Abstract
The study aimed to investigate the functional-pragmatic and communicative-pragmatic use of morphological and syntactic diminutive resources of Kazakh and English in the example of artistic contexts. The following methods were used: comparative-comparative, morphological-syntactic, communicative-pragmatic, analytical-synthetic, and contextual. This paper analysed the main morphological and syntactic resources used for word formation of diminutive adjectives in Kazakh and English languages. In particular, the results of the study showed that synthetic means (use of suffixal morphemes with diminutive semantics) and analytical means (use of special lexemes with diminutive semantics) are frequent in Kazakh. It was determined that suffixal morphemes to express the diminutiveness of adjectives were most often used to warn addressees about the properties of objects and phenomena, to soften categorical evaluation in Kazakh, to diminish the attributes of the object, to demonstrate the incompleteness of the attribute in English. This work can be used in the spheres of communicative linguistics, linguistic pragmatics, word formation, and morphology.
-
Conflicts of interest: The authors confirm, that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
-
Data availability: The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
References
Alexiadou, Artemis & Terje Lohndal. 2023. Germanic diminutives: A case study of a gap in Norwegian. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 26(2). 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-023-09141-7.Search in Google Scholar
Batool, Rabia & Tahir Saleem. 2023. Comparative construction morphology of diminutive forms in English and Urdu. Cogent Arts & Humanities 10(1). 2238998. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2238998.Search in Google Scholar
Bayramova, Agata. 2022. The structure, degrees and lexical meaning types of adjectives used in the Agbaba-Shoreyel slang. Scientific Notes of TNU Named After V.I. Vernadskyi. Series: Philology. Journalism 33(72). 160–164. https://doi.org/10.32782/2710-4656/2022.6.1/28.Search in Google Scholar
Bekbergenova, Gulaim. 2021. Gulaim Formation of nouns with diminutive meaning in modern Karakalpak language. International Journal on Orange Technologies 3(4). 21–24.Search in Google Scholar
Böhmerová, Ada. 2011. Suffixal diminutives and augmentatives in Slovak: A systemic view with some cross-linguistic considerations. Lexis – Journal in English Lexicology 6. 429.10.4000/lexis.429Search in Google Scholar
Chyzhykova, Olha. 2024. Analyzing lexical features and academic vocabulary in academic writing. International Journal of Philology 28(1). 72–80.10.31548/philolog15(1).2024.08Search in Google Scholar
Darginavičienė, Irena. 2023. The multilingualism: Language and cultural identity. Logos 116. 167–174.Search in Google Scholar
Fajardo, José A. Sánchez. 2022. Pejorative suffixes and combining forms in English (Studies in language companion series 222). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar
Hakimov, Muhammad & Yunusaliev Tulkinjon ugli. 2022. Emotional language and language units representing emotional-expressive meaning. Oriental Renaissance: Innovative, Educational, Natural and Social Sciences 2(10). 1283–1287.Search in Google Scholar
Haladzhun, Zoriana, Harmatiy Olha, Bidzilya Yuriy, Kunanets Nataliia & Shunevych Khrystyna. 2021. Hate speech in media towards the representatives of Roma ethnic community. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2870. 755–768.Search in Google Scholar
Huyghe, Richard & Rossella Varvara. 2023. Affix rivalry: Theoretical and methodological challenges. Word Structure 16(1). 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2023.0218.Search in Google Scholar
Kanasya, Alfonsa Vina & Barli Bram. 2022. Suffixes -ie and -y in modifying common first names. Journal of Language 4(2). 192–203. https://doi.org/10.30743/jol.v4i2.5879.Search in Google Scholar
Khan, Afzal. 2023. The diminutive morphological function between English and Pashto languages: A comparative study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10. 536. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02004-2.Search in Google Scholar
Kilani-Schoch, Marianne & Aris Xanthos. 2013. The adjective petit ‘small, little’ in French acquisition data: An example of the relationship between pragmatics and morphosyntactic development. Journal of Pragmatics 56. 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.008.Search in Google Scholar
Lee, Grace & Jun Ki Chung. 2025. The spiritual leadership of the founders of University Bible Fellowship. International Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Society 15(2). 23–40. https://doi.org/10.18848/2154-8633/cgp/v15i02/23-40.Search in Google Scholar
Manova, Stela & Dmitri Sitchinava. 2023. Slavic diminutive morphology: An interplay of scope, templates and paradigms. In Diminutives across languages, theoretical frameworks and linguistic domains. Mouton: De Gruyter. https://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19756.33921 (accessed 20 Mart 2024).10.1515/9783110792874-004Search in Google Scholar
Martel, Yann. 2014. Life of PI. Glasgow: Mary Glasgow Magazines.Search in Google Scholar
Mattiello, Elisa, Veronika Ritt-Benmimoun & Wolfgang Dressler. 2021. Asymmetric use of diminutives and hypocoristics to pet animals in Italian, German, English, and Arabic. Language & Communication 76. 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2020.11.004.Search in Google Scholar
Milo, Andianna. 2024. The concept of linguoculture in modern science: Formation and potential. Logos 118. 58–67.Search in Google Scholar
Mukhashin, Khaled Awadh Bin. 2018. Diminutivesin English and Hadhrami Arabic. Hadhramout University Journal of Humanities 15(1). 257–266.Search in Google Scholar
Parhat, Sardar, Mutallip Sattar, Askar Hamdulla & Abdurahman Kadir. 2023. Uyghur–Kazakh–Kirghiz text keyword extraction based on morpheme segmentation. Information 14(5). 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14050283.Search in Google Scholar
Rebrus, Péter & Péter Szigetvari. 2021. Diminutive formation in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Academica 68(1–2). 230–255. https://doi.org/10.1556/2062.2021.00481.Search in Google Scholar
Ryan, John & Victot Parra-Guinaldo. 2021. Spanish and Italian diminutives compared: Two alternatives of a single diasystem. Athens Journal of Philology 8(1). 53–78. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajp.8-1-3.Search in Google Scholar
Sarsenbaykyzy, Eda. 2021. Bagalym. Moscow: Litres.Search in Google Scholar
Schleh, Lysander. 2022. Diminutives in Yangxin Gan. Journal of Universal Language 23(1). 147–166. https://doi.org/10.22425/jul.2022.23.1.147.Search in Google Scholar
Shynkaruk, Vasyl. 2023. Revisiting syntax of coherent speech. International Journal of Philology 27(2). 6–12.10.31548/philolog14(2).2023.01Search in Google Scholar
Tadzhiboeva, Shokhsanam. 2021. Means of expressing the components of diminutive words in the German and Uzbek languages in accordance with national and cultural characteristics. Society and Innovation 2(10). 394–398.10.47689/2181-1415-vol2-iss10/S-pp394-398Search in Google Scholar
Takakura, Sandra. 2024. Contributions of the semiotics of culture as reading approach to O reino encantado dos pôneis 4D. Bakhtiniana 19(3). e63980e. https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-4573e63980.Search in Google Scholar
Türk, Utku. 2020. Tackling the augmentative puzzle in Turkish. Proceedings of the Workshop on Turkic and Languages in Contact with Turkic 5(1). 155–162. https://doi.org/10.3765/ptu.v5i1.4771.Search in Google Scholar
Vanhaverbeke, Margot & Renata Enghels. 2021. Diminutive constructions in bilingual speech. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 35. 183–213. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.00068.van.Search in Google Scholar
Voghera, Miriam. 2023. The role of diminutive suffixes in the Italian Time Nouns constructions: From approximation to focus? Journal of Word Formation 7(1). 263–286. https://doi.org/10.21248/zwjw.2023.1.93.Search in Google Scholar
Wittenberg, Eva & Andreas Trotzke. 2021. A psycholinguistic investigation into diminutive strategies in the East Franconian NP: Little schnitzels stay big, but little crooks become nicer. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 33(4). 405–436. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1470542721000052.Search in Google Scholar
Zivingi, Safia & Rafik Sulaiman. 2019. Comparative morphological analysis of diminutive and augmentative in English, Kurdish and Arabic. International Journal of Communication 9(2). 132–135.Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- “I was embroidering the towel with a sincere hand and praying to God for fate and godsend”: hybrid beliefs presented on Ukrainian rushnyks
- Pragmatic characteristics of diminutive adjectives in Kazakh and English languages
- Anthroponyms: the lexico-semantic approach to word formation and its social and cultural implications
- Unveiling humour in digital discourse: the pragmatic functions of humorous stickers in Spanish WhatsApp chat groups
- Gender stereotype: the features of development and functioning in the Kazakh language
- Cognitive foundations of the formation of communicative competencies in the theory of dialogue
- Family(jiārénmen) is not a family: a study on the construction of pragmatic identities in the generalization of Internet address term “jiārénmen”
- On the social meanings of avoiding fully-articulated explicatures and the role of pragmatics in utterance explication
- The issues of developing the historical subcorpus of the National Corpus of the Kazakh Language
- Corrigendum
- Corrigendum to: Translation of Perso-Arabic loanwords from Hindi into Polish: a pilot study
- Book Review
- Rod Ellis, Carsten Roever, Natsuko Shintani & Yan Zhu: Measuring Second Language Pragmatic Competence: A Psycholinguistic Perspective
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- “I was embroidering the towel with a sincere hand and praying to God for fate and godsend”: hybrid beliefs presented on Ukrainian rushnyks
- Pragmatic characteristics of diminutive adjectives in Kazakh and English languages
- Anthroponyms: the lexico-semantic approach to word formation and its social and cultural implications
- Unveiling humour in digital discourse: the pragmatic functions of humorous stickers in Spanish WhatsApp chat groups
- Gender stereotype: the features of development and functioning in the Kazakh language
- Cognitive foundations of the formation of communicative competencies in the theory of dialogue
- Family(jiārénmen) is not a family: a study on the construction of pragmatic identities in the generalization of Internet address term “jiārénmen”
- On the social meanings of avoiding fully-articulated explicatures and the role of pragmatics in utterance explication
- The issues of developing the historical subcorpus of the National Corpus of the Kazakh Language
- Corrigendum
- Corrigendum to: Translation of Perso-Arabic loanwords from Hindi into Polish: a pilot study
- Book Review
- Rod Ellis, Carsten Roever, Natsuko Shintani & Yan Zhu: Measuring Second Language Pragmatic Competence: A Psycholinguistic Perspective