Home Critical learning episodes in the EFL classroom: a multimodal (inter)action analytical perspective
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Critical learning episodes in the EFL classroom: a multimodal (inter)action analytical perspective

  • Jorge Andrés Mejía-Laguna ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 10, 2023

Abstract

The present study centers on exploring how different modes such as speech, gesture, gaze, body posture, and head movement are employed by an EFL teacher and his students during a Critical Learning Episode (CLE). CLEs are brief instances of classroom interaction where the instructor and the researcher believe that learning is being fostered or inhibited. This article is part of a larger qualitative multiple-case study that took place at a private Colombian University. The lesson was videotaped and then analyzed within a Multimodal (Inter)action Analysis framework. Findings indicate that CLEs are created in a highly embodied, multimodal, and ecological manner through different modal configurations. Besides speech and writing, modes such as gestures, posture, gaze, and head movement played not a marginal, but prominent role, in performing various pedagogical classroom activities such as enhancing shared/ focused attention, strengthening alignment, helping teachers and learners to visually make meaning of morphological and syntactical units, and serving as devices to check for understanding.


Corresponding author: Jorge Andrés Mejía-Laguna, Languages Department, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Cundinamarca, Colombia, E-mail:

References

Allen, L.Q. (1995). The effects of emblematic gestures on the development and access of mental representations of French expressions. Mod. Lang. J. 79: 521–529, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05454.x.Search in Google Scholar

Allen, L.Q. (2000). Nonverbal accommodations in foreign language teacher talk. Appl. Lang. Learn. 11: 155.Search in Google Scholar

Álvarez Valencia, J.A. (2016). Meaning making and communication in the multimodal age: ideas for language teachers. Colomb. Appl. Ling. J. 18: 98, https://doi.org/10.14483/calj.v18n1.8403.Search in Google Scholar

Álvarez Valencia, J.A. and Michelson, K. (2022). A design perspective on intercultural communication in second/foreign language education. J. Int. Intercult. Commun. 15: 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2022.2066152.Search in Google Scholar

Archer, A. and Newfield, D. (2014). Challenges and opportunities of multimodal approaches to education in South Africa. In: Archer, A. and Newfield, D. (Eds.), Multimodal approaches to research and pedagogy: recognition, resources, and access. Routledge, New York, pp. 1–16.10.4324/9781315879475Search in Google Scholar

Arisandi, B. (2018). Classroom interaction patterns in EFL task-based classroom. J. ELT Res. 3: 186, https://doi.org/10.22236/JER_Vol3Issue2pp186-192.Search in Google Scholar

Atkinson, D. (Ed.) (2011). Alternative approaches to second language acquisition, 1st ed. Routledge, London; New York.10.4324/9780203830932Search in Google Scholar

Atkinson, D. and Shvidko, E. (2019). Natural pedagogy in second language learning and teaching. TESOL Q. 53: 1083–1114, https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.538.Search in Google Scholar

Atkinson, D., Churchill, E., Nishino, T., and Okada, H. (2007). Alignment and Interaction in a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. Mod. Lang. J. 91, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00539.x.Search in Google Scholar

Bezemer, J. and Kress, G. (2015). Multimodality, learning and communication: a social semiotic frame. Routledge, London; New York.10.4324/9781315687537Search in Google Scholar

Block, D. (2014). Moving beyond “Lingualism”: multilingual embodiment and multimodality in SLA. In: May, S. (Ed.), The multilingual turn: implications for SLA, TESOL, and bilingual education. Routledge, New York, pp. 54–77.Search in Google Scholar

Chapeton Castro, C.M. (2009). The use and functions of discourse markers in EFL classroom interaction. PROFILE Issues Teach.’ Prof. Dev. 11: 57–77.Search in Google Scholar

Cope, B. and Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies literacy learning and the design of social futures. Macmillan, London; New York.Search in Google Scholar

Cope, B. and Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: new literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: Int. J. 4: 164–195, https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800903076044.Search in Google Scholar

Csibra, G. and Gergely, G. (2011). Natural pedagogy as evolutionary adaptation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 366: 1149–1157, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0319.Search in Google Scholar

Davis, M., Kiely, R., and Askham, J. (2009). InSITEs into practitioner research: findings from a research-based ESOL teacher professional development programme. Stud. Educ. Adults 41: 118–137, https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2009.11661577.Search in Google Scholar

Dicks, B., Flewitt, R., Lancaster, L., and Pahl, K. (2011). Multimodality and ethnography: working at the intersection. Qual. Res. 11: 227–237, https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111400682.Search in Google Scholar

Domínguez, E. and Maíz, C. (2010). Multimodality and listening comprehension: testing and implementing classroom material. Lang. Value 2: 100–139.Search in Google Scholar

Duta, N., Panisoara, G., and Panisoara, I.-O. (2015). The effective communication in teaching. Diagnostic study regarding the academic learning motivation to students. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. 186: 1007–1012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.064.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2015). Understanding second language acquisition, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Flewitt, R. (2011). Bringing ethnography to a multimodal investigation of early literacy in a digital age. Qual. Res. 11: 293–310, https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111399838.Search in Google Scholar

Fujimoto, C. (2020). A multimodal analysis of teacher-student interactions in reading recovery writing sessions, Doctoral dissertation. Georgia State University, Scholar Works, Atlanta.Search in Google Scholar

Gardner, R. (2019). Classroom interaction research: the state of the art. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact.: State Art Key Areas Appl. Conversat. Anal. 52: 212–226, https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1631037.Search in Google Scholar

Geenen, J., Matelau-Doherty, T.M., and Norris, S. (2021). Visual transcription: a method to analyze the visual and visualize the audible in interaction. Rev. Fr. Méthodes Visuelles 5: 1–55.Search in Google Scholar

Gerber, H.R., Abrams, S.S., Curwood, J.S., and Magnifico, A. (2017). Conducting qualitative research of learning in online spaces. Sage, Los Angeles.10.4135/9781483398617Search in Google Scholar

Gibbons, P. (2003). Mediating language learning: teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. Tesol Q. 37: 247, https://doi.org/10.2307/3588504.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order: American sociological association, 1982 presidential address. Am. Socio. Rev. 48: 1–17, https://doi.org/10.2307/2095141.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. (2003). The body in action. In: Coupland, J. and Gwyn, R. (Eds.), Discourse, the body, and identity. Palgrave Macmillan, UK, pp. 19–42.10.1057/9781403918543_2Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse Soc. 18: 53–73, https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507069457.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, J.K. (2003). Classroom interaction and language learning. Ilha do Desterro A J. Engl. Lang. Lit.s Engl. Cult. Stud. 44: 17–39, https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8026.2003n44p165.Search in Google Scholar

Ismail, N. and Idris, K.L.N. (2009). The effects of classroom communication on students’ academic performance at the international Islamic university Malaysia (ilium). UNITAR. e-J. 5: 37–49.Search in Google Scholar

Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., and O’Halloran, K.L. (2016). Introducing multimodality. Routledge, London.10.4324/9781315638027Search in Google Scholar

Kiely, R. and Davis, M. (2010). From transmission to transformation: teacher learning in English for speakers of other languages. Lang. Teach. Res. 14: 277–295, https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810365241.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, S. (2016). The effects of multimodality through storytelling using various movie clips. In: Papadima-Sophocleous, S., Bradley, L., and Thouësny, S. (Eds.), CALL communities and culture – short papers from EUROCALL 2016. Research-publishing.net, Cyprus, pp. 221–224.10.14705/rpnet.2016.eurocall2016.565Search in Google Scholar

Kress, G.R. (2011). ‘Partnerships in research’: multimodality and ethnography. Qual. Res. 11: 239–260, https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111399836.Search in Google Scholar

Kress, G.R. and Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: the grammar of visual design. Routledge, London.Search in Google Scholar

Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511815355Search in Google Scholar

Lazaraton, A. (2004). Gesture and speech in the vocabulary explanations of one ESL teacher: a microanalytic inquiry. Lang. Learn. 54: 79–117, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9922.2004.00249.x.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00249.xSearch in Google Scholar

Li, D. and Zhang, L. (2020). Exploring teacher scaffolding in a CLIL-framed EFL intensive reading class: a classroom discourse analysis approach. Lang. Teach. Res. 26: 333–360, https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820903340.Search in Google Scholar

Macedonia, M. and Klimesch, W. (2014). Long-term effects of gestures on memory for foreign language words trained in the classroom. Mind Brain Educ. 8: 74–88, https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12047.Search in Google Scholar

Mackey, A. and Gass, S.M. (2016). Second language research: methodology and design, 2nd ed. Routledge, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Mega Putri, D. (2018). EFL classroom discourse; from the perspective of discourse analysis and conversation analysis. TELL-US J. 4: 33–46, https://doi.org/10.22202/tus.2018.v4i1.2387.Search in Google Scholar

Mejía-Laguna, J.A., Hernández-Ocampo, S.P., and Álvarez Valencia, J.A. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions on integrating a social networking site for language learning into English classes. Signo Pensamiento 40: 1–16, https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.syp40-78.ptpi.Search in Google Scholar

Merriam, S.B. and Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education, 2nd ed. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.Search in Google Scholar

Morett, L.M. (2014). When hands speak louder than words: the role of gesture in the communication, encoding, and recall of words in a novel second language. Mod. Lang. J. 98: 834–853, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12125.x.Search in Google Scholar

Nisa, S.H. (2014). Classroom interaction analysis in Indonesian EFL speaking class. Engl. Rev. 2: 124–132.Search in Google Scholar

Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: a methodological framework. Routledge, New York.10.4324/9780203379493Search in Google Scholar

Norris, S. (2016). Concepts in multimodal discourse analysis with examples from video conferencing. Yearbk. Poznan Ling. Meet. 2: 141–165, https://doi.org/10.1515/yplm-2016-0007.Search in Google Scholar

Norris, S. (2019). Systematically working with multimodal data: research methods in multimodal discourse analysis. Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken.10.1002/9781119168355Search in Google Scholar

Norris, S. (2020). Multimodal theory and methodology: for the analysis of (inter)action and identity. Routledge, London.10.4324/9780429351600Search in Google Scholar

Norris, S. and Pirini, J.P. (2017). Communicating knowledge, getting attention, and negotiating disagreement via videoconferencing technology: a multimodal analysis. J. Organ. Knowl. Commun. 3: 23, https://doi.org/10.7146/jookc.v3i1.23876.Search in Google Scholar

Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In: Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B.B. (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics. Academic Press, New York, pp. 43–72.Search in Google Scholar

Paesani, K., Allen, H.W., and Dupuy, B. (2016). A multiliteracies framework for collegiate foreign language teaching. Pearson, Boston.Search in Google Scholar

Pi, Z., Zhu, F., Zhang, Y., and Yang, J. (2021). An instructor’s beat gestures facilitate second language vocabulary learning from instructional videos: behavioral and neural evidence. Lang. Teach. Res. 25: 136216882110390, https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211039023.Search in Google Scholar

Sato, R. (2020). Gestures in EFL classroom: their relations with complexity, accuracy, and fluency in EFL teachers’ L2 utterances. System 89: 102215, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102215.Search in Google Scholar

Scollon, R. (2002). Mediated discourse: the nexus of practice, 1st ed. Routledge, London; New York.10.4324/9780203420065Search in Google Scholar

Shomoossi, N. (2004). The effect of teachers’ questioning behavior on EFL classroom interaction: a classroom research study. Read. Matrix 4: 96–104.Search in Google Scholar

Stake, R.E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. The Guilford Press, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Stein, P. (2008). Multimodal pedagogies in diverse classrooms: representation, rights and resources. Routledge, Hoboken.10.4324/9780203935804Search in Google Scholar

Stein, P. and Newfield, D. (2007). Multimodal pedagogies, representation and identity: perspectives from post-apartheid South Africa. In: Cummins, J. and Davison, C. (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching. Springer, New York, pp. 919–930.10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_61Search in Google Scholar

Tellier, M. (2008). The effect of gestures on second language memorisation by young children. Gesture 8: 219–235.10.1075/gest.8.2.06telSearch in Google Scholar

The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: designing social futures. Harv. Educ. Rev. 66: 60–93, https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u.Search in Google Scholar

van Compernolle, R.A. and Smotrova, T. (2014). Corrective feedback, gesture, and mediation in classroom language learning. Lang. Sociocult. Theor. 1: 25–47, https://doi.org/10.1558/71056194384.Search in Google Scholar

van Compernolle, R.A. and Smotrova, T. (2017). Gesture, meaning, and thinking-for-teaching in unplanned vocabulary explanations. Classr. Discourse 8: 194–213, https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2016.1275028.Search in Google Scholar

van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: a sociocultural perspective. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.10.1007/1-4020-7912-5Search in Google Scholar

Vera, F. (2014). Impacto de la multimodalidad en la comprensión lectora de textos narrativos en inglés como lengua extranjera (L2) en estudiantes universitarios. Contextos Educ. Rev. Educ. 18: 25, https://doi.org/10.18172/con.2608.Search in Google Scholar

Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: language in action. Routledge, London.10.4324/9780203827826Search in Google Scholar

Walsh, S. and Sert, O. (2019). Mediating L2 learning through classroom interaction. In: Gao, X. (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching. Springer International Publishing, pp. 737–755.10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_35Search in Google Scholar

Waring, H.Z. (2008). Using explicit positive assessment in the language classroom: IRF, feedback, and learning opportunities. Mod. Lang. J. 92: 577–594, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00788.x.Search in Google Scholar

Weihua, Y. (2010). An analysis of college English classroom questioning. J. Lang. Teach. Res. 1:136–144, https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.2.136-144.Search in Google Scholar

Witten, M. (2012). A critical examination of classroom literacy practices: a multimodal analysis. MEXTESOL J. 36: 19.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, X. and Ke, F. (2020). Embodied interaction: learning Chinese characters through body movements. Lang. Learn. Technol. 24: 136–159.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-02-13
Accepted: 2023-02-20
Published Online: 2023-03-10

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mc-2023-0006/html
Scroll to top button