Fictional Objects

Manuele Dozzi

doi:10.1515/mp-2017-0008

Article

Fictional Objects

Manuele Dozzi

Published/Copyright: March 23, 2017

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal Metaphysica Volume 18 Issue 1

Abstract

The article, in the first part, aims at providing a positive answer to the ontological question about fictional objects starting from semantic reflections on the negative existential statements containing terms purporting to refer to such objects and the principle of compositionality. In the second part is proposed a Meinongian account of ficta, showing how it handles the problem of negative existentials without giving up neither the principle of compositionality nor our way of talking about fictional characters in the natural languages. It is also considered a particular kind of Meinongianism, namely Modal Meinongianism which seems to be the best Meinongian theory in order to explore the modal properties of ficta.

Keywords: fictional objects; meinongianism; ontology; metaphysics

References

Berto, F. 2013. “Modal Meinongianism and Actuality.” Humana Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies 25:155–176.Search in Google Scholar

Coffa, J.A. 1991. The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna Station. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.10.1017/CBO9781139172240Search in Google Scholar

Frege, G. 1918. “Der Gedanke: Eine logische Untersuchung.” Beiträge zur Philosophie des Deutschen Idealismus 2:58–77. (Thoughts, English tr. by P T Geach and R H Stoothoff. In: Brian Mc Guinness (ed.). Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic and Philosophy. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1984.)Search in Google Scholar

Kripke, S. 1972. “Naming and Necessity.” In Semantics of Natural Language, edited by D. Davidson and G. Harman. Dodrecht: Reidel (Nome e Necessità, Italian tr. by M. Santambrogio. Bollati Boringhieri, Torino, 1999. Selected pages reprinted in: Nomi e riferimento, in AAVV, Filosofia del linguaggio, Paolo Iacona and Elisa Paganini (eds.), Raffaello Cortina editore, Milano, 2003.).10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_9Search in Google Scholar

Kripke, S. 2013. Reference and Existence: The John Locke Lectures. Oxford: Oxford U.P.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199928385.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kroon, F., and A. Voltolini 2011. “Fiction.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/fiction/.Search in Google Scholar

Parsons, T. 1980. Non-Existent Objects. Heaven, CT: New Yale U.P.Search in Google Scholar

Priest, G., and F. Berto 2014. “Modal Meinongianism and Characterization Reply to Kroon.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 90:183–200.10.1163/9789004298767_012Search in Google Scholar

Read, S. 1995. Thinking about Logic. Oxford: Oxford U.P.Search in Google Scholar

Reicher, M. 2006. “Nonexistent Objects.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2015 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entries/nonexistent-objects/.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1905. “On Denoting.” Mind 14 (56):479–493.10.4324/9780203822586-6Search in Google Scholar

Spolaore, G., and P. Giaretta 2008. Esistenza e Identità. Milano-Udine: Mimesis Edizioni.Search in Google Scholar

Quine, W.V.O. 1953. “On What There Is.” In From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard U.P.; Revised Edition, 1980.Search in Google Scholar

Zalta, E. 1983. Abstract Objects: An Introduction to Axiomatic Metaphysics. Dodrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-6980-3Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-3-23

Published in Print: 2017-4-1

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2017-0008

Keywords for this article

fictional objects; meinongianism; ontology; metaphysics