“There was much new to grok”: an analysis of word coinage in science fiction literature

References

Bauer, Laurie & Rodney Huddleston. 2002. Lexical word formation. In Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.), The Cambridge grammar of the English language, 1621–1721. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530.020Search in Google Scholar

Beliaeva, Natalia. 2019. Blending in morphology. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.511.Search in Google Scholar

Berlin, Brent, Dennis Breedlove & Peter Raven. 1974. Principles of Tzeltal plant classification. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-785047-4.50012-XSearch in Google Scholar

BNC Consortium. 2007. The British National Corpus, XML edition. Oxford: Oxford Text Archive. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12024/2554 (accessed 29 June 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Burnard, Lou. 2007. Reference guide for the British National Corpus (XML edition). http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/docs/URG/(accessed 29 June 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner. 2002. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Hanks, Patrick. 2009. The impact of corpora on dictionaries. In Paul Baker (ed.), Contemporary corpus linguistics, 214–237. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Heider, Eleanor. 1971. “Focal” color areas and the development of color names. Developmental Psychology 4. 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030955.Search in Google Scholar

Kristiansen, Marita & Gisle Andersen. 2012. Corpus approaches to neology and their relevance for dynamic domains. Neologica 6. 43–62.Search in Google Scholar

Manning, Christopher, Mihai Surdeanu, John Bauer, Jenny Finkel, Steven Bethard & David McClosky. 2014. The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. In Kalina Bontcheva & Jingbo Zhu (eds.), Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System demonstrations, 55–60. Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.3115/v1/P14-5010Search in Google Scholar

Miller, George, A. 1995. WordNet: A lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM 38(11). 39–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/219717.219748.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, George A., Richard Beckwith, Christiane Fellbaum, Derek Gross & Katherine J. Miller. 1990. Introduction to WordNet: An on-line lexical database. International Journal of Lexicography 3(4). 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/3.4.235.Search in Google Scholar

Moon, Rosamund. 2007. Sinclair, lexicography, and the Cobuild Project: The application of theory. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12(1). 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.12.2.05moo.Search in Google Scholar

OED Online. 2022a. Telepath, n. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/37623394?rskey=h4uls1 (accessed 29 June 2022).Search in Google Scholar

OED Online. 2022b. Grok, v. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/81710?redirectedFrom=grok (accessed 29 June 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Prucher, Jeff. 2007. Brave new words: The Oxford dictionary of science fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Renouf, Antoinette. 1993. A word in time: First findings from dynamic corpus investigation. In Jan Aarts, Pierter de Haan & Oostdijk Nelleke (eds.), English language corpora: Design, analysis and exploitation, 279–288. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004653559_021Search in Google Scholar

Rogers, Adam. 2021. A new way to trace the history of sci-fi’s made-up words. WIRED, 27 January. https://www.wired.com/story/historical-dictionary-of-science-fiction/ (accessed 29 June 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor. 1973. On the internal structure of perception and semantic categories. In Timothy Moore (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language, 111–144. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor. 1975. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104. 193–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192.Search in Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor & Caroline Mervis. 1975. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7. 573–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9.Search in Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor, Caroline Mervis, Wayne Gray, David Johnson & Penny Boyes-Braem. 1976. Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 8. 382–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-x.Search in Google Scholar

Saeed, John I. 2009. Semantics, 3rd edn. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Sheidlower, Jesse. 2020. Historical dictionary of science fiction. https://sfdictionary.com/ (accessed 29 June 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John. 1987. The dictionary of the future. Library Review 36(4). 268–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb012852.Search in Google Scholar

Ungerer, Friedrich & Hans-Jörg Schmid. 2006. An introduction to cognitive linguistics, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Wiktionary. 2022. Conapt, n. San Francisco: Wikimedia Foundation. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/conapt (accessed 30 October 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Wright, David E. 2008. Do words have inherent meaning? ETC: A Review of General Semantics 65(2). 177–190.Search in Google Scholar