Home Technology Numerical analysis of bent aluminium sandwich panels with different tubular cores
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Numerical analysis of bent aluminium sandwich panels with different tubular cores

  • Seçil Eksi ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 8, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Sandwich panels are frequently used in transportation, automotive, aerospace and marine sectors due to their high rigidity, strength and ability to absorb energy. In this study, finite element analyses investigated the bending behaviour of aluminium sandwich panels fixed at both ends with different geometrical tubular core structures. The sandwich panels consist of 6063-T5 Aluminium core and 7075-T6 Aluminium skin. The core structure used square, circle, triangle, honeycomb, vertical ellipse and horizontal ellipse tube geometries. The square tube-core sandwich panel has the highest specific load-carrying capacity (SLCC) among the different tube-core geometries. In the square tube-core sandwich panel, where the number of tubes varies, the seven-tube-core panel showed the highest SLCC.


Corresponding author: Seçil Eksi, Mechanical Engineering, Sakarya Universitesi, Sakarya 54050, Turkey, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

[1] U. Cagri, N. Geren, M. H. Boztepe, and M. Bayramoglu, “Bending behavior of sandwich structures with different fiber facing types and extremely low-density foam cores,” Mater. Test., vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 220–230, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.111311.Search in Google Scholar

[2] G. Y. Zu, R. H. Lu, X. B. Li, et al.., “Three-point bending behavior of aluminum foam sandwich with steel panel,” Trans. Nonferrous Metals Soc. China, vol. 23, pp. 2491–2495, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(13)62759-4.Search in Google Scholar

[3] C. Liu, Y. X. Zhang, and L. Ye, “High velocity impact responses of sandwich panels with metal fibre laminate skins and aluminium foam core,” Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 100, pp. 139–153, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.09.004.Search in Google Scholar

[4] G. Altan and V. Kovan, “Flexural behavior of 3D printed honeycomb sandwich structures with waste filler material,” Mater. Test., vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 833–838, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.110927.Search in Google Scholar

[5] I. Ozen, K. Çava, H. Gedikli, Ü. Alver, and M. Aslan, “Low-energy impact response of composite sandwich panels with thermoplastic honeycomb and reentrant cores,” Thin-Walled Struct., vol. 156, 2020, Art no. 106989, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.106989.Search in Google Scholar

[6] D. H. Chen, “Bending deformation of honeycomb consisting of regular hexagonal cells,” Compos. Struct., vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 736–746, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.08.006.Search in Google Scholar

[7] J. Wang, C. Shi, N. Yang, H. Sun, Y. Liu, and B. Song, “Strength, stiffness, and panel peeling strength of carbon fiber-reinforced composite sandwich structures with aluminum honeycomb cores for vehicle body,” Compos. Struct., vol. 184, pp. 1189–1196, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.038.Search in Google Scholar

[8] L. L. Yan, B. Yu, B. Han, Q. C. Zhang, T. J. Lu, and B. H. Lu, “Effects of aluminum foam filling on the low-velocity impact response of sandwich panels with corrugated cores,” J. Sandw. Struct. Mater., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1–19, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636218776585.Search in Google Scholar

[9] C. Shu, S. Zhao, and S. Hou, “Crashworthiness analysis of two-layered corrugated sandwich panels under crushing loading,” Thin-Walled Struct., vol. 133, pp. 42–51, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2018.09.008.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Y. Rong, J. Liu, W. Luo, and W. He, “Effects of geometric configurations of corrugated cores on the local impact and planar compression of sandwich panels,” Compos. B Eng., vol. 152, pp. 324–335, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636218776585.Search in Google Scholar

[11] H. Y. Sarvestani, A. H. Akbarzadeha, H. Niknama, and K. Hermenean, “3D printed architected polymeric sandwich panels: energy absorption and structural performance,” Compos. Struct., vol. 200, pp. 886–909, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.002.Search in Google Scholar

[12] L. Bernard, G. Michon, R. E. Fatmi, and B. Castanié, “Static and dynamic analysis of bending–torsion coupling of a CFRP sandwich beam,” Compos. Struct., vol. 145, pp. 26–36, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.055.Search in Google Scholar

[13] C. Schneider, D. Zenkert, V. S. Deshpande, and S. Kazemahvazi, “Bending energy absorption of self-reinforced poly(ethylene terephthalate) composite sandwich beams,” Compos. Struct., vol. 140, pp. 582–589, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.043.Search in Google Scholar

[14] A. Refah, Ş. H. Kaya, F. N. Karaoğlu, İ. Sağlam, and N. Choupani, “Oblique impact behavior of Al-LDPE-Al sandwich plates,” Mater. Test., vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 998–1002, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.111574.Search in Google Scholar

[15] A. Kuş, “Impact behavior of multi-layer carbon skin composite sandwich panels with 3D spacer fabric,” Mater. Test., vol. 57, nos. 7–8, pp. 655–662, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.110761.Search in Google Scholar

[16] P. Striemann, M. Eichenhofer, D. Schupp, M. Niedermeier, D. Huelsbusch, and F. Walther, “Compression testing of additively manufactured continuous carbon fiber-reinforced sandwich structures,” Mater. Test., vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 801–808, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.111216.Search in Google Scholar

[17] M. Helal and E. Fathallah, “Finite element analysis and design optimization of a non-circular sandwich composite deep submarine pressure hull,” Mater. Test., vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 1025–1032, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.111580.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Z. Xia, X. Wang, H. Fan, Y. Li, and F. Jin, “Blast resistance of metallic tube-core sandwich panels,” Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 97, pp. 10–28, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.06.001.Search in Google Scholar

[19] S. Chung Kim Yuen, G. Cunliffe, and M. C. Plessis, “Blast response of cladding sandwich panels with tubular cores,” Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 110, pp. 266–278, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.04.016.Search in Google Scholar

[20] W. Cheng, X. Bin, and S. Chung Kim Yuen, “Numerical analysis of cladding sandwich panels with tubular cores subjected to uniform blast load,” Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 133, 2019, Art no. 103345, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103345.Search in Google Scholar

[21] S. Li, G. Lu, Z. Wang, L. Zhao, and G. Wu, “Finite element simulation of metallic cylindrical sandwich shells with graded aluminum tubular cores subjected to internal blast loading,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., vols 96–97, pp. 1–12, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.03.011.Search in Google Scholar

[22] R. Vignjevic, J. Campbell, K. Hughes, et al.., “Soft body impact resistance of composite foam core sandwich panels with unidirectional corrugated and tubular reinforcements,” Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 132, 2019, Art no. 103320, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103320.Search in Google Scholar

[23] M. D. Theobald and G. N. Nurick, “Experimental and numerical analysis of tube-core claddings under blast loads,” Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 37, pp. 333–348, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.10.003.Search in Google Scholar

[24] X. M. Xiang, G. Lub, and Z. H. Wang, “Quasi-static bending behavior of sandwich beams with thin-walled tubes as core,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 103, pp. 55–62, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.08.028.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-06-08
Published in Print: 2022-06-27

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 31.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mt-2021-2182/html
Scroll to top button