Home Social Sciences Shifting Proximities: A Case for Global Reading in US Higher Education
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Shifting Proximities: A Case for Global Reading in US Higher Education

  • Alexander Hartwiger EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 1, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This article argues that US higher education knowledge production remains localized but gets disguised as global. Consequently, local ways of knowing get projected as universal and students’ worldviews are never complicated or expanded. It offers a pedagogical corrective to this trend and situates the world literature classroom as one of the primary locations that is capable of reimagining global knowledge production in U.S. universities. More specifically, the article explores the fluid movement between close and distant reading as well as the potential of Globally Networked Learning Environments (GLNE) as concrete ways of ensuring that global knowledge production is truly global in scope. Utilizing GNLEs in the world literature class provides a pedagogical model that enables critical engagement with the complexity of global issues through the study and discussion of global texts all while in a global environment. While US institutions seek to expand their global footprints, the educational experiences of students too often remain local. Ultimately, through theoretical and practical examples, the article argues that if students in the US academy are to have a truly global education, teachers and administrators must first start by reforming and transforming local sites of learning.

References

Altbach, P., and J. Knight. 2007. “The Internationalization of Higher Education: Motivations and Realities.” Journal of Studies in International Education 11:290–305.Search in Google Scholar

Andreotti, V. O., and L. M. de Souza. 2012. “Introduction: (Towards) Global Citizenship Education ‘Otherwise.’” In Postcolonial Perspectives on Global Citizenship Education, edited by V. O. Andreotti, and L. M. de Souza, 1–6. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Apter, E. 2013. Against World Literature: On the Politics of Untranslatability. New York: VersoSearch in Google Scholar

Archbold, M., and D. Chami. 2015. “Finding Common Ground: Human Rights and Cultural Difference, a Student Perspective.” In Globally Networked Teaching in the Humanities, edited by A. S. Moore, and S. Simon, 169–79. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Aubry, T. 2009. “Afghanistan Meets the Amazon: Reading the Kite Runner in America.” PMLA 124 (1):25–43.Search in Google Scholar

Damrosch, D. 2003. “What Is World Literature?” World Literature Today 77 (1):9–14.Search in Google Scholar

Eisenberg, N. 2002. “Empathy-Related Emotional Responses, Altruism, and Their Socialization.” In Visions of Compassion: Western Scientists and Tibetan Buddhists Examine Human Nature, edited by R. Davidson, and A. Harrington, 131–64. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fisk, G. “‘Against World Literature: The Debate in Retrospect.” The American Reader. Accessed August 10, 2015. http://theamericanreader.com/against-world-literature-the-debate-in-retrospect/Search in Google Scholar

Hartwiger, A. Forthcoming 2015. “Locating Difference: Addressing Student Expectation in the Human Rights Literature Classroom.” In Teaching Literature and Human Rights, edited by A. S. Moore, and E. Goldberg, New York: Modern Language Association Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hosseini, K. 2003. The Kite Runner. New York: Riverhead Books.Search in Google Scholar

Hovey, R., and A. Weinberg. 2009. “Global Learning and the Making of Citizen Diplomats.” In The Handbook of Practice and Research in Study Abroad, edited by R. Lewin, 33–48. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Huggan, G. 2001. The Post-Colonial Exotic: Marketing the Margins. New York: RoutledgeSearch in Google Scholar

Jay, P. 2010. Global Matters: The Transnational Turn in Literary Studies. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jefferess, D. 2009. “To Be Good (Again): The Kite Runner as Allegory of Global Ethics.” Journal of Postcolonial Writing 45 (4):389–400.Search in Google Scholar

Khair, T. 2011. “Death of the Reader.” OPEN the Magazine. October 8. Accessed August 10, 2015. http://www.openthemagazine.com/article/arts-letters/death-of-the-reader.Search in Google Scholar

Kincaid, J. 1988. A Small Place. New York: Plume.Search in Google Scholar

Lerner, M. 1980. The Belief in a Just World. New York: Plenum.Search in Google Scholar

Levinas, E. 1969. Totality and Infinity. Pittsburg, PA: Duquesne Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lewin, R. 2009. “Introduction: The Quest for Global Citizenship Through Study Abroad.” In The Handbook of Practice and Research in Study Abroad: Higher Education and the Quest for Global Citizenship, edited by R. Lewin, xiii–xxii. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Moretti, F. 2013. Distant Reading. New York: Verso.Search in Google Scholar

Mutua, M.. 2002. Human Rights: A Political and Cultural Critique. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nance, K. 2010. “Reading Human Rights Literature in Undergraduate Literature Classes: Professorial Desire, Disciplinary Culture, and the Chances of Cultivating Compassion.” Journal of Human Rights 9 (2):161–74.Search in Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. 2002. “Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism.” In For Love of Country?, edited by J. Cohen, 3–17. Boston: Beacon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pratt, M. L. 2008. “Arts of the Contact Zone.” In Ways of Reading, edited by D. Bartholomae, and A. Petrosky, 8th edn. 497–511. New York: Bedford/St Martin’s.Search in Google Scholar

Rajaram, P., and M. Griffith. 2013. “Why World Literature Looks Different from Brooklyn.” Tehelka.com Blog, Accessed August 13. http://blog.tehelka.com/why-world-literature-looks-different-from-brooklyn/Search in Google Scholar

Readings, B. 1996. The University in Ruins. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rorty, R. 1993. “Human Rights, Rationality, and Sentimentality.” In On Human Rights: The 1993 Oxford Amnesty Lectures, edited by S. Hurley, and S. Shute, 112–34. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Rosenblatt, L. 1978. The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Siskind, M. 2010. “Globalization of the Novel and the Novel of Globalization: A Critique of World Literature.” Comparative Literature 62 (4):336–60.Search in Google Scholar

Skelly, J. 2009. “Fostering Engagement: The Role of International Education in the Development of Global Civil Society.” In The Handbook of Practice and Research in Study Abroad, edited by R. Lewin, 21–32. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Spivak, G. 2002. “Ethics and Politics in Tagore, Coetzee, and Certain Scenes of Teaching.” Diacritics 32 (3–4):17–31.Search in Google Scholar

Spivak, G. 2003. Death of a Discipline. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Spivak, G. 2004. “Righting Wrongs.” South Atlantic Quarterly 103 (2–3):523–81.Search in Google Scholar

Starke-Meyerring, D., and M. Wilson. 2008. “Learning Environments for a Globally Networked World.” In Designing Globally Networked Learning Environments, edited by D. Starke-Myering, and M. Wilson, 1–36. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Tanoukhi, N. 2008. “The Scale of World Literature.” New Literary History 39 (3):599–617.Search in Google Scholar

“World Lite: What is Global Literature?” n+1.17. Fall (2013). Accessed August 10, 2015. https://nplusonemag.com/issue-17/the-intellectual-situation/world-lite/Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-12-1
Published in Print: 2015-12-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 10.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ngs-2015-0030/html
Scroll to top button