Home The Metaphysical Foundations of the Principle of Indifference
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Metaphysical Foundations of the Principle of Indifference

  • Binyamin Eisner ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 8, 2024

Abstract

The arguments in favor of the Principle of Indifference fail to explain its fruitfulness in science. Using the recent metaphysical concept of Grounding, I devise an explanation that can justify a weak version of the principle and discuss an instance of its application in Quantum mechanics.


Corresponding author: Binyamin Eisner, Department of Philosophy, Bar-Ilan University, Max ve-Anna Webb, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel, E-mail:

References

Barnes, E. 1994. “Explaining Brute Facts.” In PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1994, 61–8.10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1994.1.193011Search in Google Scholar

Correia, F., and B. Schnieder. 2012. “Grounding: An Opinionated Introduction.” In Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality, edited by B. Schnieder, and F. Correia, 1–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139149136.001Search in Google Scholar

Dasgupta, S. 2014. “On the Plurality of Grounds.” Philosophers’ Imprint 14: 1–28.Search in Google Scholar

Dasgupta, S. 2016. “Metaphysical Rationalism.” Nous 50 (2): 379–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12082.Search in Google Scholar

Della Rocca, M. 2010. “PSR.” Philosophers’ Imprint 10 (7): 1–13.Search in Google Scholar

Fahrbach, L. 2005. “Understanding Brute Facts.” Synthese 145 (3): 449–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-6200-7.Search in Google Scholar

Fine, K. 2001. “The Question of Realism.” Philosophers’ Imprint 1: 1–30.Search in Google Scholar

Gillies, D. 2012. Philosophical Theories of Probability. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203132241Search in Google Scholar

Hájek, A. 2019. “Interpretations of Probability.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/probability-interpret/ (Accessed March 03, 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Hawthorne, J., J. Landes, C. Wallmann, and J. Williamson. 2017. “The Principal Principle Implies the Principle of Indifference.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68 (1): 123–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axv030.Search in Google Scholar

Jaynes, E. T. 1968. “Prior Probabilities.” IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics 4 (3): 227–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSSC.1968.300117.Search in Google Scholar

Jaynes, E. T. 1973. “The Well-Posed Problem.” Foundations of Physics 3 (4): 477–93, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00709116.Search in Google Scholar

Keynes, J. M. 1921. A Treatise on Probability. London: Macmillan and Company.Search in Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. 1956. The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence, edited by H. G. Alexander. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mellor, D. H. 2013. Probability: A Philosophical Introduction. London and New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Morton, A., and B. C. van Fraassen. 1993. “Laws and Symmetry.” Philosophical Review 102 (3): 408. https://doi.org/10.2307/2185907.Search in Google Scholar

North, J. 2010. “An Empirical Approach to Symmetry and Probability.” Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies In History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (1): 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2009.08.008.Search in Google Scholar

Paris, J. B., and A. Vencovská. 1990. “A Note on the Inevitability of Maximum Entropy.” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 4 (3): 183–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/0888-613X(90)90020-3.Search in Google Scholar

Pettigrew, R. 2016. Accuracy and the Laws of Credence. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732716.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Pruss, A. R. 2006. The Principle of Sufficient Reason: A Reassessment (Issue 4). New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498992Search in Google Scholar

Rodriguez-Pereyra, G. 2005. “Why Truthmakers?” In Truthmakers: The Contemporary Debate, edited by H. Beebee, and J. Dodd. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283569.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Rosen, G. 2010. “Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction.” In Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology, edited by B. Hale, and A. Hoffmann. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199565818.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Schaffer, J. 2009. “On what Grounds what.” In Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, edited by D. Manley, D. J. Chalmers, and R. Wasserman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199546046.003.0012Search in Google Scholar

Schaffer, J. 2012. “Grounding, Transitivity, and Contrastivity.” In Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality, edited by F. Correia, and B. Schnieder. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139149136.005Search in Google Scholar

Shannon, C. 1948. “A Mathematical Theory of Communication.” Bell System Technical Journal 27: 379–423.10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.xSearch in Google Scholar

Spinoza, B. 1994. A Spinoza Reader the Ethics and Other Works, edited by E. M. Curley, 92. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691209289Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, E. 2018. “How to make the Case for Brute Facts.” In Brute Facts, 28–44. Oxford: Oxford Academic.10.1093/oso/9780198758600.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

van Fraassen, B. C. 1989. Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Clarendon Paperbacks.10.1093/0198248601.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

White, R. 2009. “Evidential Symmetry and Mushy Credence.” Oxford Studies in Epistemology 3: 161–86.Search in Google Scholar

Williamson, J. 2018. “Justifying the Principle of Indifference.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8 (3): 559–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-018-0201-0.Search in Google Scholar

Żurek, W. H. 2014. “Quantum Darwinism, Classical Reality, and the Randomness of Quantum Jumps.” Physics Today 67: 44–50.10.1063/PT.3.2550Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-09-21
Accepted: 2024-01-13
Published Online: 2024-03-08
Published in Print: 2024-04-25

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mp-2023-0041/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button