Startseite Acyl chloride carbon insertion into dicarbaborane cages – new route to tricarbollide cages
Artikel Öffentlich zugänglich

Acyl chloride carbon insertion into dicarbaborane cages – new route to tricarbollide cages

  • Bohumil Štíbr EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 20. Dezember 2014

Abstract

Reactions between the arachno-6,9-C2B8H14 dicarbaborane and acyl chlorides, RCOCl, in the presence of amine bases in CH2Cl2, followed by acidification with conc. H2SO4 at 0 °C, generate in high yields a series of neutral alkyl and aryl tricarbollides of structure 8-R-nido-7,8,9-C3B8H11 (where R=alkyls and aryls). These skeletal alkylcarbonation (SAC) reactions are consistent with an aldol-type condensation between the RCO group and open-face dicarbaborane hydrogen atoms, which is associated with the insertion of the acyl chloride RC unit into the structure under elimination of three extra hydrogen atoms as H2O and HCl. The reactions thus result in an effective cross-coupling between R and the tricarbollide cage. High-temperature reactions between 8-Ar-nido-7,8,9-C3B8H11 (where Ar=Ph, 1-C10H7, and 2-C10H7) compounds and [CpFe(CO)2]2 produced the first types of monoaryl substituted twelve-vertex ferratricarbollide complexes of general constitution [1-(CpFe)-closo-ArC3B8H10] with three different arrangements of cluster carbon vertexes. The Fe-complexation is accompanied by extensive rearrangement of the cluster carbon atoms over the twelve-vertex cage and the complexes isolated can be regarded as ferrocene analogues.

Introduction

Tricarbollides (eleven-vertex nido tricarbaboranes) [1–3] have been discovered in 1995 by our group in collaboration with F. Teixidor’s team. The method for their synthesis consists in the insertion of the cyanide or isocyanide carbon into the structure of the [nido-5,6-C2B8H11]¯ anion [4–9]:

(1) [ n i d o -5,6-C 2 B 8 H 11 + HCN [7-(H 2 N)- n i d o -7,8,9-C 3 B 8 H 10  (1)

(2) [ n i d o -5,6-C 2 B 8 H 11 + t BuNC [7-( t BuHN)- n i d o -7,8,9-C 3 B 8 H 10  (2)

The carbon-insertion processes, in which the amino group has been retained on the cluster carbon, can be classified as skeletal aminocarbonation, which is typical for nido clusters [10, 11]. The reason for RNH-retention is that the lone extra hydrogen atom in [nido-5,6-C2B8H11]¯ is incapable of interrupting completely the C≡N or N≡C bond in reactions (1) and (2) to release NH3 or tBuNH2, respectively, under CH incorporation into the cluster. Further chemical transformations of the amino derivatives generated in turn a long series of tricarbollide compounds, inclusive of the parent nido compounds [7,8,9-C3B8H11]¯, 7,8,9-C3B8H12, and [7,8,10-C3B8H11]¯ and their derivatives [1–8].

The works by Brellochs at al. [12–15] on degradative insertion of the aldehyde carbon into the structure of the [6-HO-arachno-B10H13]2- dianion and some metal-carbonyl C-insertion reactions [16–18] suggested that some specific C≡O – carbon incorporation procedures might be, in principle, applicable to other cluster systems. This viable synthetic approaches have been recently followed by our group, which led to developing a new carbon-incorporation strategy based on interaction between acyl chlorides (RCOCl) and the arachno-6,9-C2B8H14 dicarbaborane in the presence of amine bases [19, 20]. These so called skeletal alkylcarbonation (SAC) reactions resulted in unprecedent incorporation of the CO–carbon into the dicarbaborane cage and formation of the symmetrical 8-substituted 7,8,9- tricarbollides. Herein we would like to feature some general aspects of this chemistry along with the first results on Fe – complexation reactions involving arylsubstituted ferratricarbollides.

Acyl chloride carbon-incorporation reactions

Treatment of the arachno-6,9-C2B8H14 (1) dicarbaborane [21–23] with excess RCOCls in the presence of two equivalents of amine base (PS or Et3N) (proton scavenger) in refluxing CH2Cl2 for 24 h, followed by adding concentrated H2SO4 at 0 °C (Scheme 1), led to the isolation of a series of neutral tricarbollides 8-R-nido-7,8,9-C3B8H11 (2) [19, 20]. The reaction seems to be of general character, as tested for RCOCls of varying R (alkyls and aryls) with yields of 2 ranging from 60–70 % and 80–95 % for alkyls and aryls, respectively. The reactions are restricted only by the availability of the starting acyl chloride.

Scheme 1 
          Tricarbollide compounds from the SAC cross-coupling via incorporation of the RC unit into the structure of arachno-6,9-C2B8H14 (1).
Scheme 1

Tricarbollide compounds from the SAC cross-coupling via incorporation of the RC unit into the structure of arachno-6,9-C2B8H14 (1).

The acyl chloride reactions are in accord with a simple stoichiometry of Eqs. (3 and 4) comprising the deprotonation of 1 along with the elimination of HCl and H2O:

(3) a r a c h n o -6,9-C 2 B 8 H 14 + base (base·H) + [ a r a c h n o -6,9-C 2 B 8 H 13      1  (3)

(4) [ a r a c h n o -6,9-C 2 B 8 H 13 + RCOCl + base         1 ¯ [8-R- n i d o -7,8,9-C 3 B 8 H 10 + base·HCl + H 2 O             2¯  (4)

Scheme 1 also suggests that these reactions are consistent with regiospecific insertion of the 3-electron carbyne RC≡ unit into the open-face section of the [arachno-6,9-C2B8H13]¯ anion (1¯) identified by B(5), C(6), C(9), and B(10) vertices to form the [8-R-nido-7,8,9-C3B8H10]¯ (2¯) anion. This must proceed under extraction of all the three extra hydrogen atoms which are then eliminated as H2O and HCl. It is also readily seen that the reactions result in an effective cross-coupling between R and the carborane cage of 1¯ which is then leaving the coupling process enriched in one more carbon vertex. From the viewpoint of cluster chemistry, the whole RC-insertion process of Eq. 4 can be envisaged as an arachnonido oxidation.

The reaction was proposed [11, 19, 20] to start with endo-acylation of 1¯ at B(5) to form the neutral acyl derivative endo-5-(RCO)-arachno-6,9-C2B8H13 (1a) (see Scheme 2) which then extracts the endo hydrogen atom from the cage C(6)H2 group to form the aldolization product 1b. Entailing H2O elimination, followed by C-insertion, would then lead directly to the formation of the neutral 2.

Scheme 2 
          Proposed aldolization mechanism for the insertion of the acyl chloride RC unit between the C(6) and C(9) positions in [arachno-6,9-C2B8H13]¯ (1¯)
Scheme 2

Proposed aldolization mechanism for the insertion of the acyl chloride RC unit between the C(6) and C(9) positions in [arachno-6,9-C2B8H13]¯ (1¯)

All the 8-R-nido-7,8,9-C3B8H11 (2) compounds can be deprotonated (Scheme 1), for example, by dissolution in 10 % aqueous NaOH, followed by precipitation of the solution with a suitable counter-cation (e.g., Tl+, NEt4+, etc.), to generate very stable anions of general constitution [8-R-nido-7,8,9-C3B8H10]¯ (2¯). However, the simplest way for ready preparation of these anions is based on treatment of compounds 2 with NEt3 in dichloromethane, which leads to quantitative formation of the corresponding Et3NH+ salts on evaporation of the solvent. These salts represent a very stable storage form of tricarbollides that can be converted easily into any other salt on dissolution in aqueous NaOH, followed by precipitation with a suitable counter-cation.

The structures of the anions [8-R-nido-7,8,9-C3B8H10]¯ (2¯) (for R=C6H5, 4-I-C6H4, and 1-C10H7) and of the neutral 8-(1-C10H7)-nido-7,8,9-C3B8H11 compound have been established unambiguously by X-ray diffraction analyses [19, 20] together with that of the parent [nido-7,8,9-C3B8H11]¯ [24]. The data confirm the overall Cs-symmetry and 8-substitution on the central carbon vertex of the pentagonal open face. The cluster C–C distances in the substituted anions approximate 1.530 Å and are slightly longer than the equivalent bond vector in the parent anion (mean 1.515 Å), and the C(7)–C(8)–C(9) angles approximate the ideal pentagonal angle.

Multinuclear 11B, 1H, and 13C NMR measurements on compounds of structures 2 and 2¯ also clearly confirm the 8-substitution. Because of the same Cs-symmetry, the NMR characteristics resemble those reported earlier for the parent nido tricarbollides [7,8,9-C3B8H11]¯ and 7,8,9-C3B8H12 [4–6]. As shown in Fig. 1, the 11B NMR spectra of compounds of structures 2 and 2¯ exhibit striking similarities, indicating that electronic effects exerted by individual substituents do not affect too much the chemical shifs at B-positions of the cluster. The spectra of the neutral compounds 2 entirely differ from those of the corresponding 2¯ counterparts due to the presence/absence of the bridging hydrogen. As exemplified by the spectra of the Ph anions in Fig. 2, those of their Et3NH+ and Tl+ salts rather differ. The latter salts exhibit a downfield shift (∼5 ppm) of the B(10,11) and B(1) resonances, which points to at least partial coordination of the Tl+ ion to the open pentagonal face in structure 2¯. The Tl centre would then appear in a position antipodal to the B(1) vertex – this type of coordination reminds that observed in the structurally similar compound Tl2[nido-C2B9H11] [25]. Similar effect was also observed for Tl+ salts of 7-aminosubstituted derivatives of the [7,8,9-C3B8H11]¯ anion [4–8]. Figure 3 shows that, the 1H NMR spectra of compounds 2 and 2¯ consist of a singlet of relative intensity two attributed to the cage CH(7,9) unit; this position being remarkably shielded (∼1.5 ppm) for anions 2¯ when compared to their conjugated acids 2 that also exhibit a typical high-field resonance (∼–2 ppm) due to the bridging hydrogen. Figure 3 also demonstrates that conversion into Tl+ salts is associated with a marked downfield shift of the cage CH(7,9) signals.

Fig. 1 
          Inter-comparison of δ(11B) NMR shifts for selected anions [8-R-nido-7,8,9-C3B8H10]¯ (2¯) and the corresponding neutral compounds 8-R-nido-7,8,9-C3B8H11 (2) showing dramatic NMR changes caused by the absence or presence of one bridging hydrogen in the open pentagonal face. Assignments by [11B-11B]-COSY NMR measurements.
Fig. 1

Inter-comparison of δ(11B) NMR shifts for selected anions [8-R-nido-7,8,9-C3B8H10]¯ (2¯) and the corresponding neutral compounds 8-R-nido-7,8,9-C3B8H11 (2) showing dramatic NMR changes caused by the absence or presence of one bridging hydrogen in the open pentagonal face. Assignments by [11B-11B]-COSY NMR measurements.

Fig. 2 
          Inter-comparison between δ(11B) NMR shifts for the [8-Ph-nido-7,8,9-C3B8H10]¯ (2¯) anions. Patterns for the Et3NH+ salt (lower traces) markedly differ from those for the Tl+ salt (upper traces) due to the Tl-C3B2 coordination. Assignments by [11B-11B]-COSY NMR measurements.
Fig. 2

Inter-comparison between δ(11B) NMR shifts for the [8-Ph-nido-7,8,9-C3B8H10]¯ (2¯) anions. Patterns for the Et3NH+ salt (lower traces) markedly differ from those for the Tl+ salt (upper traces) due to the Tl-C3B2 coordination. Assignments by [11B-11B]-COSY NMR measurements.

Fig. 3 
          Inter-comparison between δ(1H) (dotted lines) and δ(13C) (full lines) NMR shifts of cage CH or CPh units for the neutral 8-Ph-nido-7,8,9-C3B8H11 and its Et3NH+ and Tl+ salts.
Fig. 3

Inter-comparison between δ(1H) (dotted lines) and δ(13C) (full lines) NMR shifts of cage CH or CPh units for the neutral 8-Ph-nido-7,8,9-C3B8H11 and its Et3NH+ and Tl+ salts.

[The 13C{1H} NMR spectra of the 2 and 2¯ pair (see the 13C NMR scale in Fig. 3 for R=Ph) exhibit expectedly two broad (13C-11B coupling) 1:2 singlets due to the cage C(8) and C(7,9) resonances. Deprotonation of 2 brings about remarkable shielding of the C(8) (∼28 ppm) and C(7,9) positions (∼9 ppm), which may be associated with partial localization of the negative charge on the open C3B2 face. The 13C{1H} NMR spectra of the corresponding Tl+ salts exhibit a slight deshielding effect in comparison with their Et3NH+ counterparts.

Iron-complexation reactions

The cluster constitution of anions 2¯ suggests straightforward analogy with the Cp anion (pentagonal open face and monoanionic character), which constitutes an excellent setting for Fe-complexation. Scheme 3 shows that high-temperature reactions between 8-R-nido-7,8,9-C3B8H11 (2) (where R=Ph, 1-C10H7, and 2-C10H7) and [CpFe(CO)2]2 in mineral oil at ∼200 °C [26], followed by chromatographic separation of the metallatricarbollide fraction in a hexane/CH2Cl2 mixture led, indeed, to the isolation of an orange band containing a mixture of structurally different ferratricarbollide complexes which were identified as those of general closo constitution [1-Cp-10-R-1,2,4,10-FeC3B8H10] (3), [1-Cp-12-R-1,2,4,12-FeC3B8H10] (4), and [1-Cp-2-R-1,2,4,10-FeC3B8H10] (5). For R=Ph, all the three types of complexes (35) were formed, while, for R=1-C10H7 and 2-C10H7, only the symmetrical complexes of types 3 and 4 have been formed, evidently due to sterical reasons (repulsion between the bulky R and the Cp ring might be expected). All the complexes were finally separated by semi-preparative HPLC chromatography in 100 % hexane and isolated in total yields ranging 80 %; for example the three Ph isomers were obtained in 15, 35, and 30 % yields as orange crystalline substances. Comparison of structure 2 with those of complexes 35 in Scheme 3 shows that the complexation process is associated with extensive rearrangement of cage C-vertices into mutually meta positions (for a similar effect see references [27–35]). All the complexes 35 are extremely stable orange solids that can be crystallized by slow evaporation of their hexane solutions. The structures of three complexes of different substituents, namely [1-Cp-10-(2-C10H7)-1,2,4,10-FeC3B8H10] (type 3) [1-Cp-12-(1-C10H7)-1,2,4,12-FeC3B8H10] (type 4), and [1-Cp-2-Ph-1,2,4,10-FeC3B8H10] (type 5) have been established by X-ray diffraction analyses [26]. The 3 and 5 structures are characterized by 2,4,10-configuration of the cluster C-vertices, but differ in the positioning of the aryl substituent. In contrast, the complex of constitution 4 is a cluster isomer containing cage C-atoms in 2,4,12-positions with the aryl residing in para position with respect to the Fe-centre.

Scheme 3 
          Insertion of the CpFe fragment into the structure of 8-R-nido-7,8,9-C3B8H11 (2) (where R=Ph, 1-C10H7, and 2-C10H7) giving three isomeric ferratricarbollide structures, [1-Cp-10-R-1,2,4,10-FeC3B8H10] (3), [1-Cp-12-R-1,2,4,12-FeC3B8H10] (4), and [1-Cp-2-R-1,2,4,10-FeC3B8H10] (5).
Scheme 3

Insertion of the CpFe fragment into the structure of 8-R-nido-7,8,9-C3B8H11 (2) (where R=Ph, 1-C10H7, and 2-C10H7) giving three isomeric ferratricarbollide structures, [1-Cp-10-R-1,2,4,10-FeC3B8H10] (3), [1-Cp-12-R-1,2,4,12-FeC3B8H10] (4), and [1-Cp-2-R-1,2,4,10-FeC3B8H10] (5).

Inspection of NMR data shows marked similarities among compounds of individual types 35, which indicates that electronic effects contributed by the aryl substituents to the cage are very similar. As shown in Fig. 4 for R=Ph, the 11B NMR spectra of complexes 3 and 4 exhibit 2: 1: 2: 1: 2 and 2: 1: 1: 2: 2 patterns of doublets, respectively, while the spectrum of type 5 displays eight different 11B resonances due to asymmetrical disposition of the substituent.

Fig. 4 
          Correlation of the δ(11B) NMR shifts for all the three [1-Cp-10-R-1,2,4,10-FeC3B8H10] (3), [1-Cp-12-R-1,2,4,12-FeC3B8H10] (4), and [1-Cp-2-R-1,2,4,10-FeC3B8H10] (5) isomers. Exemplified for R=Ph, naphthyl-substituted analogues display very similar patterns.
Fig. 4

Correlation of the δ(11B) NMR shifts for all the three [1-Cp-10-R-1,2,4,10-FeC3B8H10] (3), [1-Cp-12-R-1,2,4,12-FeC3B8H10] (4), and [1-Cp-2-R-1,2,4,10-FeC3B8H10] (5) isomers. Exemplified for R=Ph, naphthyl-substituted analogues display very similar patterns.

Apart from typical low-field 1H and 13C resonances due to aromatic and cyclopentadienyl CH groups in the NMR spectra of the isolated compounds, the most interesting is the area of resonances of the cage carbon vertices shown in Fig. 5. The 13C NMR spectra of Cs-symmetry complexes of types 3 and 4 contain 2:1 signals assigned to equivalent C(2,4) vertices and to the substituted C(10) and C(12) atoms, respectively. The corresponding spectrum of the asymmetrical 5 expectedly contains three resonances, of which that of the substituted C(2) shows strong deshielding (∼25 ppm) with respect to C(2,4) in structure 3. A similar deshielding effect (∼30 ppm) is observed for the substituted C(10) vertex in 3 when compared to C(10) in the structurally related 5. The corresponding 1H NMR spectra of all complexes isolated contain cage CH signals within the range of 2.11–2.35 ppm.

Fig. 5 
          Correlation of the δ(1H) and δ(13C) NMR shifts for all the three 1-Cp-10-R-1,2,4,10-FeC3B8H10] (3), [1-Cp-12-R-1,2,4,12-FeC3B8H10] (4), and [1-Cp-2-R-1,2,4,10-FeC3B8H10] (5) isomers. Exemplified for R=Ph, naphthyl-substituted analogues display very similar patterns.
Fig. 5

Correlation of the δ(1H) and δ(13C) NMR shifts for all the three 1-Cp-10-R-1,2,4,10-FeC3B8H10] (3), [1-Cp-12-R-1,2,4,12-FeC3B8H10] (4), and [1-Cp-2-R-1,2,4,10-FeC3B8H10] (5) isomers. Exemplified for R=Ph, naphthyl-substituted analogues display very similar patterns.

Conclusions

The novel acyl chloride (SAC) strategy for carbon insertion into the dicarbaborane cage is highly effective for the preparation of tricarbollide compounds bearing alkyl and aryl functionalities located symmetrically on the open face of the molecule. The method brings new synthetic features into the so far restricted area of eleven-vertex tricarbaboranes [1–9], being extremely flexible and allowing for variations either in molecular shape or substituent design. These synthetic tools may be exploited in cluster engineering and B-cage based biochemistry, for example, by varying substituents on carbon and boron positions in the starting carborane 1 and R in the RCOCl reagent; other tricarbaborane molecular shapes are also expected from thermal rearrangement reactions. It is also to be expected that the SAC strategy can be also applied to other-than-dicarbaborane cages, which may result in substantial synthetic extensions.

Complexes of types 35 represent the first examples of monoaryl substituted ferratricarbollides and there is no doubt that a broad area of the twelve-vertex aryl or alkyl substituted metallacarborane chemistry has been opened that parallels the work in the fields of eleven- and ten-vertex metallatricarbaborane chemistry [36–42]. The compounds reported in this study are cluster-boron analogues of ferrocene [43] and their extremely high stability predestines them for biological uses and as starting substrates for further metallacarborane syntheses, e. g., polyhedral expansion and contraction reactions [44]. Relevant experiments are currently underway in our laboratories. In progress are also the syntheses of alkyl substituted compounds [19, 20] and homoleptic (bis-tricarbollide)Fe(II)-complexes along with experiments aimed at the isolation of complexes with other transition metals.


Article note

A collection of invited papers based on presentations at the 15th International Meeting on Boron Chemistry (IMEBORON-XV), Prague, Czech Republic, 24–28 August 2014.

Presented as a part of the introductory lecture “Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, ASCR- Organizer of IMEBORON XV”.



Corresponding author: Bohumil Štíbr, Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 250 68 Řež, Czech Republic, e-mail:

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Drs M. Bakardjiev, J. Holub and B. Grüner for performing the syntheses, NMR measurements and HPLC separations. Professor A. Růžička and Dr. Z. Padělková are thanked for X-ray diffraction studies, and the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic for support (project no. P207/11/0705).

References

[1] B. Štíbr, J. Holub, F. Teixidor. “Tricarbollides and Metallatricarbollides”, in Advances in Boron Chemistry, W. Siebert, (Ed.), pp. 333–340, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge (1997).10.1002/chin.199738350Suche in Google Scholar

[2] B. Štíbr. Proc. Ind. Natl. Acad. Sci. 68A, 487 (2003).Suche in Google Scholar

[3] R. N. Grimes. Carboranes, 2nd ed., Elsevier Science, London (2011).10.1016/B978-0-12-374170-7.00014-8Suche in Google Scholar

[4] B. Štíbr, J. Holub, F. Teixidor, C. Viñas. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 795 (1995).10.1039/C39950000795Suche in Google Scholar

[5] B. Štíbr, J. Holub, I. Císařová, F. Teixidor, C. Viñas, J. Fusek, Z. Plzák. Inorg. Chem. 35, 3635 (1996).Suche in Google Scholar

[6] J. Holub, B. Štíbr, D. Hnyk, J. Fusek, I. Císařová, F. Teixidor, C. Viñas, Z. Plzák, P.v. R. Schleyer. J. Am. Chem. Soc.119, 7750 (1997).Suche in Google Scholar

[7] B. Štíbr, J. Holub, J. Plešek, T. Jelínek, B. Grüner, F. Teixidor, C. Viñas. J. Organomet. Chem. 582, 282 (1999).Suche in Google Scholar

[8] B. Štíbr, J. Holub, I. Císařová, F. Teixidor, C. Viñas. Inorg. Chim. Acta245, 129 (1996).Suche in Google Scholar

[9] A. M. Shedlow, L. G. Sneddon. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 64, 865 (1999).Suche in Google Scholar

[10] F. R. Scholer, L. J. Todd. J. Organomet. Chem. 14, 261 (1968).10.1016/S0022-328X(00)87665-2Suche in Google Scholar

[11] B. Štíbr. J. Organomet. Chem. 747, 16 (2013), and refs. therein.10.1016/j.jorganchem.2013.04.010Suche in Google Scholar

[12] B. Brellochs. “New routes to carboranes”, in Contemporary Boron Chemistry, M. G. Davidson, A. K. Hughes, K. Wade, (Eds.), pp. 212, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge (2000).10.1039/9781847550644-00212Suche in Google Scholar

[13] B. Brellochs, J. Bačkovský, B. Štíbr, T. Jelínek, J. Holub, M. Bakardjiev, D. Hnyk, M. Hofmann, I. Císařová, B. Wrackmeyer. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 3605 (2004).10.1002/ejic.200400125Suche in Google Scholar

[14] T. Jelínek, M. Thornton-Pett, J. D. Kennedy. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 67, 1035 (2002).10.1135/cccc20021035Suche in Google Scholar

[15] B. Štíbr. Pure Appl. Chem. 75, 1295 (2003), and refs. therein.10.1351/pac200375091295Suche in Google Scholar

[16] X. L. R. Fontaine, N. N. Greenwood, J. D. Kennedy, P. L. Mackinnon, I. Macpherson. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2385 (1987).Suche in Google Scholar

[17] P. A. Wegner, L. J. Guggenberger, E. L. Muetterties. J. Am. Chem. Soc.92, 3473 (1970).10.1021/ja00714a046Suche in Google Scholar

[18] R. V. Schultz, F. Sato, L. J. Todd. J. Organomet. Chem. 125, 115 (1977).Suche in Google Scholar

[19] B. Štíbr, M. Bakardjiev, J. Holub, A. Růžička, Z. Padělková, R. Olejník, P. Švec. Chem. Eur. J. 17, 13156 (2011).10.1002/chem.201102016Suche in Google Scholar

[20] M. Bakardjiev, B. Štíbr, J. Holub, A. Růžička. Inorg. Chem. 52, 9087 (2013).10.1021/ic401293gSuche in Google Scholar

[21] B. Štíbr, J. Plešek, S. Heřmánek. Chem. Ind. (London) 649 (1972).Suche in Google Scholar

[22] B. Štíbr, J. Plešek, S. Heřmánek. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun.39, 1805 (1974).10.1135/cccc19741805Suche in Google Scholar

[23] B. Štíbr, Z. Janoušek, J. Plešek, T. Jelínek, S. Heřmánek. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun.52, 103 (1987).10.1135/cccc19870103Suche in Google Scholar

[24] J. Holub, A. Růžička, Z. Padělková, B. Štíbr. J. Organomet. Chem.696, 2742 (2011).Suche in Google Scholar

[25] J. L. Spencer,; M. Green,; F. G. A. Stone, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1178 (1972).10.1039/c3972001178bSuche in Google Scholar

[26] M. Bakarjiev, B. Štíbr, J. Holub, A. Růžička, Z. Padělková. Organometallics32, 377 (2013).10.1021/om3011118Suche in Google Scholar

[27] B. Štíbr, J. Holub, F. Teixidor, C. Viňas. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun.60, 2023 (1995).10.1135/cccc19952023Suche in Google Scholar

[28] J. Holub, B. Grüner, I. Císařová, J. Fusek, Z. Plzák, F. Teixidor, C. Viňas, B. Štíbr. Inorg. Chem. 38, 2775 (1999).Suche in Google Scholar

[29] B. Grüner, A. Lehtonen, R. Kivekäs, R. Sillanpää, J. Holub, F.Teixidor, C. Viñas, B. Štíbr. Inorg. Chem.39, 2577 (2000).Suche in Google Scholar

[30] D. S. Perekalin, J. Holub, D. G. Golovanov, K. A. Lyssenko, P. V. Petrovskii, B. Štíbr, A. R. Kudinov. Organometallics24, 4387 (2005).10.1021/om050139oSuche in Google Scholar

[31] B. Grüner, J. Bačkovský, I. Císařová, B. Štíbr. J. Organomet. Chem.690, 2850 (2005).10.1016/j.jorganchem.2005.01.050Suche in Google Scholar

[32] V. Mutseneck, D. S. Perekalin, J. Holub, K. A. Lyssenko, P. V. Petrovskii, B. Štíbr, A. R. Kudinov. Eur.J. Inorg. Chem. 1737 (2006).10.1002/ejic.200600051Suche in Google Scholar

[33] D. S. Perekalin, I. V. Glukhov, B. Štíbr, A. R. Kudinov. Inorg. Chim. Acta359, 3264 (2006).10.1016/j.ica.2006.03.007Suche in Google Scholar

[34] J. Holub, M. Bakardjiev, B. Štíbr, P. Štěpnička, I. Císařová. Eur.J. Inorg. Chem. 4196 (2010).10.1002/ejic.201000217Suche in Google Scholar

[35] J. Holub, B. Štíbr, P. Štěpnička, I. Císařová. Dalton Trans.39, 2057 (2010).10.1039/b919767bSuche in Google Scholar

[36] C. A. Plumb, P. J. Carroll, L. G. Sneddon. Organometallics11, 1665 (1992).10.1021/om00040a042Suche in Google Scholar

[37] C. A. Plumb, P. J. Carroll, L. G. Sneddon. Organometallics11, 1672 (1992).10.1021/om00040a043Suche in Google Scholar

[38] C. A. Plumb, L. G. Sneddon. Organometallics11, 1681 (1992).10.1021/om00040a043Suche in Google Scholar

[39] A. Perez-Gavilan, P. J. Carroll, L. G. Sneddon. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun.75, 905 (2010).10.1135/cccc2010055Suche in Google Scholar

[40] B. M. Ramachandran, Y. Wang, S. O. Kang, P. J. Carroll, L. G. Sneddon. Organometallics23, 2989 (2004).10.1021/om0498504Suche in Google Scholar

[41] B. A. Barnum, P. J. Carroll, L. G. Sneddon. Inorg. Chem.36, 1327 (1997).Suche in Google Scholar

[42] A. Perez-Gavilan, P. J. Carroll, L. G. Sneddon. Inorg. Chem.51, 5903 (2012).10.1021/ic300528hSuche in Google Scholar

[43] B. Štíbr. J. Organomet. Chem. 690, 2694 (2005).10.1016/j.jorganchem.2005.01.046Suche in Google Scholar

[44] B. Grüner, L. Mikulášek, I. Císařová, B. Štíbr. J. Organomet. Chem. 690, 2853 (2005).10.1016/j.jorganchem.2005.01.057Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-12-20
Published in Print: 2015-02-01

©2014 IUPAC & De Gruyter

Heruntergeladen am 21.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/pac-2014-0937/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen