Startseite Multimodal arguments: language, script, and politics
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Multimodal arguments: language, script, and politics

  • Dris Soulaimani EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 17. Oktober 2023

Abstract

This study uses discourse analysis to investigate the connectedness between embodiment and the politics of orthography. Drawing on a video-recorded conversation from a large sociolinguistic dataset on Amazigh/Berber, the study examines the role of embodied acts not only as semiotic resources that elaborate talk but also as consequential discursive entities that organize political arguments about script. The participants use multimodal utterances that extend beyond meaning to iconize social orientation as well as power in conversation. Analysis of the video reveals the way participants map their social perceptions of the language and its script onto their talk and embodied actions. Analysis also shows how script arguments mirror larger political debates in Morocco, in which script preferences are based on ideological and political orientations.


Corresponding author: Dris Soulaimani, Department of Linguistics, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA, 92182-0001, USA, E-mail:

Acknowledgment

The author would like to thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers of this journal for their helpful comments on this article.

Appendix A: Transcription conventions

The transcription is based on prior analysis developed by Sacks (1992). See also Schegloff (1997). A concise explanation of this system is provided by Goodwin (1990, 25–26).

. Falling intonation
, Continuing intonation
(( )) Nonverbal activity
(0.1) Silence in tenths of a second
[ Overlap
= Latched or contiguous utterances (no pause between the previous utterance and the next)
: Vowel lengthening
? Rising intonation
Capitalization Increased volume (e.g. KAY)
Capital italics Increased volume and some type of emphasis (e.g. WAL)
° Low volume
*hh Inbreath
with- Missing words

Appendix B: Transcription symbols of (Moroccan) Arabic sounds

ج ح ش ص ض ط ع غ ء ك ق خ ا و ي
ž ħ š ʕ γ ʔ k q x ā ū ī

References

Agha, Asif. 2005. Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1). 38–59. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.38.Suche in Google Scholar

Amahan, Ali. 1994. Notes Bibliographiques sur les Manuscrits en Langue Tamazight Écrits en Caractères Arabes. In Ahmed-Chouqui Binebine (ed.), Le Manuscrit Arabe et la Codicologie: Colloques et Seminaires, vol. 33. Rabat: Faculté des lettres et des sciences humaines.Suche in Google Scholar

al-Sahifa Newspaper. 2002. Al-Sahifa, Issue 47. http://www.ndaworld.org/uploads/Jamal_amazegeyah.doc (accessed 15 July 2014).Suche in Google Scholar

Belhiah, Hassan. 2020. English as a global language in Morocco: A qualitative study of students’ motivations for studying English. In Hassan Belhiah, Nourdin Bejjit, Jamal Bahmad, Ikbal Zeddari & Nourddine Amrous (eds.), English language teaching in Moroccan higher education, 33–48. Singapore: Springer.10.1007/978-981-15-3805-6_3Suche in Google Scholar

Ben-Layashi, Samir. 2007. Secularism in the Moroccan Amazigh discourse. The Journal of North African Studies 12(2). 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629380701201741.Suche in Google Scholar

Bucholtz, Mary & Kira Hall. 2004. Language and identity. In Alessandro Duranti (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology, 268–294. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Bucholtz, Mary & Kira Hall. 2016. Embodied sociolinguistics. In Nikolas Coupland (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates, 173–197. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107449787.009Suche in Google Scholar

Chakrani, Brahim. 2013. The impact of the ideology of modernity on language attitudes in Morocco. The Journal of North African Studies 18(3). 431–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629387.2013.791613.Suche in Google Scholar

Chakrani, Brahim. 2017. Between profit and identity: Analyzing the effect of language of instruction in predicting overt language attitudes in Morocco. Applied Linguistics 38(2). 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv013.Suche in Google Scholar

Cline, Walter. 1953. Berber dialects and Berber script. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 9(3). 268–276. https://doi.org/10.1086/soutjanth.9.3.3628698.Suche in Google Scholar

Coulmas, Florian. 2009. Evaluating merit—the evolution of writing reconsidered. Writing Systems Research 1(1). 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsp001.Suche in Google Scholar

De Haas, Hein. 2007. Morocco’s migration experience: A transitional perspective. International Migration 45(4). 39–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2007.00419.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Duranti, Alessandro. 1997. Linguistic anthropology. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511810190Suche in Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 4. 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Donald G. 2015. Argument discourse. The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi022.Suche in Google Scholar

Ennahid, Said. 2011. Information and communication technologies for the preservation and valorization of manuscript collections in Morocco. In Graziano Krätli & Ghislaine Lydon (eds.), The trans-Saharan book trade: Manuscript culture, Arabic literacy and intellectual history in Muslim Africa, 265–289. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004187429.i-424.56Suche in Google Scholar

Ennaji, Moha. 2005. Multilingualism, cultural identity, and education in Morocco. New York, NY: Springer.Suche in Google Scholar

Errihani, Mohammed. 2007. Language policy in Morocco: Implications of recognizing and teaching Berber. University of Illinois at Chicago PhD diss.Suche in Google Scholar

Ferguson, Charles. 1959. Diglossia. Word 15. 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702.Suche in Google Scholar

Gellner, Ernest. 1972. Patterns of rural rebellion in Morocco during the early years of independence. In Charles Micaud & Ernest Gellner (eds.), Arabs and Berbers: From tribe to nation in North Africa, 361–374. London: Duckworth.Suche in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Pantheon.Suche in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1981. Footing. In Erving Goffman (ed.), Forms of talk, 124–159. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Good, Jeffrey S. 2015. Reported and enacted actions: Moving beyond reported speech and related concepts. Discourse Studies 17(6). 663–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445615602349.Suche in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 1986. Audience diversity, participation and interpretation. Text & Talk 6. 283–316. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1986.6.3.283.Suche in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 2000. Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32. 1489–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00096-x.Suche in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 2002. Time in action. Current Anthropology 43. 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1086/339566.Suche in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 2007. Environmentally coupled gestures. In Susan Duncan, Justine Cassel & Elena Levy (eds.), Gestures and the dynamic dimensions of language, 195–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/gs.1.18gooSuche in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 2013. The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics 46(1). 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 2015. Narrative as talk-in-interaction. In Anna De Fina & Alexandra Georgakopoulou (eds.), The handbook of narrative analysis, 197–218. Malden: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118458204.ch10Suche in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles & John Heritage. 1990. Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology 19. 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435.Suche in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 1990. He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among black children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles & Marjorie Harness Goodwin. 1996. Seeing as a situated activity: Formulating planes. In Yrjo Engeström & David Middleton (eds.), Cognition and communication at work, 61–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University.10.1017/CBO9781139174077.004Suche in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 2006. The hidden life of girls: Games of stance, status, and exclusion. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470773567Suche in Google Scholar

Hachimi, Atiqa. 2012. The urban and the urbane: Identities, language ideologies, and Arabic dialects in Morocco. Language in Society 41(3). 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404512000279.Suche in Google Scholar

Heath, Christian. 1986. Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511628221Suche in Google Scholar

Hutchins, Edwin. 1996. Learning to navigate. In Seth Chaiklin & Jean Lave (eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context, 35–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511625510.003Suche in Google Scholar

Irvine, Judith. 1996. When talk isn’t cheap. In Donald Brenneis & Ronald Macaulay (eds.), The matrix of language, 258–283. Boulder: Westview Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kimura, Daisuke & Suresh Canagarajah. 2020. Embodied semiotic resources in Research Group Meetings: How language competence is framed. Journal of Sociolinguistics 24(5). 634–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12435.Suche in Google Scholar

Kolarz, Walter. 1972. Myths and realities in Eastern Europe. Port Washington, N.Y.: Kennikat Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kroskrity, Paul V. 2010. Language ideologies-evolving perspectives. In Jürgen Jaspers (ed.), Society and language use (Handbook of pragmatics highlights), 192–211. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hoph.7.13kroSuche in Google Scholar

Kroskrity, Paul V. 2018. On recognizing persistence in the indigenous language ideologies of multilingualism in two native American communities. Language & Communication 62. 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.04.012.Suche in Google Scholar

Laihonen, Petteri. 2008. Language ideologies in interviews: A conversation analysis approach. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(5). 668–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00387.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Maybin, Janet. 2001. Language, struggle and voice: The Bakhtin/Volosinov writings. In Discourse theory and practice: A reader, 64–71. London: Sage.Suche in Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2009. The methodical organization of talking and eating: Assessments in dinner conversations. Food Quality and Preference 20(8). 558–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.03.006.Suche in Google Scholar

Norris, Sigrid. 2004. Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203379493Suche in Google Scholar

Ochs, Elinor, Carolyn Taylor, Dina Rudolph & Ruth Smith. 1992. Storytelling as a theory-building activity. Discourse Processes 15. 37–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544801.Suche in Google Scholar

O’Connor, Michael. 1996. The Berber scripts. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 112–116. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Prussin, Labelle. 1995. African nomadic architecture: Space, place and gender. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Suche in Google Scholar

Rouighi, Ramzi. 2019. Inventing the Berbers: History and ideology in the maghrib. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.10.9783/9780812296181Suche in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1992. In Gail Jefferson (ed.), Lectures on conversation, vol.2. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Sanctex. 2007. Map of Berber languages in Berber-map.png. http://www.oocities.org/linguaeimperii/Libyan/libyan_es.html (accessed 15 June 2012).Suche in Google Scholar

Savage, Andrew. 2008. Writing Tuareg: The three script options. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 192. 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2008.031.Suche in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel. A. 1997. ‘Narrative analysis’ thirty years after. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7(1–4). 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.11nar.Suche in Google Scholar

Schieffelin, Bambi B. & Rachelle C. Doucet. 1998. The ‘real’ Haitian Creole: Ideology, metalinguistics, and orthographic choice. In Bambi B. Schieffelin, Kathryn A. Woolard & Paul V. Kroskrity (eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory, 285–316. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195105612.003.0014Suche in Google Scholar

Sebba, Mark. 2006. Ideology and alphabets in the former USSR. Language Problems and Language Planning 30(2). 99–125. https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.30.2.02seb.Suche in Google Scholar

Sebba, Mark. 2009. Sociolinguistic approaches to writing systems research. Writing Systems Research 1(1). 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsp002.Suche in Google Scholar

Sebba, Mark. 2018. Scripts, spelling, and identities. Brown Journal of World Affairs 25(1). 7–19.Suche in Google Scholar

Sidnell, Jack. 2000. Primus inter pares: Storytelling and male peer groups in an Indo-Guyanese rumshop. American Ethnologist 27(1). 72–99. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.2000.27.1.72.Suche in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John. 2004. Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203594070Suche in Google Scholar

Skarakis-Doyle, Elizabeth & Lisa L. Murphy. 1995. Discourse-based language intervention: Anefficacy study. Journal of Children’s Communication Development 17(2). 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/152574019501700202.Suche in Google Scholar

Soulaimani, Dris. 2016. Writing and rewriting Amazigh/Berber identity: Orthographies and language ideologies. Writing Systems Research 8(1). 1–16.10.1080/17586801.2015.1023176Suche in Google Scholar

Soulaimani, Dris. 2018. Talk, voice and gestures in reported speech: Toward an integrated approach. Discourse Studies 20(3). 361–376.10.1177/1461445618754419Suche in Google Scholar

Soulaimani, Dris. 2019. Arabic or Latin: Language contact and spelling practices. Middle East Topics & Arguments (Contacts) 13. 13–20.Suche in Google Scholar

Soulaimani, Dris. 2023. “Purement Amazigh”: Investigating embodied ideologies and linguistic practices in Morocco. Multiligua 42(5). 621–648.10.1515/multi-2022-0121Suche in Google Scholar

Stivers, Anya. 2004. ‘No no no’ and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction. Human Communication Research 30(2). 260–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00733.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Unseth, Peter. 2005. Sociolinguistic parallels between choosing scripts and languages. Written Language and Literacy 8. 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.8.1.02uns.Suche in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Teun A. 1998. Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.Suche in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Teun A. 2006. Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies 11(2). 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908.Suche in Google Scholar

Vološinov, Valentin N. 1973 [1929]. Marxism and the Philosophy of language (trans. L. Matejka and I. R. Titunik). New York: Seminar Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Woolard, Kathryn A. 2008. Why dat now?: Linguistic-anthropological contributions to the explanation of sociolinguistic icons and change. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4). 432–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00375.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Yokoyama, Olga. 1990. Responding with a question in colloquial Russian. In Margaret H. Mills (ed.), Topics in colloquial Russian, 1–16. New York: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-06-08
Accepted: 2023-09-26
Published Online: 2023-10-17

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 26.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mc-2023-0016/pdf?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen