Home Outer and inner approximations in quantum spaces
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Outer and inner approximations in quantum spaces

  • Mona Khare and Pratibha Pandey EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 29, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The present paper introduces and studies the concepts of K-outer approximation and K-inner approximation for a monotone function μ defined on a D-poset P, by a subfamily K of P. Some desirable properties of K-approximable functions are established and it is shown that the family of all elements of P that possess K-approximation, forms a lattice and is closed under orthosupplementation. We have proved that a submodular measure on a suitable subfamily of P having K-outer approximation can be extended to a function that has K-outer approximation, and a tight function that has K-inner approximation can be extended to a function having K-inner approximation.


The second author acknowledges with gratitude the financial support by Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi, India, under INSPIRE fellowship No. IF160721.




Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to the anonymous referees for their valuable suggestions toward the improvement of the paper.

  1. (Communicated by Anatolij Dvurečenskij )

References

[1] Adamski, W.: On extremal extensions of regular contents and measures, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 121 (1994), 1159–1164.10.1090/S0002-9939-1994-1204367-3Search in Google Scholar

[2] Adamski, W.: On regular extensions of contents and measures, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 127 (1987), 211–225.10.1016/0022-247X(87)90153-3Search in Google Scholar

[3] Avallone, A.—Basile, A.: On a Marinacci uniqueness theorem for measures, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 286 (2003), 378–390.10.1016/S0022-247X(03)00274-9Search in Google Scholar

[4] Avallone, A.—Simone, A. De.—Vitolo, P.: Effect algebras and extensions of measures, Bollettino U.M.I. 9-B(8) (2006), 423–444.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Beltrametti, E. G.—Cassinelli, G.: The Logic of Quantum Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, 1981.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Bennett, M. K.—Foulis, D. J.: Phi-symmetric effect algebras, Found. Phys. 25 (1995), 1699–1722.10.1007/BF02057883Search in Google Scholar

[7] Birkhoff, G.—von Neumann, J.: The logic of quantum mechanics, Ann. Math. 37 (1936), 823–834.10.2307/1968621Search in Google Scholar

[8] Busch, P.—Lahti, P.—Mittelstaedt, P.: The Quantum Theory of Measurements. Lecture Notes in Phys., New Series m2, Springer, Berlin, 1991.10.1007/978-3-662-13844-1Search in Google Scholar

[9] Butnariu, D.—Klement, P.: Triangular Norm-based Measures and Games with Fuzzy Coalitions, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1993.10.1007/978-94-017-3602-2Search in Google Scholar

[10] Chiara, M. Dalla—Giuntini, R.—Greechie, R.: Reasoning in Quantum Theory: Sharp and Unsharp Quantum Logics, Kluwer Academic Pub., Dordrecht, 2004.10.1007/978-94-017-0526-4Search in Google Scholar

[11] Dvurečenskij, A.: On orders of observables on effect algebras, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56 (2017), 4112–4125.10.1007/s10773-017-3472-xSearch in Google Scholar

[12] Dvurečenskij, A.—Pulmannová, S.: New Trends in Quantum Structures, Kluwer Acad. Pub., 2000.10.1007/978-94-017-2422-7Search in Google Scholar

[13] Dvurečenskij, A.—Pulmannová, S.: Difference posets, effects and quantum measurements, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 33 (1994), 819–825.10.1007/BF00672820Search in Google Scholar

[14] Foulis, D. J.—Bennett, M. K.: Effect algebras and unsharp quantum logics, Found. Phys. 10 (1994), 1331–1352.10.1007/BF02283036Search in Google Scholar

[15] Ghirardato, P.—Marinacci, M.: Ambiguity made precise: a comparative foundation, J. Econom. Theory 102 (2002), 251–289.10.4324/9780203358061_chapter_10Search in Google Scholar

[16] Halmos, P. R.: Measure Theory, Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ, 1950.10.1007/978-1-4684-9440-2Search in Google Scholar

[17] Hroch, M.—Pták, P.: States on Orthocomplemented difference posets, Lett. Math. Phys. 106 (2016), 1131–1137.10.1007/s11005-016-0862-6Search in Google Scholar

[18] Kagan, E.—Bengal, I.: Navigation of quantum-controlled mobile robots. In: Recent Advances in Mobile Robotics (A. Topalov, ed.), InTech, 2011, pp. 311–326.10.5772/25944Search in Google Scholar

[19] Kalmbach, G.: Orthomodular Lattices, Academic Press, London, 1983.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Kelley, J. L.—Nayak, M. K.—Srinivasan, T. P.: Premeasure on lattices of sets II, Symposium on Vector Measures, Salt Lake City, Utah, 1972.10.1016/B978-0-12-702450-9.50022-1Search in Google Scholar

[21] Khare, M.—Gupta, S.: Non-additive measures, envelops and extensions of quasi-measures, Sarajevo J. Math. 6(18) (2010), 35–49.10.5644/SJM.06.1.03Search in Google Scholar

[22] Khare, M.—Gupta, S.: Extension of non-additive measures on locally completeσ-continuous lattices, Novi Sad J. Math. 38(2) (2008), 15–23.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Khare, M.—Pandey, P.: Extensions of a tight function and their continuity in quantum logic, Soft Comput. 23(22) (2019), 11389–11398.10.1007/s00500-019-04057-5Search in Google Scholar

[24] Khare, M.—Shukla, A.: Extensions and measurability in quantum measure spaces, Math. Slovaca 66(2) (2016), 367–378.10.1515/ms-2015-0142Search in Google Scholar

[25] Khare, M.—Singh, A. K.: Weakly tight functions, their Jordan type decomposition and total variation in effect algebras, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 344(1) (2008), 535–545.10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.03.017Search in Google Scholar

[26] Khare, M.—Singh, B.—Shukla, A.: Approximation in quantum measure spaces, Math. Slovaca 68(3) (2018), 491–500.10.1515/ms-2017-0119Search in Google Scholar

[27] Kôpka, F.—Chovanec, F.: D-posets, Math. Slovaca 44 (1994), 21–34.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Ludwig, G.: Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Vols. I and II, Springer, New York, 1983/1985.10.1007/978-3-642-86754-5Search in Google Scholar

[29] Ludwig, G.: An Axiomatic Basis for Quantum Mechanics, Vol. II, Springer, New York, 1986/1987.10.1007/978-3-642-71897-7Search in Google Scholar

[30] Morales, P.: Extension of a tight set function with values in a uniform semigroup. Measure Theory, Oberwolfach 1981 (D. Kölzow and D. Maharam-Stone, eds.), Lecture Notes in Math. 45, Springer, 1981, pp. 282–292.10.1007/BFb0096685Search in Google Scholar

[31] Nayak, M. K.—Srinivasan, T. P.: Scalar and vector valued premeasures, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 48(2) (1975), 391–396.10.1090/S0002-9939-1975-0369653-6Search in Google Scholar

[32] Pap, E.: On nonadditive set functions, Atti. Sem. Mat. Fis. Univ. Modena 39 (1991), 345–360.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Varadarajan, V. S.: Geometry of Quantum Theory, Vol. 1, Van Nostrand, Princeton, New Jersey, 1968.10.1007/978-0-387-49386-2Search in Google Scholar

[34] Yali, W.—Yichuan, Y.: Notes on quantum logics and involutive bounded posets, Soft Comput. 21 (2017), 2513–2519.10.1007/s00500-017-2579-6Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-12-27
Accepted: 2020-04-14
Published Online: 2021-01-29
Published in Print: 2021-02-23

© 2021 Mathematical Institute Slovak Academy of Sciences

Downloaded on 12.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ms-2017-0449/html
Scroll to top button