Sparks of New Metaphysics and the Limits of Explanatory Abstractions

References

Allen, K. 2019. “Merleau-Ponty and Naïve Realism.” Philosophers’ Imprint 19 (2): 1–25.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, B. L., and J. Kim. 2009. “Image Statistics Do Not Explain the Perception of Gloss and Lightness.” Journal of Vision 9 (11): 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1167/9.11.10.Search in Google Scholar

Arkani-Hamed, N., and P. Benincasa. 2018. “On the Emergence of Lorentz Invariance and Unitarity from the Scattering Facet of Cosmological Polytopes.” arXiv:1811.01125. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1811.01125.Search in Google Scholar

Arkani-Hamed, N., and J. Trnka. 2014. “The Amplituhedron.” arXiv:1312.2007v1. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1312.2007.Search in Google Scholar

Arkani-Hamed, N., J. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, A. Hodges, and J. Trnka. 2012. “A Note on Polytopes for Scattering Amplitudes.” Journal of High Energy Physics 2012: 81. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2012)081.Search in Google Scholar

Arkani-Hamed, N., J. Henn, and J. Trnka. 2021a. “Nonperturbative Negative Geometries: Amplitudes at Strong Coupling and the Amplituhedron.” arXiv:2112.06956v1. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.06956.Search in Google Scholar

Arkani-Hamed, N., T. C. Huang, and Y. T. Huang. 2021b. “Scattering Amplitudes for All Masses and Spins.” arXiv:1709.04891. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1709.04891.Search in Google Scholar

Arkani-Hamed, N., Lance J. Dixon, Andrew J. McLeod, M. Spradlin, J. Trnka, and A. Volovich. 2022. “Solving Scattering in N=4 Super-Yang-Mills Theory.” arXiv:2207.10636v1. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.10636.Search in Google Scholar

Auletta, G. 2011. Cognitive Biology: Dealing with Information from Bacteria to Minds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199608485.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bokulich, A. 2011. “How Scientific Models Can Explain.” Synthese 180: 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9565-1.Search in Google Scholar

Bokulich, A. 2016. “Fiction as a Vehicle for Truth: Moving beyond the Ontic Conception.” The Monist 99: 260–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onw004.Search in Google Scholar

Bowers, J. S., and C. J. Davis. 2012. “Bayesian Just-so Stories in Psychology and Neuroscience.” Psychological Bulletin 138 (3): 389–414. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026450.Search in Google Scholar

Buckley, C. L., C. S. Kim, S. McGregor, and A. K. Seth. 2017. “The Free Energy Principle for Action and Perception: A Mathematical Review.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 81: 55–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2017.09.004.Search in Google Scholar

Di Biagio, A., and C. Rovelli. 2021. “Relational Quantum Mechanics is about Facts, Not States: A Reply to Pienaar and Brukner.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.03610.10.1007/s10701-022-00579-5Search in Google Scholar

Chakravartty, A. 2007. A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511487354Search in Google Scholar

Chater, N. 1996. “Reconciling Simplicity and Likelihood Principles in Perceptual Organization.” Psychological Review 103: 566–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.566.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, X., T. P. McNamara, J. W. Kelly, and T. Wolbers. 2017. “Cue Combination in Human Spatial Navigation.” Cognitive Psychology 95: 105–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.04.003.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, K., S. J. Shettleworth, J. Huttenlocher, and J. J. Rieser. 2007. “Bayesian Integration of Spatial Information.” Psychological Bulletin 133 (4): 625–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.625.Search in Google Scholar

Colombo, M., and C. Wright. 2021. “First Principles in the Life Sciences: The Free-energy Principle, Organicism, and Mechanism.” Synthese 198 (Suppl 14): S3463–S3488, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-01932-w.Search in Google Scholar

Contessa, G. 2011. “Scientific Models and Representation.” In The Continuum Cowpanion to the Philosophy of Science, edited by S. French, and J. Saatsi, 120–37. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Search in Google Scholar

Fields, C, and M. Levin. 2021. “Metabolic Limits on Classical Information Processing by Biological Cells.” Preprint Arxiv 2103;17061v1 [quant.ph]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2021.104513.Search in Google Scholar

Fields, C., D. Prakash, D. Hoffman, R. Prentner, and M. Singh. 2020. “Fact, Fiction, and Fitness.” Entropy 22 (5): 514, https://doi.org/10.3390/e22050514.Search in Google Scholar

Freeman, A. W. 2021. “A Model for the Origin of Motion Direction Selectivity in Visual Cortex.” Journal of Neuroscience 41: 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1362-20.2020.Search in Google Scholar

French, S. 2006. “Structure as a Weapon of the Realist.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106 (1): 169–87, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2006.00143.x.Search in Google Scholar

French, S. 2014. The Structure of the World: Metaphysics and Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684847.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Friston, K. J. 2012. “A Free Energy Principle for Biological Systems.” Entropy 14 (11): 2100–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/e14112100.Search in Google Scholar

Friston, K. J. 2019. “Beyond the Desert Landscape.” In Matteo Colombo, Elizabeth Irvine, and Mog Stapleton, edited by Andy Clark, and His Critics, 174–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190662813.003.0014Search in Google Scholar

Friston, K., and A. Ping. 2012. “Free Energy, Value, and Attractors.” Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine 2012: 27. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/937860Search in Google Scholar

Friston, K. J., S. Samothrakis, and R. Montague. 2012. “Active Inference and Agency: Optimal Control without Cost Functions.” Biological Cybernetics 106 (8–9): 523–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-012-0512-8.Search in Google Scholar

Friston, K. J., F. Rigoli, D. Ognibene, C. Mathys, T. Fitzgerald, and G. Pezzulo. 2015. “Active Inference and Epistemic Value.” Cognitive Neuroscience 6 (4): 187–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2015.1020053.Search in Google Scholar

Friston, K., B. Sengupta, and G. Auletta. 2014. “Cognitive Dynamics: From Attractors to Active Inference.” Proceedings of the IEEE 102 (4): 427–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2014.2306251.Search in Google Scholar

Friston, K. J., W. Wiese, and J. A. Hobson. 2020. “Sentience and the Origins of Consciousness: From Cartesian Duality to Markovian Monism.” Entropy 2020 (22): 516. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22050516.Search in Google Scholar

Frigg, R. 2010. “Models and Fiction.” Synthese 172 (2): 251–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9505-0.Search in Google Scholar

Gelfert, A. 2016. How to do Science with Models: A Philosophical Primer. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-27954-1Search in Google Scholar

Halberda, J. 2016. “Epistemic Limitations and Precise Estimates in Analog Magnitude Representation.” In Core Knowledge and Conceptual Change, edited by D. Barner, and A. S. Baron, 171–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190467630.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Hindriks, F. 2013. “Explanation, Understanding, and Unrealistic Models.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44: 523–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.12.004.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffman, D. 2019. The Case against Reality: Why Evolution Hid the Truth from Our Eyes. New York: W.W. Norton.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffman, D., and C. Prakash. 2014. “Objects of Consciousness.” Frontiers in Psychology 5: 577. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00577.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffman, D., C. Prakash, and M. Singh. 2015. “The Interface Theory of Perception.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 22: 1480–506. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0890-8.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffman, D., C. Prakash, and R. Prentner. 2023. “Fusions of Consciousness.” Entropy 25: 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/e25010129.Search in Google Scholar

Hopp, W. 2020. Phenomenology: A Contemporary Introduction. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781003047216Search in Google Scholar

Huang, X., M. Rangel, K. L. Briggman, and W. Wei. 2019. “Neural Mechanisms of Contextual Modulation in the Retinal Direction Selective Circuit.” Nature Communications 10 (1): 2431. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10268-z.Search in Google Scholar

Hughes, R. I. G. 1997. “Models and Representation.” Philosophy of Science 64: S325–36. https://doi.org/10.1086/392611.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Y. J., B. B. Peterson, J. D. Crook, H. R. Joo, J. Wu, C. Puller, and F. R. Robinson. 2022. “Origins of Direction Selectivity in the Primate Retina.” Nature Communications 13 (1): 2862. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30405-5.Search in Google Scholar

Kirchhoff, M. D., T. Parr, E. Palacios, K. J. Friston, and J. Kiverstein. 2018. “The Markov Blankets of Life: Autonomy, Active Inference and the Free Energy Principle.” Journal of the Royal Society, Interface 15 (138): 20170792. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0792.Search in Google Scholar

Klein, C. 2018. “What Do Predictive Coders Want?” Synthese 195 (6): 2541–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1250-6.Search in Google Scholar

Knill, D., and W. Richards. 1996. Perception as Bayesian Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511984037Search in Google Scholar

Knuuttila, T. 2005. “Models, Representation, and Mediation.” Philosophy of Science 72: 1260–71. https://doi.org/10.1086/508124.Search in Google Scholar

Knuuttila, T. 2011. “Modelling and Representing: An Artefactual Approach to Model-based Representation.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42 (2): 262–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.034.Search in Google Scholar

Koffka, K. 1935. Principles of Gestalt Psychology. London: Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Lettvin, J. Y., H. R. Maturana, W. S. Mcculloch, and W. H. Pitts. 1959. “What the Frog’s Eye Tells the Frog’s Brain.” Proceedings of the IRE 47: 1940–51. https://doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1959.287207Search in Google Scholar

Li, Y., and Z. Pizlo. 2011. “Depth Cues versus the Simplicity Principle in 3D Shape Perception.” Topics in Cognitive Science 3: 667–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01155.x.Search in Google Scholar

Linde, A. 2002. Inflation, Quantum Cosmology and the Anthropic Principle. In “Science and Ultimate Reality: From Quantum to Cosmos”, Honoring John Wheeler’s 90th Birthday, edited by J. D. Barrow, P. C. W. Davies, and C. L. Harper. Cambridge University Press. https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0211048.Search in Google Scholar

Ma, W. J. 2019. “Bayesian Decision Models: A Primer.” Neuron 104: 164–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.09.037.Search in Google Scholar

Ma, W. J. 2012. “Organizing Probabilistic Models of Perception.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16 (10): 511–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.08.010.Search in Google Scholar

Martínez, S. F., and X. Huang. 2011. “Epistemic Groundings of Abstraction and their Cognitive Dimension.” Philosophy of Science 78: 490–511. https://doi.org/10.1086/660305.Search in Google Scholar

Matthiessen, D. 2017. “Mechanistic Explanation in Systems Biology: Cellular Networks.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68 (1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axv011.Search in Google Scholar

Mark, J. T., B. B. Marion, and D. D. Hoffman. 2010. “Natural Selection and Veridical Perceptions.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 266 (4): 504–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.07.020.Search in Google Scholar

Marlow, P. J., J. Kim, and B. L. Anderson. 2012. “The Perception and Misperception of Specular Reflectance.” Current Biology 22 (20): 1909–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.009.Search in Google Scholar

McCoy, C. D., and M. Massimi. 2018. “Simplified Models: A Different Perspective on Models as Mediators.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8 (1): 99–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-017-0178-0.Search in Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. 2012. Phenomenology of Perception, trans. D. Landes. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203720714Search in Google Scholar

Mirski, R., and M. H. Bickhard. 2019. “Encodingism is not just a Bad Metaphor.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42.10.1017/S0140525X19001286Search in Google Scholar

Morrison, M. 2015. Reconstructing Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199380275.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Nasir-Ahmad, S., K. A. Vanstone, M. Novelli, S. C. S. Lee, M. T. H. Do, P. R. Martin, and U. Grünert. 2022. Satb1 Expression in Retinal Ganglion Cells of Marmosets, Macaques, and Humans. Journal of Comparative Neurology 530: 923–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.25258.Search in Google Scholar

Nersessian, N. J. 2008. Creating Scientific Concepts. Cambridge: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7967.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Ordorica, S. 2016. “The Explanatory Role of Abstraction Processes in Models: The Case of Aggregations.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 56: 161–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.10.002.Search in Google Scholar

Parr, T., L. Da Costa, and K. Friston. 2020. “Markov Blankets, Information Geometry and Stochastic Thermodynamics.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 378 (2164). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0159.Search in Google Scholar

Pizlo, Z., and A. K. Stevenson. 1999. “Shape Constancy from Novel Views.” Perception and Psychophysics 61: 1299–307. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03206181.Search in Google Scholar

Portides, D. P. 2005. “Scientific Models and the Semantic View of Scientific Theories.” Philosophy of Science 72: 1287–98. https://doi.org/10.1086/508125.Search in Google Scholar

Prakash, C., C. Field, D. Hoffman, R. Prentner, and M. Singh. 2020. “Fact, Fiction, and Fitness.” Entropy 22 (5): 514. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22050514.Search in Google Scholar

Psillos, S. 1999. Scientific Realism. How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Ramstead, M. J. D., M. D. Kirchhoff, and K. J. Friston. 2019. “A Tale of Two Densities: Active Inference is Enactive Inference.” Adaptive Behavior 28 (4): 225–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712319862774.Search in Google Scholar

Ramstead, M. J., K. J. Friston, and I. Hipólito. 2020. “Is the Free-energy Principle a Formal Theory of Semantics? From Variational Density Dynamics to Neural and Phenotypic Representations.” Entropy 22 (8): 889. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22080889.Search in Google Scholar

Rovelli, C. 2018a. Order of Time. New York: Riverhead Books.Search in Google Scholar

Rovelli, C. 2018b. “Space is Blue and Birds Fly through it.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 376: 2123. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1712.02894.Search in Google Scholar

Rovelli, C. 2021. “The Relational Interpretation of Quantum Physics.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.09170. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2109.09170.Search in Google Scholar

Rovelli, C. 2022. “The Relational Interpretation of Quantum Physics.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Quantum Interpretations. Oxford University Press, arXiv:2109.09170v3.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198844495.013.44Search in Google Scholar

Sabbah, S., J. A. Gemmer, A. Bhatia-Lin, G. Manoff, G. Castro, J. K. Siegel, N. Jeffery, and D. M. Berson. 2017. “A Retinal Code for Motion along the Gravitational and Body Axes.” Nature 546: 492–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22818.Search in Google Scholar

Sampaio, C., M. Jones, A. Engelbertson, and M. Williams. 2020. “Bayesian Priors in Estimates of Object Location in Virtual Reality.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01782-z.Search in Google Scholar

Sawada, T., and Z. Pizlo. 2022. Testing a Formal Theory of Perception is Not Easy: Comments on Yu, Todd, & Petrov (2021) and Yu, Petrov, &Todd (2021). Journal of Vision 22 (4): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.4.15.Search in Google Scholar

Suárez, M. 2003. “Scientific Representation: Against Similarity and Isomorphism.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17: 225–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269859032000169442.Search in Google Scholar

Teller, P. 2009. “Fictions, Fictionalization, and Truth in Science.” In Fictions in Science: Philosophical Essays on Modeling and Idealization, edited by M. Suarez, 235–47. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Todd, J. T., and A. A. Petrov. 2022. The Many Facets of Shape. Journal of Vision 22 (1): 1–30, https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.1.1.Search in Google Scholar

van Es, T. 2020. “Living Models or Life Modelled? On the Use of Models in the Free Energy Principle.” Adaptive Behavior 29 (5): 105971232091867, https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712320918678.Search in Google Scholar

Von Glasersfeld, E. 2013. Radical Constructivism. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.10.4324/9780203454220Search in Google Scholar

Von Glasersfeld, E. 1984. “An Introduction to Radical Constructivism.” In The Invented Reality, edited by P. Watzlawick, 17–40. New York: Norton. English translation of: Glasersfeld, E. (1981) Einführung in den Radikalen Konstruktivismus. In: Watzlawick, P. (ed.) Die Erfundene Wirklichkeit, 16–38. Munich: Piper.Search in Google Scholar

Verhoef, B.-E., R. Vogels, and P. Janssen. 2016. “Binocular Depth Processing in the Ventral Visual Pathway.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 371: 20150259. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0259.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, R. F. 2016. “Building a Cognitive Map by Assembling Multiple Path Integration Systems.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 23 (3): 692–702. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0952-y.Search in Google Scholar

Wandell, B. 1995. Foundations of Vision. Sunderland: Sinauer.Search in Google Scholar

Weber, M. 2014. “Experimental Modeling in Biology: In Vivo Representation and Stand-ins as Modeling Strategies.” Philosophy of Science 81: 756–69. https://doi.org/10.1086/678257.Search in Google Scholar

Weiss, Y., E. Simoncelli, and E. Adelson. 2002. “Motion Illusions as Optimal Percept.” Nature Neuroscience 5: 598–604. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn0602-858.Search in Google Scholar

Weisberg, M. 2007. “Who is a Modeler?” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (2): 207–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axm011.Search in Google Scholar

Weisberg, M. 2013. Simulation and Similarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199933662.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Yoshioka, T. W., T. Doi, M. Abdolrahmani, and I. Fujita. 2021. “Specialized Contributions of Mid-tier Stages of Dorsal and Ventral Pathways to Stereoscopic Processing in Macaque.” Elife 10: e58749. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.58749.Search in Google Scholar

Yu, Y., A. A. Petrov, and J. T. Todd. 2021a. “Bilateral Symmetry Has No Effect on Stereoscopic Shape Judgments.” i-Perception 12 (4): 2041669521104–2644. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669521104264420416695211042644.Search in Google Scholar

Yu, Y., J. T. Todd, and A. A. Petrov. 2021b. Failures of Stereoscopic Shape Constancy over Changes of Viewing Distance and Size for Bilaterally Symmetric Polyhedra. Journal of Vision 21 (6): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.6.5.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, L., W. Mou, X. Lei, and Y. Du. 2019. “Cue Combination Used to Update the Navigator’s Self-Localization, Not the Home Location.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 46 (12): 2314–2339, https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000794.Search in Google Scholar