Startseite Existence and Asymptotic Periodicity of Solutions for Neutral Integro-Differential Evolution Equations with Infinite Delay
Artikel Open Access

Existence and Asymptotic Periodicity of Solutions for Neutral Integro-Differential Evolution Equations with Infinite Delay

  • Jianbo Zhu EMAIL logo und Xianlong Fu EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 16. Februar 2022
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this work, making use of the theory of resolvent operators and Banach fixed point theorem, we first discuss the existence and regularity of mild solutions for neutral partial functional integro-differential equations with infinite delay. We assume that the linear part of the considered equation generates a resolvent operator and the nonlinear function satisfies Lipschitz conditions. Then we investigate the asymptotic periodicity of mild solutions under asymptotic periodic assumption on the nonlinear function. The obtained results extend somewhat the related conclusions in literature. In the end, an example is presented to illustrate the obtained results.

1 Introduction

In this paper, we study the existence, regularity and asymptotic periodicity of solutions for neutral functional integro-differential evolution equations with infinite delay of the form

(1.1){ddt[x(t)+0tN(ts)x(s)ds]=A[x(t)+0tF(ts)x(s)ds]+f(t,xt),t0,x0=ϕ,

where x(·) is the state variable taking values in a Banach space X and the notation xt represents the functional defined by xt: (−∞, 0] → X, xt(θ) = x(t + θ), belonging to some abstract phase space ℬ which is defined axiomatically. The operator (A, D(A)) is the infinitesimal generator of an analytic semigroup on X, while F(t): D(A) → D(A) and N(t): XX are two families of bounded linear operators. The nonlinear function f (·, ·) is to be specified later.

Neutral partial integro-differential equations without or with time delay arise in various areas. For example, the following heat conduction system, see [3, 6, 7, 30], has been frequently used to describe the evolution of the temperature in different types of materials with fading memory,

(1.2){t[u(t,x)+tk1(ts)u(s,x)ds]=cΔu(t,x)+tk2(ts)Δu(s,x)ds+f(t,u(t,x)),t0,u(t,x)=0,xΩ.

In this system, Ω ⊂ ℝn is open, bounded and has smooth boundary, (t, x) ∈ [0, ∞) × Ω, u(t, x) represents the temperature in x at time t, c is a physical constant and ki: ℝ → ℝ, i = 1, 2, are functions of the internal energy and the heat flux relaxation respectively, and the internal energy here the heat flux terms are described as functionals of u and Δu. For more models of partial integro-differential equations and related applications we refer to the paper [2] and the monographs [22, 38]. One of the the important way to deal with partial integro-differential equations is to transform them into (neutral) abstract integro-differential evolution equations in Banach space, and then study the abstract systems by applying theory of resolvent operators. Actually, by assuming the solution u is known on (−∞, 0]. we can transform (1.2) into the abstract neutral integro-differential evolution equation of the following form

ddt[u(t)+F(t,ut)]=Au(t)+0tB(ts)u(s)ds+f(t,ut)fort0.

In [10], it was illustrated that the equation

du(t)dt=A[u(t)+tK(ts)u(s)ds]+tF(ts)u(s)dsfor t0

can be regarded as the abstract formulation of the model proposed and studied by Coleman and Gurtin [8], Gurtin and Pipkin [20], and Miller [31] for the heat flow in a rigid isotropic viscoelastic material in the elastic case, and the model in thermoviscoelasticity considered by Leugering [28].

An important approach to study the above abstract equations is the theory of resolvent operators founded in [17]–[19]. Grimmer et al. proved in [17]–[19] that there is a (unique) resolvent operator (R(t))t≥0 associated to the linear homogeneous equation

{υ(t)=Aυ(t)+0tγ(ts)υ(s)dsfor t0,υ(0)=υ0X.

Based on it the authors obtained the representation, existence, and uniqueness of mild solutions of the following inhomogeneous integro-differential evolution equation in Banach space X

(1.3){υ(t)=Aυ(t)+0tγ(ts)υ(s)ds+f(t)for t0,υ(0)=υ0X,

via the resolvent operator, where f : ℝ+X is a continuous function. Actually, the resolvent operator, replacing the role of C0-semigroup for evolution equations, plays an essential role in solving Eq. (1.3) in weak and strict senses. Based on these important works, in these years much works on various topics, such as existence, regularity and stability of solutions and control problems, for semilinear integro-differential evolution equations has been done by many authors through applying the theory of resolvent operator, see [4, 5, 11, 1416, 32, 40] and the references therein.

On the other hand, existence of periodic solutions is one of the most interesting and important topics in the qualitative theory of differential equations due to their significance in practical sciences. Many contributions on the existence of periodic solutions for differential equations have been made. Meanwhile, the concept of asymptotically ω-periodic solutions is more general than periodic solutions and, from view of applications, asymptotically periodic systems describe the models more realistically and accurately than periodic ones. The notion of S-asymptotically ω-periodic functions was introduced by Henríquez et al. in [25, 26] (i.e. a bounded continuous function f (·) is called to be S-asymptotically ω-periodic if there exists ω > 0 such that limtf(t+ω)f(t)=0) and it is related to and more general than that of asymptotic ω-periodic functions. Moreover, the authors have established there a relationship between S-asymptotically ω-periodic functions and the class of asymptotically ω-periodic functions. In these years this topic is attracting much attention increasing interest of many researchers, some recent works of this area can be found in [1, 9, 12, 24, 29, 35, 37, 39] among others. Particularly, Dos Santos and Henríquez [37] investigated existence of S-asymptotically ω-periodic solutions for neutral integro-differential equations of the following form

{ddt[x(t)+0tN(ts)x(s)ds]=Ax(t)+0tB(ts)x(s)ds+f(t,x(t))for t0,x(0)=x0,

via the theory of resolvent operators associated to the linear homogeneous equation

(1.4){ddt[x(t)+0tN(ts)x(s)ds]=Ax(t)+0tB(ts)x(s)dsfor t0,x(0)=x0,

which was founded in [36]. In [36] the authors first established the theory of resolvent operators for (1.4) and then they discussed the existence and uniqueness of solutions for a semilinear neutral integro-differential equation with infinite delay.

To the best of our knowledge, the regularity and asymptotic periodicity of mild solutions for the neutral partial functional integro-differential equation ((1.1) are untreated topics in the literature up to know. The purpose of this paper is to explore the existence, regularity and S-asymptotic periodicity of solutions for the equation (1.1). The main tool in our discussion is also the theory of resolvent operators for neutral linear integro-differential systems of 1.1) established in [36]. We will represent the global mild solutions of Eq. (1.1) by the resolvent operator R(t) and analyze existence and uniqueness of solutions by using theory of resolvent operator and Banach fixed point theorem. Following this we further study the regularity of mild solutions for Eq. (1.1) under some smoothness conditions. It is seen that the results obtained in this part are better than those in [14, 16, 27] due to the application of the newly theory of resolvent operators. More precisely, other than in [14, 16, 27], we do not impose here any smoothness condition on the neutral term. At last, we study the existence and uniqueness of S-asymptotically ω-periodic solutions assuming the nonlinear function is so. The results are proved by utilizing Schauder’s fixed point theorem and Banach fixed point theorem, respectively, for the different cases that the resolvent operator is compact and non-compact. We point out here that, compared to [29, 37], the conditions for the existence of S-asymptotically ω-periodic solutions are somewhat weaker (see Theorem 4.1 and Theorem 4.2). Clearly, our obtained results in this article extend and develop the existing results in literature mentioned above.

Subsequently the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we state briefly the basic theory of analytic semigroup and resolvent operators. In Section 3 we discuss the existence and regularity of global mild solutions of (1.1). The existence and uniqueness of S-asymptotically ω-periodic solutions is then studied in Section 4. Finally, in Section 5, we provide an example to illustrate the applications of the obtained results.

2 Preliminaries

In this section, we present some preliminary facts on theory of analytic semigroup and resolvent operators to be used in this paper.

Let (X, ǁ·ǁ and (Z, ǁ·ǁ) be two Banach spaces, we denote by ℒ(X, Z) the Banach space of bounded linear operators from X into Z endowed with the general operator norm and we abbreviate this notation to ℒ(X) when X = Z. For a linear operator A:D(A)XX, let Y be the Banach space (D(A), ǁ · ǁ1) with the graph norm ǁxǁ1 = ǁAxǁ + ǁxǁ, for xD(A). Hereafter C([0, T], X) denotes the Banach space consisting of continuous functions from [0, T] to X with the norm

xC=sup0tTx(t),xC([0,T],X).

Cb([0, ∞); X) denotes the Banach space consisting of bounded and continuous functions from [0, ∞) to X with ǁ · ǁ defined by x=supt0x(t).

Next we present briefly the basic theory of resolvent operators for the following neutral integro-differential equation associated to Eq. (1.1).

(2.1){ddt[x(t)+0tN(ts)x(s)ds]=A[x(t)+0tF(ts)x(s)ds],x(0)=x0X.
Definition 1

A one-parameter family of bounded linear operators (R(t))t≥0 on X is called a resolvent operator for Eq. (2.1) if it verifies the following conditions.

  1. The function R(·): [0, ∞) → ℒ(X) is strongly continuous, and there exist M0 ≥ 1 and ω ∈ ℝ, such that ǁR(t)ǁ ≤ M0eωt for t ≥ 0;

  2. R(0) = I;

  3. For xY, R(·)xC1((0, ∞), X) ⋂ C([0, ∞), Y), and

    (2.2)ddt[R(t)x+0tN(ts)R(s)xds]=A[R(t)x+0tF(ts)R(s)xds],
    (2.3)ddt[R(t)x+0tR(ts)N(s)xds]=R(t)Ax+0tR(ts)AF(s)xds,

    for each t ≥ 0.

We assume for the operators in Eq. ((1.1) (or 2.1)) that the following conditions are fulfilled.

  1. There are constants M0 > 0 and θ(π2,π) such that

    ρ(A)Λθ={λ:|arg(λ)|<θ} and R(λ,A)M0|λ|1,λΛθ.

    Hence in this case the operator A generates an analytic semigroup (T(t))t≥0 on X (see [13, 34]).

  2. The function N: [0, ∞) → ℒ(X) is strongly continuous and N^(λ)x is absolutely convergent for xX and Re(λ) > 0. There exist β > 0 and an analytical extension of N^(λ) (still denoted by N^(λ)) to Λθ such that N^(λ)xN0|λ|βx1 for each λ ∈ Λθ and xD(A). Here N0 is a constant, the notation f^(λ) represents the Laplace transform of f (t).

  3. For all t ≥ 0, F(t) ∈ ℒ(X). F(t): XD(A), and AF(·)x is strongly measurable on (0, ∞) for any xX. There exists a b()Lloc1(R+) such that b^(λ) exists for Re λ > 0 and ǁAF(t)xǁ ≤ b(t)ǁxǁ1 for all t > 0 and xD(A). Moreover, the operator valued function F^:Λπ2(Y) has an analytical extension (still denoted by F^) to Λθ such that AF^(λ)xAF^(λ)x1 for all xD(A), and AF^(λ)0 as |λ| → ∞.

  4. There exist a subspace DD(A) dense in Y and positive constants Ci, i = 1, 2, such that A(D)D(A), F^(λ)(D)D, N^(λ)(D)D(A), and AF^(λ)x1C1x1, N^(λ)x1C2|λ|βx1 for every xD and λ ∈ Λθ.

Observe that the above assumptions guarantee that AF(·) verifies the conditions of the family B(·) in [36]. Hence, according to [36], we infer readily that, under the hypotheses (V1)−(V4) there is a resolvent operator R(t) for the linear part of (1.1) (i.e. (2.1)), which is given by

R(t)={12πiΓr,θeλtG(λ)dλ,t>0,I,t=0,

where G(λ)=(λI+λN^(λ)AAF^(λ))1 satisfying ǁG(λ)ǁ ≤ M0−1| for λ ∈ Λr, ϑ and some M0 > 0. We put Ω(G)={λFN:λI+λN^(λ)AAF^(λ)isinvertibleandG(λ)(X)}, σ(G) = ℂ \ Ω(G) and WG = sup{Re(λ) : λ ∈ σ(G)}. Here the notations F and N stand for the domain of maximal extension of the operators F^() and N^() on ℂ, respectively. The region Λr,ϑ = {λ ∈ ℂ \ {0} : |λ| > r, |arg(λ)| < ϑ} and Γr,ϑ=i=13Γr,ϑi the curves Γr,ϑi,i=1,2,3, are given respectively by

Γr,ϑ1={teiϑ:tr},Γr,ϑ2={reiξ:ϑξϑ},Γr,ϑ3={teiϑ:tr},

for r>0,ϑ(π2,θ) being fixed numbers. These curves are oriented so that Im(λ) is increasing.

The following theorem founded in [37] will be used in this paper.

THEOREM 2.1

If WG < 0, then there exist constants M ≥ 1 andγ > 0 such that

(2.4)R(t)Meγt,t0.

In this paper, we will use an axiomatic definition of the phase space ℬ introduced by Hale and Kato in [21] and follow the terminology used in [23]. Thus, ℬ is a linear space of functions mapping (−∞, 0] into X endowed with a seminorm ǁ · ǁ. We assume that ℬ satisfies the following axioms:

  1. If x: (–∞,σ + a) → X, a > 0 is continuous on [σ, σ + a) and xσ ∈ ℬ, then for every t ∈ [σ, σ + a) the following conditions hold:

    1. xt is in ℬ.

    2. ǁx(t)ǁ ≤ Hǁxtǁ.

    3. ǁxtǁK(tσ) sup{ǁx(s)ǁ : σst} + M(tσxσǁ.

Here H ≥ 0 is a constant, K, M: [0, +∞) → [0, +∞), K(·) is continuous and M(·) is locally bounded, and H, K(·), M(·) are independent of x(·).

  1. For the function x(·) in (A), the function txt is continuous from [σ, σ + a) into ℬ.

  2. The space ℬ is complete.

For our later discussion we also need some additional properties of the space ℬ. Let C00 be the space of continuous functions from (−∞, 0] into X with compact support. Then from [23: Proposition 2.1], C00. We assume that the phase space ℬ satisfies additionally the following axioms:

  1. If {ϕn} is a Cauchy sequence in ℬ and converges compactly to ϕ on (−∞,0], then ϕ ∈ ℬ and limn+ϕnϕ=0.

  2. If a uniformly bounded sequence {ϕn(θ)} in C00 converges to a function ϕ(θ) compactly on (–∞, 0], then ϕ ∈ ℬ and limn+ϕnϕ=0.

Thus we have that

LEMMA 2.1

If the phase space ℬ satisfies axiom (C2), thenCb((–∞, 0], X) is continuously imbedded into ℬ, and there exists a constant J > 0 such that ǁϕǁJǁϕǁ∞′for allϕCb((–∞, 0], X).

In addition, from [33], one has that

LEMMA 2.2

Let ℬ satisfy axiom (C1) andf : [0, a] → ℬ, be a continuous function such thatf (t)(θ) is continuous for (t, θ) ∈ [0, a] × (–∞, 0]. Then

(0af(t)dt)(θ)=0af(t)(θ)dtforθ(,0].

Finally we introduce the concept of fading memory spaces. To do this, let ℬ0 = {ϕ ∈ ℬ : ϕ(0) = 0} which is a closed subspace of the space ℬ, and let the operator S0 (t) on ℬ0 be defined by

[S0(t)ϕ](θ)={0tθ0,ϕ(t+θ)θ<t,

for ϕ ∈ ℬ0. Clearly, the operator family S0(t), t ≥ 0, is a C0-semigroup on ℬ0.

DEFINITION 2

The space ℬ is called a fading memory space if it additionally verifies Axioms (C2), and S0(t)ϕ → 0 as t → ∞ for each ϕ ∈ ℬ0.

Remark 1

According to [23], if ℬ is a fading memory space, then there exist K*, M* > 0, such that K(·) and M(·) in (A)-(iii) verify K*=supt0K(t) and M*=supt0M(t). In this condition, we can choose J = K*, here J is the constant in Lemma 2.1.

3 Existence and regularity of solutions

The purpose of this section is to study the existence, uniqueness and regularity of mild solutions for the equation (1.1) on (–∞, ∞).

3.1 Existence of solutions

First we discuss in this subsection the existence and uniqueness of mild solutions for Eq. (1.1). The mild solutions of Eq. (1.1) are defined as:

DEFINITION 3

A function x: ℝ → X is said to be mild solution of Eq. (1.1), if x0 = ϕ, x(·) is continuous on [0, ∞) and satisfies the integral equation

x(t)=R(t)ϕ(0)+0tR(ts)f(s,xs)dsfort0.

To guarantee the existence of mild solutions, we impose the following restrictions on the function f (·, ·) in Eq. (1.1).

(H1) The function f : [0, ∞) × ℬ → X is continuous and there is a constant L1 > 0 such that

f(t,ϕ1)f(t,ϕ2)L1ϕ1ϕ2

for any t ∈ [0, ∞), ϕ1, ϕ2 ∈ ℬ, and the inequality

(3.1)f(t,ϕ)L1ϕ,t[0,),ϕ

holds.

THEOREM 3.1

Suppose that ℬ is a fading memory space, and the assumptions (H1) and (2.4) hold true. Then, for anyϕℬ, the Cauchy problem (1.1) has a unique mild solution on (−∞, ∞).

Proof. Let T > 0 be small enough such that K *L1MT < 1. We define ⅅϕ = {xC ([0, T],X) : x(0) = ϕ(0)} and consider the operator Γ: ⅅϕ → ⅅϕ given by

(Γx)(t)=R(t)ϕ(0)+0tR(ts)f(s,xs)ds.

Here we identify x with its extension to (−∞, 0], by x(θ) = ϕ(θ) for θ ≤ 0. Clearly, Γ(ⅅϕ) ⊂ ⅅϕ.

We can show easily that Γ is a contraction on ⅅϕ. In fact, let x,y ∈ ⅅϕ, we find

(Γx)(t)(Γy)(t)L1M0txsysdsK*L1MTxyC,

for all 0 ≤ tT, that is

ΓxΓyCK*L1MTxyC.

Therefore, we conclude that there exists a fixed point x(·) for Γ on C([0, T], X) by Banach fixed point theorem. Now we put

x1(t)={x(t)t[0,T];ϕ(t)t(,0],

then x1(t) is clearly a mild solution of problem (1.1) on (−∞, T].

Next we extend the solutions of Eq. (1.1) to (–∞, 2T]. To do so, we define ϕ1=xT1 and consider the equation

(3.2){ddt[y(t)+0tN(ts)y(s)ds]=A[y(t)+0tF(ts)y(s)ds]+f(t,yt),t[T,2T],yT=ϕ1,

The mild solutions of System (3.2) are given by

{y(t)=R(tT)ϕ1(0)+TtR(ts)f(s,ys)ds,t[T,2T],yT=ϕ1.

Here we also identify y with its extension to (–∞, T], which is defined by y(T + θ) = ϕ1(θ) for θ ≤ 0.

Put Dϕ"={yC([T,2T],X):y(T)=ϕ1(0)} and define the operator Γ1 on Dϕ" by

(Γ1y)(t)=R(tT)ϕ1(0)+TtR(ts)f(s,ys)ds,t[T,2T].

Using Banach fixed point theorem again, we can obtain as above a fixed point y(t) of Γ1 on C([T, 2T], X). Hence, the function

x2(t)={y(t)t[T,2T],x1(t)t(,T],

is a mild solution of Eq. (1.1) on (–∞, 2T]. Thus, by induction, we get the solution

xn+1(t)={x(t)t[nT,(n+1)T],xn(t)t(,nT],

of Eq. (1.1) on (–∞, (n + 1)T] for all n ≥ 1. Therefore, we infer that there is a mild solution of Eq. (1.1) on (–∞, ∞) for any ϕ ∈ ℬ.

Now, we verify that the uniqueness of mild solutions for Eq. (1.1) by using Gronwall’s lemma. Let u(t, ϕ) and v(t, ϕ) be two solutions of Eq. (1.1) through (0, ϕ), then, for each t ∈ [0, ∞),

u(t,ϕ)υ(t,ϕ)0tR(ts)f(s,us)f(s,υs)dsK*L1M0teγ(ts)sup0τsu(τ)υ(τ)ds

which implies that

sup0stu(s)υ(s)K*L1M0teγ(ts)sup0τsu(τ)υ(τ)ds.

Applying Gronwall’s lemma, we infer u(t) = v(t) for t in [0, ∞). Therefore, u(t, ϕ) = v(t, ϕ) for t ∈ (–∞, ∞).

3.2 Regularity of solutions

We devote in this subsection to the regularity of the global mild solutions for Eq. ((1.1) obtained above, that is, we will provide sufficient conditions to allow the differentiability of the global mild solutions of 1.1). Let us give the definition of classical solutions of Eq. (1.1) as below.

Definition 4

A function x(·) : ℝ → D(A) is said to be a classical solution of Eq. (1.1), if

  1. xC([0, ∞), D(A)) ⋂ C1((0, ∞), X);

  2. x satisfies that x0 = ϕ and

    ddt[x(t)+0tN(ts)x(s)ds]=A[x(t)+0tF(ts)x(s)ds]+f(t,xt)fort[0,).

The main result of this subsection is that:

THEOREM 3.2

Let ℬ be a fading memory space satisfying axiom (C1) and suppose that the condition (H1) and (2.4) are fulfilled. Assume further that the functionfC1([0, ∞) × ℬ, X), and the partial derivativesD1f (·, ·), D2f (·, ·) are both Lipschitz continuous with respect to the second variables, i.e., there exists li > 0 such that

(3.3)Dif(t,x1)Dif(t,x2)liϕ1ϕ2,
for any t ∈ [0, ∞), ϕ1, ϕ2 ∈ ℬ,i = 1, 2. Then, for any initial functionϕ ∈ ℬ which is continuously differentiable withϕ(0) ∈ D(A), the mild solutionx(·) given by Theorem 3.1is also a classical solution ofEq. (1.1).

Proof. Let T > 0 (being arbitrary), from Theorem 3.1 the unique mild solution x(·) of Eq. (1.1) through (0, ϕ) is given by

(3.4)x(t)=R(t)ϕ(0)+0tR(ts)f(s,xs)ds.

Proceeding as in the proof of Theorem 3.1, one can easily show that there exists a unique solution y(·) ∈ C([0, T], X) to the following linear integral equation on (−∞, T],

(3.5)y(t)={R(t)[Aϕ(0)+f(0,ϕ)]ddt0tR(ts)N(s)ϕ(0)ds+0tR(ts)AF(s)ϕ(0)ds+0tR(ts)[D1f(s,xs)+D2f(s,xs)ys]ds,t[0,T],ϕ(t),t(,0].

We now introduce the function z(t) as

(3.6)z(t)={ϕ(0)+0ty(s)ds,t[0,T],ϕ(t),t(,0].

By Lemma 2.2, we get that

(3.7)zt=ϕ+0tysds,t[0,T],

and we will show x(·) = z(·) on [0, T], which implies immediately that x(·) is continuously differentiable on [0, T] as z(·) is so. Indeed, it follows from (3.5) and (3.6) that

(3.8)z(t)=ϕ(0)+0tR(s)[Aϕ(0)+f(0,ϕ)]ds0tR(ts)N(s)ϕ(0)ds+0t0sR(sτ)AF(τ)ϕ(0)dτds+0t0sR(sτ)[D1f(τ,xτ)+D2f(τ,xτ)yτ]dτds.

From (3.7), the function tzt and t0tR(ts)f(s,zs)ds are continuously differentiable, consequently, we see that

ddt0tR(ts)f(s,zs)ds=ddt0tR(s)f(ts,zts)ds=R(t)f(0,ϕ)+0tR(ts)[D1f(s,zs)+D2f(s,zs)ys]ds,

which implies

(3.9)0tR(s)f(0,ϕ)ds=0tR(ts)f(s,zs)ds0t0sR(sτ)[D1f(τ,zτ)+D2f(τ,zτ)yτ]dτds.

And, on the other hand, put x = ϕ(0) in (2.3) and integrating from 0 to t, we find

(3.10)ϕ(0)+0tR(s)Aϕ(0)ds=R(t)ϕ(0)+0tR(ts)N(s)ϕ(0)ds0t0sR(sτ)AF(τ)ϕ(0)dτds.

Substituting (3.9) and (3.10) into (3.8), we then obtain that

z(t)=R(t)ϕ(0)+0tR(ts)f(s,zs)ds+0t0sR(sτ)[D1f(τ,xτ)D1f(τ,zτ)]dτds+0t0sR(sτ)[D2f(τ,xτ)D2f(τ,zτ)]yτdτds.

Hence, it follows from (3.4) that

z(t)x(t)=0tR(ts)(f(s,zs)f(s,xs))ds+0t0sR(sτ)[D1f(τ,xτ)D1f(τ,zτ)]dτds+0t0sR(sτ)[D2f(τ,xτ)D2f(τ,zτ)]yτdτds.

So, from the conditions (H1) and (3.3) it yields that

x(t)z(t)0tR(ts)f(s,zs)f(s,xs)ds+0t0sR(sτ)D1f(τ,xτ)D1f(τ,zτ)dτds+0t0sR(sτ)D2f(τ,xτ)D2f(τ,zτ)yτdτds(K*L1M+K*l1MT+(K*yC+M*ϕ)K*l2MT)0tsup0τsx(τ)z(τ)ds,

or

sup0stx(s)z(s)(K*L1M+K*l1MT+(K*yC+M*ϕ)K*l2MT)×0tsup0τsx(τ)z(τ)ds.

Then, applying Gronwall lemma, we conclude that x(t) = z(t) for all t ∈ [0, T] and x(t) is continuously differentiable on [0, T], and hence the following formula holds

(3.11)x(t)=R(t)ϕ(0)+f(t,xt)+0tR(ts)f(s,xs)ds.

In order to prove x(·) is a classical solution of Eq. ((1.1) on [0, T], we only need to testify that it satisfies Eq. (1.1). Using 3.4), we see that

ddt[x(t)+0tN(ts)x(s)ds]=ddt[R(t)ϕ(0)+0tR(ts)f(s,xs)ds+0tN(ts)[R(s)ϕ(0)+0sR(sτ)f(τ,xτ)dτ]ds]=ddt[R(t)ϕ(0)+0tN(ts)R(s)ϕ(0)ds]+ddt[0tR(ts)f(s,xs)ds+0tN(ts)0sR(sτ)f(τ,xτ)dτds]:=I1+I2.

From (2.2) it follows that

(3.12)I1=A[R(t)ϕ(0)+0tF(ts)R(s)ϕ(0)ds].

As for I2 , we write

(3.13)I2=ddt[0tR(ts)f(s,xs)ds]+ddt[0tN(ts)0sR(sτ)f(τ,xτ)dτds]:=I21+I22.

According to (3.11), we have

(3.14)I21=f(t,xt)+0tR(ts)f(s,xs)ds,

and, by (2.2) again,

(3.15)I22=ddt(0tτtN(ts)R(sτ)f(τ,xτ)dsdτ)=ddt(0t0tτN(tτs)R(s)f(τ,xτ)dsdτ)=A0tR(ts)f(s,xs)ds0tR(ts)f(s,xs)ds+A0tF(ts)0sR(sτ)f(τ,xτ)dτds.

We substitute (3.14) and (3.15) into (3.13) yield that

(3.16)I2=A0tR(ts)f(s,xs)ds+A0tF(ts)0sR(sτ)f(τ,xτ)dτds+f(t,xt).

Combining (3.12) and (3.16) we then obtain

ddt[x(t)+0tN(ts)x(s)ds]=AR(t)ϕ(0)+A0tF(ts)R(s)ϕ(0)ds+A0tR(ts)f(s,xs)ds+A0tF(ts)0sR(sτ)f(τ,xτ)dτds+f(t,xt)=A(R(t)ϕ(0)+0tR(ts)f(s,xs)ds)+A0tF(ts)(R(s)ϕ(0)+0sR(sτ)f(τ,xτ)dτ)ds+f(t,xt)=A[x(t)+0tF(ts)x(s)ds]+f(t,xt).

Finally, as T is arbitrary, we conclude that x(·) is a classical solution of Eq. (1.1) on [0, +∞), which is the desired result. The proof is completed now. □

4 Asymptotic periodicity of solutions

The goal of this section is to establish the existence and uniqueness of S-asymptotically ω-periodic mild solutions for the equation (1.1). Initially we introduce some concepts and properties related to S-asymptotically ω-periodic functions.

Definition 5

A function fCb([0, ∞), X) is called to be S-asymptotically ω-periodic if there exists ω > 0 such that

limtf(t+ω)f(t)=0.

We denote by SAPω(X) the set of all S-asymptotically ω-periodic functions from [0, ∞) to X. Note that SAPω(X) is a Banach space with the sup-norm ǁ · ǁ.

Definition 6

A continuous function f : [0, ∞) × XX is said to be uniformly S-asymptotically ω-periodic on bounded sets if for each bounded subset K of X, the set {f (t, x) : (t, x) ∈ [0, ∞) × K} is bounded, and limt(f(t+ω,x)f(t,x))=0 uniformly in xK.

Definition 7

A continuous function f : [0, ∞) × XX is said to be asymptotically uniformly continuous on bounded sets if for every ε > 0 and any bounded set KX, there exist constants Lε,K ≥ 0 and δ = δε, K > 0 such that ǁf (t, x) – f (t, y)ǁ ≤ ε for all tLε, K and x, yK with ǁxyǁ ≤ δε, K.

The following two results, established respectively in [25] and [26], will play an essential role in proving the S-asymptotically ω-periodicity of solutions for Eq. (1.1).

LEMMA 4.1

(cf. [25: Lemma 4.1]). Let X, Y be two Banach spaces, and f : [0, ∞) × XY be a function uniformly S-asymptotically ω-periodic on bounded sets and asymptotically uniformly continuous on bounded sets. If xSAPω (X). Then

limt(f(t+ω,x(t+ω))f(t,x(t))=0.
LEMMA 4.2

(cf. [26: Lemma 2.10]). Assume that ℬ is a fading memory space. Let x: ℝ → X be a function with x0ℬ and x|[0, ∞)SAPω (X). Then the function txt belongs to SAPω ().

Next we give the definition of S-asymptotically ω-periodic mild solutions for Eq. (1.1).

Definition 8

A bounded function x : ℝ → X is said to be S-asymptotically ω-periodic mild solution of Eq. (1.1), if x0 = ϕ, x|[0, ∞)SAPω(X) and it verifies the integral equation

x(t)=R(t)ϕ(0)+0tR(ts)f(s,xs)dsfort0.

Now, we establish the first result of this part.

THEOREM 4.1

Let ℬ be a fading memory space and fC([0, ∞) × ℬ, X) be uniformly S-asymptotically ω-periodic and asymptotically uniformly continuous on bounded sets. Assume that R(t) is a compact operator for each t > 0, and the conditions (2.4) and (3.1) are satisfied. Also, there exists a positive function WL1([0, ∞)) such that

(4.1)supψρf(t,ψ)W(ρ)
for all t ≥ 0 andψ. Then, for any initial function ϕℬ, Eq. (1.1) has an S-asymptotically ω-periodic mild solution provided that
(4.2)limρ¯(ρMW(ρ1)γ)=,
where ρ1 := K*ρ + M*ǁϕǁ.

Proof. Let SAPω0(X)={xSAPω(X):x(0)=ϕ(0)} and the operator Γ:SAPω0(X)C([0,),X) be defined by

(4.3)(Γx)(t)=R(t)ϕ(0)+0tR(ts)f(s,xs)ds.

Here we identify x with its extension to (–∞, 0], by x(θ) = ϕ(θ) for θ ≤ 0. By virtue of (2.4) and (3.1), we find that, for xSAPω0(X), f(·, x(·)) is bounded and hence ΓxCb([0, ∞), X). Moreover, from Lemma 4.1 and 4.2, we have that f(·, X(·)) ∈ SAPω(X). So, for any ε > 0, there exists a constant Lε > 0 such that ǁf (t + ω, xt+ω) – f (t, xt)ǁ ≤ ε for all tLε.

We show at first that ΓxSAPω0(X). Utilizing the conditions (2.4) and (3.1) again, we obtain that

(Γx)(t+ω)(Γx)(t)R(t+ω)ϕ(0)+R(t)ϕ(0)+0ωR(t+ωs)f(s,xs)ds+0LεR(ts)(f(s+ω,xs+ω)f(s,xs))ds+LεtR(ts)(f(s+ω,xs+ω)f(s,xs))dsMeγ(t+ω)Hϕ+MeγtHϕ+Mf0ωeγ(t+ωs)ds+M0Lεeγ(ts)f(s+ω,xs+ω)f(s,xs)ds+MLεteγ(ts)f(s+ω,xs+ω)f(s,xs)ds2MHeγtϕB+Mfγeγt+2Mfγeγ(tLε)+Mγε,

where f=supt0f(t,xt)<. This implies that ΓxSAPω0(X).

We denote Bρ(0,SAPω0(X))={x()SAPω0(X):xρ}. It is clear that Bρ(0,SAPω0(X)) is a bounded closed convex subset of SAPω0(X). Next we prove that the operator Γ has a fix point on Bρ0(0,SAPω0(X)) for some ρ0 > 0 (determined below) by applying Schauder fixed point theorem. To do so, we certify Γ is a completely continuous operator on Bρ0(0,SAPω0(X)).

We claim that there exists ρ0 > 0 such that Γ(Bρ0(0,SAPω0(X)))Bρ0(0,SAPω0(X)). Indeed, if it is not true, then for each ρ > 0, there exists a function xρ()Bρ(0,SAPω0(X)), but Γxρ()Bρ(0,SAPω0(X)), that is ǁ(Γxρ)(t)ǁ > ρ for some t := t(ρ) ∈ [0, ∞) (dependent on ρ). On the other hand, however, in view of (4.1) and ǁxtǁρ1, we find that

ρ<(Γxρ)(t)MHϕ+M0teγ(ts)W(ρ1)ds,MHϕ+MW(ρ1)γ,

or

ρMW(ρ1)γ<MHϕ,

which contradicts (4.2). Hence there is a ρ0 > 0 such that Γ(Bρ0(0,SAPω0(X)))Bρ0(0,SAPω0(X)).

To show the complete continuity of the operator Γ, we first note that it is clearly continuous on Bρ0(0,SAPω0(X)) by the dominated convergence theorem.

Then we show that Γ(Bρ0(0,SAPω0(X)))={Γx:xBρ0(0,SAPω0(X))} is equicontinuous in SAPω0(X). To do so, let t1, t2 ∈ (0, ∞) and ε > 0 with 0 < ε < t1 < t2 < ∞, then for any xBρ0(0,SAPω0(X)),

(Γx)(t1)(Γx)(t2)[R(t2)R(t1)]φ(0)+0t1ε[R(t2s)R(t1s)]f(s,xs)ds+t1εt1[R(t2s)R(t1s)]f(s,xs)ds+t1t2R(t2s)f(s,xs)ds[R(t2)R(t1)φ(0)]+0t1ε[R(t2s)R(t1s)]W(ρ1)ds+2MW(ρ1)ε+MW(ρ1)|t2t1|.

As t2t1 and ε sufficiently small, the right-hand side of the above inequality tends to zero independently of xBρ0(0,SAPω0(X)), since R(t) is strong continuous and the compactness of R(t) for t > 0 implies the continuity in the uniform operator topology on (0, ∞). Thus, Γ maps Bρ0(0,SAPω0(X)) into an equicontinuous family of functions on [0, ∞) (note (Γx)(0) = ϕ(0)).

Now, we prove that (ΓBρ0(0,SAPω0(X)))(t)={(Γx)(t):xBρ0(0,SAPω0(X))} is relatively compact in X for each t ∈ [0, ∞). Obviously, (ΓBρ0(0,SAPω0(X)))(0) is relatively compact in X. Let t ∈ (0, ∞) be fixed, 0 < ε < t, for xBρ0(0,SAPω0(X)), we define

(Γεx)(t)=R(t)ϕ(0)+0tεR(ts)f(s,xs)ds.

Since R(t)(t > 0) is compact, we infer that (ΓεBρ0(0,SAPω0(X)))(t) is relatively compact in X. Furthermore, for xBρ0(0,SAPω0(X)), we have

(Γx)(t)(Γεx)(t)tεtR(ts)f(s,xs)dsMW(ρ1)ε,

which implies that (ΓBρ0(0,SAPω0(X)))(t) is totally bounded, i.e, relatively compact in X. From the Arzelà–Ascoli theorem, we deduce that Γ is a completely continuous map. Hence, from Schauder’s fixed point theorem there exists a fixed point x(·) on SAPω0(X) for the operator Γ. Now, set

x*(t)={x(t),t[0,),ϕ(t),t(,0],

then x*(t) is clearly a S-asymptotically ω-periodic mild solution of problem (1.1) on (−∞, ∞). The proof is finished. □

If (R(t))t≥0 doesn’t verify the compactness condition, we can prove the existence and uniqueness of S asymptotically ω-periodic solutions by Banach fixed point theorem under lipschitz conditions. That is,

  1. The function f : [0, ∞) × ℬ → X is continuous and there exist a measurable bounded function L2L1([0, ∞), ℝ+) such that

    f(t,ϕ1)f(t,ϕ2)L2(t)ϕ1ϕ2,t[0,),ϕ1,ϕ2.

THEOREM 4.2

Let ℬ be a fading memory space and f be uniformly S-asymptotically ω-periodic on bounded sets. Suppose that (2.4) and the assumption (H2) hold. Then, for any ϕℬ, the Cauchy problem (1.1) has a unique S-asymptotically ω-periodic mild solution on (−∞, ∞).

Proof. Let SAPω0(X)={xSAPω(X):x(0)=ϕ(0)} and the operator Γ:SAPω0(X)Cb([0,),X) given by (4.3). By (2.4) and the condition (H2), we have that f (·, ·) is a bounded function. Furthermore, ΓxMHϕ+Mfγ, where f=supt0f(t,xt). In addition, from Lemma 4.1 and 4.2, we also infer that f (·, x(·)) ∈ SAPω(X). Hence, for arbitrary ε > 0, there exists constant Lε > 0 such that ǁf (t + ω, xt+ω) - f (t, xt)ǁ ≤ ε for all tLε.

As in the proofs of the previous theorem, we can readily prove that ΓxSAPω0(X). In the sequel we show that Γn is a contractive map. Let x,ySAPω0(X), due to the condition (H2) and (2.4) we first have that

(4.4)(Γx)(t)(Γy)(t)M0tL2(s)xsysdsK*ML2L1xy,

for all 0 ≤ t < ∞. Put u = Γx and v = Γy, from (4.4) we further get that

(Γ2x)(t)(Γ2y)(t)=(Γu)(t)(Γϑ)(t)K*M0tL2(s)sup0τsu(τ)ϑ(τ)ds(K*ML2L1)22!xy,

for each t ∈ [0, ∞). Proceeding inductively, we then obtain that

(Γnx)(t)(Γny)(t)(K*ML2L1)nn!xy.

Noting that (K*ML2L1)nn!<1 for n large enough, we deduce Γn is contractive and hence by Banach fixed point principle Γ has a fixed point in SAPω0(X). Let

x*(t)={x(t)t[0,);ϕ(t)t(,0],

then x*(t) is a S-asymptotically ω-periodic solution of problem (1.1) on (–∞, ∞).

Finally, the uniqueness of S-asymptotically ω-periodic mild solutions for Eq. (1.1) can be readily verified by using Gronwall lemma. The proof is completed.□

5 An example

In this section, we apply the obtained abstract results to investigate the existence and asymptotical periodicity of solutions for the following neutral partial functional integro-differential equation which arises in the theory of viscoelastic materials (see [8, 10, 20, 31]).

(5.1){t[z(t,x)0t(ts)e(ts)z(s,x)ds]=2t2[z(t,x)0te(ts)z(s,x)ds]+a(t)t0πh(st,x,z(s,y))dyds,0xπ,t0,z(t,0)=z(t,π)=0,t[0,),z(θ,x)=ϕ(θ,x),θ(,0],x[0,π],

where the functions a(·), f1(·, ·) and ϕ(·, ·) will be described below.

We first need to rewrite this system into the form of Eq. (1.1). For this, let the space X = L2([0, π], ℝ) and the operator (A, D(A)) be defined by

Az=z

with the domain

D(A)={z()X:z,zXandz(0)=z(π)=0}.

Then A generates a strongly continuous semigroup (T(t))t≥0 which is compact, analytic, and self-adjoint. Moreover, A has a discrete spectrum, the eigenvalues are –n2, n ∈ ℕ, with the corresponding normalized eigenvectors ξn(x)=2πsin(nx), n = 1, 2,.... And, for zD(A),

Az=n=1n2z,ξnξn.

Here we choose the phase space as =Cg0, where the space Cg0 is defined in the following way. Let g : (–∞, 0] → (0, ∞) be a continuous function satisfying g(θ) → ∞ as θ → −∞, and the function G(t)=supθtg(t+θ)g(θ) is locally bounded for t ≥ 0, then

Cg0={ϕC((,0],X):limθϕ(θ)g(θ)=0},

and its norm is given by

ϕg=supθ0ϕ(θ)g(θ),

for ϕCg0. According to [23], it is known that Cg0 satisfies the axioms (A), (A1), (B), (C1) and (C2), and in this situation we can take H = 1, K(t) = 1 and M(t) = G(t). Moreover, if G(·) is a bounded function, then Cg0 is a fading memory space.

We assume that the following conditions hold:

  1. The function h: (−∞, 0] × [0, π] × ℝ → ℝ is continuously differentiable and there exists a measurable function b1(·, ·) : (−∞, 0] × [0, π] → ℝ+ such that

    |h(θ,x,y1)h(θ,x,y2)|b1(θ,x)|y1y2|,

    and

    |h(θ,x,y)|b1(θ,x)|y|,

    for θ ∈ (−∞, 0], x ∈ [0, π] and y1, y2, y ∈ ℝ. Moreover, there holds

    (5.2)L:=0π(0g(θ)b1(θ,x)dθ)2dx<.
  2. The initial function ϕ defined by ϕ(θ)(x) = ϕ(θ, x) belongs to Cg0.

We now take u(t)(x) = z(t, x), and define the functions N(t):XX,F(t):D(A)XD(A) and f:[0,)×Cg0X, respectively, as

(F(t)u)(x)=etu(x),(N(t)u)(x)=tetu(x),

for u(·) ∈ X and

f(t,ϕ)(x)=a(t)00πh(θ,x,ϕ(θ)(y))dydθforϕCg0.

Then, with these notations, system (5.1) are rewritten into the form of (1.1). From [37], it is easy to see that the conditions (V2)−(V4) are all verified with N^(λ)=1(λ+1)2I, F^(λ)=1(λ+1)I in this situation. As a result, the corresponding linear system of (5.1) has an operator (R(t))t≥0, which is given by

R(t)z={12πiΓr,ϑeλt(λI+λN^(λ)AAF^(λ))1zdλ,t>0,zX,I,t=0,

where Γr, ϑ is as described in Section 2. Moreover, by virtue of the property of (λIA)–1, it is seen that R(t) is compact for all t > 0 since the semigroup (T(t))t≥0 is so. Additionally, employing the similar arguments as in [37], we can certify that WG=12 and hence there exist constants M ≥ 1 and γ > 0 such that ǁR(t)ǁ ≤ Meγt for all t ≥ 0.

In the sequel we assume that G(·) is a bounded function so that Cg0 is a fading memory space. We have that,

  1. If the function a(·) ∈ C1(ℝ+, ℝ) and it is S-asymptotically ω-periodic, then the assumption (a1) implies clearly that the function f satisfies the conditions of Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 3.2. Particularly, from (5.2) and direct computations it is easy to find that the Lipschitz constant L1 in (H1) for this case given by L1=aπL since a(·) is continuous and bounded due to its S-asymptotic periodicity. Therefore, by virtue of Theorems 3.1 and 3.2, for any initial function ϕ which is continuously differentiable on [0, +∞) with ϕ(0, x) ∈ D(A), the system (5.1) admits a unique classical solution on (–∞, +∞). Furthermore, from Theorem 4.1 the solutions are meanwhile S-asymptotically periodic provided that (4.2) is satisfied (here W(ρ) = L1ρ).

  2. Let now a(·) be S-asymptotically ω-periodic on [0, +∞) and belongs to L1([0, ∞), ℝ+). Then (H2) holds true with L2(t)=a(t)πL. As a consequence, Eq. (5.1) admits a unique S-asymptotically ω-periodic solution for any ϕCg0.


(Communicated by Michal Fečkan)

This work was supported by NSF of China, Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (STCSM) (grant No. 18dz2271000).


Acknowledgement

We would like to thank the referees greatly for the careful review and the valuable comments on this paper.

REFERENCES

[1] [1] AGARWAL, R. P.—CUEVAS, C.—SOTO, H.—EL-GEBEILY, M.: Asymptotic periodicity for some evolution equations in Banach spaces, Nonlinear Anal. 74 (2011), 1769–1798.10.1016/j.na.2010.10.051Suche in Google Scholar

[2] [2] AGARWAL, R. P.—DOMOSHNITSKY, A.—GOLTSER, YA.: Stability of partial functional integrodifferential equations, J. Dyn. Control Syst. 12 (2006), 1–31.10.1007/s10450-006-9681-xSuche in Google Scholar

[3] [3] CANNARSA, P.—SFORZA, D.: Global solutions of abstract semilinear parabolic equations with memory terms, NoDEA Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl. 10 (2003), 399–430.10.1007/s00030-003-1004-2Suche in Google Scholar

[4] [4] CHANG, Y.—PONCE, R.: Uniform exponential stability and applications to bounded solutions of integrodifferential equations in Banach spaces, J. Integral Equations Appl. 30 (2018), 347–369.10.1216/JIE-2018-30-3-347Suche in Google Scholar

[5] [5] CHEN, P.—ZHANG, X.—LI, Y.: A blowup alternative result for fractional nonautonomous evolution equation of Volterra type, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 17 (2018), 1975–1992.10.3934/cpaa.2018094Suche in Google Scholar

[6] [6] CLÉMENT, PH.—NOHEL, J. A.: Asymptotic behavior of solutions of nonlinear Volterra equations with completely positive kernels, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 12 (1981), 514–535.10.1137/0512045Suche in Google Scholar

[7] [7] CLÉMENT, PH.—PRÜSS, J.: Global existence for a semilinear parabolic Volterra equation, Math. Z. 209 (1992), 17–26.10.1007/BF02570816Suche in Google Scholar

[8] [8] COLEMAN, B. D.—GURTIN, M. E.: Equipresence and constitutive equations for rigid heat conductors, Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 18 (1967), 199–208.10.1007/BF01596912Suche in Google Scholar

[9] [9] CUEVAS, C.—LIZAMA, C.: S-asymptotically ω-periodic solutions for semilinear Volterra equations, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 33 (2010), 1628–1636.10.1002/mma.1284Suche in Google Scholar

[10] [10] DESCH, W.—GRIMMER, R.—SCHAPPACHER, W.: Wellposedness and wave propagation for a class of integrodifferential equations in Banach space, J. Differential Equations 74 (1988), 391–411.10.1016/0022-0396(88)90011-3Suche in Google Scholar

[11] [11] DIOP, M. A.—CARABALLO, T.: Existence and asymptotic behavior of solutions for neutral stochastic partial integrodifferential equations with infinite delays, Stoch. Dyn. 16 (2016), 1–17.10.1142/S0219493716500143Suche in Google Scholar

[12] [12] DIMBOUR, W.—N’GUÉRÉKATA, G. M.: S-asymptotically ω-periodic solutions to some classes of partial evolution equations, Appl. Math. Comp. 218 (2012), 7622–7628.10.1016/j.amc.2012.01.029Suche in Google Scholar

[13] [13] ENGEL, K.-J.—NAGEL, R.: One-Parameter Semigroups for Linear Evolution Equations, Springer, New York, 2000.Suche in Google Scholar

[14] [14] EZZINBI, K.—GHNIMI, S.: Existence and regularity of solutions for neutral partial functional integrodifferential equations, Nonlinear Anal. (RWA) 11 (2010), 2335–2344.10.1016/j.nonrwa.2009.07.007Suche in Google Scholar

[15] [15] EZZINBI, K.—GHNIMI, S.: Existence and regularity of solutions for some partial integrodifferential equations involving the nonlocal conditions, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 40 (2019), 1532–1549.10.1080/01630563.2019.1604547Suche in Google Scholar

[16] [16] FU, X.—GAO, Y.—ZHANG, Y.: Existence of solutions for neutral integrodifferential equations with nonlocal conditions, Taiwanese J. Math. 16 (2012), 1879–1909.10.11650/twjm/1500406803Suche in Google Scholar

[17] [17] GRIMMER, R.: Resolvent operator for integral equations in a Banach space, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 273 (1983), 333–349.10.1090/S0002-9947-1982-0664046-4Suche in Google Scholar

[18] [18] GRIMMER, R.—KAPPEL, F.: Series expansions of Volterra integrodifferential equations in Banach space, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 15 (1984), 595–604.10.1137/0515045Suche in Google Scholar

[19] [19] GRIMMER, R.—PRITCHARD, A. J.: Analytic resolvent operators for integral equations in a Banach space, J. Differential Equations 50 (1983), 234–259.10.1016/0022-0396(83)90076-1Suche in Google Scholar

[20] [20] GURTIN, M. E.—PIPKIN, A. C.: A general theory of heat conduction with finite wave speeds, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 31 (1968), 113–126.10.1007/BF00281373Suche in Google Scholar

[21] [21] HALE, J.—KATO, J.: Phase space for retarded equations with infinite delay, Funkcial. Ekvac. 21 (1978), 11–41.Suche in Google Scholar

[22] [22] HALE, J. K.—VERDUYN LUNEL, S. M.: Introduction to Functional Differential Equations, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993.10.1007/978-1-4612-4342-7Suche in Google Scholar

[23] [23] HINO, Y.—MURAKAMI, S.—NAITO, T.: Functional Differential Equations with Infinite Delay, Springerverlag, Berlin, 1991.10.1007/BFb0084432Suche in Google Scholar

[24] [24] HERNÁNDEZ, E.—PIERRI, M.: S-asymptotically ω-periodic solutions for abstract equations with statedependent delay, Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 98 (2018), 456–464.10.1017/S0004972718000771Suche in Google Scholar

[25] [25] HENRÍQUEZ, H. R.—PIERRI, M.—TÁBOAS, P.: On S-asymptotically ω-periodic functions on Banach spaces and applications, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 343 (2008), 1119–1130.10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.02.023Suche in Google Scholar

[26] [26] HENRÍQUEZ, H. R.—PIERRI, M.—TÁBOAS, P.: Existence of S-asymptotically ω-periodic solutions for abstract neutral equations, Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 78 (2008), 365–382.10.1017/S0004972708000713Suche in Google Scholar

[27] [27] HU, Z.—JIN, Z.: Necessary and sufficient conditions for the regularity and stability of solutions for some partial neutral functional differential equations with infinite delay, Nonlinear Anal. 73 (2010), 2752–2765.10.1016/j.na.2010.06.060Suche in Google Scholar

[28] [28] LEUGERING, G.: A Generation Result for a Class of Linear Thermo-Viscoelastic Material. In: Dynamical Problems in Mathematical Physics, Verlag Peter Lang, Frankfurt, 1983.Suche in Google Scholar

[29] [29] LI, F.—WANG, H.: S-asymptotically ω-periodic mild solutions of neutral fractional differential equations with finite delay in Banach space, Mediterr. J. Math. 14 (2017), 1–16.10.1007/s00009-017-0855-4Suche in Google Scholar

[30] [30] LUNARDI, A.: On the linear heat equation with fading memory, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 21 (1990), 1213–1224.10.1137/0521066Suche in Google Scholar

[31] [31] MILLER, R. K.: An integrodifferential equation for rigid heat conductions with memory, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 66 (1978), 313–332.10.1016/0022-247X(78)90234-2Suche in Google Scholar

[32] [32] MOKKEDEM, F. Z.—FU, X.: Approximate controllability of semi-linear neutral integro-differential systems with finite delay, Appl. Math. Comp. 242 (2014), 202–215.10.1016/j.amc.2014.05.055Suche in Google Scholar

[33] [33] NAITO, T.—SHIN, J. S.—MURAKAMI, S.: The generator of the solution semigroup for the general linear functional differential equation, Bull. Univ. Electro-Comm. 11 (1998), 29–38.Suche in Google Scholar

[34] [34] PAZY, A.: Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to Partial Differential Equations, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1983.10.1007/978-1-4612-5561-1Suche in Google Scholar

[35] [35] PIERRI, M.—O’REGAN, D.: S-asymptotically ω-periodic solutions for abstract neutral differential equations,Electr. J. Diff. Equ. 2015 (2015), 1–14.10.1186/s13662-014-0331-4Suche in Google Scholar

[36] [36] DOS SANTOS, J. P. C.—HENRÍQUEZ, H.—HERNÁNDEZ, E.: Existence results for neutral integrodifferential equations with unbounded delay, J. Int. Equ. Appl. 23 (2011), 289–330.10.1216/JIE-2011-23-2-289Suche in Google Scholar

[37] [37] DOS SANTOS, J. P. C.—HENRÍQUEZ, H. R.: Existence of S-asymptotically ω-periodic solutions to abstract integrodifferential equations, Appl. Math. Comp. 256 (2015), 109–118.10.1016/j.amc.2015.01.005Suche in Google Scholar

[38] [38] WU, J.: Theory and Applications of Partial Functional Differential Equations, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996.10.1007/978-1-4612-4050-1Suche in Google Scholar

[39] [39] XIA, Z.—WANG, D.—WEN, C.—YAO, J.: Psuedo asymptotically periodic mild solutions of semilinear functional integro-differential equations in Banach spaces, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 40 (2017), 7333–7355.10.1002/mma.4533Suche in Google Scholar

[40] [40] YAN, Z.—YAN, X.: The optimal behavior of solutions to fractional impulsive stochastic integro-differential equations and its control problems, J. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 21 (2019), 1–42.10.1007/s11784-018-0649-8Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-12-05
Accepted: 2021-06-24
Published Online: 2022-02-16
Published in Print: 2022-02-16

© 2022 Mathematical Institute Slovak Academy of Sciences

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Heruntergeladen am 13.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ms-2022-0009/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen