Home Perceiving with strangeness: quantifying a style of altered consciousness as estrangement in a corpus of 1960s American science fiction
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Perceiving with strangeness: quantifying a style of altered consciousness as estrangement in a corpus of 1960s American science fiction

  • Elizabeth Oakes ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 27, 2023

Abstract

In 1960s American science fiction, representations of altered consciousness may function as a novum, framing how protagonists perceive and interact with the storyworld, motivating their actions, and estranging readers. Representations of these states are rooted in the lexical particulars of style, which became of central concern to the rising New Wave subgenre. As a result of the defamiliarized focalization of altered consciousness, estranged readers confront in fresh ways core sociocultural concerns of the era embedded in the thematics of the novels. For this reason, it is fruitful to ask how the language of altered consciousness can be characterized. What lexical elements defamiliarize the focalization giving rise to estrangement? This paper addresses this question through a computational literary linguistic approach. Quantifying the lexical composition of altered states with content analysis dictionaries and performing cluster analysis uncovers underlying similarities within a corpus of 1960s American science fiction novels. The language of altered consciousness is then identified as a language of estrangement through stylistic close reading. This provides one route into understanding how a novum may be constructed of language, estrange the reader, and prompt reexamination of the formerly familiar through staying with strangeness.


Corresponding author: Elizabeth Oakes, Department of Languages, Faculty of Arts, University of Helsinki, Metsätalo C604, Unioninkatu 40, 00014 Helsinki, Finland, E-mail:

References

Primary

Budrys, Algis. 1960. Rogue moon. London: Gollancz.Search in Google Scholar

Delany, Samuel R. 1966. Babel-17. New York: Vintage Books.Search in Google Scholar

Dick, Philip K. 2004 [1964]. The three stigmata of Palmer Eldritch. In Five great novels, 1–157. London: Gollancz.Search in Google Scholar

Disch, Thomas M. 1968. Camp concentration. New York: Vintage Books.Search in Google Scholar

Galouye, Daniel F. 1961. Dark universe. New York: Bantam Books.Search in Google Scholar

Harrison, Harry. 1962. Planet of the damned. New York: TOR.Search in Google Scholar

Herbert, Frank. 1969. Dune Messiah. New York: Berkley Books.Search in Google Scholar

Lafferty, R. A. 2018 [1969]. Fourth mansions. In R. A. Lafferty: Three great novels. London: Gollancz.Search in Google Scholar

Leiber, Fritz. 1964. The wanderer. New York: TOR.Search in Google Scholar

Norton, Andre. 1965. The X factor. Greenwich: Fawcett Crest.Search in Google Scholar

Pohl, Frederik. 1965. A plague of pythons. New York: Ballantine Books.Search in Google Scholar

Schmitz, James H. 1966. The witches of Karres. New York: Ace Books.Search in Google Scholar

Wilhelm, Kate. 1967. The killer thing. New York: Doubleday.Search in Google Scholar

Zelazny, Roger. 1966. The dream master. New York: iBooks.Search in Google Scholar

Secondary

Broderick, Damien. 2003. New Wave and backwash: 1960–1980. In Edward James & Farah Mendlesohn (eds.), The Cambridge companion to science fiction, 48–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Enns, Anthony. 2006. Media, drugs, and schizophrenia in the works of Philip K. Dick. Science Fiction Studies 33(1). 68–88.Search in Google Scholar

Feder, Lilian. 1980. Madness in literature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Felman, Shoshana. 2003. Writing and madness (literature/philosophy/psychoanalysis). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Golumbia, David. 1996. Resisting “the world”: Philip K. Dick, cultural studies, and metaphysical realism. Science Fiction Studies 23(1). 3–102.Search in Google Scholar

Le Guin, Ursula K. 1972. The word for world is forest. In Harlan Ellison (ed.), Again, dangerous visions, 30–108. New York: Doubleday.Search in Google Scholar

Lowe, Will. 2015. Yoshikoder: Cross-platform multilingual content analysis, version 0.6.5 [Java software]. https://yoshikoder.org (accessed 18 September 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Mahlberg, Michaela. 2014. Corpus stylistics. In Michael Burke (ed.), The Routledge handbook of stylistics, 378–392. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Mandala, Susan. 2010. Language in science fiction and fantasy: The question of style. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar

Martindale, Colin. 2008. The laws governing the history of poetry. In Sonia Zyngier, Marisa Bortolussi, Anna Chesnokova & Jan Auracher (eds.), Directions in empirical literary studies: In honor of Willie van Peer, 229–242. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Martindale, Colin & Alan N. West. 2002. Quantitative hermeneutics: Inferring the meaning of narratives from trends in their content. In Max Louwerse & Willie van Peer (eds.), Thematics: Interdisciplinary studies, 377–395. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Metzinger, Thomas. 2009. The ego tunnel: The science of the mind and the myth of the self. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Norledge, Jessica. 2021. Modelling an unethical mind. In Alice Bell, Sam Browse, Alison Gibbons & David Peplow (eds.), Style and reader response: Minds, media, methods, 43–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Norledge, Jessica. 2022. Experiencing dystopia through umwelt: Modelling the nonhuman animal in Hollow Kingdom. English Studies 103(3). 386–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838x.2022.2043003.Search in Google Scholar

Oakes, Elizabeth. 2017. Altered states in speculative fiction: A computational stylistic analysis. Helsinki: University of Helsinki MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Parrinder, Patrick. 2000. Revisiting Suvin’s poetics of science fiction. In Patrick Parrinder (ed.), Learning from other worlds: Estrangement, cognition, and the politics of science fiction and utopia, 36–50. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Piper, Andrew. 2018. Enumerations: Data and literary study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Seth, Anil. 2021. Being you: A new science of consciousness. United States: Dutton.Search in Google Scholar

Silverberg, Robert. 1974. Drug themes in science fiction. Rockville: National Institute on Drug Abuse.Search in Google Scholar

Spiegel, Simon. 2008. Things made strange: On the concept of “estrangement” in science fiction theory. Science Fiction Studies 35(3). 369–385.Search in Google Scholar

Stockwell, Peter. 2000. The poetics of science fiction. Harlow: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Suvin, Darko. 1979. Metamorphoses of science fiction: On the poetics and history of a literary genre. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Underwood, Ted. 2019. Distant horizons: Digital evidence and literary change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wells, H. G. 1898. The war of the worlds. London: William Heineman.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-12-27
Accepted: 2023-02-24
Published Online: 2023-10-27

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 20.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingvan-2022-0165/html
Scroll to top button