Abstract
Recently, iron disulphide (FeS2) has been considered as a potential solar absorber material due to several factors. These include more abundance and less toxicity of the elements involved, suitable energy band gap (0.95 eV) with high optical absorption coefficient and sufficiently long minority carrier diffusion length to produce short circuit currents >30 mA. Thin films of FeS2 have been grown by a variety of physical as well as chemical methods. In this work, a simple wet chemical process, chemical bath deposition, was used to synthesise FeS2 films using iron sulphate and thiourea as precursors. Ammonia was used in combination with EDTA as a novel complexing agent to form the layers for the first time. The films were deposited using different bath temperatures (Tb) that vary in the range 50°C–70°C, keeping the other deposition parameters constant. The chemical and physical properties of the films were investigated using appropriate techniques.
1 Introduction
Iron disulphide (FeS2) has considerable attraction as a potential candidate for photoelectrochemical and photovoltaic (PV) applications [1, 2] consisting of abundant, cheap and nontoxic elements. Pyrite films exhibit complex behaviour by variation in structural properties. Pyrite and marcasite are two phases of FeS2. Marcasite has an orthorhombic structure with a band gap of 0.34 eV indicating its unsuitability for PV applications. These days, cubic pyrite is receiving more attention because of its important applications as PV, photoelectrochemical, thermoelectric and cathode materials, though it is susceptible to oxidative degradation [3, 4]. It is a promising PV material as it has a suitable band gap with high optical absorption coefficient (105 cm-1), with an indirect band gap at 0.95 eV [5, 6] and a direct band gap at 1.38 eV. Moreover, the elements involved in this material are earth abundant and non-toxic. FeS2 thin films have been prepared by a variety of methods such as metal organic chemical vapour deposition [7], sol-gel method [8], solvothermal process [9], chemical vapour deposition [10], electrodeposition [2], molecular beam deposition [11], spray pyrolysis [1] and chemical bath deposition (CBD) [12, 13]. Of all the methods, CBD is inexpensive, highly feasible and reproducible for large area deposition with less material consumption. So far, many semiconductor materials have been deposited by CBD with its limited reports on the preparation of FeS2. This method is based on the reaction between dissolved cations and anions in acidic water solution. Triethanolamine, ammonia (NH3) and ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) are generally used as complexing agents, which eliminate spontaneous precipitation by slowing down the release of metallic ions on dissociation and thereby forming a solid film on the substrate. In this work, we report the effect of bath temperature (Tb) on the properties of chemically deposited FeS2 films.
2 Materials and methods
Iron sulphate (FeSO4·9H2O; Sisco Research Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, Maharashtra, India) and thiourea (CS (NH2)2) (Sigma Aldrich, Kushaiguda, Hyderabad, India) were used as precursors with NH3 (Sigma Aldrich, Kushaiguda, Hyderabad, India) and EDTA (Sigma Aldrich, Kushaiguda, Hyderabad, India) as complexing agents. Three sets of films were prepared by varying the bath temperature (Tb) from 50°C to 70°C. Sodalime glass plates were used as substrates. Non-uniformity and poor adhesion of the films were the common notified problems in CBD. In order to obtain good quality films, the substrates were cleaned in the following procedure: The substrates were thoroughly cleaned with ordinary water, soap solution and distilled water sequentially. The cleaned substrates were then dipped in potassium dichromate solution for 5–6 h. Finally, the substrates were rinsed with distilled water and dried in a hot air oven before placing in a beaker. Chemical bath consisted of 10 ml of FeSO4·9H2O and CS(NH2)2 and 3 ml and 5 ml of NH3 and EDTA, respectively. Twenty millilitres of distilled water was added to the bath and stirred well. A deposition time (td) of 60 min was maintained for all the depositions. The as-deposited films were removed from the beaker, cleaned with distilled water and dried. Structural analyses of the films were carried out by using a Siefert X-ray diffractometer (model: 3003 TT) using Cu-Kα as a radiation source (wavelength, λ=1.542 A°) and a Raman spectrometer. Surface morphology and chemical composition of the films were examined using a Carl Zeiss scanning electron microscope (SEM) (EVO MA 15) attached to an Oxford instruments (Inca Penta FET x3) X-ray energy analyser. Optical absorption studies were carried out using a Perkin-Elmer Lambda 950 UV-Vis-NIR spectrophotometer. Fourier transform infra red (FTIR) measurements were carried out with a Nicolet Model 400D Spectrometer operating in the wavenumber range 4000–1500 cm-1.
3 Results and discussion
Iron pyrite (FeS2) films deposited by CBD method at different bath temperatures are reddish brown in colour. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the pyrite films deposited at different temperatures are shown in Figure 1. From the XRD patterns, it was observed that at lower temperature, there were four characteristic peaks of 110 and 220 corresponding to marcasite and 200 and 023 corresponding to pyrite phases of iron sulphide. At 60°C, the 110 peak that correspond to marcasite phase was converted to pyrite phase. At a temperature of 70°C, all the other phases disappeared except pyrite phase. Four peaks corresponding to 111, 200, 311 and 023 [14] planes were observed at this temperature, which indicates that the purity of the films increases with the rise of bath temperature to 70°C. The identified planes are in agreement with the reported Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS)-42-1340 data. The XRD observations were also confirmed by the Raman analysis. The Raman spectra of the deposited films at different bath temperatures are shown in Figure 2.

XRD patterns of the deposited films at different bath temperatures (M=marcasite, P=pyrite).

Raman spectra of the deposited films.
The Raman spectra showed a peak present at 217 cm-1 in the film formed at 50°C, which corresponds to the marcasite phase that was also detected by XRD studies. But at Tb=70°C, this peak disappeared, and the peaks related to pyrite phase alone were present. Figure 3 shows the SEM pictures of FeS2 films formed at different bath temperatures. The morphological studies showed that films deposited at 50°C had an inhomogeneous distribution of grains on the substrate with small grain size. However, at 70°C, a regular distribution of large grains over the substrate surface was observed. The energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDAX) spectra of the films deposited at different bath temperatures are shown in Figure 4. The S/Fe ratio in the films formed at 70°C was found to be 1.95, and this was close to the stoichiometric ratio of FeS2 (1.97) observed by other workers. Figure 5 represents the FTIR data of FeS2 films grown in this work. The spectra exhibited a small peak around 3738 cm-1 due to -OH stretching mode. Another band at 2925 cm-1 was also observed, which can be assigned to the C-H stretching modes. In addition, the band that appeared at 1774 cm-1 represents the asymmetric S-O mode corresponding to the sulphate ion.

SEM photographs at different bath temperatures.

EDAX spectrum of the film deposited at Tb=70°C.

FTIR spectra of the films at different bath temperatures.
The optical properties of the films were studied using UV-Vis-NIR spectrophotometer. Figure 6 shows the absorbance versus wavelength spectra recorded in the wavelength range of 400–800 nm. The evaluated absorption coefficient was >105 cm-1. The films exhibited an indirect as well as a direct band gap. The direct and indirect band gaps of the material were calculated by plotting the graphs of (αhν)1/2 versus hν and (αhν)2 versus hν, respectively. The evaluated direct band gap of the material decreases from 1.47 eV to 1.26 eV with increase of the bath temperature from 50°C to 70°C, which was well matched with the literature values [15].

Plot of wavelength versus absorbance of the films at different Tb.
4 Conclusion
The iron pyrite thin films were chemically deposited by using aqueous solutions of iron sulphate and thiourea. The layers were formed at various bath temperatures that varied in the range 50°C–70°C. The film deposited at Tb=50°C showed pyrite as well as marcasite phases, while it showed only pyrite phase with cubic structure at 70°C. The later films showed uniform and better surface morphology compared to the films formed at temperatures lower than 70°C. The EDAX analysis revealed the presence of Fe and S with some impurity elements. The FTIR spectrum exhibited peaks related to -OH, C-H and S-O stretching modes. The optical studies indicated a decrease of direct band gap from 1.47 eV to 1.26 eV as Tb increased from 50°C to 70°C.
References
[1] Yamamoto A, Nakamura M, Seki A, Li EL, Hashimoto A, Nakamura S. Pyrite FeS2 thin films prepared by spray method using FeSO4 and (NH)4Sx. Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells 2003, 75, 451–456.10.1016/S0927-0248(02)00205-2Suche in Google Scholar
[2] Nakumara S, Yamamoto A. Electrodeposition of pyrite (FeS2) thin films for photovoltaic cells. Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells 2011, 65, 79–85.10.1016/S0927-0248(00)00080-5Suche in Google Scholar
[3] Liu S, Li M, Li S, Li H, Yan L. Synthesis and adsorption/ photocatalysis performance of pyrite FeS2. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 268, 213–217.10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.12.061Suche in Google Scholar
[4] Luan ZJ, Wang Y, Wang F, Huang LY, Meng L. The surface free energy of pyrite films prepared by sulfurizing the precursive electrodeposited films. Thin Solid Films 2011, 519, 7830–7835.10.1016/j.tsf.2011.05.077Suche in Google Scholar
[5] Meng L, Huang LY. Effects of film thickness on microstructure and electrical properties of the pyrite thin films. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2007, 137, 310–314.10.1016/j.mseb.2006.11.029Suche in Google Scholar
[6] Ares JR, Pascual A, Ferrer IJ, Sanchez C. Grain and crystallite size in polycrystalline pyrite thin films. Thin Solid Films. 2005, 480–481, 477–481.10.1016/j.tsf.2004.11.064Suche in Google Scholar
[7] Clayton AJ, Irvine SJC, Barrioz V, Brooks WSM, Zoppi G, Forbes I, Rogers KD, Lane DW, Hutchings K, Roncallo S. Metal-organic chemical vapour deposition of ultra-thin photovoltaic devices using a pyrite based p-i-n structure. Thin Solid Films. 2011, 519, 7360–7363.10.1016/j.tsf.2010.12.147Suche in Google Scholar
[8] Wang F, Huang L, Luan Z, Huang J, Meng L. Effect of sulfurization temperature on the surface roughening, electrical and optical properties of fes2 films deposited by sol-gel method. Mater. Chem. Physics 2012, 132, 505–508.10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.11.061Suche in Google Scholar
[9] Kar S, Chaudhuri S. Solvothermal synthesis of nanocrystalline FeS2 with different morphologies. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 398, 22–26.10.1016/j.cplett.2004.09.028Suche in Google Scholar
[10] Berry N, Cheng M, Perkins CL, Limpinsel M, Hemminger JC, Law M. Atmospheric-pressure chemical vapour deposition of iron pyrite thin films. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 2, 1124–1135.10.1002/aenm.201200043Suche in Google Scholar
[11] Bronold M, Kubala S, Pettenkofer C, Jaegermann W. Thin pyrite (FeS2) films by molecular beam deposition. Thin Solid Films. 1997, 304, 178–182.10.1016/S0040-6090(97)00121-1Suche in Google Scholar
[12] Kassim A, Wee Tee T, Abdullah DK, Sharif AM, SoonMin H, Yong GS, Nagalingam S. Preparation and characterization of iron sulphide thin films by chemical bath deposition method. Indo. J. Chem. 2010, 10, 8–11.10.22146/ijc.21473Suche in Google Scholar
[13] Prabhukanthan P, Soukup RJ, Ianno NJ, Sarkar A, Knenet S, Kmentova H, Kamler CA, Exstrom CL, Olejnick J, Darveau SA. Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 35th IEEE, 2010, 2965–2969.Suche in Google Scholar
[14] Akthar M, Abdelhady AL, Malik MA, O’Brien P. Deposition of iron sulfide thin films by AACVD from single source precursors. J. Crystal Growth 2012, 346, 106–112.10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2012.02.013Suche in Google Scholar
[15] Liu YH, Meng L, Zhang L. Optical and electrical properties of FeS2 thin films with different thickness prepared by sulfurizing evaporated iron. Thin Solid Films. 2005, 479, 83–88.10.1016/j.tsf.2004.11.147Suche in Google Scholar
©2015 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- In this issue
- Editorial
- Frontiers in nanoscience, technology and applications
- Review
- Design of reversible logic circuits using quantum dot cellular automata-based system
- Research highlights
- Surface plasmon coupled emission as a novel analytical platform for the sensitive detection of cysteine
- Copper oxide nanoparticles: an antidermatophytic agent for Trichophyton spp.
- Synthesis and superconductivity in spark plasma sintered pristine and graphene-doped FeSe0.5Te0.5
- Efficient bulk heterojunction photovoltaic devices based on modified PCBM
- Electrical transport in titania nanoparticles embedded in conducting polymer matrix
- Prediction and validation of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) on plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): a step toward development of nano-biofertilizers
- Evaluation of acoustical parameters and thermal conductivity of TiO2-ethylene glycol nanofluid using ultrasonic velocity measurements
- Studies on structural, optical and mechanical properties of MWCNTs and ZnO nanoparticles doped PVA nanocomposites
- Polycrystalline and single phase FeS2 films grown by chemical bath deposition
- Cu2ZnSnS4 synthesized through a low-cost reflux method
- Nanotechnology institutions
- Energy and our future: a perspective from the Clemson Nanomaterials Center
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- In this issue
- Editorial
- Frontiers in nanoscience, technology and applications
- Review
- Design of reversible logic circuits using quantum dot cellular automata-based system
- Research highlights
- Surface plasmon coupled emission as a novel analytical platform for the sensitive detection of cysteine
- Copper oxide nanoparticles: an antidermatophytic agent for Trichophyton spp.
- Synthesis and superconductivity in spark plasma sintered pristine and graphene-doped FeSe0.5Te0.5
- Efficient bulk heterojunction photovoltaic devices based on modified PCBM
- Electrical transport in titania nanoparticles embedded in conducting polymer matrix
- Prediction and validation of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) on plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): a step toward development of nano-biofertilizers
- Evaluation of acoustical parameters and thermal conductivity of TiO2-ethylene glycol nanofluid using ultrasonic velocity measurements
- Studies on structural, optical and mechanical properties of MWCNTs and ZnO nanoparticles doped PVA nanocomposites
- Polycrystalline and single phase FeS2 films grown by chemical bath deposition
- Cu2ZnSnS4 synthesized through a low-cost reflux method
- Nanotechnology institutions
- Energy and our future: a perspective from the Clemson Nanomaterials Center