Startseite Multimodal (Inter)action Analysis for the study of lectures: active and passive uses of metadiscourse
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Multimodal (Inter)action Analysis for the study of lectures: active and passive uses of metadiscourse

  • Edgar Bernad-Mechó EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 13. März 2023

Abstract

This paper offers a Multimodal (Inter)action Analysis study of how metadiscourse is used in university lectures. Metadiscourse is frequently employed in spoken academic discourse to guide the audience through the contents of the speech, thus becoming an essential element to foster comprehension in lectures. Although lectures have been largely researched under a multimodal eye, studies looking at the multimodal nature of metadiscourse are still scarce. In fact, previous multimodal explorations of metadiscourse in lectures point towards discrepancies in the attention given by lecturers to metadiscursive instances. In this study, six face-to-face lectures in fields within Humanities were analyzed to spot all instances of organizational metadiscourse. Next, the fragments containing such metadiscourse were further explored through a Multimodal (Inter)action Analysis to identify the structure of higher-level actions and the ways in which metadiscourse was integrated as part of the modal configurations of the actions. The analysis of higher-level actions using the foreground-background continuum reveals two main roles in the use of metadiscourse: an active one, in which metadiscourse is explicitly used to guide and engage the audience, as expected; and a passive one, in which metadiscourse is rather used as a filler in the background. These results contribute to reflecting on teaching practices and raising awareness on the importance of multimodal literacy for teacher training.


Corresponding author: Edgar Bernad-Mechó, Universitat Jaume I (UJI), Castelló de la Plana, Spain, E-mail:

Funding source: Generalitat Valenciana

Award Identifier / Grant number: CIAICO/2021/069

Award Identifier / Grant number: PID2021-127827NB-I00

  1. Research funding: This study is encompassed within a research project funded by the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Spain (Ref: PID2021-127827NB-I00) and entitled Cybergenres and English as a Medium of Instruction. Multimodal analysis of digital academic genres and their pedagogical implications in Higher Education EMI contexts; a research project funded by Generalitat Valenciana – Conselleria d’Innovació, Universitats, Ciència i Societat Digital (Ref: CIAICO/2021/069) entitled Análisis y descripción de la naturaleza multimodal y multimedial de los géneros académicos en la educación superior. La comunicación académica digital en inglés.

References

Ädel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. John Benjamins, Amsterdam & Philadelphia.10.1075/scl.24Suche in Google Scholar

Ädel, A. (2010). Just to give you kind of a map of where we are going: a taxonomy of metadiscourse in spoken and written academic english. Nordic J. Engl. Stud. 9: 69–97, https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.218.Suche in Google Scholar

Aguilar-Pérez, M. and Khan, S. (2022). Metadiscourse use when shifting from L1 to EMI lecturing: implications for teacher training. Innovat. Lang. Learn. Teach. 16: 297–311, https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2022.2057503.Suche in Google Scholar

Bernad-Mechó, E. (in press). Building successful communication in EMI contexts: a multimodal approach to organizational metadiscourse in intercultural lectures. Chin. J. Appl. Ling.Suche in Google Scholar

Bernad-Mechó, E. (2015). A Multimodal Discourse Analysis of linking metadiscursive elements in two opencourseware lectures (MOOCs). Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 212: 61–66, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.299.Suche in Google Scholar

Bernad-Mechó, E. (2017). Metadiscourse and topic introductions in an academic lecture: a multimodal insight. Multimodal Commun. 6: 39–60, https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2016-0030.Suche in Google Scholar

Bernad-Mechó, E. (2021). Combining multimodal techniques to approach the study of academic lectures: a methodological reflection. Atlantis 43: 178–198, https://doi.org/10.28914/Atlantis-2021-43.1.10.Suche in Google Scholar

Bernad-Mechó, E. (2022). Modal density in structuring segments containing organizational metadiscourse versus content sequences. ESP Today J. 10: 2–21, https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2022.10.1.1.Suche in Google Scholar

Bernad-Mechó, E. and Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2019). Organizational metadiscourse across lecturing styles: engagement beyond language. In: Sancho-Guinda, C. (Ed.). Engagement in professional genres: deference and disclosure. John Benjamins, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, pp. 321–340.10.1075/pbns.301.17berSuche in Google Scholar

Bernad-Mechó, E. and Ruiz-Garrido, M.F. (2022). Fostering multimodal literacy in EME lecturers: a comparative analysis of metadiscourse as a multimodal guiding tool in English and in Spanish. In: 20th international AELFE conference. Communication in the academic, professional and political spheres during pandemic times, 14–15 Semptember 2022. Università Di Pisa.Suche in Google Scholar

Carrió-Pastor, M.L. (2022). Teaching multimodal metadiscourse in academic English as a foreign language. Porta Linguarum 4: 155–172, https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi.21423.Suche in Google Scholar

Costa, F. and Mair, O. (2022). Multimodality and pronunciation in ICLHE (integration of content and language in higher education) training. Innovat. Lang. Learn. Teach. 16: 281–296, https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2022.2053130.Suche in Google Scholar

Crawford-Camiciottoli, B. (2007). The Language of business studies lectures. A corpus-assisted analysis. John Benjamins, Amsterdam & Philadelphia.10.1075/pbns.157Suche in Google Scholar

Crawford Camiciottoli, B. (2015). Elaborating explanations during OpenCourseWare Humanities lectures: the interplay of verbal and nonverbal strategies. In: Crawford-Camiciottoli, B. and Fortanet-Gómez, I. (Eds.). Multimodal Analysis in academic settings: from Research to teaching. Routledge, New York, pp. 144–170.10.4324/9781315738758Suche in Google Scholar

Crawford Camiciottoli, B. (2016). A multimodal Analysis of Interaction in academic lectures: a case study. In: Bonsignori, V. and Crawford Camiciottoli, B. (Eds.). Multimodality across communicative settings, discourse domains and genres. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, pp. 65–92.Suche in Google Scholar

Crawford Camiciottoli, B. and Bonsignori, V. (2015). The pisa audiovisual corpus project: a multimodal approach to ESP research and teaching. ESP Today 3: 139–159.Suche in Google Scholar

Crawford Camiciottoli, B. and Campoy-Cubillo, M.C. (2018). Introduction: the nexus of multimodality, multimodal literacy, and English language teaching in research and practice in higher education settings. System 77: 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.03.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Dafouz, E. (2018). English-medium instruction and teacher education programmes in higher education: ideological forces and imagined identities at work. Int. J. Biling. Educ. BiLing. 21: 540–552, https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1487926.Suche in Google Scholar

De Groot, E., Nickerson, C., Korzilius, H., and Gerritsen, M. (2016). Picture this: developing a model for the analysis of visual metadiscourse. J. Bus. Tech. Commun. 30: 165–201, https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651915620235.Suche in Google Scholar

Doiz, A. and Lasagabaster, D. (2022). Looking into English-medium instruction teachers’ metadiscourse: an ELF perspective. System 105: 102730, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102730.Suche in Google Scholar

Drajati, N.A., Tan, L., Haryati, S., Rochsantiningsih, D., and Zainnuri, H. (2018). Investigating English language teachers in developing TPACK and multimodal literacy. Indones. J. Appl. Linguist. 7: 575–582, https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9806.Suche in Google Scholar

Dudley-Evans, T. (1994). Variations in the discourse patterns favoured by different disciplines and their pedagogical implications. In: Flowerdew, J. (Ed.). Academic listening: research perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 146–158.10.1017/CBO9781139524612.012Suche in Google Scholar

Fogarty-Bourget, C.G., Artemeva, N., and Fox, J. (2019). Gestural silence: an engagement device in the multimodal genre of the chalk talk lecture. In: Sancho Guinda, C. (Ed.). Engagement in professional genres: deference and disclosure. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, pp. 277–295.10.1075/pbns.301.15fogSuche in Google Scholar

Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2020). The dimensions of EMI in the international classroom: training teachers for the future University. In: Sánchez, M.M. (Ed.). Teacher training for english-medium instruction in higher education. IGI Global, Hershey, Pennsylvania, pp. 1–20.10.4018/978-1-7998-2318-6.ch001Suche in Google Scholar

Fortanet-Gómez, I. and Ruiz-Madrid, M.N. (2016). Multimodal humor in plenary lectures in English and in Spanish. Multimodal Commun. 5: 55–69, https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2016-0007.Suche in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: exploring interaction in writing. Continuum, London, England.Suche in Google Scholar

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: a social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge, London.Suche in Google Scholar

Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge, London, England.Suche in Google Scholar

Lockee, B.B. (2021). Online education in the post-COVID era. Nat. Electron. 4: 5–6, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-020-00534-0.Suche in Google Scholar

Malavska, V. (2016). Genre of an academic lecture. LLCE 3: 56–84, https://doi.org/10.1515/llce-2016-0010.Suche in Google Scholar

Morell, T. (2004). Interactive lecture discourse for university EFL students. Engl. Specif. Purp. 23: 325–338, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-4906(03)00029-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Morell, T. (2020). EMI teacher training with a multimodal and interactive approach: a new horizon for LSP specialists. Language Value 12: 56–87, https://doi.org/10.6035/languagev.2020.12.4.Suche in Google Scholar

Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction. A methodological framework. Routledge, New York.10.4324/9780203379493Suche in Google Scholar

Norris, S. (2017). Scales of action: an example of driving and car talk in Germany and North America. Text Talk 37: 117–139, https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0040.Suche in Google Scholar

O’Halloran, K. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. In: Hyland, K. and Paltridge, B. (Eds.). Companion to discourse. Continuum, London, pp. 120–137.Suche in Google Scholar

Pérez-Llantada, C. (2018). ELF and linguistic diversity in EAP writing pedagogy: academic biliteracy in doctoral education. In: Tatsioka, Z., Seidlhofer, B., Sifaki, N.C., and Ferguson, G. (Eds.). English in Europe - using english as a lingua franca in education in Europe. De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin, pp. 200–224.10.1515/9781501503115-010Suche in Google Scholar

Pirini, J. (2015). Research into tutoring: exploring agency and intersubjectivity. Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.Suche in Google Scholar

Querol-Julián, M. (2021). How does digital context influence interaction in large live online lectures? The case of English-medium instruction. Eur. J. Engl. Stud. 25: 299–317, https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2021.1988265.Suche in Google Scholar

Querol-Julián, M. and Crawford Camiciottoli, B. (2019). The impact of online technologies and English medium instruction on university lectures in international learning contexts: a systematic review. ESP Today 7: 2–23, https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2019.7.1.1.Suche in Google Scholar

Ruiz-Garrido, M.F. and Fortanet-Gómez, I. (Forthcoming). A multimodal analysis of an Integrating content and language in higher education (ICLHE) lecture: multimodal ensembles in action. Routledge, New York.Suche in Google Scholar

Ruiz-Madrid, M.N. and Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2016). A model for a multimodal analysis of asides in conference plenary lectures. E-Aesla 2: 157–168.Suche in Google Scholar

Scollon, R. (2001). Mediated discourse: the nexus of practice. Longman, London & New York.10.4324/9780203420065Suche in Google Scholar

Taylor, S.V. and Leung, C.B. (2020). Multimodal literacy and social interaction: Young children’s literacy learning. Early Child. Educ. J. 48: 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-00974-0.Suche in Google Scholar

Thompson, S.E. (2003). Text-structuring metadiscourse, intonation and the signaling of organization in academic lectures. J. Engl. Acad. Purp. 2: 5–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1475-1585(02)00036-x.Suche in Google Scholar

Varó Alcaraz, E. (2000). El inglés profesional y académico. Alianza Editorial, Madrid.Suche in Google Scholar

Waugh, G.H. and Waugh, R.F. (1999). The new technologies versus the lecture tradition in higher education: is change possible? Aust. J. Teach. Educ. 24: 35–51.10.14221/ajte.1999v24n1.3Suche in Google Scholar

Young, L. (1994). University lectures - macro-structure and micro-features. In: Flowerdew, J. (Ed.). Academic listening: research perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 159–176.10.1017/CBO9781139524612.013Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, L. and Lo, Y.Y. (2021). EMI teachers’ use of interactive metadiscourse in lecture organisation and knowledge construction. In: Lasagabaster, D. and Doiz, A. (Eds.). Language use in English-medium instruction at university. International perspectives on teacher practice. Routledge, New York & London, pp. 56–79.10.4324/9781003134534-4Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-02-19
Accepted: 2023-02-20
Published Online: 2023-03-13

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 26.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mc-2023-0007/pdf?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen