3: For aqueous adsorption, as saturation solubility mass concentration of the absorbate is much higher than equilibrium mass concentration, the term (C s/C e) can be approximated to.

( 1 + C s C e )  or  ( 1 + 1 C e C s )

Renaming the dimensionless variable C e/C s as C, the Polanyi potential in the DR isotherm can be shown as.

ε = R T ln ( 1 + 1 C )

See adsorption, adsorbate, adsorbent.

  1. electrical conductivity (EC)

The capacity of a soil-solution mixture or material to conduct or transmit electrical current. In soil and biochar samples it is related to the functional groups and potential electrolyte substances released in water after stirring for a fixed period of time [65].

See functional group.

  1. electrostatic interaction

Τhe attractive or repulsive interaction between the electric charges on an adsorbate and those present on biochar.

Note 1: It is highly dependent on the point of zero net charge (PZNC) of biochar and pH of the solution [66].

Note 2: The interactive strength is usually less than 50 kJ mol−1.

  1. Elovich equation

An empirical equation in adsorption kinetics suited for heterogeneous adsorbing surfaces and employed in fitting chemical adsorption data.

q t = 1 β ln ( 1 + α β t )

where q t , mg g−1, is the amount adsorbed at time t; α, mg g−1 min−1, is the initial rate constant; β, g mg−1, is the desorption constant; and t, min, is the time.

Note: Linearizing for easy computation, an assumption of αβt >> 1 is made [67].

See adsorption, adsorbate, adsorbent.

  1. eluent

See regenerant.

  1. engineered biochar

Biochar that had its physicochemical and/or textural properties purposedly tuned during biomass pyrolysis or through post-production physical and chemical processes [68]. The term used to describe application-specific, outcome-based biochar production and/or modification.

See biochar inoculation, biochar charging.

  1. enriched biochar

An engineered biochar embedded with inorganic or organic substances. The aim is to produce biochar with specific physicochemical properties and improved performance for a specific application [31, 69, 70].

See biochar charging, engineered biochar, biochar inoculation.

  1. environmental remediation

The removal of pollution or contaminants from environmental media such as soil, groundwater, sediment, or surface water. Biochar has been widely used in environmental remediation and has proven to be effective in removing organic and inorganic contaminants through adsorption and other mechanisms [27, 71].

  1. enthalpy (of pyrolysis)

The energy required to raise biomass from room temperature to the reaction temperature and convert the solid biomass into the reaction products of gas, liquids, and biochar. The average value of the enthalpy for pyrolysis for each kg of the biomass tested is approximately 1.5 MJ when the biomass has typical moisture content of 8–10 %. The values for the woody biomass are higher than those of the herbaceous materials [72].

See pyrolysis (of biomass).

  1. European Biochar Certificate (EBC)

A voluntary biochar industry standard in Europe describing essential biochar physicochemical analyses that should be performed and setting limit values to categorize biochar into the following four categories: EBC-Feed (Class I), EBC-AgroBio (Class II), EBC-Agro (Class III), and EBC-Material (Class IV). The European Biochar Certificate aims to enable and guarantee sustainable biochar production. It was introduced to give biochar users (e.g., farmers) a reliable quality basis, while giving producers the opportunity of proving that their product meets well-defined quality standards. It further aims to provide a firm state-of-the-art knowledge transfer as a sound basis for future legislation. Finally, it was introduced to prevent and hinder misuse or dangers from the initial biomass harvesting (or collection) such as cutting down native forests to produce biochar [65].

See International Biochar Initiative (IBI) Certification Program.

  1. external mass transfer

See film diffusion transport.

  1. film diffusion transport

The transport by diffusion of the adsorbate through the fixed (stagnant) liquid film surrounding the adsorbent to the entrance of the pores of the adsorbent [20].

  1. field capacity (FC)

The content of water, on a mass or volume basis, remaining in a soil 2 days after having been wetted with water after prolonged rainfall or irrigation, and after free gravitational drainage is negligible [7]. Biochar effects on FC varies with feedstock selection, pyrolysis temperature and soil type.

  1. flammability (of biochar)

A flammable biochar is any biochar that is combustible or may contribute to a fire through friction or brief contact with a source of ignition. The flammability of biochar is measured according to the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria, part III N, 1 Test for readily combustible solids [73].

  1. food security

A situation that exists when all people, at all times, have physical, social and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food that meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life [74]. The application of biochar to degraded soils may help toward this purpose.

See climate change mitigation.

  1. Freundlich isotherm

An empirical equation proposed by Freundlich in 1907 for describing adsorption characteristics of heterogeneous surfaces.

q e = K F C e 1 n

where q e, mg g−1, is the amount of adsorbate adsorbed per unit weight of adsorbent; K F, (mg g−1) (L mg−1)1/n , is the Freundlich constant; 1/n is the Freundlich intensity parameter, dimensionless; and C e, mg L−1, is the equilibrium amount of adsorbate.

Note: 1/n describes the magnitude of the adsorption driving force and predicts adsorption to be irreversible, favorable, linear, and unfavorable when values of 1/n = 0, 1/n < 1, 1/n = 1, and 1/n > 1, respectively [17, 63].

See adsorption, adsorbate, adsorbent.

  1. functional group

An atom or a group of atoms that has similar chemical properties whenever it occurs in different compounds. It defines the characteristic physical and chemical properties of families of organic compounds [75].

  1. functionalized biochar

See engineered biochar.

  1. gasification (of biomass)

The thermochemical conversion of solid/liquid organic compounds to a gas/vapor phase and a solid phase by heating the material at high temperatures (above 700 °C), without combustion, with a controlled amount of oxygen and/or steam. The gas phase has a high heating power and can be used for power generation or biofuel production. The solid phase includes the organic unconverted fraction and the inert material present in the treated biomass [76, 77].

  1. greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions

Gases that trap emanated heat in the atmosphere are called greenhouse gases. These include but are not limited to the following: carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and fluorinated gases. The primary sources of greenhouse gas emissions are transportation, electricity production, heavy industry, commercial and residential activity, and agriculture.

See carbon abatement, climate smart agriculture (CSA).

  1. hemi-cellulose

A branched polysaccharide comprised of different sugar monomers such as glucose, xylose, mannose, galactose arabinose, glucuronic, and galacturonic acid. Hemi-cellulose is a major component of lignocellulosic biomass, along with cellulose and lignin. During pyrolysis, it readily degrades within the temperature range of 220–315 °C [51, 52].

See cellulose, lignin.

  1. hydrochar

The solid product of hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) or liquefaction (sometimes referred to as HTC material), and is distinct from biochar due to its production process and properties [78]. It typically has higher H/C ratios [79] and lower aromaticity than biochar as well as little or no fused aromatic ring structures [31].

See hydrothermal carbonization (HTC).

  1. hydrothermal carbonization (HTC)

The treatment of biomass or any biodegradable waste with water at a temperature in the range of 100–374 °C in a closed reactor at a pressure that maintains water in the liquid state (as defined by the volume of the reactor and the thermodynamic properties of water in this temperature range). The result is a solid product with increased carbon content (hydrochar) and the residual water, referred to as HTC wastewater.

See hydrochar.

  1. International Biochar Initiative (IBI) Certification Program

A voluntary scheme administered by the International Biochar Initiative to provide certification of biochar products. The purpose of the program is to provide to biochar manufacturers the opportunity to demonstrate that their biochar (s) meet the minimum criteria established in the latest IBI Biochar Standards. Currently, the IBI standards apply to biochar produced in North America.

See European Biochar Certificate.

  1. intra-particle diffusion

The transport of the adsorbate through the pores by a combination of molecular diffusion through the pore liquid and/or by diffusion along the surface of the adsorbent.

  1. intra-particle diffusion model

See Weber and Morris intra-particle diffusion model (IPD).

  1. ion exchange

The exchange of cations and anions on biochar surface with dissolved species in the liquid phase.

Note: For metallic adsorbates, substitution or exchanges are more likely to occur with other metallic elements within groups 1–3 of the periodic table due to similar bond characteristics following the Goldschmidt geochemical classification [80].

  1. ionic strength

On a molality basis,

I m = 1 2 m B z B 2

where the sum goes over all the ions B, and m denotes the molality of ion B, z B is the charge number of ion B [81]. The ionic strength on a concentration basis is defined analogously

I c = 1 2 c B z B 2

where c denotes the amount concentration of ion B.

  1. isoelectric point (IEP)

The pH value at which the net electric charge of an elementary entity is zero [82].

  1. labile carbon

Soil organic matter in transition from fresh residues to CO2 or inert C. Much of it consists of recently incorporated plant, faunal, and microbial debris, with a turnover time of less than a decade [83].

See soil organic matter (SOM).

  1. Langmuir isotherm

A hyperbolic equation based on assumptions of adsorption reversibility, monolayer coverage of adsorbent’s surface, homogeneous surface, existence of a fixed number of accessible sites on adsorbent, and non-existence of adsorbateadsorbate interactions.

q e = q m K L C e 1 + K L C e

A dimensionless factor, separation factor, R L, is expressed as.

R L = 1 1 + K L C o

where q e, mg g−1, is the amount of adsorbate adsorbed per unit weight of adsorbent at equilibrium; q m , mg g−1, is the maximum adsorption capacity of the adsorbent; K L, L mg−1, is the Langmuir constant related to the affinity between adsorbate and adsorbent; C e, mg L−1, is the equilibrium concentration of adsorbate; and C o, mg L−1, is the initial adsorbate mass concentration.

Note: R L is calculated only if the experimental data is well fitted by the Langmuir isotherm and is interpreted as irreversible, favorable, linear, and unfavorable adsorption when R L = 0, 0 < R L < 1, R L = 1, and R L > 1 respectively [19, 63].

See adsorption, adsorbate, adsorbent.

  1. Lagergren pseudo-first order kinetics model (PFO)

A two parameter, reaction-based, exponential rise to the maximum rate model for fitting kinetic data on adsorption.

q t = q e ( 1 e k 1 t )

where q t and q e, mg g−1, are the amount of adsorbed adsorbate at time t and at equilibrium respectively; k 1, min−1, is the rate constant; and t, min, is time.

Note: Often applies well for only the initial 20–30 min of adsorption. Deviation at longer time periods generally attributed to the boundary layer effect [84].

See adsorption, adsorbate, adsorbent.

  1. Lagergren pseudo-second order kinetics model (PSO)

A two-parameter hyperbolic rate model that assumes chemical adsorption involving valence forces through electron sharing between adsorbate and adsorbent [85].

q t = q e 2 k 2 t 1 + q e k 2 t

where q e and q t , mg g−1, is the amount of adsorbed adsorbate at equilibrium and at variable time t, respectively; k 2, g mg−1 min−1, is the pseudo-second order rate constant; and t, min, is time.

Note: Concomitant to PSO is the initial adsorption rate h, mg g−1 min−1, expressed as h = k 2 q e 2 [86].

See adsorption, adsorbate, adsorbent.

  1. lignin

An organic polymer, composed of phenolic propylbenzene skeletal units, linked at various sites and apparently randomly [36]. A major component of lignocellulosic biomass, along with cellulose and hemi-cellulose. During pyrolysis, lignin slowly decomposes over the temperature range of 150–900 °C [51, 52, 87].

See cellulose, hemi-cellulose.

  1. liming effect

The effect that a material delivers to acidic soils through increasing soil pH and reducing the solubility of aluminum and manganese, and through amending soil physical, physicochemical, chemical, and biological properties [88].

See soil pH.

  1. liquefaction

A relatively low-temperature (300–400 °C), high-pressure (40–200 bar) process that produces bio-oil from a relatively wet biomass in the presence of a catalyst and hydrogen [89].

  1. loamy soil

(i) Texture group consisting of coarse sandy loam, sandy loam, fine sandy loam, very fine sandy loam, loam, silt loam, silt, clay loam, sandy clay loam, and silty clay loam soil textures. (ii) Family particle-size class for soils with textures finer than very fine sandy loam but below 35 % clay and below 35 % rock fragments in upper subsoil horizons [7].

See soil texture, soil separates.

  1. magnetic biochar

An engineered biochar that has undergone modification with magnetic precursors for the primary role of facilitating separation of powdered biochar grades from aqueous solution when exposed to a magnetic field [68].

Note: Magnetic modifications include co-precipitation approaches in alkaline Fe2+/Fe3+ solution, direct hydrolysis of Fe(NO3)3, oxidative hydrolysis/reduction, electro-modification, mechanochemical approaches, and co-pyrolysis of FeSO4·7H2O and biomass.

See engineered biochar.

  1. macropores

In material and engineering sciences, macropores are the pores with a diameter exceeding 50 nm [90, 91]. In soil science, a class of pores with an equivalent diameter higher than 75 μm [92]. Very coarse macropores drain water very quickly and are responsible for preferential flows. Macropores are good for soil aeration.

See soil texture, soil separates.

  1. mean residence time (MRT)

The average time for which biochar is present in soil and is determined as the inverse of the decay rate [30].

  1. mesopores

In material and engineering sciences, mesopores are defined as having a diameter in the range of 2–50 nm [91, 93]. In soil science, a class of pores with the equivalent diameter between 30 and 75 μm [94]. These pores contribute to capillary water flow and solute movement by advection and diffusion. The mesopore size is ideal to hold water that is easily available to plants.

See soil texture, soil separates.

  1. micropore filling

The process in which molecules are adsorbed in the adsorption space within micropores [95].

See micropores.

  1. micropores

In material and engineering science, micropores have a diameter of less than 2 nm [91, 96]. In soil science, a class of pores with the equivalent diameter between the range of 5–30 μm [92]. Pores smaller than 5 μm when not classified are also added to the micropores. The water within these pores drains very slowly and is not available to all plants. To enhance available water, biochar should ideally have pores larger than micropores and smaller than the larger macropores than drain water too quickly.

See soil texture, soil separates.

  1. modified biochar

See engineered biochar.

  1. monolayer adsorption

Adsorption in which all adsorbate molecules or ions are in contact with the surface layer of the adsorbent thus leading to a single layer of adsorbed species. Usually characteristic of chemisorption [94].

See adsorption.

  1. monolayer adsorption capacity

The quantity of adsorbate molecules or ions needed to occupy all adsorption sites as determined by the structure of the adsorbent and by the chemical nature of the adsorbate for chemisorption.

Note: For physisorption, forming a complete monolayer of adsorbate in close-packed array while stating the kind of close packing explicitly when necessary is key [97].

See adsorption, adsorption capacity.

  1. multi-component systems

Adsorption systems with more than one type of adsorbate.

See adsorption.

  1. multilayer adsorption

Adsorption such that the adsorption space accommodates more than one layer of molecules, and not all adsorbed molecules are in contact with the surface layer of the adsorbent [98]. Normally typical of physisorption [94].

See adsorption, adsorbent, physisorption.

  1. nanobiochar

Biochar having particle sizes below 100 nm, achieved through mechanical or thermal means [99, 100].

  1. nucleophile–π * interactions (n–π * interactions)

Occurs between a nucleophile carbonyl oxygen (electron-pair donor) on the surface of the adsorbent (biochar) and the π electrons of the aromatic structures of the adsorbate [62].

  1. nutrient availability (in soil)

The portion of any element or compound in the soil in chemical forms that can be readily taken up and assimilated by plants.

  1. nutrient recycling

The reuse of collected or recovered nutrients in agriculture. It involves nutrient collection through the gathering of waste material including preliminary sorting and storage prior to a subsequent direct use or processing, and nutrient recovery through which a nutrient is extracted, purified, or concentrated from a substrate [101].

  1. physical activation (of biochar)

The process of increasing the porosity of a carbonaceous material through the use of an oxidizing agent, such as steam, ozone, carbon dioxide, or air at temperatures usually above 700 °C [102]. These oxidizing agents penetrate into the internal structure of char and gasify the carbon atoms, which results in opening and widening of inaccessible pores.

See chemical activation (of biochar).

  1. physical adsorption

See physisorption, adsorption.

  1. physisorption

Adsorption in which the forces involved are intermolecular forces (van der Waals forces) of the same kind as those responsible for the imperfection of real gases and the condensation vapors, and which do not involve a significant change in the electronic orbital patterns of the species involved [103].

See adsorption.

  1. pi–pi interactions (ππ interactions)

A phenomenon occurring between the π-electrons arising from the aromatic or aliphatic structures in biochar and the π-electrons of the aromatic rings of the adsorbate [63].

  1. point of zero net charge (PZNC)

The condition of the solution for which the surface charge density of the adsorbent equals zero. It measures net surface charge (both internal and external) [19].

  1. pore blocking

The obstruction to entry or exit of adsorbates in pores or capillaries with pore width comparable to the molecular size of the adsorbate. Pore blocking may also be a result of capillary condensation where the liquid-like phase in the pore of the biochar prevents entry or exit of adsorbates.

  1. pore condensation

See capillary condensation.

  1. pore diffusion

See intra-particle diffusion.

  1. pore size

The distance between two opposite walls of the pore (diameter of cylindrical pores, width of slit-shaped pores). Pore sizes are classified as micropores, mesopores, and macropores.

See micropores, mesopores, macropores.

  1. pore size distribution

The distribution of pore volume with respect to pore size; alternatively, it may be defined by the related distribution of pore area with respect to pore size [104].

See micropores, mesopores, macropores.

  1. pore width

See pore size.

  1. porosity

The total volume of pores and voids divided by the volume occupied by the solid [94].

  1. precipitation

The formation of insoluble solids on the surface of biochar during sorption processes and as a result of the reaction between the adsorbate metallic ions with the mineral phases entrained in the biochar. Precipitation (under ambient conditions or elevated temperature and pressure) is also a common method through which various types of metal oxide nanoparticles are deposited on the biochar surface [105], [106], [107].

Note 1: Mineral phases include quartz (SiO2), sylvite (KCl), calcite (CaCO3), calcium anhydrite (CaSO4), hydroxyapatite Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2, and may exist in free forms or intercalated within the carbon matrix of the biochars [15].

Note 2: Precipitation on biochar surfaces is highly likely for metals and rare earth metals with intermediate ionization potentials ranging from 2.5 to 9.5 and thus occurs more frequently on biochars from higher temperature pyrolysis since they generally possess higher alkalinity [42].

  1. priming effect (of biochar)

An increase or decrease in mineralization of one source of organic matter (e.g., native soil organic matter) due to the addition of a new organic matter source (e.g., biochar) [31].

See soil organic matter (SOM).

  1. pseudo-first order kinetics model

See Lagergren pseudo-first order kinetics model.

  1. pseudo-second order kinetics model

See Lagergren pseudo-second order kinetics model.

  1. pyrochar

See biochar.

  1. pyrogenic carbon

“Pyrogenic C” (abbreviated to PyC after first use) is synonymous with black C. It should be used preferentially to “black C”. PyC (or black C) refers to the (non-inorganic) C atoms that have undergone pyrogenic or thermal transformation, and by this definition only include C present in fused rings, including C on surfaces of fused aromatic C that may also bind to other atoms such as O and N, non-hydrogenated C, and hydrogenated C. The term does not include non-transformed C present in residual carbohydrates or lignin structures, or in tars, or in functional groups bound to fuse aromatic C such as carboxyl groups. Different methods to quantify PyC (or black C) typically attempt to capture this C fraction, but do so with varying success or intentionally capture a portion of it (e.g., only the fused aromatic C without the surface C). When referring to a certain analytically-defined fraction, the method should be stated in conjunction with the term PyC [31].

See pyrogenic carbon capture and storage (PyCCS).

  1. pyrogenic carbon capture and storage (pyccs)

A promising carbon sequestration technology that can mitigate climate change while improving soil fertility. The technological opportunities of PyCCS are represented by three tracks accounting for the sequestration of different pyrolysis products: biochar (as soil amendment), bio-oil (pumped into geological storages), and permanent-pyrogas (capture and storage of CO2 from gas combustion) [108, 109].

See biochar, pyrogenic carbon.

  1. pyrogenic organic matter

An umbrella term for all materials that are produced by thermochemical conversion and contain some organic C, such as charcoal, biochar, char, black carbon, soot, activated carbon, and may contain some or no pyrogenic carbon (PyC). The term refers to the material and not the C atom.

  1. pyrolysis (of biomass)

Thermolysis (of biomass), usually associated with exposure to a high temperature in the absence, or limited concentration of oxygen [110].

Note 1: In the context of biochar, it is commonly defined as the thermochemical conversion of biomass to gas (a mixture of synthesis gas CO and H2 and condensable volatile compounds), bio-oil and biochar, at temperatures in the range of 350 to 800 °C in an inert atmosphere.

Note 2: Pyrolysis is further categorized into fast and slow pyrolysis. Fast pyrolysis processes biomass in the temperature range of 600 to 1000 °C, heating rates between 10 and 10000 °C min−1 and residence time in the range of several seconds. Slow pyrolysis processes biomass in the temperature range of 300 to 700 °C, heating rates between 0.1 and 10 °C min−1 and residence times in the range of minutes to hours [111]. Biochar yield is favored in slow pyrolysis conditions.

See biomass, biochar.

  1. quaternary adsorption system

A multi-component system with four different types of adsorbates.

See adsorption.

  1. recalcitrance index

A temperature-programmed oxidation index to specifically evaluate the thermal oxidative stability of biochar. The recalcitrance index corresponds to relative stability as compared to graphite. It is calculated by dividing T 50, x , which is the temperature value corresponding to 50 % oxidation/volatilization of a biochar sample (named x), by T 50,graphite, an external standardization factor (T 50,graphite = 885 °C) [112].

  1. Redlich–Peterson (RP) isotherm

A three-parameter adsorption isotherm equation that addresses the short-comings of Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms by incorporating both over wide adsorbate concentration ranges, applicable to heterogeneous and homogeneous systems [53].

q e = K RP C e 1 + α RP C e g

where q e, mg g−1, is the amount of adsorbate adsorbed per unit weight of adsorbent at equilibrium; K RP, L g−1, and α RP, (mg L−1)g are Redlich–Peterson constants and g (dimensionless) is an exponent with a value within 0 and 1.

Note: Redlich–Peterson isotherm translates into Henry’s law when g = 0, into Langmuir isotherm when g = 1 and into Freundlich isotherm when g = 1 and α RP >> 1 [17, 113].

See adsorption, adsorbate, adsorbent.

  1. regenerant

The substance or solution used to restore the adsorption capacity of spent biochar [50].

  1. regeneration

The process used to recover the adsorption capacity of the spent biochar without repeating a chemical or physical activation step. It may include chemicals to oxidize the adsorbed material, steam to drive off the adsorbed material, solvents and biological conversion processes.

See adsorption, spent biochar.

  1. regeneration agent

See regenerant.

  1. regeneration cycles

The number of repeated adsorption-desorption cycles that biochar can be subjected to after which further usage as adsorbent will be economically unattractive as a result of decreased adsorption capacity.

  1. regeneration solution

See regenerant.

  1. sandy soil

(i) Texture group consisting of sand and loamy sand textures. (ii) Family particle-size class for soils with sand or loamy sand textures and below 35 % rock fragments in upper subsoil horizons [7].

See soil texture, soil separates.

  1. seed coating (with biochar)

See biochar-coated seeds.

  1. Sips isotherm

A hybrid equation featuring Freundlich and Langmuir isotherms for predicting heterogeneous adsorption systems and to bypass the limitation of Freundlich isotherm at higher adsorbate concentrations.

q e = K s C e β s 1 + α s C e β s

where q e , mg g−1, is the equilibrium amount of adsorbate adsorbed per unit weight of adsorbent K S, L g−1, and α S, L mg−1, are the Sips isotherm model constants and β S, dimensionless, is the isotherm model exponent.

Note 1: The Sips isotherm reduces to Freundlich and Langmuir at low and high adsorbate concentrations respectively.

Note 2: Operating conditions such as pH, temperature and concentration determine the outcome of the equation parameters [63].

See adsorption, adsorbate, adsorbent.

  1. slash-and-char agriculture

A sustainable agricultural practice where vegetation is cleared and then charred on site to biochar rather than burnt to ash [114].

See biochar.

  1. smart biochar

See engineered biochar, functionalized biochar.

  1. soil aeration

The proportion of air-filled pores in the soil. The process by which air in the soil is replaced by air from the atmosphere. Depends largely on the structure of the medium, the volume and continuity of pores. Addition of biochar may increase soil aeration in certain soil types, mainly those with high clay content.

  1. soil albedo

The fraction of the incident radiation that is reflected from the soil surface. Its value ranges from 0 to 1, where 0 represents a blackbody (theoretical medium) absorbing 100 % of the incident radiation. Biochar is close to a blackbody and will lower the albedo of bare soils to which it is applied as a power function with increasing biochar application rate, depending on soil moisture content and biochar application method [115].

  1. soil bulk density

The mass of dry soil per unit of bulk volume, including the air space. The bulk density of most soils is reduced after biochar addition [116, 117].

  1. soil carbon sequestration

Land management strategy that increases the soil organic carbon content, resulting in a net removal of CO2 from the atmosphere [118].

See carbon storage (carbon stock), climate change mitigation, carbon abatement.

  1. soil erosion

The movement and transport of soil by various agents, particularly water, wind, and mass movement. Factors such as rainfall intensity, rainfall volume, slope angle, soil properties, land use, and land management determine soil erosion rates. Soil erosion is reversible if certain soil protection and rehabilitation measures are taken. Biochar addition to weathered soils can help reduce soil losses, by improving their physical properties (such as aggregate stability) and increase erosion resistance [119, 120].

See desertification.

  1. soil hydraulic conductivity

An expression of the readiness with which a liquid, such as water, flows through soil, in response to a given potential gradient. Represents the ability of a porous medium to conduct water. The effect of biochar on soil hydraulic properties depends on the feedstock and amount of biochar added and soil type including soil texture, aggregation, mineralogy. Contrasting results are found in the biochar studies [27, 117].

  1. soil organic matter (SOM)

The sum total of all organic carbon-containing substances in soils. Chemically and physically, SOM consists of a mixture of plant and animal residues in various stages of decomposition and recombination, substances synthesized microbiologically and/or chemically from the breakdown products, and the bodies of live and dead microorganisms and small animals and their decomposing remains [121].

  1. soil pH

The pH of a solution in equilibrium with soil. It is determined by means of a glass, quinhydrone, or other suitable electrode or indicator at a specified soil–solution ratio in a specified solution, usually distilled water, 0.01 M CaCl2, or 1 M KCl [7, 52].

See acid soil, alkaline soil.

  1. soil separates

The specific ranges of soil particle sizes. The smallest particles are clay particles and are classified as having diameters of less than 0.002 mm. Clay particles are plate-shaped instead of spherical, allowing for an increased specific surface area. The next smallest particles are silt particles and have diameters between 0.002 mm and 0.05 mm (in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) soil taxonomy). The largest particles are sand particles and are larger than 0.05 mm in diameter. Furthermore, large sand particles can be described as coarse, intermediate as medium, and the smaller as fine. Other countries have their own particle size classifications. Table 1 provides a comparison between the soil particle sizes as defined in the United States Department of Agriculture soil taxonomy and World Reference Base for Soil Resources (WRB).

See soil texture.

Table 1:

Soil separates and their diameters.

Name of soil separate Diameter limits (mm) (USDA classification) Diameter limits (mm) (WRB classification)
Clay <0.002 <0.002
Silt 0.002–0.05 0.002–0.063
Very fine sand 0.05–0.10 0.063–0.125
Fine sand 0.10–0.25 0.125–0.20
Medium sand 0.25–0.50 0.20–0.63
Coarse sand 0.50–1.00 0.63–1.25
Very coarse sand 1.00–2.00 1.25–2.00
  1. soil texture

The relative proportions of the various soil separates in a soil as described by the 12 classes of soil texture [7]. The limits of the various classes are as follows:

Clay: Soil material that contains 40 % or more clay, below 45 % sand, and below 40 % silt.

Clay loam: Soil material that contains 27 to 40 % clay and 20 to 45 % sand.

Loam: Soil material that contains 7 to 27 % clay, 28 to 50 % silt, and below 52 % sand.

Loamy sand: Soil material that contains between 70 and 91 % sand and the percentage of silt plus 1.5 times the percentage of clay is 15 or more; and the percentage of silt plus twice the percentage of clay below 30 %.

Sand: Soil material that contains 85 % or more of sand; percentage of silt, plus 1.5 times the percentage of clay, shall not exceed 15.

Sandy clay: Soil material that contains 35 % or more clay and 45 % or more sand.

Sandy clay loam: Soil material that contains 20 to 35 % clay, 45 % sand.

Sandy loam: Soil material that contains 7 to 20 % clay, above 52 % sand, and the percentage of silt plus twice the percentage of clay is 30 or more; or below 7 % clay, below 50 % silt, and above 43 % sand.

Silt: Soil material that contains 80 % or more silt and below 12 % clay.

Silty clay: Soil material that contains 40 % or more clay and 40 % or more silt.

Silty clay loam: Soil material that contains 27 to 40 % clay and below 20 % sand.

Silt loam: Soil material that contains 50 % or more silt and 12 to 27 % clay (or) 50 to 80 % silt and below 12 % clay.

See soil separates, clayey soil, loamy soil, sandy soil.

  1. sorption

The process by which a substance (sorbate) is sorbed (adsorbed or absorbed) on or in another substance (sorbent) [122]].

See absorption, adsorption.

  1. spent biochar

The term given to biochar with an exhausted adsorption capacity and which requires regenerative or reactivation processes to recover its adsorptive capacity. This is the case where the adsorbate’s rate of adsorption onto and desorption off the adsorbent are in equilibrium [31].

See adsorption capacity, regeneration, regenerant.

  1. tailor-made biochar

See engineered biochar, functionalized biochar, smart biochar.

  1. Temkin isotherm model

An isotherm which accounts for adsorbate-adsorbent interactions and is characterized by the uniform distribution of binding energies up to some maximum value.

q e = R T b T ln ( A T C e )

where q e, mg g−1, is the equilibrium amount of adsorbate adsorbed per unit weight of adsorbent; C e is the equilibrium concentration of adsorbate, mg L−1; A T, L g−1, is the Temkin isotherm equilibrium binding constant and b T, J mol−1, is the Temkin isotherm constant; R, J mol−1 K−1, is the universal gas constant; and T, K, is the temperature.

Note 1: Assumes a linear decrease in heat of adsorption of all molecules in the layer by ignoring extremely low and large adsorbate concentrations.

Note 2: Poor fits are usually obtained for complex adsorption systems with liquid-phase adsorption isotherms included [63].

See adsorption, adsorbate, adsorbent.

  1. ternary adsorption system

A multi-component system with three different types of adsorbates.

See adsorption.

  1. Terra Preta soil

Terra Preta (de Índio) is the local Portuguese name for a soil anthropogenically enriched by ancient indigenous cultures with nutrients and carbon that occurs, mainly, in some parts of the Amazon Basin, and literally means “Indian Black Earth.” It commonly contains human artifacts (ceramics), moreover it is enriched with P, Ca, Sr, Ba, Mn, and pyrogenic carbon [123]. It is a source of inspiration and a model for some biochar research topics.

  1. torrefaction (of biomass)

Thermochemical processing of biomass at atmospheric pressure, absence of oxygen and at temperatures typically between 200 and 320 °C. Torrefaction changes biomass properties to provide a better fuel quality for combustion and gasification applications. The final product is the remaining solid, dry, blackened material that is referred to as torrefied biomass or biocoal. Depending on the feedstock and required product quality excess heat can be generated for drying purposes or electricity production.

See biocoal.

  1. water holding capacity

The ability of a soil to contain and to retain water. Dependent upon the factors, which determine hydraulic conductivity and permeability, e.g., texture, organic matter, porosity, and interconnectedness of pores [124].

See field capacity.

  1. Weber and Morris intra-particle diffusion model (IPD)

A diffusion-based single resistance rate model for the purposes of revealing the underlying rate determining step for adsorption onto solid adsorbents.

q t = k p t 1 / 2 + C

where k p, mg g−1 min−1/2, is the intra-particle diffusion rate constant; C, mg g−1, is a constant that describes the thickness of the boundary layer.

Note 1: A zero value of C makes the adsorption rate fully pore diffusion controlled, otherwise boundary layer effect may be at play [125].

Note 2: Generally, multi-straight line regions arise upon application of IPD highlighting the mechanism of adsorption [20].

See adsorption, boundary layer.

  1. wilting point

The mass of water per unit weight or per unit soil bulk volume in the soil, expressed in percent, that is held so tightly by the soil matrix that roots cannot absorb this water and a plant will wilt [126].

See field capacity, water holding capacity.

  1. Yoshida H-bonding

Occurs between O and/or N-containing functional groups on the biochar surface and the aromatic rings of the adsorbate [62].

See adsorption.

3 Conclusions

The above list of terms related to biochar research is only the beginning of a dynamic document that aims to be enriched with further terms – and possibly refine the existing ones – in the future. Its objective is to become a reference document for students, researchers and any professional working with this material. If one term had to be singled out, the definition for the term “biochar” would be the one. Since biochar is a multi-functional material and biochar research is multi-disciplinary, it was important to develop an inclusive definition that is not bound to a specific application but covers all current applications and emerging future ones. This does not mean that biochar definitions provided elsewhere are not scientifically sound or complete. If a short and quick definition is required, this may come from the word biochar itself. The prefix “bio-” refers to a biomass-based material, whereas the suffix “-char” refers to the carbonization process of the biomass. Regardless of current and emerging applications, it is important to highlight that biochar production and applications should be environmentally sustainable. In this framework, biochar valorization strategies should involve negative emissions technologies (NET) that can remove carbon from the atmosphere and contribute to the reduction in greenhouse gases emission worldwide.

Membership of sponsoring bodies

Membership of the IUPAC Chemistry and the Environment Division Committee for the period 2022–2023 is as follows:

President: Prof. Roberto Terzano (Italy); Past President: Prof. Hemda Garelick (United Kingdom); Vice President: Prof. Annemieke Farenhorst (Canada); Secretary: Prof. Fani Sakellariadou (Greece); Titular Members: Dr. Wenlin Chen (United States), Prof. Rai Kookana (Australia), Dr. Bradley Miller (United States), Prof. Irina Perminova (Russia), Prof. Diane Purchase (United Kingdom), Prof. Weiguo Song (China); Associate Members: Prof. Cristina Delerue-Matos (Portugal), Dr. Matteo Guidotti (Italy), Dr. Bipul Behari Saha (India), Prof. Walter Waldman (Brazil), Prof. Weiping Wu (China), Prof. Baoshan Xing (United States); National Representatives: Prof. Doo Soo Chung (South Korea), Dr. Jérôme François (France), Prof. Mélanie Kah (New Zealand), Prof. Roland Kallenborn (Norway), Prof. Nadia Kandile (Egypt), Prof. Oluseun Elizabeth Popoola (Nigeria), Dr. Diana Rabadjieva (Bulgaria), Prof. Hiroto Tamura (Japan), Dr. Susanne Laura Waaijers (Netherlands), Prof. Cora Young (Canada).


Corresponding author: Dimitrios Kalderis, Department of Electronics Engineering, Hellenic Mediterranean University, Chania, Crete 73100, Greece. e-mail:
Article note: Sponsoring body: IUPAC Chemistry and the Environment Division: see more details on p. 1568. This manuscript was prepared in the framework of IUPAC project 2015-056-3-600.
  1. Research funding: Frank Verheijen acknowledges the financial support of CESAM (UID/AMB/50017/2019) and FCT/MCTES through national funds, and the co-funding by the FEDER, within the PT2020 Partnership Agreement and Compete 2020.

List of abbreviations

CSA

Climate smart agriculture

EBC

European Biochar Certificate

EC

Electrical conductivity

FC

Field capacity

GHG

Greenhouse gas emissions

HTC

Hydrothermal carbonization

IBI

International Biochar Initiative

IEP

Isoelectric point

IPD

Weber and Morris intra-particle diffusion model

MRT

Mean residence time

NOx

Nitrogen oxides

PFO

Lagergren pseudo-first order kinetics model

PM

Particulate matter

PSO

Lagergren pseudo-second order kinetics model

PyCCS

Pyrogenic carbon capture and storage

PZNC

Point of zero net charge

SOM

Soil organic matter

VOCs

Volatile organic compounds

References

[1] A. Tomczyk, Z. Sokolowska, P. Boguta. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 19, 191 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-020-09523-3.Search in Google Scholar

[2] P. R. Yaashikaa, P. S. Kumara, S. Varjani, A. Saravanan. Biotechnol. Rep. 28, e00570 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00570.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[3] IUPAC. Compendium of chemical terminology, in (the “Gold Book”). Compiled by A. D. McNaught, A. Wilkinson, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 2nd ed. (1997). Online version (2019-) created by S. J. Chalk. ISBN 0-9678550-9-8.Search in Google Scholar

[4] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/A00016 Search in Google Scholar

[5] P. Ahmad, M. N. V. Prasad (Eds.). Environmental Adaptations and Stress Tolerance of Plants in the Era of Climate Change, Springer-Verlag, New York (2012).10.1007/978-1-4614-0815-4Search in Google Scholar

[6] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/A00036 Search in Google Scholar

[7] Soil Science Society of America. Glossary of soil science terms (2020), Available at: https://www.soils.org/publications/soils-glossary/#.Search in Google Scholar

[8] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/A00108 Search in Google Scholar

[9] H. Marsh, F. R. Reinoso. Activated Carbon, p. 554, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006).Search in Google Scholar

[10] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/A00152 Search in Google Scholar

[11] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/A00153 Search in Google Scholar

[12] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/A00155 Search in Google Scholar

[13] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/A00156 Search in Google Scholar

[14] D. Everett. Pure Appl. Chem. 31, 577 (1972), https://doi.org/10.1351/pac197231040577.Search in Google Scholar

[15] J. J. Pignatello, M. Uchimiya, S. Abiven, M. W. I. Schmidt. Evolution of biochar properties in soil. in Biochar for Environmental Management Science, Technology and Implementation, J. Lehmann, S. Joseph (Eds.), pp. 195–233, Routledge, London (2015).Search in Google Scholar

[16] X. Tan, Y. Liu, G. Zeng, X. Wang, X. Hu, Y. Gu, Z. Yang. Chemosphere 125, 70 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.058.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] H. N. Tran, S.-J. You, A. Hosseini-Bandegharaei, H.-P. Chao. Water Res. 120, 88 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.04.014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] M. T. Yagub, T. K. Sen, S. Afroze, H. M. Ang. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 209, 172 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2014.04.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] M. I. Inyang, B. Gao, Y. Yao, Y. Xue, A. Zimmerman, A. Mosa, P. Pullammanappallil, Y. S. Ok, X. Cao. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 406 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2015.1096880.Search in Google Scholar

[20] G. F. Malash, M. I. El-Khaiary. Chem. Eng. J. 163, 256 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.07.059.Search in Google Scholar

[21] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/AT06934 Search in Google Scholar

[22] S. Chowdhury, R. Mishra, P. Saha, P. Kushwaha. Desalination 265, 159 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.07.047.Search in Google Scholar

[23] S. E. Smith, D. Read. The symbionts forming arbuscular mycorrhizas. in Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, S. E. Smith, D. Read (Eds.), pp. 13–41, Academic Press, New York, 3rd ed. (2008).10.1016/B978-012370526-6.50003-9Search in Google Scholar

[24] I. Ipsilantis, M. Karamesouti, D. Gasparatos. Beneficial microorganisms for the management of soil phosphorus. in Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, E. Lichtfouse (Ed.), pp. 53–75, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, Vol. 32 (2018).10.1007/978-3-319-98914-3_3Search in Google Scholar

[25] X. Zhu, B. Chen, L. Zhu, B. Xing. Environ. Pollut. 227, 98 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.032.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/A00442 Search in Google Scholar

[27] M. Kleber, W. Hockaday, P. S. Nico. Characteristics of biochar: macro-molecular properties. in Biochar for Environmental Management: Science, Technology and Implementation, J. Lehmann, S. Joseph (Eds.), pp. 111–137, Routledge, London (2015).Search in Google Scholar

[28] P. Tammeorg, A. C. Bastos, S. Jeffery, F. Rees, J. Kern, E. R. Graber, M. Ventura, M. Kibblewhite, A. Amaro, A. Budai, C. M. d. S. Cordovil, X. Domene, C. Gardi, G. Gascó, J. Horák, C. Kammann, E. Kondrlova, D. Laird, S. Loureiro, M. A. S. Martins, P. Panzacchi, M. Prasad, M. Prodana, A. P. Puga, G. Ruysschaert, L. Sas-Paszt, F. C. Silva, W. G. Teixeira, G. Tonon, G. D. Vedove, C. Zavalloni, B. Glaser, F. G. A. Verheijen. J. Environ. Eng. Landsc. Manag. 25, 192 (2017), https://doi.org/10.3846/16486897.2016.1239582.Search in Google Scholar

[29] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/B00649 Search in Google Scholar

[30] X. Xiong, K. Iris, L. Cao, D. C. Tsang, S. Zhang, Y. S. Ok. Bioresour. Technol. 246, 254 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.163.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] J. Lehmann, S. Joseph (Eds.). Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation, Routledge, London (2015).10.4324/9780203762264Search in Google Scholar

[32] United States Patent no. US20170022117A1 – Biochar coated seeds (12th of June 2024). Inventors: V. Traxler, Han S. Kim, R. Malyala, Timothy A. Thompson, B. Buege, Mark L. Jarand. Current assignee: Talipot Cool Extract IP LLC, USA..Search in Google Scholar

[33] J. Lehmann, S. Abiven, M. Kleber, G. Pan, B. P. Singh, S. Sohi, A. Zimmerman. Persistence of biochar in soil. in Biochar for Environmental Management: Science, Technology and Implementation, J. Lehmann, S. Joseph (Eds.), pp. 235–282, Routledge, London (2015).Search in Google Scholar

[34] L. Leng, H. Huang, H. Li, J. Li, W. Zhou. Sci. Total Environ. 647, 210 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.402.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[35] B. Singh, M. M. Dolk, Q. Shen, M. C. Arbestain. Biochar pH, electrical conductivity and liming potential. in Biochar: A guide to analytical methods, B. Singh, M. C. Arbestain, J. Lehmann (Eds.), pp. 23–25, CRC Press, London (2017).10.1071/9781486305100Search in Google Scholar

[36] F. Qi, Z. Dong, D. Lamb, R. Naidu, N. S. Bolan, Y. S. Ok, C. Liu, N. Khan, M. A. H. Johir, K. T. Semple. Chemosphere 180, 564 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.04.014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[37] S. Barskov, M. Zappi, P. Bucchireddy, S. Dufreche, J. Guillory, D. Gang, R. Hernandez, R. Bajpai, J. Baudier, R. Cooper, R. Sharp. Renew. Energy 142, 624 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.068.Search in Google Scholar

[38] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/B00660 Search in Google Scholar

[39] A. C. Newton, S. N. Johnson, P. J. Gregory. Euphytica 179, 3 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0359-4.Search in Google Scholar

[40] Y. Elad, E. Cytryn, Y. Meller Harel, B. Lew, E. R. Graber. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 50, 335 (2011), https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/pm/article/view/5419.Search in Google Scholar

[41] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/C00824 Search in Google Scholar

[42] I. Tsibranska, E. H. Bulg. Chem. Commun. 43, 370 (2011).Search in Google Scholar

[43] G. Tchobanoglous, F. L. Burton, H. D. Stensel. Wastewater engineering treatment and reuse, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Boston (2003).Search in Google Scholar

[44] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/C00794 Search in Google Scholar

[45] S. Shackley, J. Hammond, J. Gaunt, R. Ibarrola. Carbon Manag. 2, 335 (2011), https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.11.22.Search in Google Scholar

[46] J. L. Field, C. M. H. Keske, G. L. Birch, M. W. DeFoort, M. Francesca Cotrufo. GCB Bioenergy 5, 177 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12032.Search in Google Scholar

[47] A. C. Dias, L. Arroja. J. Clean. Prod. 24, 30 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.005.Search in Google Scholar

[48] Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Global forest resources assessment update 2005 Terms and definitions, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome (2004), Available at: http://lfccsandclimatechange.pbworks.com/f/GFRA%202005%20-%20Terms%20and%20definitions.pdf/.Search in Google Scholar

[49] C. K. Savile, J. J. Lalonde. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 22, 818 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2011.06.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[50] G. Sposito. The chemistry of soils, p. 342, Oxford University Press, New York, 2nd ed. (2008).Search in Google Scholar

[51] H. Yang, R. Yan, H. Chen, D. H. Lee, C. Zheng. Fuel 86, 1781 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013.Search in Google Scholar

[52] V. Pasangulapati, K. D. Ramachandriya, A. Kumar, M. R. Wilkins, C. L. Jones, R. L. Huhnke. Bioresour. Technol. 114, 663 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.036.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[53] P. J. Johnson, D. J. Setsuda, R. S. Williams. Chapter 8 – activated carbon for automotive applications. in Carbon materials for advanced technologies, T. B. Burcell (Ed.), p. 235–268, Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford (1999).10.1016/B978-008042683-9/50010-8Search in Google Scholar

[54] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/C01048 Search in Google Scholar

[55] European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, A new Circular Economy Action Plan, Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0029&from=EN.Search in Google Scholar

[56] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Glossary, acronyms and chemical symbols. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change, Working Group III Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report, pp. 1249–1280, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2015).10.1017/CBO9781107415416.023Search in Google Scholar

[57] Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Climate-Smart Agriculture Sourcebook, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome (2013).Search in Google Scholar

[58] D. Mohan, C. U. PittmanJr. J. Hazard. Mater. 142, 1 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[59] R. H. Crabtree (Ed.). The organometallic chemistry of the transition metals, p. 520, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey (2009).Search in Google Scholar

[60] UNCCD. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification, UNCCD, Paris, France (1994).Search in Google Scholar

[61] C. B. Crawford, B. Quinn (Eds.). Microplastic pollutants, p. 336, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2016).Search in Google Scholar

[62] H. N. Tran, S.-J. You, H.-P. Chao. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 34, 1708 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-017-0056-7.Search in Google Scholar

[63] K. Y. Foo, B. H. Hameed. Chem. Eng. J. 156, 2 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.09.013.Search in Google Scholar

[64] B. Mahanty, S. K. Behera, N. K. Sahoo. Sep. Sci. Technol. 58, 1275 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2023.2189050.Search in Google Scholar

[65] EBC European Biochar Certificate – Guidelines for a Sustainable Production of Biochar. European Biochar Foundation (EBC), Arbaz, (2012). http://www.europeanbiochar.org/en/download. Version 8.3E of 1st September 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[66] X. Dong, L. Q. Ma, Y. Li. J. Hazard. Mater. 190, 909 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.04.008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[67] S. H. Chien, W. R. Clayton. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44, 265 (1980), https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400020013x.Search in Google Scholar

[68] A. U. Rajapaksha, S. S. Chen, D. C. Tsang, M. Zhang, M. Vithanage, S. Mandal, B. Gao, N. S. Bolan, Y. S. Ok. Chemosphere 148, 276 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.043.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[69] S. Joseph, H. M. Anawar, P. Storer, P. Blackwell, C. Chee, L. Yun, P. Munroe, S. Donne, J. Horvat, W. Jianli. Pedosphere 25, 749 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(15)30056-4.Search in Google Scholar

[70] C. H. Chia, B. P. Singh, S. Joseph, E. R. Graber, P. Munroe. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 108, 26 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2014.05.021.Search in Google Scholar

[71] L. Beesley, E. Moreno-Jiménez, J. L. Gomez-Eyles, E. Harris, B. Robinson, T. Sizmur. Environ. Pollut. 159, 3269 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.07.023.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[72] D. E. Daugaard, R. C. Brown. Energy Fuel. 17, 934 (2003), https://doi.org/10.1021/ef020260x.Search in Google Scholar

[73] M. Y. Zhao, A. Enders, J. Lehmann. Biomass Bioenergy 69, 183 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.07.017.Search in Google Scholar

[74] Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Rome Declaration on World Food Security and World Food Summit Plan of Action. World Food Summit 13-17 November 1996, Rome, Italy (1996).Search in Google Scholar

[75] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/F02555 Search in Google Scholar

[76] A. Molino, S. Chianese, D. Musmarra. J. Neurochem. 25, 10 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2015.11.005.Search in Google Scholar

[77] V. Kirubakaran, V. Sivaramakrishnan, R. Nalini, T. Sekar, M. Premalatha, P. Subramanian. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13, 179 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2007.07.001.Search in Google Scholar

[78] S. Schimmelpfennig, B. Glaser. J. Environ. Qual. 41, 1001 (2012), https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0146.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[79] J. A. Libra, K. S. Ro, C. Kammann, A. Funke, N. D. Berge, Y. Neubauer, M.-M. Titirici, C. Fühner, O. Bens, J. Kern, K.-H. Emmerich. Biofuels 2, 71 (2011), https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.10.81.Search in Google Scholar

[80] B. K. Krauskopf. Introduction to geochemistry, McGraw-Hill, New York (1967).Search in Google Scholar

[81] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/I03180 Search in Google Scholar

[82] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/I03275 Search in Google Scholar

[83] H. Janzen, C. Campbell, B. Ellert, E. Bremer. Dev. Soil Sci. 25, 277 (1997), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2481(97)80039-6.Search in Google Scholar

[84] Y. Ho, G. McKay. Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 76, 332 (1998), https://doi.org/10.1205/095758298529696.Search in Google Scholar

[85] G. Blanchard, M. Maunaye, G. Martin. Water Res. 18, 1501 (1984), https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(84)90124-6.Search in Google Scholar

[86] Y. S. Ho, D. J. Wase, C. Forster. Environ. Technol. 17, 71 (1996), https://doi.org/10.1080/09593331708616362.Search in Google Scholar

[87] M. P. Pandey, C. S. Kim. Chem. Eng. Technol. 34, 29 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201000270.Search in Google Scholar

[88] T. Filipek. Liming, effects on soil properties. in Encyclopedia of Agrophysics, Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series, J. Gliński, J. Horabik, J. Lipiec (Eds.), pp. 17–34, Springer, Dordrecht (2011).10.1007/978-90-481-3585-1_84Search in Google Scholar

[89] J. J. Milledge, B. Smith, P. W. Dyer, P. Harvey. Energies 7, 7194 (2014), https://doi.org/10.3390/en7117194.Search in Google Scholar

[90] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/M03672 Search in Google Scholar

[91] J. Rouquerol, D. Avnir, C. Fairbridge, D. Everett, J. Haynes, N. Pernicone, J. Ramsay, K. Sing, K. Unger. Pure Appl. Chem. 66, 1739 (1994), https://doi.org/10.1351/pac199466081739.Search in Google Scholar

[92] J. Brewer. Fabric and Mineral Analysis of Soils, p. 470, Wiley, New York (1964).Search in Google Scholar

[93] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/M03853 Search in Google Scholar

[94] M. Thommes, K. Kaneko, A. V. Neimark, J. P. Olivier, F. Rodriguez-Reinoso, J. Rouquerol, K. S. Sing. Pure Appl. Chem. 87, 1051 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2014-1117.Search in Google Scholar

[95] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/M03907 Search in Google Scholar

[96] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/M03906 Search in Google Scholar

[97] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/M04016 Search in Google Scholar

[98] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/M04050 Search in Google Scholar

[99] N. Chausali, J. Saxena, R. Prasad. J. Agric. Food Res. 5, 100191 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2021.100191.Search in Google Scholar

[100] S. Ramanayaka, M. Vithanage, D. S. Alessi, W.-J. Liu, A. C. A. Jayasundera, Y. S. Ok. Environ. Sci. Nano 7, 3279 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EN00486C.Search in Google Scholar

[101] A. Buckwell, E. Nadeu. Nutrient recovery and reuse (NRR) in European agriculture. in A Review of the Issues, Opportunities, and Actions, p. 92, RISE Foundation, Brussels (2016).Search in Google Scholar

[102] A. Sajjadi, W.-Y. Chen, N. O. Egiebora. Rev. Chem. Eng. 35, 735 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2017-0113.Search in Google Scholar

[103] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/P04667 Search in Google Scholar

[104] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/P04760 Search in Google Scholar

[105] I. G. Karunanayake, C. M. Navarathna, S. R. Gunatilake, M. Crowley, R. Anderson, D. Mohan, F. Perez, C. U. PittmanJr., T. Mlsna. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2, 3467 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.9b00430.Search in Google Scholar

[106] A. Khataee, P. Gholami, D. Kalderis, E. Pachatouridou, M. Konsolakis. Ultrason. Sonochem. 41, 503 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.10.013.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[107] A. Khataee, B. Kayan, P. Gholami, D. Kalderis, S. Akay, L. Dinpazhoh. Ultrason. Sonochem. 39, 540 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.05.023.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[108] H.-P. Schmidt, A. Anca-Couce, N. Hagemann, C. Werner, D. Gerten, W. Lucht, C. Kammann. GCB Bioenergy 11, 573 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12553.Search in Google Scholar

[109] C. Werner, H.-P. Schmidt, D. Gerten, W. Lucht, C. Kammann. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 044036 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabb0e.Search in Google Scholar

[110] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/P04961 Search in Google Scholar

[111] H. Tan, C. T. Lee, P. Y. Ong, K. Y. Wong, C. P. C. Bong, C. Li, Y. Gao. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1051, 012075 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1051/1/012075.Search in Google Scholar

[112] O. R. Harvey, L.-J. Kuo, A. R. Zimmerman, P. Louchouarn, J. E. Amonette, B. E. Herbert. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 1415 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1021/es2040398.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[113] F.-C. Wu, B.-L. Liu, K.-T. Wu, R.-L. Tseng. Chem. Eng. J. 162, 21 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.03.006.Search in Google Scholar

[114] J. Lehmann, J. P. da SilvaJr., M. Rondon, M. S. Cravo, J. Greenwood, T. Nehls, C. Steiner, B. Glaser. Slash-and-char – a feasible alternative for soil fertility management in the central Amazon? in 17th World Congress of Soil Science, Bangkok, Thailand. CD–ROM Paper no. 449, pp. 1–12 (2002).Search in Google Scholar

[115] F. G. Verheijen, S. Jeffery, M. van der Velde, V. Penížek, M. Beland, A. C. Bastos, J. J. Keizer. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 044008 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044008.Search in Google Scholar

[116] H. Blanco-Canqui. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 81, 687 (2017), https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2017.01.0017.Search in Google Scholar

[117] M. O. Omondi, X. Xia, A. Nahayo, X. Liu, P. K. Korai, G. Pan. Geoderma 274, 28 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.03.029.Search in Google Scholar

[118] K. J. Mach, S. Planton, C. von Stechow. Annex II: glossary. in Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, R. K. Pachauri, L. A. Meyer (Eds.), pp. 117–130, IPCC, Geneva (2014).Search in Google Scholar

[119] L. Zhi-Guo, G. Chi-Ming, Z. Run-Hua, I. Mohamed, Z. Guo-Shi, W. Li, Z. Run-Qin, C. Fang, L. Yi. Agric. Water Manag. 185, 145 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.02.018.Search in Google Scholar

[120] S.-H. Jien, C.-S. Wang. Catena 110, 225 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2013.06.021.Search in Google Scholar

[121] M. Schnitzer, H.-R. Schulten. Adv. Agron. 55, 199 (1995), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60540-4.Search in Google Scholar

[122] https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/S05769 Search in Google Scholar

[123] T. J. F. Cunha, E. H. Novotny, B. E. Madari, L. Martin-Neto, M. O. de O Rezende, L. P. Canelas, V. de M Benites. Spectroscopy characterization of humic acids isolated from amazonian dark earth soils (Terra Preta De Índio). in Amazonian dark earths: Wim Sombroek’s vision, W. I. Woods, W. G. Teixeira, J. Lehmann, C. Steiner, A. WinklerPrins, L. Rebellato (Eds.), Springer, Berlin (2009).10.1007/978-1-4020-9031-8_20Search in Google Scholar

[124] W. Chesworth. Encyclopedia of Soil Science, p. 822, Springer Science and Business Media, New York (2008).10.1007/978-1-4020-3995-9Search in Google Scholar

[125] W. J. Weber, J. C. Morris. J. Sanit. Eng. Div. 89, 31 (1963), https://doi.org/10.1061/JSEDAI.0000430.Search in Google Scholar

[126] M. B. Kirkham. Field capacity, wilting point, available water and the non-limiting water range. In Principles of Soil and Plant Water Relations, M. B. Kirkham (Ed.), pp. 101–115, Academic Press, New York (2005).10.1016/B978-012409751-3/50008-6Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-01-04
Accepted: 2024-05-22
Published Online: 2024-07-01
Published in Print: 2024-11-26

© 2024 IUPAC & De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. In this issue
  3. IUPAC Technical Reports
  4. Terms of Latin origin relating to sample characterization (IUPAC Technical Report)
  5. Glossary of terms used in biochar research (IUPAC Technical Report)
  6. Properties and units in the clinical laboratory sciences. Part XXVIII. NPU codes for characterizing subpopulations of the hematopoietic lineage, described from their clusters of differentiation molecules (IUPAC Technical Report)
  7. Special Topic: Mass spectrometry congress in Italy – MASSA 2023l; Guest Editor: Giuliana Bianco
  8. Milk protein polymorphisms of Aosta Valley cattle breeds
  9. Capabilities and drawbacks of mass spectrometry in the forensic field: analysis of real cases dealing with toxicology and explosives
  10. Mapping the distribution of bioactive compounds and aroma/flavour precursors in green coffee beans with an integrated mass spectrometry-based approach
  11. Fire fighters and mass spectrometry: from the world of combustion to the molecular ion
  12. Special Topic: IUPAC Distinguished Women in Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Awards 2023; Guest Editor: Mary J. Garson
  13. Method development for multielement determination of halogens and sulfur in teas
  14. Regular Review Article
  15. A brief history of risk assessment for agrochemicals
  16. Regular Research Articles
  17. Capture of volatile iodine by aromatic amines solutions
  18. Facile and green hydrothermal synthesis of MgAl/NiAl/ZnAl layered double hydroxide nanosheets: a physiochemical comparison
  19. Production of oil palm mesocarp fiber-based hydrogel using selected cross-linking acids
Downloaded on 28.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/pac-2021-0106/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button