Metadiscourse and Topic Introductions in an Academic Lecture: A Multimodal Insight

References

Ädel, A. (2005). On the boundaries between evaluation and metadiscourse. In: Strategies in Academic Discourse, E. Tognini-Bonelli and G. Dell Lungo Camiciotti (Eds.), 153–162. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.19.11adeSearch in Google Scholar

Ädel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.24Search in Google Scholar

Ädel, A. (2010). Just to give you kind of a map of where we are going: A taxonomy of metadiscourse in spoken and written academic English. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2):69–97.10.35360/njes.218Search in Google Scholar

Ädel, A., and Mauranen, A. (2010). Metadiscourse: diverse and divided perspectives. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2):1–11.10.35360/njes.215Search in Google Scholar

Bannink, A., and Van Dam, J. (2013). The first lecture: playing upon identities and modeling academic roles. Linguistics and Education, 24(4):556–571.10.1016/j.linged.2013.03.001Search in Google Scholar

Bernad-Mechó, E., and Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2017). Semiotic modes in the organization of lectures in English and in Spanish. In: Professional and Academic Discourse: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (Epic Series in Language and Linguistics, Volume 2), C. Vargas-Sierra (Ed.), 224–234. http://easychair.org/publications/volume/AESLA_2016.Search in Google Scholar

Cannam, C., Landone, C., and Sandler, M. (2010). Sonic visualiser: an open source application for viewing, analysing, and annotating music audio files. In MM’10. Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. Firenze, Italy – October 25–29, 2010, 1467–1468. New York, NY: ACM.10.1145/1873951.1874248Search in Google Scholar

Crawford-Camiciottoli, B. (2004). Interactive discourse structuring in L2 guest lectures: Some insights from a comparative corpus-based study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3:39–54.10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00044-4Search in Google Scholar

Crawford-Camiciottoli, B., and Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2015). Multimodal Analysis in Academic Settings: From Research to Teaching. New York & London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315738758Search in Google Scholar

Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., and Steffensen, M. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: a study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication, 10:39–71.10.1177/0741088393010001002Search in Google Scholar

Dudley-Evans, T. (1994). Variations in the discourse patterns favoured by different disciplines and their pedagogical implications. In: Academic Listening: Research Perspectives, J. Flowerdew (Ed.), 146–158. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Duff, P.A. (2010). Language socialization into academic discourse communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30(1):169–192.10.1017/S0267190510000048Search in Google Scholar

Fortanet-Gómez, I., and Ruiz-Madrid, M.N. (2015). Multimodal humour in plenary lectures in English and in Spanish. In: Multimodal Analysis in Academic Settings: From Research to Teaching, B. Crawford-Camiciottoli and I. Fortanet-Gómez (Eds.), 39–60. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315738758Search in Google Scholar

Fortanet-Gómez, I., and Ruiz-Madrid, M.N. (2016). Multimodal humor in plenary lectures in English and in Spanish. Multimodal Communication, 5(1):55–69.10.1515/mc-2016-0007Search in Google Scholar

Fox, J., and Artemeva, N. (2013). The cinematic art of teaching university mathematics: Chalk talk as embodied practice. Multimodal Communication, 1(1):83–103.10.1515/mc-2012-0007Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, M.A.K. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. New York: Elsevier North-Holland, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London, England: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K., and Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: a reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 6(2):156–177.10.1093/applin/25.2.156Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: linguistics and poetics. In: Style in Language, T.A. Sebeok (Ed.), 350–377. Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. (1998). On Language: Roman Jakobson. (L. R. Waugh & M. Monville-Burston, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, J.J., and Subtirelu, N.C. (2015). Metadiscourse in the classroom: A comparative analysis of EAP lessons and university lectures. English for Specific Purposes, 37:52–62.10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.005Search in Google Scholar

Mao, L.M. (1993). “I conclude not”: toward a pragmatic account of metadiscourse. Rhetoric Review, 11(2):265–289.10.1080/07350199309389006Search in Google Scholar

Mauch, M., Cannam, C., Bittner, R., Fazekas, G., Salamon, J., Dai, J., … Dixon, S. (2015). Computer-aided melody note transcription using the tony software: accuracy and efficiency. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Technologies for Music Notation and Representation (TENOR 2015), 25–30.Search in Google Scholar

Mauch, M., and Dixon, S. (2014). pYin: a fundamental frequency estimator using probabilistic threshold distributions. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 659–663. May 4–9, Florence, Italy.10.1109/ICASSP.2014.6853678Search in Google Scholar

Mauranen, A. (1993a). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: metatext in finnish-English economics text. English for Specific Purposes, 12:3–22.10.1016/0889-4906(93)90024-ISearch in Google Scholar

Mauranen, A. (1993b). Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric: A Textlinguistic Study. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

McKeachie, W., and Svinicki, M. (2013). Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers. 14th Edition. Boston: Cengage Learning.Search in Google Scholar

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nilson, L.B. (2016). Teaching at Its Best: A Research-Based Resource for College Instructors. 4th Edition. New York: Jossey-Bass.Search in Google Scholar

Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing Multimodal Interaction. A Methodological Framework. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203379493Search in Google Scholar

Norris, S. (2011). Indentity in (Inter)Action. Introducing Multimodal Interaction Analysis. Göttingen: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781934078280Search in Google Scholar

Norris, S. (2013). What is a mode? Smell, olfactory perception, and the notion of mode in multimodal mediated theory. Multimodal Communication, 2(2):155–169.10.1515/mc-2013-0008Search in Google Scholar

Norris, S. (2016). Concepts in multimodal discourse analysis with examples from video conferencing. Yearbook of the Poznań Linguistic Meeting, 2:141–165.10.1515/yplm-2016-0007Search in Google Scholar

Norris, S. (2017). Scales of action: an example of driving and car talk in Germany and North America. Text and Talk, 37(1):117–139.10.1515/text-2016-0040Search in Google Scholar

Palmer Silveira, J.C. (2002). Defining structure in business presentations: Linguistic features. In: Proposals and Resources for the Development of Oral Communication Skills, M.C. Campoy and M.P. Safont (Eds.), 185–202. Castelló de la Plana: Universitat Jaume I.Search in Google Scholar

Palmer Silveira, J.C. (2004). Delivery strategies in classroom lectures: organising the message. In: Current Trends in Intercultural, Cognitive and Social Pragmatics, P. Garcés Conejos, R. Gómez Morón, L. Fernández Amaya and M. Padilla Cruz (Eds.), 97–114. Sevilla: Editorial Kronos.Search in Google Scholar

Ruiz-Madrid, M.N., and Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2015). Contrastive multimodal analysis: conference plenary lectures in English and in Spanish. In: Multimodal Analysis in Academic Settings: From Research to Teaching, B. Crawford-Camiciottoli and I. Fortanet-Gómez (Eds.), 39–60. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Ruiz-Madrid, M.N., and Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2016). A model for a multimodal analysis of asides in conference plenary lectures. E-Aesla, 2:157–168.Search in Google Scholar

Scollon, R. (1998). Mediated Discourse as Social Interaction. London, New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Scollon, R. (2001). Mediated Discourse: The Nexus of Practice. London, New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Swales, J.M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.Search in Google Scholar

Thesen, L. (2016). The past in the present: modes, gaze and changing communicative practices in lectures. In: Multimodality in Higher Education, A. Archer and E.O. Breuer (Eds.), 31–52. Leiden, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, S.E. (2003). Text-structuring metadiscourse, intonation and the signaling of organization in academic lectures. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2:5–20.10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00036-XSearch in Google Scholar

Vande Kopple, W.J. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36(1):82–93.10.2307/357609Search in Google Scholar

Young, L. (1990). Language as Behaviour, Language as Code. A Study of Academic English. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Young, L. (1994). University lectures – macro-structure and micro-features. In: Academic Listening: Research Perspectives, J. Flowerdew (Ed.), 159–176, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar