Startseite Assessing the L2 pragmatic awareness of non-native EFL teacher candidates: Is spotting a problem enough?
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Assessing the L2 pragmatic awareness of non-native EFL teacher candidates: Is spotting a problem enough?

  • Karen Glaser

    Karen Glaser is Assistant Professor of TEFL/TEYL at University of Leipzig, Germany. She holds a PhD in English Applied Linguistics from Leuphana University Lüneburg/Germany, an MA in TESL from Kent State University, Ohio/USA, and an MA in English and Applied Linguistics from TU Dresden/Germany. Her research interests include interlanguage pragmatics, classroom interaction, L2 literacy acquisition, and digital media in TEFL. She has authored the monograph Inductive or Deductive? The Impact of Method of Instruction on the Acquisition of Pragmatic Competence in EFL, and her papers have appeared in edited volumes and international peer-reviewed journals such as Intercultural Pragmatics and Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition.

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 15. Oktober 2020

Abstract

The assessment of pragmatic skills in a foreign or second language (L2) is usually investigated with regard to language learners, but rarely with regard to non-native language instructors, who are simultaneously teachers and (advanced) learners of the L2. With regard to English as the target language, this is a true research gap, as nonnative English-speaking teachers (non-NESTs) constitute the majority of English teachers world-wide (Kamhi-Stein 2016). Addressing this research gap, this paper presents a modified replication of Bardovi-Harlig and Dörnyei’s (1998) renowned study on grammatical vs. pragmatic awareness, carried out with non-NEST candidates. While the original study asked the participants for a global indication of (in)appropriateness/ (in)correctness and to rate its severity, the participants in the present study were asked to identify the nature of the violation and to suggest a repair. Inspired by Pfingsthorn and Flöck (2017), the data was analyzed by means of Signal Detection Theory with regard to Hits, Misses, False Alarms and Correct Rejections to gain more detailed insights into the participants’ metalinguistic perceptions. In addition, the study investigated the rate of successful repairs, showing that correct problem identification cannot necessarily be equated with adequate repair abilities. Implications for research, language teaching and language teacher education are derived.

About the author

Karen Glaser

Karen Glaser is Assistant Professor of TEFL/TEYL at University of Leipzig, Germany. She holds a PhD in English Applied Linguistics from Leuphana University Lüneburg/Germany, an MA in TESL from Kent State University, Ohio/USA, and an MA in English and Applied Linguistics from TU Dresden/Germany. Her research interests include interlanguage pragmatics, classroom interaction, L2 literacy acquisition, and digital media in TEFL. She has authored the monograph Inductive or Deductive? The Impact of Method of Instruction on the Acquisition of Pragmatic Competence in EFL, and her papers have appeared in edited volumes and international peer-reviewed journals such as Intercultural Pragmatics and Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition.

References

Alcón-Soler, Eva. 2002. Relationship between teacher-led versus learners' interaction and the development of pragmatics in the EFL classroom. International Journal of Educational Research 37. 359–377.10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00010-7Suche in Google Scholar

Allami, Hamid & Amin Naeimi. 2011. A cross-linguistic study of refusals: An analysis of pragmatic competence development in Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Pragmatics 43(1). 385–406.10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.010Suche in Google Scholar

Bachman, Lyle F. & Adrian S. Palmer. 2010. Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen. 2013. Developing L2 pragmatics. Language Learning 63(1). 68–86.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00738.xSuche in Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen & Zoltan Dörnyei. 1998. Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic versus grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly 32(2). 233–262.10.2307/3587583Suche in Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen & Robert Griffin. 2005. L2 pragmatic awareness: Evidence from the ESL classroom. System 33. 401–415.10.1016/j.system.2005.06.004Suche in Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen & David Stringer. 2017. Unconventional expressions: Productive syntax in the L2 acquisition of formulaic language. Second Language Research 33(1). 61–90.10.1177/0267658316641725Suche in Google Scholar

Barron, Anne. 2003. Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics: Learning how to do things with words in a study abroad context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.108Suche in Google Scholar

Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar & Britta Freitag-Hild. Forthcoming. Interaktionale Kompetenzen im Englischunterricht beurteilen: Ein interdisziplinäres Seminar zur Entwicklung von Diagnosefähigkeiten im Lehramtsstudium [Assessing interactional competencies in EFL: An interdisciplinary EFL teacher training seminar on the development of diagnostic skills]. In Holger Limberg & Karen Glaser (eds.), Pragmatische Kompetenzen im schulischen Fremdsprachenunterricht [Pragmatic competences in primary and secondary EFL education] Frankfurt/M.: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1987. Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different? Journal of Pragmatics 11(2). 131–146.10.1016/0378-2166(87)90192-5Suche in Google Scholar

Cohen, Andrew D. 2018. Learning pragmatics from native and nonnative language teachers Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/COHEN9924Suche in Google Scholar

Ekiert, Monika, Sofia Lampropoulou, Andrea Révész & Eivind Torgersen. 2018. The effects of task type and L2 proficiency on discourse appropriacy in oral task performance. In Naoko Taguchi & YouJin Kim (eds.), Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics, 247–263. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.10.10ekiSuche in Google Scholar

Eslami, Zohreh R. & Abbass Eslami-Rasekh. 2008. Enhancing the pragmatic competence of non-native English speaking teacher candidates (NNESTCs) in an EFL context. In Eva Alcón-Soler & Alicia Martínez-Flor (eds.), Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing, 178–197. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847690869-011Suche in Google Scholar

Faerch, Claus & Gabriele Kasper. 1984. Pragmatic knowledge: Rules and procedures. Applied Linguistics 5(3). 214–225.10.1093/applin/5.3.214Suche in Google Scholar

Flöck, Ilka & Joanna Pfingsthorn. 2014. Pragmatik und Englischunterricht [Pragmatics and English language teaching]. In Wolfgang Gehring & Matthias Merkl (eds.), Englisch lehren, lernen, erforschen [Teaching, learning and researching English] 175–199. Oldenburg: BIS-Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Fulcher, Glenn & Rosina Marquez-Reiter. 2003. Task difficulty in speaking tests. Language Testing 20(3). 321–344.10.1191/0265532203lt259oaSuche in Google Scholar

Glaser, Karen. 2014. Inductive or deductive? The impact of method of instruction on the acquisition of pragmatic competence in EFL. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Glaser, Karen. 2018. Enhancing the role of pragmatics in primary English teacher training. Glottodidactica - An International Journal of Applied Linguistics 45(2). 119–131.10.14746/gl.2018.45.2.06Suche in Google Scholar

Grabowski, Kirby Cook. 2008. Investigating the construct validity of a performance test designed to measure grammatical and pragmatic knowledge. SPAAN Fellow Working Papers in Second or Foreign Language Assessment 6. 131–179.Suche in Google Scholar

Green, David & John Swets. 1966. Signal detection theory and psychophysics New York: Wiley.Suche in Google Scholar

Hudson, Thom, Emily Detmer & James Dean Brown. 1995. Developing prototypic measures of cross-cultural pragmatics. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Suche in Google Scholar

Huth, Thosten, Emma Betz & Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm. 2019. Rethinking language teacher training: Steps for making talk-in-interaction research accessible to practitioners. Classroom Discourse 10(1). 99–122.10.1080/19463014.2019.1570529Suche in Google Scholar

Huth, Thosten & Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm. 2006. How can insights from conversation analysis be directly applied to teaching L2 pragmatics? Language Teaching Research 10(1). 53–79.10.1191/1362168806lr184oaSuche in Google Scholar

Kamhi-Stein, Lia. 2016. The non-native English speaker teachers in TESOL movement. ELT Journal 70(2). 180–189.10.1093/elt/ccv076Suche in Google Scholar

Kasper, Gabriele & Kenneth R. Rose 2002. Pragmatic development in a second language. Mahwah, NJ: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Kreutel, Karen. 2007. “I’m not agree with you”. ESL learners’ expressions of disagreement. TESL-EJ 11(3), n3. Available at: http://tesl-ej.org/ej43/a1.pdf (accessed 3 August, 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of pragmatics New York: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, Jianda. 2006. Measuring interlanguage pragmatic knowledge of EFL learners. Frankfurt/M.: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar

Martí-Arnándiz, Otilia. 2008. Grammatical and pragmatic competence in EFL contexts: Do they really go hand in hand? In Eva Alcón-Soler (ed.), Learning how to request in an instructed language learning context 163–189. Bern: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar

McNicol, Donald. 2005. A primer of signal detection theory Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.10.4324/9781410611949Suche in Google Scholar

Ngai, Phyllis & Sandra Janusch. 2018. Professional development for TESL teachers: A course in transcultural pragmatics. TESL-EJ 22(3). n3. Available at: http://www.tesl-ej.org/pdf/ej87/a2.pdf (accessed 12 September, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar

Niezgoda, Kimberly & Carsten Roever. 2001. Pragmatic and grammatical awareness: A function of the learning environment? In Kenneth Rose & Gabriele Kasper (eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching, 63–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524797.008Suche in Google Scholar

Pfingsthorn, Joanna & Ilka Flöck. 2017. Die Bemessung pragmatischer Sprachbewusstheit: Precision und Recall im metalinguistischen Beurteilungstest [Assessing pragmatic awareness: Precision and recall in a metalinguistic judgment test]. Paper presented at the 27th Conference of the DGFF [German Association for Foreign Language Research], University of Jena, 27–30 September.Suche in Google Scholar

Povolna, Renata. 2012. Pragmatic awareness in teacher education. Acta Academica Karviniensia 12(1). 148–158.10.25142/aak.2012.014Suche in Google Scholar

Roever, Carsten. 2012. What learners get for free: Learning of routine formulae in ESL and EFL environments. ELT Journal 66(1). 10–21.10.1093/elt/ccq090Suche in Google Scholar

Rose, Kenneth R. 1997. Pragmatics in teacher education for nonnative-speaking teachers: A consciousness-raising approach. Language, Culture and Curriculum 10(2). 125–138.10.1080/07908319709525246Suche in Google Scholar

Schauer, Gila. 2006. Pragmatic awareness in ESL and EFL contexts: Contrast and development. Language Learning 56(2). 269–318.10.1111/j.0023-8333.2006.00348.xSuche in Google Scholar

Taguchi, Naoko. 2007. Task difficulty in oral speech act production. Applied Linguistics 28(1). 113-135.10.1093/applin/aml051Suche in Google Scholar

Taguchi, Naoko. 2011. The effect of L2 proficiency and study-abroad experience on pragmatic comprehension. Language Learning 61(3). 904–939.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00633.xSuche in Google Scholar

Thaler, Engelbert. 2012. Englisch unterrichten: Grundlagen, Kompetenzen, Methoden Teaching English: Principles, Competences, Methods Berlin: Cornelsen.Suche in Google Scholar

Thomas, Jenny. 1983. Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics 4(2). 91–112.10.1093/applin/4.2.91Suche in Google Scholar

Thomas, Jenny. 1995. Meaning in interaction. An introduction to pragmatics. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Wickens, Thomas. 2002. Elementary signal detection theory New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195092509.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Xu, Wei, Rod Case &Yu Wang. 2009. Pragmatic and grammatical competence, length of residence, and overall L2 proficiency. System 37(2). 205–216.10.1016/j.system.2008.09.007Suche in Google Scholar

Xiao, Feng. 2015. Proficiency effect on L2 pragmatic competence. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 5(4). 557–581.10.14746/sllt.2015.5.4.3Suche in Google Scholar

Young, Richard F. 2019. Interactional competence and L2 pragmatics. In Naoko Taguchi (ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics 93–110. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781351164085-7Suche in Google Scholar

Appendix: Scenarios

Unproblematic (U) situations

Snack Bar

Eric goes to the snack bar to get something to eat before class.

Assistant: May I help you?

Eric: A cup of coffee please.

Assistant: Would you like some cream in it?

Eric: Yes, please.

Shopping

Phil and Brad are co-workers who run into each other downtown while shopping. Phil’s wife

Pat is in another store waiting for Phil to pick her up from there. Brad is keen to keep discussing some work-related issues with Phil, but Phil doesn’t have the time for a chat.

Brad: … I am concerned, Phil, as you mentioned yesterday, that there may be a number of questions that just cannot be answered without me being there.

Phil: Uh, listen Brad, Pat’s waiting for me at the bookstore to pick her up.

Brad: Yeah? Okay.

Phil: Why don’t you call me later?

Books

Anna is talking to her professor in his office when she knocks over some books from his desk,

which fall to the floor on his side. The professor bends down to pick them up.

Anna (rushing to help him): Oh no! I'm really sorry! Let me help you pick them up.

Horse Ranch

Claire and Judy are co-workers at a horse ranch. They’re discussing house decorations.

Claire: The house is a piece of garbage but, you know, I’m getting attached to it.

Judy: The inside is starting to look nice because you’re renovating it.

Claire: The only thing that was done well on that house was the masonry work.

Judy: Well, anyway – it is starting to look nice on the inside.

Claire: Yeah, I guess... thanks. Listen, do we have enough time to run by the vet clinic before we pick up my truck? They close at 5:30.

Dinner

Leah would like to invite Mila, an exchange student, to her house for dinner, but Mila cannotcome.

Leah: Mila, would you like to come over for dinner this evening?

Mila: Oh, how nice, thank you…. But I’m sorry, I can’t. I'd really like to come but I have a difficult history test tomorrow and I need to study tonight.

Grammar (G) situations

Double Past

Sophia has borrowed a book from a classmate, Ben. Ben needs it back, but Sophia has forgotten to bring it.

Ben: Sophia, do you have the book I gave you last week?

Sophia: Oh…. Oh no…. I'm really sorry but I was in a rush this morning and I didn't brought it today.

Missing Auxiliary

After class, Alex would like to ask his instructor for a book.

Alex: Ms. Smith?

Ms. Smith: Yes, Alex?

Alex: Could I possibly borrow this book over the weekend if you not need it?

Advice

Peter is talking to his professor about an exam he failed and which he needs to retake. The conversation is almost finished.

Professor: Well, I think that's all I can help you with at the moment.

Peter: That's great. Thank you so much for all the advices.

Inversion

Kevin needs directions to the library. He asks another student.

Kevin: Excuse me, could you please tell me where is the library?

Missing Gerund

Andrew is Ken’s new colleague on the editorial team of their company’s newsletter. He has just e-mailed Ken his article draft on their cafeteria’s new vegan line when he meets him in the hallway.

Andrew: Hi Ken, I’ve just e-mailed you my cafeteria article for the newsletter.

Ken: Great, thanks, I’m looking forward to read it!

Pragmatics (P) situations

Missing Apology

Paul is going to the library to meet up with Michael to work on their presentation. He is quite late.

Paul: Hi Michael.

Michael: Hi… hey, I've been waiting for over half an hour for you. Weren't we supposed to meet at 4?

Paul: I couldn't come earlier. And anyway, we don't have to hurry anywhere.

Overpolite Request

Melissa goes to the snack bar to get something to eat before class.

Assistant: How can I help you?

Melissa: Would you be so kind as to give me a sandwich and a yogurt, please?

Missing Grounder

Lisa and her co-workers are planning her company’s annual get-together. Greg is in the middle of assigning the different tasks.

Greg: OK, so we'll need a restaurant that seats 45. Lisa, could you do an online search and check out the restaurants downtown for our next meeting?

Lisa: Uhm, no, sorry, I can't.

Impolite Request

Tim has made an appointment with his professor to talk about his research project. After discussing his ideas with her, he says:

Tim: Oh, and here is a draft of the consent form I’d like to give to the participants to sign. It would be good if you could double-check it for me.

Impolite Suggestion

Nicole is on campus and happens to walk by the office of one of her instructors. This reminds her that she needs to ask him something about her term paper. She knocks on the door.

Instructor: Yes, come in.

Nicole: Hello, Mr. Gordon. Are you busy?

Instructor: Erm ... I'm afraid so. Could you come back later?

Nicole: OK, I'll be here tomorrow morning at 9.

Published Online: 2020-10-15
Published in Print: 2020-07-28

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 5.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lpp-2020-0003/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen