Home Mathematics Characterization of generalized Gamma-Lindley distribution using truncated moments of order statistics
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Characterization of generalized Gamma-Lindley distribution using truncated moments of order statistics

  • Dorsaf Laribi EMAIL logo , Afif Masmoudi and Imen Boutouria
Published/Copyright: April 14, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Having only two parameters, the Gamma-Lindley distribution does not provide enough flexibility for analyzing different types of lifetime data. From this perspective, in order to further enhance its flexibility, we set forward in this paper a new class of distributions named Generalized Gamma-Lindley distribution with four parameters. Its construction is based on certain mixtures of Gamma and Lindley distributions. The truncated moment, as a characterization method, has drawn a little attention in the statistical literature over the great popularity of the classical methods. We attempt to prove that the Generalized Gamma-Lindley distribution is characterized by its truncated moment of the first order statistics. This method rests upon finding a survival function of a distribution, that is a solution of a first order differential equation. This characterization includes as special cases: Gamma, Lindley, Exponential, Gamma-Lindley and Weighted Lindley distributions. Finally, a simulation study is performed to help the reader check whether the available data follow the underlying distribution.

MSC 2010: Primary 62-XX
  1. (Communicated by Gejza Wimmer )

References

[1] Abd El-Monsef, M. M. E.—Hassanein, W. A.—Kilany, N. M.: Erlang-Lindley Distribution, Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 46 (2016), 9494–9506.10.1080/03610926.2016.1212069Search in Google Scholar

[2] Arnold, B. C.—Balakrishnan, N.—Nagaraja, H. N.: A First Course in Order Statistics, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Afify, A.—Nofal, Z.—Ahmed, A.: Characterization of exponential and power function distributions using Sth truncated moments of order statistics, J. Adv. Math. 4(3) (2013), 486–494.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Ahsanullah, M.—Hamedani, G. G.: Certain characterizations of power function and beta distributions based on order statistics, J. Statist. Theor. Appl. 6 (2007), 220–226.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Ahsanullah, M.—Shakil, M.: Characterizations of Rayleigh distribution based on order statistics and record values, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 36(3) (2013), 625–635.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Ahsanullah, M.—Ghitany, M. E.—Al-Mutairi, D. K.: Characterizations of Lindley distributions by truncated moments, Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 46 (2016), 6222–6227.10.1080/03610926.2015.1124117Search in Google Scholar

[7] Boutouria, I.—Bouzida, I.—Masmoudi, A.: On characterizing the Exponential q-distribution, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 42(6) (2019), 3303–3322.10.1007/s40840-018-0670-5Search in Google Scholar

[8] Glaser, R. E..: Bathtube and related failure rate characterizations, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 75 (1980), 667–672.10.1080/01621459.1980.10477530Search in Google Scholar

[9] Galambos, J.—Kotz, S.: Characterizations of Probability Distributions. Lecture Notes in Math. 675, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1978.10.1007/BFb0069530Search in Google Scholar

[10] Gupta, P. L.—Gupta, R. C.: On the moments of residual life in reliability and some characterization results, Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 12(4) (1983), 449–461.10.1080/03610928308828471Search in Google Scholar

[11] Gupta, R. D.—Kundu, D.: Generalized exponential distributions, Aust. N. Z. J. Stat. 41(2) (1999), 173–188.10.1111/1467-842X.00072Search in Google Scholar

[12] Ghitany, M. E.—Atieh, B.—Nadarajah, S.: Lindley distribution and its application, Math. Comput. Simulation 78 (2008), 493–506.10.1016/j.matcom.2007.06.007Search in Google Scholar

[13] Ghitany, M. E.—Alqallaf, F.—Al-Mutairi, D. K.—Husain, H. A.: A two-parameter weighted Lindley distribution and its applications to survival data, Math. Comput. Simulation 81 (2011), 1190–1201.10.1016/j.matcom.2010.11.005Search in Google Scholar

[14] Glänzel, W.: Some consequences of a characterization theorem based on truncated moments, Statistics 21 (1990), 613–618.10.1080/02331889008802273Search in Google Scholar

[15] Glänzel, W.: A characterization theorem based on truncated moments and its application to some distribution families. In: Mathematical Statistics and Probability Theory (Bauer P., Konecny F., Wertz W., (eds.)), Vol B, Springer Netherlands, 1987, 75–84.10.1007/978-94-009-3965-3_8Search in Google Scholar

[16] Hamedani, G. G.: Characterizations of continuous univariate distributions based on the truncated moments of functions of order statistics, Studia Sci. Math. Hungar. 47 (2010), 462–484.10.1556/sscmath.2009.1143Search in Google Scholar

[17] Hussain, E.: The Non-linear Functions of Order Statistics and their Properties in Selected Probability Models, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Statistics, University of Karachi, Pakistan, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Kilany, N. M.—Atallah, H. M.: Inverted beta Lindley distribution, J. Adv. Math. 13(1) (2017), 4074–4085.10.24297/jam.v13i1.5857Search in Google Scholar

[19] Kilany, N. M.: Characterization of Lindley distribution based on truncated moments of order statistics, J. Stat. Appl. Pro. 6(2) (2017), 1–6.10.18576/jsap/060210Search in Google Scholar

[20] Laurent, A. G.: On characterization of some distributions by truncation properties, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 59 (1974), 823–827.10.1080/01621459.1974.10480213Search in Google Scholar

[21] Lindley, D. V.: Fiducial distributions and Bayes theorem, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 20 (1958), 102–107.10.1111/j.2517-6161.1958.tb00278.xSearch in Google Scholar

[22] Elbatal, I.—Merovci, F.—Elgarhy, M.: A new generalized Lindley distibution, Mathematical Theory and Modeling 3 (2013), 30–47.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Masmoudi, K.—Masmoudi, A.: A new class of continuous Bayesian networks, Internat. J. Approx. Reason 109 (2019), 125–138.10.1016/j.ijar.2019.03.010Search in Google Scholar

[24] Nanda, A. K.: Characterization of distributions through failure rate and mean residual life functions, Statist. Prob. Lett. 80(9–10) (2010), 752–755.10.1016/j.spl.2010.01.006Search in Google Scholar

[25] Nadarajah, S.—Kotz, S.: The exponentiated type distributions, Acta Appl. Math. 92(2) (2006), 97–111.10.1007/s10440-006-9055-0Search in Google Scholar

[26] Su, N. C.—Huang, W. J.: Characterizations based on conditional expectations, Statist. Papers 41(4) (2000), 423–435.10.1007/BF02925761Search in Google Scholar

[27] Ghitany, E. M.—Suja, M. A.—Baqer, A. A.—Gupta, C. R.: Gompertz-Lindley distribution and associated inference, Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput. (2019), https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2019.1699113.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Sankaran, M.: The discrete Poisson-Lindley distribution, Test 18 (2009), 497–515.10.1007/s11749-008-0110-1Search in Google Scholar

[29] Shaked, M.—Shanthikumar, G.: Stochastic Orders, Springer: New York, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Torabi, H.—Falahati-Naeini, M.—Montazeri, N. H.: An extended generalized Lindley distribution and its applications to lifetime data, Journal of Statistical Research of Iran 11 (2014), 203–222.10.18869/acadpub.jsri.11.2.203Search in Google Scholar

[31] Zeghdoudi, H.—Nedjar, S.: On Gamma Lindley distribution: Properties and simulations, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 298 (2016), 167–174.10.1016/j.cam.2015.11.047Search in Google Scholar

[32] Zakerzadeh, H.—Dolati, A.: Generalized Lindley distribution, J. Math. Ext. 3(2) (2009), 13–25.Search in Google Scholar

6 Appendix A

To prove the characterization theorem, we need to use the following propositions which are based on the coming Newten′s generalized Binomial theorem for all α ∈ ℝ, a + bR+,,

(a+b)α=p=0αpbpaαp,if|b|<|a|p=0αpbαpap,if|b|>|a|

where

αp=α(α1)(α2)(αp+1)p!andpα.(6.1)

Lemma 6.1

For all n ≥ 1 andk = 1, 2, …, n, wherexk ∈ ℝ, y ∈ ℝ*andxk + yR+,we obtain according to Newten’s generalized Binomial theorem, the following expressions:

  1. Ifxk∣ < ∣yandPi ∈ ℕ, i = 1, …, n,

    k=1n(xk+y)α1=yn(α1)Pn=0Pn1=0PnPn2=0Pn1P1=0P2α1P1α1P2P1α1Pn1Pn2×α1PnPn1x1P1x2P2P1xnPnPn1(1y)Pn.
  2. Ifxk∣ > ∣yandPi ∈ ℕ, i = 1, …, n,

    k=1n(xk+y)α1=Pn=0Pn1=0PnPn2=0Pn1P1=0P2α1P1α1Pn1Pn2α1PnPn1×x1αP11x2αP2+P11xnαPn+Pn11(y)Pn.

Mathematical induction is used to prove this lemma.

Proof

For all n ≥ 1 and ∣xk∣ < ∣y∣, we denote

Qn:k=1n(xk+y)α1=yn(α1)Pn=0Pn1=0PnPn2=0Pn1P2=0P3P1=0P2α1P1×α1P2P1α1Pn1Pn2α1PnPn1×x1P1x2P2P1xnPnPn1(1y)Pn.

For n = 1,

(x1+y)α1=y(α1)P1=0α1P1(1y)P1x1P1,

for n = 2,

(x1+y)α1(x2+y)α1=y2(α1)p=0α1p(1y)px1pq=0α1q(1y)qx2q,=y2(α1)P2=0P1=0P2α1P1α1P2P1x1P1x2P2P1(1y)P2.

For n ≥ 2, we assume that the formula is true for n and we need now to show that it is also true for n + 1,

k=1n+1(xk+y)α1=k=1n(xk+y)α1(xn+1+y)α1=yn(α1)Pn=0Pn1=0PnPn2=0Pn1P2=0P3P1=0P2α1P1α1P2P1α1Pn1Pn2α1PnPn1×x1P1x2P2P1xnPnPn1(1y)Pny(α1)×Pn+1=0α1Pn+1(1y)Pn+1x1Pn+1,=y(n+1)(α1)Pn+1=0Pn=0Pn+1Pn1=0PnP2=0P3P1=0P2α1P1α1P2P1α1Pn1Pn2×α1PnPn1α1Pn+1Pnx1P1x2P2P1xnPnPn1xn+1Pn+1Pn(1y)Pn+1.

For all k = 1, 2, …, n, where ∣xk∣ > ∣y∣, we denote

Qn:k=1n(xk+y)α1=Pn=0Pn1=0PnPn2=0Pn1P2=0P3P1=0P2α1P1α1P2P1α1Pn1Pn2×α1PnPn1x1αP11x2αP2+P11xnαPn+Pn11×(y)Pn.

The same steps are applied to prove that Qn is true.□

Let

τk(x)=x(θy)αkeθyk(Γ(α,θy))nrkdy,=x(θy)αkeθykθyθyz1α1z2α1znrkα1×exp(j=1nrkzj)dz1dznrk,=x(θy)αkeθyk00(u1+θy)α1(u2+θy)α1(unrk+θy)α1×exp(j=1nrkuj)e(nrk)θydu1dunrk.

We need the following two lemmas to calculate τk(x) in two different ways.

Lemma 6.2

For allu1∣, ∣u2∣, …, ∣unrk∣ < ∣θy∣, andk = 0, 1, …, nr, if (α − 1)(nr − 1) + k > 0,

τk(x)=Pnrk=0Pnrk1=0PnrkP1=0P2α1P1α1P2P1α1PnrkPnrk1×Γ(P1+1)Γ(P2P1+1)Γ(PnrkPnrk1+1)×Γ(αk+(α1)(nrk)Pnrk+1,(nr)θx)(θ(nr))αk+(α1)(nrk)Pnrk+1.

Proof

Lemma 6.1 implies

(u1+θy)α1(unrk+θy)α1=(θy)(nrk)(α1)Pnrk=0Pnrk1=0PnrkPnrk2=0Pnrk1P2=0P3P1=0P2α1P1×α1P2P1α1Pnrk1Pnrk2α1PnrkPnrk1×u1P1u2P2P1unrkPnrkPnrk1(1θy)Pnrk.

It follows that

τk(x)=x(θy)αkeθyk00(u1+θy)α1(u2+θy)α1(unrk+θy)α1×exp(j=1nrkuj)e(nrk)θydu1dunrk=Pnrk=0Pnrk1=0PnrkPnrk2=0Pnrk1P1=0P2α1P1α1P2P1α1PnrkPnrk1×Γ(P1+1)Γ(PnrkPnrk1+1)x(θy)αk+(nrk)(α1)Pnrke(nr)θydy,=Pnrk=0Pnrk1=0PnrkPnrk2=0Pnrk1P1=0P2α1P1α1P2P1α1PnrkPnrk1×Γ(P1+1)Γ(PnrkPnrk1+1)x(θy)(nr)(α1)+kPnrke(nr)θydy.

If (α − 1)(nr − 1) + k > 0, then

τk(x)=Pnrk=0Pnrk1=0PnrkPnrk2=0Pnrk1P1=0P2α1P1α1P2P1α1PnrkPnrk1×Γ(P1+1)Γ(PnrkPnrk1+1)×Γ(αk+(α1)(nrk)Pnrk+1,(nr)θx)(θ(nr))αk+(α1)(nrk)Pnrk+1.

Lemma 6.3

For allu1∣, ∣u2∣, …, ∣unrk∣> ∣θy∣,

τk(x)=Pnrk=0Pnrk1=0PnrkPnrk2=0Pnrk1P1=0P2α1P1α1P2P1α1PnrkPnrk1×Γ(αP1)Γ(αPnrk+Pnrk1)Γ(αk+Pnrk+1,(nr)θx)(θ(nr))αk+Pnrk+1.

To prove this lemma, the same approach is applied as in the previous proposal.

We now assert that

H1=Pnrk=0Pnrk1=0PnrkP1=0P2α1P1α1PnrkPnrk1×Γ(P1+1)Γ(PnrkPnrk1+1).

This expression is needed to prove what follows.

H1×(θx)Pnrk=e(nrk)θx(θx)(nrk)(α1)(Γ(α,θx))nrk,

which implies

H1×(θx)Pnrk=(θx)PnrkPnrk=0Pnrk1=0PnrkP2=0P3P1=0P2α1P1α1PnrkPnrk1×0z1P1ez1dz10z2P2P1ez2dz20znrkPnrkPnrk1eznrkdznrk,=00Pnrk=0Pnrk1=0PnrkP2=0P3P1=0P2α1P1α1PnrkPnrk1×z1P1×z2P2P1××znrkPnrkPnrk1(θx)Pnrk×ei=1nrkzidz1dznrk,=(θx)(nrk)(α1)00(z1+θx)α1(z2+θx)α1(znrk+θx)α1×ei=1nrkzidz1dznrk,=e(nrk)θx(θx)(nrk)(α1)×(Γ(α,θx))nrk.
Received: 2020-03-12
Accepted: 2020-07-15
Published Online: 2021-04-14
Published in Print: 2021-04-27

© 2021 Mathematical Institute Slovak Academy of Sciences

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular papers
  2. Prof. RNDr. Michal Fečkan, DrSc. – Sexagenarian?
  3. Tribonacci numbers with two blocks of repdigits
  4. Padovan numbers that are concatenations of two distinct repdigits
  5. On the 2-rank and 4-rank of the class group of some real pure quartic number fields
  6. A general inverse matrix series relation and associated polynomials – II
  7. Some hardy type inequalities with finsler norms
  8. Starlikeness and convexity of the product of certain multivalent functions with higher-order derivatives
  9. Block Hessenberg matrices and spectral transformations for matrix orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle
  10. How is the period of a simple pendulum growing with increasing amplitude?
  11. Fourier transforms of convolution operators on orlicz spaces
  12. Some characterizations of property of trans-Sasakian 3-manifolds
  13. P-Adic metric preserving functions and their analogues
  14. On statistical convergence of sequences of closed sets in metric spaces
  15. A characterization of the uniform convergence points set of some convergent sequence of functions
  16. A nonparametric estimation of the conditional ageing intensity function in censored data: A local linear approach
  17. Donsker’s fuzzy invariance principle under the Lindeberg condition
  18. Characterization of generalized Gamma-Lindley distribution using truncated moments of order statistics
  19. Matrix variate pareto distributions
  20. Global exponential periodicity and stability of neural network models with generalized piecewise constant delay
  21. Optimal inequalities for contact CR-submanifolds in almost contact metric manifolds
Downloaded on 15.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ms-2017-0481/html
Scroll to top button