Home Asymmetric bi-level dual-core mode converter for high-efficiency and polarization-insensitive O-band fiber-chip edge coupling: breaking the critical size limitation
Article Open Access

Asymmetric bi-level dual-core mode converter for high-efficiency and polarization-insensitive O-band fiber-chip edge coupling: breaking the critical size limitation

  • Xiaolin Yi , Dongyue Sun , Weike Zhao , Hanwen Li , Long Zhang , Yaocheng Shi ORCID logo and Daoxin Dai ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 9, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Efficient coupling between optical fibers and on-chip photonic waveguides has long been a crucial issue for photonic chips used in various applications. Edge couplers (ECs) based on an inverse taper have seen widespread utilization due to their intrinsic broadband operation. However, it still remains a big challenge to realize polarization-insensitive low-loss ECs working at the O-band (1,260–1,360 nm), mainly due to the strong polarization dependence of the mode coupling/conversion and the difficulty to fabricate the taper tip with an ultra-small feature size. In this paper, a high-efficiency and polarization-insensitive O-band EC is proposed and demonstrated with great advantages that is fully compatible with the current 130-nm-node fabrication processes. By introducing an asymmetric bi-level dual-core mode converter, the fundamental mode confined in the thick core is evanescently coupled to that in the thin core, which has an expanded mode size matched well with the fiber and works well for both TE/TM-polarizations. Particularly, no bi-level junction in the propagation direction is introduced between the thick and thin waveguide sections, thereby breaking the critical limitation of ultra-small feature sizes. The calculated coupling loss is 0.44–0.56/0.48–0.61 dB across the O-band, while achieving 1-dB bandwidths exceeding 340/230 nm for the TE/TM-polarization modes. For the fabricated ECs, the peak coupling loss is ∼0.82 dB with a polarization dependent loss of ∼0.31 dB at the O-band when coupled to a fiber with a mode field diameter of 4 μm. It is expected that this coupling scheme promisingly provides a general solution even for other material platforms, e.g., lithium niobate, silicon nitride and so on.

1 Introduction

Silicon photonics has gained substantial interest in recent years owing to its high integration density, cost-efficiency and complementary metal oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) compatibility [1]. This has made it an ideal solution for transmitting light in high performance optical interconnect systems. Within these complex optical transmission systems, the interfacing between photonic integrated chips and fibers is frequently used and highly desired, making it a crucial component of the whole system [2]. Nevertheless, the high-efficient coupling on the Silicon-on-insulator (SOI) platform still remains a big challenge, which is mainly due to the large mode mismatch between the sub-micron silicon waveguides and optical fibers.

To this end, considerable efforts have been made to realize efficient coupling by utilizing smart structural designs, including the evanescent coupler assisted with a special processed fiber [3], [4], polymer waveguide-based photonic wire bonding or 3D couplers [5], [6], [7], grating couplers [8], [9] and edge couplers (ECs) [10], [11], [12]. The first two categories typically offer high coupling efficiency, but are not compatible with the wafer-scale fabrication processes and increase the package difficulty. The approach of using grating couplers is an attractive option for large-scale integration and wafer-scale testing, yet it suffers from inherent narrow bandwidths, low coupling efficiency and polarization sensitivity. In contrast, ECs are increasingly important because of the capability with broad bandwidth, high efficiency and low polarization dependence, while additional edge dicing and polishing are required to achieve high-quality facets [13].

Currently attentions have been paid to develop various types of ECs for silicon photonics, including suspended cantilever structures [14], [15], SiN-assisted structures [16], [17], [18], multi-tip configurations [19], [20], subwavelength-grating (SWG) designs [21], [22], [23] and multi-stage tapers [24], [25], [26]. It can be seen that these reported structures are helpful to achieve high efficiency for the case of working at the C-band. However, for the popular O-band with shorter wavelengths around 1,310 nm than the C-band, it becomes even more challenging to develop high-efficiency ECs due to the following two reasons. First, smaller taper tips or a smaller pitch for the metamaterial waveguide at the chip facet are required to ensure a low-loss coupling because of the shorter wavelength. Second, realizing polarization-insensitive ECs remains difficult even with a small tip width, because the TM polarization mode has tighter confinement than the TE polarization mode in a narrow waveguide tip.

Recently, some efforts have been made to address these challenges. A suspended metamaterial-waveguide-based EC for the O-band is proposed with a minimal feature size of 120 nm, showing a peak coupling loss of 1.3 dB with polarization dependent loss (PDL) of 0.3 dB [27]. However, this is designed with a 150-nm-thick silicon core layer, in which case an additional transition is required to connect the popular 220-nm-thick SOI photonic waveguide for practical applications. Alternatively, a silicon inverse taper and a low-index SiON ridge waveguide are combined to efficiently expand the mode field. The silicon tip width at the interface of the silicon waveguide and the SiON waveguide is 130 nm, achieving a coupling loss of ∼4 dB and PDL of ∼2 dB when coupling to an SMF [28]. Another suspended EC was demonstrated by using a parabolic inverse taper with an ultra-small tip width of only 70 nm, showing a coupling loss of 2–3 dB for TE polarization mode only at 1,280–1,340 nm [29]. A dual-tip SiN EC combined with a SiN–Si transition structure is also introduced to realize the coupling between a 4-μm mode field diameter (MFD) fiber and a silicon photonic waveguide [30], where the silicon tip width at the SiN–Si transition interface is about 120 nm, achieving an overall coupling loss of 2.35 dB and 3–4.8 dB for TE and TM polarization modes, respectively. Notably, despite the potential of the bi-level inverse taper structure for achieving low-loss edge coupling [31], [32], the key challenge is creating a very tiny tip at the bi-level junction between the thick and thin silicon core regions to improve the coupling efficiency for the TM polarization mode (see the simulation result in Supplementary S1), which imposes critical fabrication requirements. On the other hand, unfortunately, even with an ultra-small waveguide tip size, the improvement in the coupling efficiency for the TM polarization mode is still limited. For example, there is a mode conversion loss of ∼0.2 dB from the thick core to the thin core even when the tip size is reduced to only 40 nm. As a summary, it is still highly desired to achieve a polarization-insensitive low-loss edge coupling for silicon photonic chips working at the O-band with relaxed requirements for the fabrication.

In this paper, we propose a high-efficiency and polarization-insensitive O-band EC on the standard 220-nm SOI platform by introducing an asymmetric bi-level dual-core mode converter, which is fully compatible with the current regular 130-nm fabrication node. The introduced asymmetric bi-level dual-core mode converter enables low-loss mode expansion for both TE and TM polarization modes confined in the thick-core silicon photonic waveguide to be matched well with the fiber and works well for both polarizations. Particularly, there is no bi-level junction in the propagation direction introduced between the thick and thin sections of the inverse taper, thereby breaking the critical limitation for the small feature size required in the previous bi-level inverse tapers [31], [32]. The calculated coupling loss to a high numerical aperture (HNA) fiber with an MFD of ∼4 μm are 0.44–0.56 dB and 0.48–0.61 dB for TE and TM polarization modes across the O-band, respectively, while their 1-dB bandwidths are even more than 340 nm and 230 nm. For the fabricated ECs, the experimental results show a peak coupling efficiency of ∼0.82 dB with a PDL of ∼0.31 dB at the O-band, thus providing a general solution for the fiber-chip coupling with easy fabrication.

2 Principle and design

Figure 1(a) shows the 3D illustration of the proposed asymmetric bi-level dual-core mode converter for efficient coupling, which consists of two adjacent cores with different heights (h 1, h 2; h 1 > h 2). Note that the mode converter includes nine sections, whose parameters are shown in Figure 1(b), including the input region (Section 1), the mode transition region (Sections 2 and 3) and the mode expanding region (Section 4). At Section 1 for the input region, the fundamental TE and TM modes are launched from the thick waveguide (A) whose height is h 1. Then they are efficiently coupled to the thin waveguide (B) whose height is h 2 through Section 2 for the TE polarization mode coupling and Section 3 for TM polarization mode coupling, respectively. Finally, the mode field is expanded at the mode expanding Section 4. In this way, both TE and TM polarization modes can be converted efficiently from the thick singlemode waveguide to the thin narrow tip, which has an expanded mode size matched well with the fiber. It is worth noting that both the bi-level inverse taper structure and the proposed coupling structure require an additional overlay etch step to form the thin core. Such an etching step is compatible with the standard CMOS fabrication process, which is similar to that used frequently for fabricating grating couplers. When the silicon core is thin, a relatively large tip width is allowed for high mode coupling efficiency (see Supplementary S1). The fabrication for the structures with larger feature sizes becomes easier, particularly for MPW processes. Besides, it is possible to enhance the overlay tolerance further by choosing a larger gap width when needed. In particular, no bi-level junction in the propagation direction is introduced between the thick and thin sections of the inverse taper, avoiding to introduce any ultra-tiny tip, and thus it is fully compatible with the current 130-nm fabrication node and shows great potential for large-scale photonic systems on-a-chip.

Figure 1: 
Illustration of the proposed EC based on an asymmetric bi-level dual-core mode converter. (a) 3D illustration. (b) The top view of the EC and the cross sections of the silicon photonic waveguides at different sections.
Figure 1:

Illustration of the proposed EC based on an asymmetric bi-level dual-core mode converter. (a) 3D illustration. (b) The top view of the EC and the cross sections of the silicon photonic waveguides at different sections.

Here the present EC is designed on the standard SOI platform with a 220-nm-thick top-silicon layer, which is one of the most popular options for silicon photonics. The refractive index of the silicon core and the SiO2 cladding are n si = 3.506 and n sio2 = 1.446 at around 1,310 nm, respectively. Accordingly, the height h 1 of the thick waveguide A is chosen as 220 nm. The width w a1 of the input singlemode waveguide is chosen as 0.38 μm. The width w b1 of the input S-bend waveguide should be small enough so that the mode is mainly localized in the thick waveguide A, which is chosen as 0.18 μm here for fabrication ease. The gap w g2 between two waveguides is also chosen as 0.18 μm for fabrication ease. The gap w g1 is chosen as 2 μm, which is sufficiently large to avoid coupling from the other waveguide. The length L 1 of the input Section 1 is chosen as 10 μm, which is sufficiently long for the S-bend to have adiabatic low-loss transmission.

The overall coupling loss can be divided into two parts, including the mode mismatch loss α c between the mode at the chip facet and the optical fiber, and the on-chip mode transmission loss α t from the singlemode waveguide to the chip facet. These two parts are carefully optimized, as described below.

2.1 Mode mismatch loss

The mode coupling efficiency η and the mode mismatch loss α c between the modes at the chip facet and the optical fiber by using the following formula:

(1) η = | E 1 E 2 d A | 2 | E 1 | 2 d A | E 2 | 2 d A α c = 10 L o g 10 η ,

where E 1 and E 2 is the complex electric distributions at the chip facet and the fiber, respectively. We calculate the mode mismatch loss α c and PDL at the wavelength of 1,260, 1,310 and 1,360 nm by varying the tip width w b9 and the core height h 2 of the thin waveguide B, respectively. The height h 2 of the thin waveguide B is chosen as 150 nm, which is also compatible with the standard MPW fabrication process of many foundries. The tip width w b9 is then optimally chosen as 130 nm, and the mode mismatch loss α c is as low as 0.22/0.20 dB for TE/TM polarization mode, respectively. More details are given in Supplementary S1.

2.2 On-chip mode transmission loss

The total on-chip mode transmission loss α t includes the transmission loss in the mode transition region (α tt) and the mode expanding region (α te). For the mode transition region, the widths w ai and w bi (i = 2, 3, 4, 5) of the cores in Sections 2 and 3 should be designed carefully, so that the TE and TM polarization modes can be evanescent coupled to the thin waveguide B with low loss. For the TE polarization mode coupling Section 2, the core width should be chosen optimally to make n eff (w a2) > n eff (w b2) and n eff (w a3) < n eff (w b3) satisfied simultaneously. Similarly, for the TM-polarization mode-coupling Section 3, one should have n eff (w a4) > n eff (w b4) and n eff (w a5) < n eff (w b5) as well. The lengths of all the mode transition regions are optimized carefully to be adiabatic. We perform a comprehensive simulation of the entire mode transition region by using the finite-difference time-domain (3D-FDTD) method, see Supplementary S2. The simulation of the conventional bi-level inverse taper structure is also carried out as a comparison, see Supplementary S3. For the TE polarization mode, the transmission loss α tt is as low as <0.045 dB in an ultra-broad bandwidth of over 300 nm. The reflection of the bi-level inverse taper is about −32.2–48.3 dB when the critical dimension w min varies from 40 nm to 180 nm, which is around 10 dB higher than that observed in our proposed coupling scheme (<−57.1 dB) with an asymmetric bi-level dual-core mode converter. For the TM polarization mode, the transmission loss α tt is <0.057 dB and the reflection is <−57.1 dB in the O-band operation when the tip width w min is no more than 140 nm. As it should be noticed, the transmission loss of the conventional bi-level inverse taper even with 40-nm tip size is about 0.08–0.17 dB, which is still higher than that (∼0.01–0.05 dB) of our present asymmetric bi-level dual-core mode converter with 130-nm tip size. The simulation results reveal that the present EC performs much better than the conventional bi-level inverse taper when the tip width is chosen to be more than 130 nm (which is a typical fabrication node of foundries). For example, the loss of the present mode converter remains at a low level of <0.24 dB even when w min is increased to 160 nm, while the conventional bi-level inverse taper has a loss as high as 0.83–0.91 dB. More details are given in Supplementary S2 and S3. Additionally, the fabrication tolerance analysis of the mode transition region shows that the maximum transmission loss of 0.25 dB is observed when the width variation Δw = +20 nm, see Supplementary S4.

For the mode expanding region (Section 4), it is designed by being divided into several inverse-taper sections so that the footprint can be minimized. All the taper lengths (L 6, L 7, L 8, L 9) for these sections are carefully chosen to minimize the on-chip transmission loss α te. For the section at the facet, there is a trade-off between the mode conversion loss and the substrate leakage loss as the mode field is mainly expanded to be beyond the confinement of the core region, and thus the length L 9 should be determined carefully. We give an analysis on the influence of the length L 9 and the buried oxide layer thickness h BOX, and it can be seen that the substrate leakage loss is reduced to 0.08–0.24 dB when L 9 is chosen as 50 μm considering h BOX = 3 μm, while the transmission loss α te is as low as 0.26/0.27 dB for TE/TM polarization mode. It is crucial to mention that the substrate leakage still increases slightly, especially at longer wavelengths, as the length L 9 increases. Even though increasing the BOX thickness further, for example, to 4 μm, helps reduce the substrate leakage, we have considered a design with h BOX = 3 μm, which is a commonly available commercial value. More details are given in Supplementary S5.

2.3 Overall coupling loss

Finally, the overall coupling loss (which is the sum of the mode mismatch loss α c and on-chip mode transmission loss α t) and the PDL are calculated, as shown in Figure 2(a) and (b). The simulated coupling loss is 0.44–0.56 dB and 0.48–0.61 dB in the wavelength range of 1,260–1,360 nm for TE and TM polarization modes, respectively. A low PDL of <0.097 dB is achieved across the O-band. Here the simulation is carried out under an ideal condition where the fiber is in close contact with the chip. While, it is more likely to have a small gap between them in reality. When considering a gap of 0.5 μm, an additional loss of 0.40 dB and 0.36 dB for TE and TM polarization mode is introduced. More details can be found in Supplementary S6. Figure 2(c) and (d) show the analysis of the misalignment tolerance to the center of the optical fiber, indicating that the 1-dB alignment tolerances in the horizontal and vertical directions are ∼±1.0 μm and ±0.9 μm, respectively. The simulated light propagations for TE/TM polarization modes are shown in Figure 2(e) and (f). As it can be seen, when TE/TM polarization modes are launched at the thick waveguide A, the evanescent coupling to the thin waveguide B occurs at Sections 2 and 3, significantly reducing the mode confinement in the vertical direction. The mode field undergoes further expansion through the inverse taper Section 4, allowing it to be matched well with the optical fiber.

Figure 2: 
Analysis of the overall coupling loss. (a) Simulated overall coupling loss for TE/TM polarization mode. (b) Calculated PDL. Analysis of the misalignment tolerance for the present EC in the horizontal (c) and vertical (d) directions. (e) and (f) Simulated light propagation for TE/TM polarization mode. (g)–(j) Fabrication tolerance analysis when assuming that the core height or width has a deviation of ±10 nm and ±20 nm.
Figure 2:

Analysis of the overall coupling loss. (a) Simulated overall coupling loss for TE/TM polarization mode. (b) Calculated PDL. Analysis of the misalignment tolerance for the present EC in the horizontal (c) and vertical (d) directions. (e) and (f) Simulated light propagation for TE/TM polarization mode. (g)–(j) Fabrication tolerance analysis when assuming that the core height or width has a deviation of ±10 nm and ±20 nm.

The fabrication tolerance analysis is also carried out by assuming that the core height or width has a deviation of ±10 nm and ±20 nm, respectively, and the simulated results are shown in Figure 2(g–j). It can be seen that a loss increase is observed at short wavelengths for both TE and TM polarization modes when core-width deviation Δw = +20 nm, because the mode confinement becomes stronger and the mode expansion becomes less. When Δw = −20 nm, the loss deterioration of TE polarization mode mainly comes from the increased mode mismatch loss (∼0.74 dB), while the transmission loss α tt remains at a low value of ∼0.01 dB. For the TM polarization mode, higher substrate leakage loss of ∼0.30 dB and higher mode mismatch loss α c of ∼0.32 dB both contribute to the higher coupling loss. Note that the TM polarization mode coupling loss increases at the longer wavelength when the core-height deviation Δh < 0, as indicated by the purple line. Here the coupling loss at 1,360 nm reaches 1.46 dB, which comprises of 0.45 dB mode mismatch loss α c, 0.06 dB on-chip transmission loss α tt of the mode transition region and 0.95 dB transmission loss α te of the mode expanding region, as given in Supplementary S2 and S3. The increased loss at the shorter wavelength when Δh = +20 nm mainly owes to the increased mode mismatch loss, as shown by the green line. It can be seen that the TE polarization mode has relatively high sensitivity to the width deviation, while the TM polarization mode is predominantly affected by the core-height deviation. In addition, we also calculate the coupling loss in a broad wavelength-band ranging from 1,260 nm to 1,600 nm, demonstrating that the 1-dB bandwidth is as large as ∼340/230 nm for TE/TM polarization modes. More details can be found in Supplementary S7.

3 Fabrication and measurement

The designed EC was fabricated on the SOI platform with a 220-nm-thick top-silicon layer and a 3-μm-thick buried oxide layer. The electron beam lithography (EBL) was used for the patterning and the inductively coupled plasma (ICP) dry-etching process was used for etching the silicon core. A 3-μm-thick SiO2 thin film was deposited above the Si layer as the cladding by utilizing the plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) process. Figure 3 shows the microscope image and the scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the fabricated EC with loop-back structure. The lateral separation between these two identical ECs is 127 μm.

Figure 3: 
Microscope image and the SEM image of the fabricated EC.
Figure 3:

Microscope image and the SEM image of the fabricated EC.

Figure 4 shows the experiment setup for the characterization of the EC. A Super Luminescent Diode (SLD) was used as the light source whose wavelength ranges from 1,260 nm to 1,360 nm. The polarization of the input light is adjusted by a polarization controller (PC). The TE- and TM-polarizations are established by adjusting the PC, and the polarizations are determined by using a polarimeter (PAX1000IR2) at the output port and analyzing the recorded power simultaneously. A 127 μm pitched HNA fiber array fused with SMF-28 was used to couple light in and out of the chip, which matches the distance between the two identical ECs. The total excess loss of the FA is ∼0.4 dB/channel (including the fusion splicing loss) and is subtracted from the coupling loss. The transmission spectrums are recorded by the optical spectrum analyzer (OSA).

Figure 4: 
Experiment setup for the characterization of the EC. SLD, super luminescent diode; PC, polarization controller; HNA, high numerical aperture fiber; DUT, device under test; OSA, optical spectrum analyzer.
Figure 4:

Experiment setup for the characterization of the EC. SLD, super luminescent diode; PC, polarization controller; HNA, high numerical aperture fiber; DUT, device under test; OSA, optical spectrum analyzer.

Figure 5(a–c) show the measured coupling loss and the calculated PDL of the fabricated EC. We measured three EC test structures, which are shown in different colors. The measured coupling loss is about 0.82–1.35 dB and 0.94–1.49 dB for TE- and TM-polarization modes while the PDL is ∼0.31 dB in the wavelength range of 1,260–1,360 nm. Note that there is some deviation from the simulated results, about 0.6 dB of loss deterioration is observed. On one hand, this may attribute to the fabrication imperfectness, while it is possibly because the core height and width has a deviation of 10–20 nm, which contributes to ∼0.2–0.4 dB additional loss, as analyzed in the fabrication tolerance result in Figure 2. On the other hand, the imperfect characterization process may also account for part of the loss increase. As it is well known, if the angle of the fiber array is not adjusted properly, it may also have influence on the misalignment on the z direction. For example, an angle deviation of ∼0.2° corresponds to a misalignment of ∼0.5 μm, leading to an additional loss of ∼0.3 dB, as shown in Figure 2. Besides, it is likely to have a ∼0.5 μm air-gap between the fiber and the chip during the characterization, which may result in 0.31–0.43 dB loss degradation, as discussed in Supplementary S6. The observed ripples at the longer wavelengths should be attributed to the end-to-end facet Fabry–Perot resonances caused by air-gap reflection. The ripples at the shorter wavelengths (∼1,260–1,300 nm) are possibly from the SLD source used in the experiment.

Figure 5: 
Measured coupling loss for TE (a) and TM (b) polarization mode and PDL (c) of the fabricated EC.
Figure 5:

Measured coupling loss for TE (a) and TM (b) polarization mode and PDL (c) of the fabricated EC.

4 Discussion

Generally, the coupling loss, polarization dependence, operating bandwidth, device footprint, fabrication tolerance and misalignment tolerance are often used for evaluating the performance of the ECs. One should be aware that the fabrication ease is extremely important for the photonic devices/circuits developed for real applications. For example, those ECs that utilizing 3D polymer waveguide assisted structures, photonic wire bonding or special possessed fibers [4], [6], [7] still remains challenges for practical uses in view of the current fabrication capability available for the MPW foundries. While, those ECs that exhibit CMOS compatibility such as suspended waveguides, SiN-assisted structures or bi-level inverse tapers [29], [30], [32], usually requires a small feature size or additional complicated processes. It becomes even more challenging for operating at the short wavelength with dual polarizations, e.g. the O-band as discussed, because very tiny tip size is needed.

Table 1 gives a comparison between this work and the O-band silicon ECs reported previously. Our proposed EC utilizing the asymmetric bi-level dual-core mode converter shows low coupling loss and low polarization dependence in both simulation and experiments, compared with the other coupling structures. This is very important for photonic chips developed to work polarization-insensitively or to work with dual polarizations, which is often desired in data transmissions. Notably, the present asymmetric bi-level dual-core mode converter offers prospective broadband operation over 300 nm, potentially paving the way for ultra-broadband coupling in a wide range of applications, e.g., on-chip spectrometers [33] and optical frequency comb generators [34]. It can be seen that the present EC works well across both polarizations without additional undercut processes or introducing special low-index waveguides, while only a standard two-step etching process is required. This contributes to a high reliability for the photonic packaging, yielding high consistency and robustness in the performance of the optical system. More importantly, it should be pointed out that the minimum feature size is as large as 130 nm, which is fully compatible with the current 130-nm fabrication node. The coupling loss is also insensitive to this critical size across a broad range of width deviation, showcasing large fabrication tolerances.

Table 1:

Comparison of the O-band silicon EC.

Ref. Structure Fiber MFD Coupling loss (dB) PDL (dB) Bandwidth (nm) Minimum feature Fabrication
type (μm) Sim. Exp. Sim. Exp. Sim. Exp. size (μm)
[27] SWG (150 nm-thick) SMF 10 1.3–2.1 0.5 100 0.12 Under cut
[28] SiON lens SMF 10 4.5–5.5 1–2 220 0.13 SiON assisted
[29] Inversed taper SMF 10 0.5–0.6 1.6–3.5 60 60 0.07 Under cut
[30] Multicore-SiN HNA 4 0.8–1.0 2.35 0.2–0.5 0.6–2.5 100 100 0.12 SiN assisted
This Asymmetric bi-level dual-core HNA 4 0.44–0.56 0.82–1.35 <0.096 0.31 340/230 100 0.13 Two-step etching

Further improvement can be made on the device footprint and the misalignment tolerance. The length of the present EC reaches 270 μm, which can be downsized by further optimizing the parameters of each section carefully. Achieving high-efficiency ECs with compact footprints is the key to overcome the photonic packaging bottleneck impeding by high-cost and limited throughput [2]. The misalignment tolerance can be improved if combined with the multi-core structures at the mode expanding region, which has been used for SWG-assisted ECs [20]. The idea of utilizing mode evanescent coupling can also be employed in combination with SiN-assisted structures, facilitating polarization-insensitive coupling in a broad bandwidth. It also has the potential for on-demand coupling with SMFs or fibers with different MFDs, where the predominant limitation lies on the non-negligible substrate leakage loss, attributing to the limited buffer layer thickness. Evidently, the idea of utilizing mode evanescent coupling all-on-chip provides a general solution even for other material platforms and other coupling cases, e.g., laser-chip coupling and chip-chip coupling on silicon nitride [35], lithium niobate [36], lithium tantalate [37] and so on. Particularly, even for optical waveguides with angled sidewalls (e.g., thin-film lithium niobate optical waveguides), the structure can also work well when the gap width is chosen to be relatively large. The remarkable fiber-chip coupling ability and the fabrication compatibility of the proposed EC makes it a promising candidate in next-generation silicon photonic circuits where power consumption matters mostly. We believe that this coupling approach opens the door for further implementations at the high-volume manufacturing and large-scale integration in the future.

5 Conclusions

In summary, we have proposed and demonstrated a low-loss and polarization-insensitive O-band fiber-chip EC that breaks the limitations on critical requirements for tiny feature size. The asymmetric bi-level dual-core mode converter enables low-loss mode conversion between the thick and thin silicon photonic waveguides. In particular, it avoids the introduction of bi-level junction, thereby reducing the fabrication difficulty. The calculated coupling loss is 0.44–0.56 dB and 0.48–0.61 dB across the O-band for TE and TM polarization modes, while their 1-dB bandwidths exceed 340 nm and 230 nm, respectively. The experimental results have shown that a peaking coupling loss is achieved with ∼0.82 dB and the PDL is about 0.31 dB in the O-band. This high-efficiency and polarization-insensitive EC has the potential for not only fiber-chip coupling but also various kinds of optical interface cases.

Supplementary document

See Supplementary 1 for supporting content.


Corresponding author: Daoxin Dai, State Key Laboratory for Extreme Photonics and Instrumentation, College of Optical Science and Engineering, Center for Optical & Electromagnetic Research, International Research Center for Advanced Photonics, Zhejiang University, Zijingang Campus, Hangzhou 310058, China; Ningbo Research Institute, Zhejiang University, Ningbo 315100, China; and Jiaxing Key Laboratory of Photonic Sensing & Intelligent Imaging, Intelligent Optics & Photonics Research Center, Jiaxing Research Institute, Zhejiang University, Jiaxing 314000, China, E-mail: 

Funding source: National Major Research and Development Program

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2019YFB2203600

Award Identifier / Grant number: 61961146003

Award Identifier / Grant number: 62005238

Award Identifier / Grant number: 62125503

Award Identifier / Grant number: 91950205

Award Identifier / Grant number: 61725503

Funding source: The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Award Identifier / Grant number: LD19F050001

Funding source: The Leading Innovative and Entrepreneur Team Introduction Program of Zhejiang

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2021R01001

Funding source: National Key Research and Development Program of China

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2021YFB2800404

  1. Research funding: This work is supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFB2800404), National Natural Science Foundation of China (U23B2047, 62321166651, 62305294, and 92150302), Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LD19F050001), Zhejiang Provincial Major Research and Development Program (2022C01103), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, and Leading Innovative and Entrepreneur Team Introduction Program of Zhejiang (2021R01001).

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflicts of interest.

  4. Data availability: The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

[1] S. Shekhar, et al.., “Roadmapping the next generation of silicon photonics,” Nat. Commun., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 751, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-44750-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[2] L. Ranno, et al.., “Integrated photonics packaging: challenges and opportunities,” ACS Photonics, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 3467–3485, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.2c00891.Search in Google Scholar

[3] T. G. Tiecke, et al.., “Efficient fiber-optical interface for nanophotonic devices,” Optica, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 70–75, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.2.000070.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Y. Jin, et al.., “Efficient fiber‐to‐chip interface via an intermediated CdS nanowire,” Laser Photonics Rev., vol. 17, no. 6, 2023, Art. no. 2200919. https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.202200919.Search in Google Scholar

[5] M. R. Billah, et al.., “Hybrid integration of silicon photonics circuits and InP lasers by photonic wire bonding,” Optica, vol. 5, no. 7, p. 876, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.5.000876.Search in Google Scholar

[6] M. Blaicher, et al.., “Hybrid multi-chip assembly of optical communication engines by in situ 3D nano-lithography,” Light: Sci. Appl., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 71, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-020-0272-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[7] L. Ranno, et al.., “Highly efficient fiber to Si waveguide free-form coupler for foundry-scale silicon photonics,” Photonics Res., vol. 12, no. 5, p. 1055, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.514999.Search in Google Scholar

[8] D. Taillaert, P. Bienstman, and R. Baets, “Compact efficient broadband grating coupler for silicon-on-insulator waveguides,” Opt. Lett., vol. 29, no. 23, p. 2749, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.29.002749.Search in Google Scholar

[9] V. Vitali, et al.., “High-efficiency reflector-less dual-level silicon photonic grating coupler,” Photonics Res., vol. 11, no. 7, p. 1275, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.488970.Search in Google Scholar

[10] V. R. Almeida, R. R. Panepucci, and M. Lipson, “Nanotaper for compact mode conversion,” Opt. Lett., vol. 28, no. 15, p. 1302, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.28.001302.Search in Google Scholar

[11] R. Takei, et al.., “Silicon knife-edge taper waveguide for ultralow-loss spot-size converter fabricated by photolithography,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 102, no. 10, 2013, Art. no. 101108. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4795308.Search in Google Scholar

[12] W. Zhang, et al.., “Buried 3D spot-size converters for silicon photonics,” Optica, vol. 8, no. 8, p. 1102, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.431064.Search in Google Scholar

[13] R. Marchetti, C. Lacava, L. Carroll, K. Gradkowski, and P. Minzioni, “Coupling strategies for silicon photonics integrated chips [Invited],” Photonics Res., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 201, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.7.000201.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Q. Fang, J. Song, X. Luo, M. Yu, G. Lo, and Y. Liu, “Mode-size converter with high coupling efficiency and broad bandwidth,” Opt. Express, vol. 19, no. 22, 2011, Art. no. 21588. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.021588.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] M. Wood, P. Sun, and R. M. Reano, “Compact cantilever couplers for low-loss fiber coupling to silicon photonic integrated circuits,” Opt. Express, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 164, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.000164.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] M. Papes, et al.., “Fiber-chip edge coupler with large mode size for silicon photonic wire waveguides,” Opt. Express, vol. 24, no. 5, p. 5026, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.005026.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Y. Maegami, et al.., “Simple and fully CMOS-compatible low-loss fiber coupling structure for a silicon photonics platform,” Opt. Lett., vol. 45, no. 7, p. 2095, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.388267.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] S. Sun, Y. Chen, Y. Sun, F. Liu, and L. Cao, “Novel low-loss fiber-chip edge coupler for coupling standard single mode fibers to silicon photonic wire waveguides,” Photonics, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 79, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8030079.Search in Google Scholar

[19] A. He, X. Guo, K. Wang, Y. Zhang, and Y. Su, “Low loss, large bandwidth fiber-chip edge couplers based on silicon-on-insulator platform,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 38, no. 17, pp. 4780–4786, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2020.2995544.Search in Google Scholar

[20] A. He, X. Guo, T. Wang, and Y. Su, “Ultracompact fiber-to-chip metamaterial edge coupler,” ACS Photonics, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 3226–3233, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.1c00993.Search in Google Scholar

[21] P. Cheben, et al.., “Refractive index engineering with subwavelength gratings for efficient microphotonic couplers and planar waveguide multiplexers,” Opt. Lett., vol. 35, no. 15, p. 2526, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.002526.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Y. Xiao, Y. Xu, Y. Dong, B. Zhang, and Y. Ni, “A 60 μm-long fiber-to-chip edge coupler assisted by subwavelength grating structure with ultralow loss and large bandwidth,” Photonics, vol. 9, no. 6, p. 413, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics9060413.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Y. Li, et al.., “Polarization insensitive edge coupler assisted by subwavelength grating and suspended structure,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., vol. 34, no. 14, pp. 765–768, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2022.3185993.Search in Google Scholar

[24] A. Khilo, M. A. Popović, M. Araghchini, and F. X. Kärtner, “Efficient planar fiber-to-chip coupler based on two-stage adiabatic evolution,” Opt. Express, vol. 18, no. 15, 2010, Art. no. 15790. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.015790.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] A. Dewanjee, J. N. Caspers, D. F. V. James, and M. Mojahedi, “A low-loss, compact, broadband, polarization insensitive edge coupler for silicon photonics,” in 2014 IEEE Photonics Conference, IEEE, 2014, pp. 560–561.10.1109/IPCon.2014.6995499Search in Google Scholar

[26] Q. Fang, et al.., “Low loss fiber-to-waveguide converter with a 3-D functional taper for silicon photonics,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., vol. 28, no. 22, pp. 2533–2536, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2016.2602366.Search in Google Scholar

[27] T. Barwicz, et al.., “An O-band metamaterial converter interfacing standard optical fibers to silicon nanophotonic waveguides,” in Optical Fiber Communication Conference, OSA, 2015, p. Th3F.3.10.1364/OFC.2015.Th3F.3Search in Google Scholar

[28] B. Snyder, et al.., “Broadband, polarization-insensitive lensed edge couplers for silicon photonics,” in 2018 IEEE 68th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), IEEE, 2018, pp. 841–847.10.1109/ECTC.2018.00130Search in Google Scholar

[29] R. Larrea, A. M. Gutierrez, A. Griol, A. Brimont, and P. Sanchis, “Fiber-to-Chip spot-size converter for coupling to silicon waveguides in the O-band,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 31–34, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2018.2881334.Search in Google Scholar

[30] M. Teng, H. Wu, C. Li, F. Wang, Y. Du, and X. Zheng, “O-band fiber-to-chip edge coupler for high NA fiber based on a CMOS compatible SOI platform,” in Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2022, Optica Publishing Group, 2022, p. Th2A.5.10.1364/OFC.2022.Th2A.5Search in Google Scholar

[31] D. Dai, S. He, and H.-K. Tsang, “Bilevel mode converter between a silicon nanowire waveguide and a larger waveguide,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 2428–2433, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2006.874554.Search in Google Scholar

[32] L. Jia, C. Li, T.-Y. Liow, and G.-Q. Lo, “Efficient suspended coupler with loss less than −1.4 dB between Si-photonic waveguide and cleaved single mode fiber,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 239–244, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2017.2779863.Search in Google Scholar

[33] L. Zhang, et al.., “Silicon photonic spectrometer with multiple customized wavelength bands,” Photonics Res., vol. 12, no. 5, p. 1016, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.520543.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Y. Hu, et al.., “High-efficiency and broadband on-chip electro-optic frequency comb generators,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 679–685, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-022-01059-y.Search in Google Scholar

[35] C. Xiang, W. Jin, and J. E. Bowers, “Silicon nitride passive and active photonic integrated circuits: trends and prospects,” Photonics Res., vol. 10, no. 6, p. A82, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.452936.Search in Google Scholar

[36] A. Boes, et al.., “Lithium niobate photonics: unlocking the electromagnetic spectrum,” Science, vol. 379, no. 6627, p. eabj4396, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj4396.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[37] C. Wang, et al.., “Lithium tantalate photonic integrated circuits for volume manufacturing,” Nature, vol. 629, no. 8013, pp. 784–790, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07369-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2024-0320).


Received: 2024-06-16
Accepted: 2024-08-21
Published Online: 2024-09-09

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 25.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/nanoph-2024-0320/html
Scroll to top button