Self-disclosure in initial interactions amongst speakers of American and Australian English

References

Arundale, Robert.2006. Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research2(2). 193–216.10.1515/PR.2006.011Suche in Google Scholar

Arundale, Robert.2010a. Constituting face in conversation: Face, facework and interactional achievement. Journal of Pragmatics42(8). 2078–2105.Suche in Google Scholar

Arundale, Robert.2010b. Relating. In MiriamLocher & SageLambert Graham (eds.), Interpersonal pragmatics, 137–166. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110214338.1.137Suche in Google Scholar

Barron, Anne & Klaus P.Schneider (eds.). 2005. The pragmatics of Irish English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110898934Suche in Google Scholar

Berry, Michael.2009. The social and cultural realization of diversity: An interview with Donal Carbaugh. Language and Intercultural Communication9. 230–241.10.1080/14708470903203058Suche in Google Scholar

Brezina, Vaclav & MiriamMeyerhoff.2014. Significant or random? A critical review of sociolinguistic generalisations based on large corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics19(1). 1–28.10.1075/ijcl.19.1.01breSuche in Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope & StephenLevinson.1987. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Button, Graham & NeilCasey.1984. Generating topic. In J.Maxwell Atkinson & John C.Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action, 167–190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511665868.013Suche in Google Scholar

Button, Graham & NeilCasey.1985. Topic nomination and topic pursuit. Human Studies8(1). 3–55.10.1007/BF00143022Suche in Google Scholar

Carbaugh, Donal.1997. Finnish and American linguistic patterns: A cultural comparison. In Larry A.Samovar & Richard E.Porter (eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader. 8th edn., 221–226. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Suche in Google Scholar

Carbaugh, Donal.2002. Some distinctive features of U.S. American conversation. In William F.Eadie & Paul E.Nelson (eds.), The changing conversation in America, 61–75. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781452229195.n4Suche in Google Scholar

Carbaugh, Donal.2005. Cultures in conversation. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Carbaugh, Donal.2007. Cultural discourse analysis: Communication practices and intercultural encounters. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research36(3). 167–182.10.1080/17475750701737090Suche in Google Scholar

Carbaugh, Donal.2012. A communication theory of culture. In AnastaciaKurylo (ed.), Inter/Cultural communication: Representation and construction of culture, 69–87. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781544304106.n4Suche in Google Scholar

Carbaugh, Donal, SunnyLie, LieneLocmele, & NadezhdaSotirova.2012. Ethnographic studies of intergroup communication. In HowardGiles (ed.), International communication association’s handbook of intergroup communication, 44–57. New York & Abingdon: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan & MichaelHaugh.2014. Pragmatics and the English language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-137-39391-3Suche in Google Scholar

Derlega, Valerian, SandraMetts, SandraPetronio & StephenMargulis.1993. Self-Disclosure. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Suche in Google Scholar

Dindia, Kathryn.2000. Self-disclosure, identity, and relationship development: A dialectical perspective. In KathrynDindia & SteveDuck (eds.), Communication and personal relationships, 147–162. Chichester: Wiley.Suche in Google Scholar

Fuchs, Stephan.2001. Against essentialism: A theory of culture and society. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674037410Suche in Google Scholar

Garfinkel, Harold.1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Suche in Google Scholar

Glenn, Philip.2003. Laughter in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519888Suche in Google Scholar

Goddard, Cliff.2006. “Lift your game Martina!”: Deadpan jocular irony and the ethnopragmatics of Australian English. In CliffGoddard (ed.), Ethnopragmatics: Understanding discourse in cultural context, 65–97. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110911114.65Suche in Google Scholar

Goddard, Cliff.2009. Not taking yourself too seriously in Australian English: Semantic explications, cultural scripts, corpus evidence. Intercultural Pragmatics6(1). 29–53.10.1515/IPRG.2009.002Suche in Google Scholar

Goddard, Cliff.2012a. ‘Early interactions’ in Australian English, American English, and English English: Cultural differences and cultural scripts. Journal of Pragmatics44(9). 1038–1050.Suche in Google Scholar

Goddard, Cliff.2012b. Cultural scripts and communication style differences in three Anglo Englishes. In BarbaraKyrk-Kastovsky (ed.), Intercultural miscommunication: Past and present, 101–120. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael.2010. Jocular mockery, (dis)affiliation, and face. Journal of Pragmatics42(8). 2106–2119.10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.018Suche in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael.2011. Humour, face and im/politeness in getting acquainted. In BethanDavies, MichaelHaugh & AndrewMerrison (eds.), Situated politeness, 165–184. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael.2012. Conversational interaction. In KeithAllan & KasiaJaszczolt (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics, 251–274. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139022453.014Suche in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael.2014. Jocular mockery as interactional practice in everyday Anglo-Australian conversation. Australian Journal of Linguistics34(1). 76–99.10.1080/07268602.2014.875456Suche in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael.2015. Im/politeness implicatures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110240078Suche in Google Scholar

Hepburn, Alex & Galina B.Bolden.2013. The conversation analytic approach to transcription. In TanyaStivers & JackSidnell (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 57–76. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781118325001.ch4Suche in Google Scholar

Holliday, Adrian.1999. Small cultures. Applied Linguistics20(2). 237–264.10.1093/applin/20.2.237Suche in Google Scholar

Holt, Elizabeth.2013. ‘There’s many a true word said in jest’: Seriousness and nonseriousness in interaction. In PhillipGlenn & ElizabethHolt (eds.), Studies of laughter in interaction, 69–89. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781472542069.ch-004Suche in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail.1979. A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance-declination. In GeorgePsthas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 79–95. New York: Irvington.Suche in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail.1984. On stepwise transition from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters. In J.Maxwell Atkinson & John C.Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action, 191–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511665868.014Suche in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail.2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In GeneLerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, 13–23. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.125.02jefSuche in Google Scholar

Maynard, Douglas & DonZimmermann.1984. Topical talk, ritual and the social organization of relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly47. 301–316.Suche in Google Scholar

Pearce, W. Barnett & Stewart M.Sharp. 1973. Self-disclosing communication. The Journal of Communication23(4). 409–425.10.1111/j.1460-2466.1973.tb00958.xSuche in Google Scholar

Petronio, Sandra.2002. Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Pillet-Shore, Danielle. 2010. Making way and making sense: Including newcomers in interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly73(2). 152–175.10.1177/0190272510369668Suche in Google Scholar

Pillet-Shore, Danielle. 2011. Doing introductions: The work involved in meeting someone new. Communication Monographs78(1). 73–95.10.1080/03637751.2010.542767Suche in Google Scholar

Pillet-Shore, Danielle. 2012. Greeting: Displaying stance through prosodic recipient design. Research on Language and Social Interaction45(4). 375–398.10.1080/08351813.2012.724994Suche in Google Scholar

Pomerantz, Anita.1988. Offering a candidate answer: An information seeking strategy. Communication Monographs55. 360–373.10.1080/03637758809376177Suche in Google Scholar

Potter, Jonathan & AlexaHepburn.2010. Putting aspiration into words: ‘Laugh particles’, managing descriptive trouble and modulating action. Journal of Pragmatics42(6). 1543–1555.Suche in Google Scholar

Rayson, Paul.2008. From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics13(4). 519–549.10.1075/ijcl.13.4.06raySuche in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel.2001. Getting serious: Joke >> serious ‘no’. Journal of Pragmatics33. 1947–1955.10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00073-4Suche in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel.2007. Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791208Suche in Google Scholar

Schneider, Klaus P.1987. Topic selection in phatic communication. Multilingua6(3). 247–256.10.1515/mult.1987.6.3.247Suche in Google Scholar

Schneider, Klaus P.1988. Small talk: Analysing phatic discourse. Marburg: Hitzeroth.Suche in Google Scholar

Schneider, Klaus P.2008. Small talk in England, Ireland, and the USA. In Klaus P.Schneider & AnneBarron (eds.), Variational pragmatics: A focus on regional varieties in pluricentric languages, 99–139. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.178.06schSuche in Google Scholar

Schneider, Klaus P.2010. Variational pragmatics. In MirjamFried, Jan-OlaÖstman, & JefVerschueren (eds.), Variation and change: Pragmatic perspectives, 239–267. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/hoph.6.18schSuche in Google Scholar

Schneider, Klaus P.2012. Appropriate behaviour across varieties of English. Journal of Pragmatics44(9). 1022–1037.10.1016/j.pragma.2011.09.015Suche in Google Scholar

Schneider, Klaus P. & AnneBarron (eds.). 2008. Variational pragmatics: A focus on regional varieties in pluricentric languages. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.178Suche in Google Scholar

Scollo, Michelle.2011. Cultural approaches to discourse analysis: A theoretical and methodological conversation with special focus on Donal Carbaugh’s cultural discourse theory. Journal of Multicultural Discourses6(1). 1–32.10.1080/17447143.2010.536550Suche in Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael.1984. On the pragmatic ‘poetry’ of prose: Parallelism, repetition, and cohesive structure in the time course of dyadic conversation. In DeborahSchiffrin (ed.), Meaning, form and use in context: Linguistic applications, 181–199. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Stewart, Edward C. & Milton J.Bennett. 1991. American cultural patterns. A cross-cultural perspective. Revised edn. Yarmouth, MN: Intercultural Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Stivers, Tanya.2013. Sequence organization. In TanyaStivers and JackSidnell (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 191–209. Malden, MA: Blackwell-Wiley.10.1002/9781118325001.ch10Suche in Google Scholar

Stokoe, Elizabeth.2010. ‘Have you been married, or . . . ?’: Eliciting and accounting for relationship histories in speed-dating interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction43(3). 260–282.Suche in Google Scholar

Svennevig, Jan.1999. Getting acquainted in conversation. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.64Suche in Google Scholar

Svennevig, Jan.2014. Direct and indirect self-presentation in first conversations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology33(3). 302–327.10.1177/0261927X13512307Suche in Google Scholar

Tottie, Gunnel.2002. An introduction to American English. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Usami, Mayumi.2002. Discourse politeness in Japanese conversation. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Suche in Google Scholar