Startseite Low-temperature growth of GaSb epilayers on GaAs (001) by molecular beam epitaxy
Artikel Open Access

Low-temperature growth of GaSb epilayers on GaAs (001) by molecular beam epitaxy

  • D. Benyahia EMAIL logo , Ł. Kubiszyn , K. Michalczewski , A. Kębłowski , P. Martyniuk , J. Piotrowski und A. Rogalski
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 8. Februar 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Non-intentionally doped GaSb epilayers were grown by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) on highly mismatched semi-insulating GaAs substrate (001) with 2 offcut towards [110]. The effects of substrate temperature and the Sb/Ga flux ratio on the crystalline quality, surface morphology and electrical properties were investigated by Nomarski optical microscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Hall measurements, respectively. Besides, differential Hall was used to investigate the hole concentration behaviour along the GaSb epilayer. It is found that the crystal quality, electrical properties and surface morphology are markedly dependent on the growth temperature and the group V/III flux ratio. Under the optimized parameters, we demonstrate a low hole concentration at very low growth temperature. Unfortunately, the layers grown at low temperature are characterized by wide FWHM and low Hall mobility.

1. Introduction

Antimonide-based compound semiconductors offer a wide range of band gaps, band gap offsets, and electronic barriers along with extremely high electron mobility and electron saturation velocity [13], and, therefore, enable a variety of extremely fast low-power electronic devices and infrared light sources [4,5]. Lattice-mismatched epitaxy of Sb-based materials on GaAs and Si substrates has attracted considerable attention due to the numerous advances in optoelectronic devices that can be enabled, including field effect transistors [6], infrared detectors [7], and semiconductor lasers [8]. While recent technical advancement has enabled high quality lattice matched GaSb epitaxy on native substrates, GaAs substrates are desirable for many applications due to its high quality with semi-insulating, large area, favourable thermal properties, excellent n and p-type ohmic contacts and low cost. In addition, it affords the possibility of monolithic integration for optoelectronic devices. However, the high lattice mismatch between the GaSb epilayer and the GaAs substrate (7.8%) complicates the growth of sophisticated device structures. To overcome the problem of this large lattice mismatch, which can lead to a big amount of threading dislocations and high defect density, various buffer layers such as compositionally graded metamorphic buffers [9,10], low temperatures layers [11,12], and superlattice layers [13] were proposed. Metamorphic buffers’ layers have been demonstrated in the growth of AlGaAsSb on GaAs [9] to achieve mid-infrared detectors and lasers. However, in this approach, initially the strain within the critical thickness is accommodated by a tetragonal distortion followed by defect formation and filtering, therefore, the necessity to grow thick buffer layers (often > 1 μm) is required. Moreover, metamorphic buffer layer approach exhibits several deficiencies such as the poor thermal and electrical conductivity, and the material degradation through the presence of threading dislocations. Recently, another technology, interfacial misfit dislocation (IMF) growth mode was developed [14,15], where the strain is relieved instantaneously at the mismatched heterointerface by the formation of a two-dimensional (2 D), periodic IMF arrays comprised of pure-edge (90°) dislocations along both [110] and [110] [14]. This growth mode offers a “buffer-free” approach with low threading dislocation density (~105 cm−2) [15].

In this paper, we investigate the influence of the growth temperature and the Sb/Ga flux ratio on the crystal quality, the surface morphology and electrical properties of the GaSb epilayer grown on GaAs substrate.

2. Experiment

GaSb epilayers were grown on a semi-insulating GaAs (001) substrate with 2° offcut towards [110] in a RIBER COMPACT 21 DZ solid-source molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) system, equipped with valved cracker for arsenic and antimony to produce As4 and Sb2, respectively. The manipulator thermocouple was used to monitor the substrate temperature. Growth temperature was calibrated from the GaAs oxide desorption temperature. After thermal desorption of oxide at 640°C under As4 overpressure, a 300-nm thick GaAs layer was grown at 640°C to obtain a smooth surface, with a growth rate of 0.93 μm/h. Then, the substrate temperature was lowered to grow the GaSb layer. As shutter was left opened until the temperature of 580°C to protect the surface. Several GaSb layers were grown at growth temperature between 250°C and 540°C with 5 Sb/Ga flux ratio. After the optimization of the growth temperature, three GaSb layers were grown with a different Sb/Ga flux ratio: 2.5, 5 and 12.5, respectively. The growth rate for a GaSb layer was 0.66 μm/h, while the thickness was 2 μm for 6 samples and 5 μm for 4 samples. The growth process was monitored by in-situ reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED).

The crystal quality of the samples was evaluated by a PANalytical X-ray diffractometer (XRD). The measurements were made in the ω-direction. The electrical properties were characterized by Hall measurement using Van der Pauw method between 80 K and room temperature. Nomarski optical microscopy was used to evaluate the surface morphology.

3. Results and discussion

For all the samples, when the Sb shutter was opened, the RHEED pattern changed from a streaky of GaAs (4×2) to bright dots, corresponding to the transfer from a two-dimensional (2 D) to a three-dimensional (3 D) growth, being characteristic for Volmer-Weber growth mode [16]. After a few minutes, a clear two-dimensional RHEED (1×3) pattern was observed, as it is shown in Fig. 1, indicating a flat surface of GaSb layer.

Shiny mirror-like GaSb epilayers were grown at 250°C to 540°C temperature range with growth rate of 0.66 μm/h under optimized Ga and Sb fluxes [Fig. 2(a)]. Typically, the growth is much smoother for 2° disoriented GaAs substrates. Rough not mirror-like looking surfaces were obtained in the attempts to grow outside some temperature and Sb/Ga flux ratio ranges. Surface covered with fine Ga droplets [Fig. 2(b)] are typical for too low Sb/Ga flux ratio.

Fig. 1 GaSb layer RHEED patterns (a) (×1), (b) (×3).
Fig. 1

GaSb layer RHEED patterns (a) (×1), (b) (×3).

Fig. 2 Nomarski optical microscopy pictures with a magnification of 1000 of 2 μm thick GaSb layer grown at 250°C for 5 Sb/Ga flux ratio (a) and at 475°C for 3 Sb/Ga fux ratio (b).
Fig. 2

Nomarski optical microscopy pictures with a magnification of 1000 of 2 μm thick GaSb layer grown at 250°C for 5 Sb/Ga flux ratio (a) and at 475°C for 3 Sb/Ga fux ratio (b).

Figure 3 shows the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the GaSb layers in the ω-direction as a function of growth temperature and with a 5 Sb/Ga flux ratio. The FWHM is significantly smaller for thicker layers and decreases with increasing growth temperature. This suggests a better crystal quality at high growth temperature and thicker sample.

The low crystalline quality of the samples grown at low temperatures is probably due to the formation of various extended defects, e.g., dislocations and microinclusions. This could be prevented by optimized growth conditions at the low temperature, namely reduced growth rate and smaller Sb/Ga flux ratio.

FWHM as low as 110 arcsec was obtained for a 5-μm thick layer grown at 490°C. In the literature, A. Jallipalli et al. [17] reported FWHM of 194 arcsec and 20 arcsec of GaSb layers which thickness is of 0.5 μm and 5 μm, respectively. On the other hand, Y. Li et al. [18] reported FWHM of 160 arcsec for a GaSb layer with a 1 μm thickness and a growth rate of 1 μm/h.

Fig. 3 FWHM of GaSb epilayers vs. growth temperature with a thickness of 2 μm (a) and 5 μm (b).
Fig. 3

FWHM of GaSb epilayers vs. growth temperature with a thickness of 2 μm (a) and 5 μm (b).

As follows from Figs. 4, 5 and 6, all of the samples exhibited p-type conduction, being consistent with the results of Anayama et al. [19]. The hole mobility at room temperature weakly depends on growth temperature with an average of 560 cm2/Vs while at 80 K, it increases from 493 cm2/Vs to 956 cm2/Vs as the growth temperature ramps from 250°C to 440°C (Fig. 4). When the growth temperature was higher than 440°C, there was a significant decrease in hole mobility at 80 K.

Both the room temperature and 80 K hole concentrations increase when the growth temperature of GaSb epilayers ramps (Fig. 4) due to native defects [20,21]. These p-type native defects include Ga antisite defect (GaSb) [22], Ga vacancy (VGa) [23], and complex defect composed of a VGa and a GaSb [24]. Ga antisite is believed to be the main defect with concentration increasing with Ga-rich growth conditions. In fact, when the growth temperature increases, Sb atoms re-evaporate from the surface, therefore, the Sb lattice sites available for other atoms, especially Ga, increase, which contributes to more Ga antisite.

Fig. 4 The GaSb epilayer’s hole concentration and hole mobility as a function of growth temperature measured at 80 K (a) and room temperature (b).
Fig. 4

The GaSb epilayer’s hole concentration and hole mobility as a function of growth temperature measured at 80 K (a) and room temperature (b).

Fig. 5 The differential Hall measurement of a 5−μm thick GaSb layer grown at 300°C, with a 5 Sb/Ga flux ratio. The etched thickness is 2.5 μm.
Fig. 5

The differential Hall measurement of a 5−μm thick GaSb layer grown at 300°C, with a 5 Sb/Ga flux ratio. The etched thickness is 2.5 μm.

As a result, the hole concentration increases when the growth temperature ramps without suitable compensation by an increased Sb/Ga flux ratio. On the contrary to the previous work, we had the lowest hole concentration at very low temperature; 3.78×1016 cm−3 and 1.8×1016 cm−3 for a 2-μm thick GaSb layer grown at 250°C, and a 5-μm thick GaSb layer grown at 300°C, respectively.

Lower hole concentrations were obtained by other groups. Y. Li et al. [18] reported on 1.63×1016 cm−3 room temperature hole concentration at growth temperature of 490°C, while M. Lee et al. [25] had 7.8×1015cm−3 at growth temperature 550°C. A growth rate of 1 μm/h was used by the two previous groups.

Excessive hole concentration in the layers grown by us was probably due to the non-optimized low temperature growth conditions resulting in formation of structural defects, especially in vicinity to GaAs substrate – GaSb interface.

In order to study the variation of the hole concentration along the GaSb layer, the differential Hall measurement was performed. The measured GaSb layer had a thickness of 5 μm grown at 300°C with 5 Sb/Ga flux ratio. Figure 5 shows the hole concentrations for the bottom and top regions, as well as that for the whole layer. The first-to-grow region of the layer shows significantly higher hole concentrations and large activation energy. Moreover, the hole concentration in the bottom part of the GaSb layer increases with temperature ramp, in contrast to the top region layer. This is an indication of different type of the defects in the bottom and upper layers.

Figure 6(a) shows the FWHM and room temperature hole concentration of GaSb epilayers as a function of the growth temperature. The growth temperature 440°C seems to be the best parameter to get relatively low hole concentration and proper crystal quality at the same time. To investigate the influence of the Sb/Ga flux ratio, three GaSb epilayers were grown at 440°C with selected Sb/Ga flux ratios.

Fig. 6 FWHM and room temperature hole concentration for 2-μm thick GaSb epilayers vs. growth temperature (a) and versus Sb/Ga flux ratio at growth temperature of 440°C (b).
Fig. 6

FWHM and room temperature hole concentration for 2-μm thick GaSb epilayers vs. growth temperature (a) and versus Sb/Ga flux ratio at growth temperature of 440°C (b).

Figure 6(b) shows the FWHM and the room temperature hole concentration of GaSb epilayers as a function of a Sb/Ga flux ratio. When the Sb/Ga flux ratio increases from 2 to 5, crystalline quality improves and at the same time, the hole concentration decreases down to 1.18×1017 cm−3. Further increase of Sb/Ga flux ratio results in the deterioration of crystalline quality and a large hole concentration.

4. Summary and conclusions

Undoped GaSb epilayers were grown on GaAs substrates. The influence of the growth temperature and the Sb/Ga flux ratio on GaSb epilayers’ surface morphology, crystalline quality, hole concentration and mobility was investigated with optical microscopy, X ray diffractometry and Hall measurements. Shiny mirror-like GaSb epilayers were grown with growth rate of 0.66 μm/h under optimized Ga and Sb fluxes at temperatures ranging from 250°C to 540°C.

The X-ray measurements shows steady improvement of crystalline quality with the increase of growth temperature from 250°C to 540°C with suitable choice of Sb/Ga flux ratio. This finding is confirmed by larger Hall effect mobility in the layers grown at higher temperatures. The poor quality of layers grown at low temperatures are probably due to the formation of extended defects in the material, especially when growth rate is too large for the low growth temperature.

All the layers show p-type conductivity over 80 to 300 K temperature range due to Ga and Sb antisites. The hole concentration tends to drop with decreasing temperature. The lowest concentration (3.78×1016 cm−3) was measured in the layers grown at 250°C, unfortunately of low crystalline quality.

Differential Hall measurements revealed increased hole concentration in the bottom part of the layers interfacing GaAs substrates, characterized by a high dislocation density.

We expect the growth of high quality layers with low native defects’ concentration can be accomplished at elevated temperatures and with more careful optimization of the Sb/Ga ratio.

Acknowledgement

This paper has been completed with the financial support of the Polish National Science Centre, Project: UMO-2012/07/D/ST7/02564.

References

1 B.R. Bennet, R. Magno, J.B. Boos, W. Kruppa, and M.G. Ancona, “Antimonide-based compound semiconductors for electronic devices: A review”, Solid-State Electron.49, 1875–1895 (2005).10.1016/j.sse.2005.09.008Suche in Google Scholar

2 L. Desplanque, D. Vignaud, and X. Wallart, “High mobility metamorphic AlSb/InAs heterostructures grown on InP substrates”, J. Cryst. Growth.301302, 194–198 (2007).10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.11.229Suche in Google Scholar

3 Y. Li, Y. Zhang, and Y. Zeng, “Electron mobility in modulation-doped AlSb/InAs quantum wells”, J. Appl. Phys.109, 073703 (2011).10.1063/1.3552417Suche in Google Scholar

4 L. Shterengas, G.L. Belenky, A. Gourevitch, D. Donetsky, J.G. Kim, R.U. Martinelli, and D. Westerfeld, “High-power 2.3 μm GaSb-based linear laser array”, IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett.16, 2218–2220 (2004).10.1109/LPT.2004.833920Suche in Google Scholar

5 C. Mourad, D. Gianardi, K.J. Malloy, and R. Kaspi, “2 μm GalnAsSb/AlGaAsSb midinfrared laser grown digitally on GaSb by modulated-molecular beam epitaxy”, J. Appl. Phys.88, 5543 (2000).10.1063/1.1319967Suche in Google Scholar

6 H.K. Lin, D.W. Fana, Y.C. Lina, P.C. Chiua, C.Y. Chiena, P.W. Lia, J.I. Chyia, C.H. Kob, T.M. Kuanb, M.K. Hsiehb, W.C. Leeb, and C.H. Wann, “E-beam-evaporated Al2O3 for InAs/AlSb metal-oxide-semiconductor HEMT development”, Solid-State Electron.54, 505–508 (2010).10.1016/j.sse.2010.01.014Suche in Google Scholar

7 E.H. Aifer, J.G. Tischler, J.H. Warner, I. Vurgaftman, W.W. Bewley, J.R. Meyer, J.C. Kim, L.J. Whitman, C.L. Canedy, and E.M. Jackson, “W-structure type-II superlattice long-wave infrared photodiodes with high quantum efficiency”, Appl. Phys. Lett.89, 053519 (2006).10.1063/1.2335509Suche in Google Scholar

8 O. Cathabard, R. Teissier, J. Devenson, J.C. Moreno, and A.N. Baranov, “Quantum cascade lasers emitting near 2.6 μm”, Appl. Phys. Lett.96, 141110 (2010).10.1063/1.3385778Suche in Google Scholar

9 Y.C. Xin, L.G. Vaughn, L.R. Dawson, A. Stintz, Y. Lin, L.F. Lester, and D.L, Huffaker, “InAs quantum-dot GaAs-based lasers grown on AlGaAsSb metamorphic buffers”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 2133 (2003).10.1063/1.1582229Suche in Google Scholar

10 P. Jayavel, S. Nakamura, T. Koyama, and Y. Hayakawa, “Effects of buffer layer on the structural and electrical properties of InAsSb epilayers grown on GaAs (001)”, Phys. Stat. Sol.C3, 2685–2688 (2006).10.1002/pssc.200669517Suche in Google Scholar

11 H.S. Kim, Y.K. Noh, M.D. Kim, Y.J. Kwon, J.E. Oh, Y.H. Kim, J.Y. Lee, S.G. Kim, and K.S. Chung, “Dependence of the AlSb buffers on GaSb/GaAs (001) heterostructures”, J. Cryst. Growth.301302, 230–234 (2007).10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.11.223Suche in Google Scholar

12 K. Akahane, N. Yamamoto, S. Gozu, and N. Ohtani, “Heteroepitaxial growth of GaSb on Si (001) substrates”, J. Cryst. Growth.264, 21–25 (2004).10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2003.12.041Suche in Google Scholar

13 R.T. Hao, S.K. Deng, L.X. Shen, P.Z. Yang, J.L. Tu, H. Liao, Y.Q. Xu, and Z.C. Niu, “Molecular beam epitaxy of GaSb on GaAs substrates with AlSb/GaSb compound buffer layers”, Thin Solid Films.519, 228–230 (2010).10.1016/j.tsf.2010.08.001Suche in Google Scholar

14 A. Jallipalli, G. Balakrishnan, S.H. Huang, A. Khoshakhlagh, L.R. Dawson, and D.L. Huffaker, “Atomistic modeling of strain distribution in self-assembled interfacial misfit dislocation (IMF) arrays in highly mismatched III–V semiconductor materials”, J. Cryst. Growth.303, 449–455 (2007).10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.12.032Suche in Google Scholar

15 J. Tatebayashi, A. Jallipalli, M.N. Kutty, S.H. Huang, G. Balakrishnan, L.R. Dawson, and D.L. Huffaker, “Room-temperature lasing 1.82 μm of GaInSb/AlGaSb quantum wells grown on GaAs substrates using an interfacial misfit array”, Appl. Phys. Lett.91, 141102 (2007).10.1063/1.2793186Suche in Google Scholar

16 W. Qian, M. Skowronski, R. Kaspi, M. De Graef, and V.P. Dravid, “Nucleation of misfit and threading dislocations during epitaxial growth of GaSb on GaAs (001) substrates”, J. Appl. Phys.81, 7268 (1997).10.1063/1.365324Suche in Google Scholar

17 A. Jallipalli, G. Balakrishnan, S.H. Huang, T.J. Rotter, K. Nunna, B.L. Liang, L.R. Dawson, and D.L. Huffaker, “Structural analysis of highly relaxed GaSb grown on GaAs substrates with periodic interfacial array of 90° misfit dislocations”, Nanoscale Res. Lett.4, 1458–1462 (2009).10.1007/s11671-009-9420-9Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18 Y. Li, Yang Zhang, Yuwei Zhang, B. Wang, Z. Zhu, and Y. Zeng, “Molecular beam epitaxial growth and characterization of GaSb layers on GaAs (001) substrates”, Appl. Surface Science.258, 6571–6575 (2012).10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.03.081Suche in Google Scholar

19 C. Anayama, T. Tanahashi, H. Kuwatsuka, S. Nishiyama, S. Isozumi, and K. Nakajima, “High-purity GaSb epitaxial layers grown from Sb-rich solutions”, Appl. Phys. Lett.56, 239 (1990).10.1063/1.102842Suche in Google Scholar

20 G.R. Johnson, B.C. Cavenett, T.M. Kerr, P.B. Kirby, and C.E.C. Wood, “Optical, Hall and cyclotron resonance measurements of GaSb grown by Molecular Beam Epitaxy”, Semicond. Sci. Technol.3, 1157–1165 (1988).10.1088/0268-1242/3/12/002Suche in Google Scholar

21 E.T.R. Chidley, S.K. Haywood, A.B. Henriques, N.J. Mason, R.J. Nicholas, and P.J. Walker, “Photoluminescence of GaSb grown by metal-organic vapour phase epitaxy”, Semicond. Sci. Technol.6, 45–53 (1991).10.1088/0268-1242/6/1/009Suche in Google Scholar

22 D. Effer and P.J. Etter, “An investigation into the apparent purity limit in GaSb”, J. Phys. Chem. Solids.25, 451–460 (1964).10.1016/0022-3697(64)90117-9Suche in Google Scholar

23 M. Ichimura, K. Higuchi, Y. Hattori, T. Wada, and N. Kitamura, “Native defects in the AlxGa1−xSb alloy semiconductor”, J. Appl. Phys.68, 6153 (1990).10.1063/1.346904Suche in Google Scholar

24 Q.H. Xie, J.E. Van Nostrand, R.L. Jones, J. Sizelove, and D. C. Look, “Electrical and optical properties of undoped GaSb grown by molecular beam epitaxy using cracked Sb1 and Sb2”, J. Cryst. Growth.207, 255–265 (1999).10.1016/S0022-0248(99)00379-6Suche in Google Scholar

25 M. Lee, D.J. Nicholas, K.E. Singer, and B. Hamiltom, “A photoluminescence and Hall-effect study of GaSb grown by molecular beam epitaxy”, J. Appl. Phys.59, 2895 (1986).10.1063/1.336948Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-2-8
Published in Print: 2016-1-1

© 2016 SEP, Warsaw

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Heruntergeladen am 30.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/oere-2016-0007/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen