Holism Resurfacing: How Far Should We Go With It?

References

Bernstein, N. 2016. “What a Structuralist Theory of Properties Could Not Be.” In The Metaphysics of Relations, edited by A. Marmodoro, 157–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735878.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Bird, A. 2004. “The Dispositionalist Conception of Laws.” Foundations of Science 152: 1–18.10.1007/s10699-004-5259-9Search in Google Scholar

Blanshard, B. 1939. The Nature of Thought. London: Allen & Unwin.Search in Google Scholar

Block, N. 1995. “An Argument for Holism”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95: 151–69.10.1093/aristotelian/95.1.151Search in Google Scholar

BonJour, L. 1985. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bradley, F. H. 1897. Appearance and Reality, 2nd ed. London: Swan Sonnenschein.Search in Google Scholar

Bradley, F. H. 1912. The Principles of Logic. New York: G. E. Stechert and Co. (1st edition: 1883, London).Search in Google Scholar

Briceno, S., and S. Mumford. 2016. “Relations all the Way Down? Against Ontic Structural Realism.” In The Metaphysics of Relations, edited by A. Marmodoro, 198–217. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735878.003.0012Search in Google Scholar

Dasgupta, S. 2017. “Can We Do without Fundamental Individuals?” In Current Controversies in Metaphysics, edited by E. Barnes, 7–23. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203735602-1Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, D. 1983. “A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge.” In Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective, edited by Davidson, 137–53. Oxford: Clarendon, 2011.10.1093/0198237537.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, D. 1984. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, B. 2006. “Universals, the Essential Problem and Categorical Properties.” In Metaphysics in Science, edited by A. Drewery, 88–97. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1111/j.1467-9329.2005.00305.xSearch in Google Scholar

Ellis, B. 2011. Scientific Essentialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, B., and C. Lierse. 1994. “Dispositional Essentialism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72: 27–45, https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409412345861.Search in Google Scholar

Fine, K. 1994. “Essence and Modality: The Second Philosophical Perspectives Lecture.” Philosophical Perspectives 8: 1–6, https://doi.org/10.2307/2214160.10.2307/2214160Search in Google Scholar

Fine, K. 2014. “Guide to Ground.” In Metaphysical Grounding. Understanding the Structure of Reality, edited by F. Correia, and B. Schnieder, 37–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139149136.002Search in Google Scholar

Gorman, M. 2005. “The Essential and the Accidental.” Ratio 18: 276–89, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9329.2005.00290.x.Search in Google Scholar

Harman, G. 1993. “Meaning Holism Defended.” In Holism. A Consumers Update, edited by J. Fodor, and E. Lepore, 163–71. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/18756735-04601007Search in Google Scholar

Hawthorne, J. 2001. “Causal Structuralism”. Philosophical Perspectives.” Metaphysics 15: 361–78, https://doi.org/10.1111/0029-4624.35.s15.16.Search in Google Scholar

Heil, J. 2006. “Kinds and Essences.” In Metaphysics in Science, edited by A. Drewery, 38–46. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1111/j.1467-9329.2005.00302.xSearch in Google Scholar

Katzav, J. 2005. “Ellis on the Limitations of Dispositionalism.” Analysis 65: 92–4.10.1093/analys/65.1.92Search in Google Scholar

Kim, J. 1994. “Explanatory Knowledge and Metaphysical Dependence.” Philosophical Issues 5: 51–69, https://doi.org/10.2307/1522873.Search in Google Scholar

Kment, B. 2014. “Modality and Explanatory Reasoning.” Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604685.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Ladyman, J., and D. Ross. 2007. Every Thing Must Go. Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276196.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Ladyman, J. 2016. “The Foundations of Structuralism and the Metaphysics of Relations.” In The Metaphysics of Relations, edited by A. Marmodoro, 177–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735878.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, D. 2009. “Ramseyan Humility.” In Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism, edited by D. Braddon-Mitchell, and R. Nola, 203–22. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262012560.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Lowe, E. J. 2014. “Asymmetrical Dependence in Individuation.” In Metaphysical Grounding, edited by F. Correia, and B. Schnieder, 214–33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139149136.009Search in Google Scholar

Lowe, E. J. 2016. “There are (Probably) no Relations.” In The Metaphysics of Relations, edited by A. Marmodoro, 100–12. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735878.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Martin, C. B. 1994. “Dispositions and Conditionals.” The Philosophical Quarterly 44: 1–8, https://doi.org/10.2307/2220143.Search in Google Scholar

Martinez, M. 2020. “Synergic Kinds.” Synthese 197: 1931–46, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1480-2.Search in Google Scholar

Maurin, A. S. 2019. “Grounding and Metaphysical Explanation: It’s Complicated.” Philosophical Studies 176 (6): 1573–94, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1080-0.Search in Google Scholar

Molnar, G. 2003. Powers: A Study in Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mumford, S. 2006. “Kinds, Essences, Powers.” In Metaphysics in Science, edited by A. Drewery, 47–62. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1111/j.1467-9329.2005.00303.xSearch in Google Scholar

Mumford, S., and R. L. Anjum. 2011. Getting Causes from Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199695614.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Neurath, O. 1931. Empirische Soziologie. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-7091-2334-8Search in Google Scholar

Oderberg, D. 2007. Real Essentialism. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203356753Search in Google Scholar

Oderberg, D. 2011. “Essence and Properties.” Erkenntnis 75: 85–111, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-011-9276-0.Search in Google Scholar

Pagin, P. 2006. “Meaning Holism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language, edited by E. Lepore, and B. C. Smith, 204–32. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552238.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Phenister, P. 2016. “Leibnizian Pluralism and Bradleian Monism: A Question of Relations.” In Leibniz: Aspects of Plurality, Vol. 45, edited by A. Pelletier, 61–82. Special Issue of Studia Leibniziana.Search in Google Scholar

Simons, P. 2016. “External Relations, Caudal Coincidence and Contingency.” In The Metaphysics of Relations, edited by A. Marmodoro, 113–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735878.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Striker, G. 1996. “The Ten Tropes of Aenesidemus.” In Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics, 116–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139172783.006Search in Google Scholar

Turner, J. 2017. “Can we do Without Fundamental Individuals? No.” In Current Controversies in Metaphysics, edited by E. Barnes, 24–34. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203735602-2Search in Google Scholar

Ujvári, M. 2020. “Metaphysical Explanation Separated from Grounding.” Metaphysica 21: 55–69, https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2019-0009.Search in Google Scholar

Wiggins, D. 2016. Essays on Identity and Substance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar