Startseite Thinking Globally: Reassessing the Fields of Law, Politics and Economics in the US Academy
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Thinking Globally: Reassessing the Fields of Law, Politics and Economics in the US Academy

  • Eve Darian-Smith EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 15. August 2017
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In the United States, students of law, politics and economics are primarily trained to think in terms of state-centric analytical frameworks. This essay argues that this training is anachronistic and does not adequately prepare students for the complex geopolitics of the 21st century. Of course, not all scholarship in these disciplines can be characterized in this way since each discipline has its own internal disputes and scholarly innovations. That being said, a mainstream state-centric approach dominates the literature and the curriculum in most law, politics and economics departments. The first part of the essay describes the rise of law schools and the establishing of political science and economics disciplines in the late 19th century. It explores the implications of these disciplines’ claim to do “scientific” research. It argues that this claim continues to bind the disciplines to a state-centric framework which in turn provides obstacles to developing new theories and methods.


Thanks to Philip McCarty for his insightful comments on an earlier draft and my colleague Mark Juergensmeyer whose edited volume Thinking Globally: A Global Studies Reader (2014) inspired the title of this essay.


References

Amelina, A., D.D. Negriz, T. Faist, and N. Glick Schiller (eds.) 2012. Beyond Methodological Nationalism: Research Methodologies for Cross-Border Studies. New York and London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203121597Suche in Google Scholar

Anderson, B. 2006, originally published 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Suche in Google Scholar

Barrow, C.W. 1990. Universities and the Capitalist State: Corporate Liberalism and the Reconstruction of American Higher Education, 1894–1928. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Beck, U. 2005. Power in a Global Age: A New Global Political Economy. New York: Polity Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Bonham, G.W. 1980. “An Overview.” In The Role of the Scholarly Disciplines, edited by R. D. Lambert, 3–4. New Rochelle, NY: Change Magazine Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Brenner, N. 2004. New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199270057.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Briggs, L. 2002. Reproducing Empire: Race, Sex, Science, and U.S. Imperialism in Puerto Rico. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Burns, R. 1981. “Introduction.” In The World in the Curriculum: Curricular Strategies for the 21st Century, edited by H. Tonkin and J. Edwards, 4–8. New Rochelle, NY: Change Magazine Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Buroway, M. 2014. “Preface.” In Global Knowledge Production in the Social Sciences: Made in Circulation, xiii–xvii. Farnham: Ashgate.Suche in Google Scholar

Chaterjee, P. 1986. Nationalist Thought and the Colonial Imagination. A Derivative Discourse? London: Zed Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Cohen, B. 2014. Advanced Introduction to International Political Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers.Suche in Google Scholar

Cohen, B. 2015. “A Concluding Note.” Contexto Internacional 37 (3):1069–80. Rio de Janeiro Sept./Dec. 2015.10.1590/S0102-85292015000300010Suche in Google Scholar

Darian-Smith, E. 2010. Religion, Race, Rights: Landmarks in the History of Modern Anglo-American Law. Oxford: Hart.10.5040/9781509955596Suche in Google Scholar

Darian-Smith, E. 2013. Laws and Societies in Global Contexts: Contemporary Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Darian-Smith, E. 2015. “The Constitution of Identity: New Modalities of Nationality, Citizenship, Belonging and Being.” In The Handbook of Law and Society, edited by A. Sarat and P. Ewick, 351–66. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118701430.ch23Suche in Google Scholar

Darian-Smith, E. 2016a. “The Crisis in Legal Education: Embracing Ethnographic Approaches to Law.” Transnational Legal Theory 7 (2):199–227.10.1080/20414005.2016.1176790Suche in Google Scholar

Darian-Smith, E. 2016b. “Mismeasuring Humanity: Examining Indicators through a Critical Global Studies Perspective.” New Global Studies 10 (1):73–99.10.1515/ngs-2015-0018Suche in Google Scholar

Darian-Smith, E., and P.C. McCarty. 2017. Writing Global Research: Interdisciplinary Theories, Designs, and Method. Oakland, CA: California University Press. (in press).Suche in Google Scholar

Deflem, M. 2008. Sociology of Law: Visions of a Scholarly Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815546Suche in Google Scholar

Duve, T. 2013. ‘European Legal History – Global Perspectives.’ Working paper for the Colloquium ‘European Normativity – Global Historical Perspectives’ (Max-Planck-Institute, September 2nd – 4th, 2013).10.2139/ssrn.2292666Suche in Google Scholar

Falk, R. 2002. “Revisiting Westphalia, Discovering Post-Westphalia.” The Journal of Ethics 6 (4):311–52.10.1023/A:1021222318112Suche in Google Scholar

Flyvberg, B. 2001. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511810503Suche in Google Scholar

Geiger, R.L. 2014. The History of American Higher Education: Learning and Culture from the Founding to World War II. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400852055Suche in Google Scholar

Goodchild, L.F. et al. eds 2014. Higher Education in the American West: Regional History and State Contexts. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137381958Suche in Google Scholar

Gunn, G. 2013. ‘Introduction: Mapping and Remapping the Global’ in Giles Gunn Ideas to Die For: The Cosmopolitan Challenge. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203550915Suche in Google Scholar

Hall, K.L., and P. Karsten. 2009. The Magic Mirror: Law in American History, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hartwiger, A. 2015. “Shifting Proximities: A Case for Global Reading in US Higher Education.” New Global Studies 9 (3):295–312.10.1515/ngs-2015-0030Suche in Google Scholar

Heilbron, J., L. Magnusson, and B. Wittrock (eds.) 1998. The Rise of the Social Sciences and the Formation of Modernity: Conceptual Change in Context, 1750–1850, 1–33. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook. New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-94-011-5528-1_1Suche in Google Scholar

Held, D. 2002. “Culture and Political Community: National, Global, and Cosmopolitan.” In Conceiving Cosmopolitanism: Theory, Context, and Practice, edited by S. Vertovec and R. Cohen, 48–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hodgson, G.M. 2001. How Economics Forgot History. the Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science. London – New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203519813Suche in Google Scholar

Jarausch, K.H. (ed.) 1983. The Transformation of Higher Learning 1860–1930: Expansion, Diversification, Social Opening, and Professionalization in England, Germany, Russia, and the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Jasanoff, S. 1987. “‘Biology and the Bill of Rights: Can Science Reframe the Constitution.” American Journal of Law and Medicine 13:249–89.10.1017/S0098858800008364Suche in Google Scholar

Jasanoff, S. 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. London and New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Jaschik, S. (2016) “What You Teach Is What You Earn”. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/03/28/study-finds-continued-large-gaps-faculty-salaries-based-discipline accessed 27 April 2017.Suche in Google Scholar

Jasper, W.F. (2016, 22 July) Trump: “Americanism, Not Globalism, Will Be Our Credo.” https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/23690-trump-americanism-not-globalism-will-be-our-credo accessed 1 May 2017.Suche in Google Scholar

Juergensmeyer, M. 2011. “What Is Global Studies?” Global-E: A Global Studies Journal v5.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190630577.013.44Suche in Google Scholar

Juergensmeyer, M. 2014. Thinking Globally: A Global Studies Reader. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520958012Suche in Google Scholar

Khagram, S., and P. Levitt 2008. The Transnational Studies Reader: Intersections and Innovations. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

McCarty, P. (2014) ‘Communicating Global Perspectives.’ Basel Papers in European Global Studies. Published by the Institute for European Global Studies, University of Basel, Switzerland.Suche in Google Scholar

Merry, S.E. 2016. The Seduction of Quantification: Measuring Human Rights, Gender Violence, and Sex Trafficking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226261317.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Moyn, S. 2010. The Last Utopia: Human Rightsin History. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Nederveen Pieterse, J. 2013. “What Is Global Studies?” Globalizations 10 (4):499–514.10.1080/14747731.2013.806746Suche in Google Scholar

Newfield, C. 2004. Ivy and Industry: Business and the Making of the American University, 1880–1980. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.2307/j.ctv11smgf1Suche in Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. et al. 1999. “Revisiting the Commons: Local Lessons, Global Challenges.” Science 284:278–82.10.1126/science.284.5412.278Suche in Google Scholar

Prakash, G. 1999. Another Reason: Science and the Imagination in Modern India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691214214Suche in Google Scholar

Pries, L. (ed.) 2008. “Transnational Society Spaces: Which Units of Analysis, Reference and Measurement?” In Rethinking Transnationalism: The Meso-Link of Organizations. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Rehbein, B. 2014. “Epistemology in a Multicentric World.” In Global Knowledge Production in the Social Sciences: Made in Circulation, edited by W. Keim, E. Çelik, C. Ersche and V. Wöhrer, 217–22. Franham, Surrey: Ashgate.Suche in Google Scholar

Richardson, S. 2016. Cosmopolitanism Learning for a Global Era: Higher Education in an Interconnected World. New York and London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315871004Suche in Google Scholar

Said, E. 1983. “Opponents, Audiences, Constituencies and Community.” In The Politics of Interpretation, edited by W.J.T. Mitchell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Said, E. 1993. Culture and Imperialism. New York: Random House.Suche in Google Scholar

Samuel, G. 2009. “Interdisciplinarity and the Authority Paradigm: Should Law Be Taken Seriously by Scientists and Social Scientists?” Journal of Law and Society 36 (4):431–59.10.1111/j.1467-6478.2009.00478.xSuche in Google Scholar

Sánchez-Bayón, A. 2014. “Global System in a Changing Social Reality: How to Rethink and to Study It.” Beijing Law Review 5:196–209.10.4236/blr.2014.53019Suche in Google Scholar

Santos, B.D.S. 1995. Toward a New Common Sense: Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Sassen, S. 2008. “Neither Global nor National: Novel Assemblages of Territory, Authority and Rights.” Ethics & Global Politics 1 (1–2):61–79.10.3402/egp.v1i1.1814Suche in Google Scholar

Sassen, S. 2014. Expulsions: Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: The Bekknap Press of Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674369818Suche in Google Scholar

Shionoya, Y. 2001. The German Historical School: The Historical and Ethical Approach to Economics. London and New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Shionoya, Y. 2005. The Soul of the German Historical School. Springer.Suche in Google Scholar

Silbey, S. (ed.) 2008. “Introductory Essay.” In Law and Science (1): Epistemological, Evidentiary, and Relational Engagements. International Library of Essays in Law and Society. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.Suche in Google Scholar

Sinha, D. (2017) “Re-Visioning Research Methodology in Global Times”. global-e. http://www.21global.ucsb.edu/global-e/april-2017/re-visioning-research-methodology-global-times accessed 27 April 2017.Suche in Google Scholar

Steger, M. 2014. The Global Studies Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Steger, M.B., and A. Wahlrab. 2016. What Is Global Studies?: Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315459332Suche in Google Scholar

Stiglitz, J.E., A. Sen, and J.-P. Fitoussi. 2010. Mismeasuring Our Lives: Why GDP Doesn’t Add Up: The Report. New York: The New Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Twining, W. 2009. General Jurisprudence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511807374Suche in Google Scholar

Vlahakis, G.N. et al. 2006. Imperialism and Science: Social Impact and Interaction. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC- CLIO.Suche in Google Scholar

Weiss, T.G., and R. Wilkinson. 2014. “Global Governance to the Rescue: Saving International Relations?” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 20 (1): 19–36 January-March.10.1163/19426720-02001003Suche in Google Scholar

Wimmer, A., and N.G. Schiller. 2003. “Methodological Nationalism and Beyond: Nation–State Building, Migration and the Social Sciences.” Global Networks 2 (4):301–34.10.1111/1471-0374.00043Suche in Google Scholar

Zürn, M. 2013. “Globalization and Global Governance.” In Handbook of International Relations, 2nd, edited by W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B.A. Simmons, 401–25. London: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781446247587.n16Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-8-15
Published in Print: 2017-12-20

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 14.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ngs-2017-0012/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen