Home Speech style variation in an endangered language
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Speech style variation in an endangered language

  • Nala H. Lee EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 28, 2022

Abstract

Baba Malay encodes a coarse-refined contrast in speech styles, with the vowel [ɛ] being traditionally restricted to the use of refined word forms. Coarse forms ending with [al], [aɾ], and [as] contrast with refined forms that end with [ɛ], which are used when the speaker wants to be perceived as being particularly refined. A comparison of natural conversational speech with careful performative speech supports the claim that speakers of endangered languages are not “monostylistic”. Production data from eight speakers across different age groups show that the [ɛ] forms more commonly occur in the careful performative speech of younger speakers, as compared to when they converse more informally. No such trend is established for older speakers. The production data is considered together with the findings of a previously-executed matched-guise experiment, which shows that younger speakers in particular are reanalyzing the refined forms as being emblematic of community identity. In this study, younger speakers appear to be using [ɛ] to index an ideal speaker of Baba Malay in their careful performative speech. The research highlights that speakers of endangered languages, and even members of the younger generation, do have access to multiple styles.


Corresponding author: Nala H. Lee, Department of English Language and Literature, National University of Singapore, 7 Arts Link, 117570, Singapore, Singapore, E-mail:

Funding source: Ministry of Education Singapore AcRF Tier 1

Award Identifier / Grant number: R-103-000-150-133

  1. Ethical approval: The study was approved by the National University of Singapore Institutional Review Board, including a waiver of informed consent as it was determined that the research presents no more than minimal risk to subjects and a waiver of informed consent would not adversely affect the rights and welfare of subjects.

  2. Research funding: This research was funded by Ministry of Education Singapore AcRF Tier 1 (Award Number: R-103-000-150-133).

References

Andersen, Roger W. 1982. Determining the linguistic attributes of language attrition. In Richard Lambert & Barbara Freed (eds.), The loss of language skills, 83–118. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Ansaldo, Umberto & Stephen Matthews. 1999. The Minnan substrate and creolization in Baba Malay. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 27(1). 38–68.Search in Google Scholar

Ansaldo, Umberto, Lisa Lim & Salikoko S. Mufwene. 2007. The sociolinguistic history of the Peranakans: What it tells us about “creolization”. In Umberto Ansaldo, Stephen Matthews & Lisa Lim (eds.), Deconstructing Creole (Typological studies in language 73), 203–226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.73.11ansSearch in Google Scholar

Babel, Molly. 2008. The phonetic and phonological effects of moribundity. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 14(2). 24–34.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle & Martha C. Muntzel. 1989. The structural consequences of language death. In Nancy Dorian (ed.), Investigating obsolescence: Studies in language contraction and death, 181–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620997.016Search in Google Scholar

Chambers, Jack K., Trudgill Peter & Natalie Schilling-Estes. 2002. The handbook of language variation and change. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1111/b.9781405116923.2003.00026.xSearch in Google Scholar

Dorian, Nancy C. 1977. The problem of the semi-speaker in language death. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 12. 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1977.12.23.Search in Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic variation as social practice: The linguistic construction of identity at Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Kasstan, Jonathan R. 2019. Emergent sociolinguistic variation in severe language endangerment. Language in Society 48(5). 685–720. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404519000472.Search in Google Scholar

Klingler, Thomas A. & Amanda LaFleur. 2007. L’enquête PFC en Louisiane. In Sylvain Detey & Dominique Nouveau (eds.), Bulletin PFC N. 7, PFC: Enjeux descriptifs, théoriques et didactiques 2007, 331–340. Toulouse: Université de Toulouse II.Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1963. The social motivation of a sound change. WORD 19. 273–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1963.11659799.Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 2001. Principles of linguistic change, Volume 2: Social factors. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Nala H. 2014. A grammar of Baba Malay with sociophonetic considerations. Manoa: University of Hawai’i PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Nala H. 2018. Baba Malay: Diverging trends in two ecologies. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 33(1). 136–173. https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00004.lee.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Nala H. 2020. Utilizing the matched-guise as a method of examining perceptual change in an endangered creole. Applied Linguistics 42(2). 207–229. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaa011.Search in Google Scholar

Lim, Lisa. 2016. The art of losing: Beyond java, patois and postvernacular vitality – Repositioning the periphery in global Asian ecologies. In Luna Filipović & Pütz Martin (eds.), Endangered languages and languages in danger: Issues of documentation, policy, and language rights, 283–312. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/impact.42.12limSearch in Google Scholar

Mansfield, John & James Stanford. 2017. Documenting sociolinguistic variation in lesser-studied indigenous communities: Challenges and practical solutions. Language Documentation & Conservation 13. 116–136.Search in Google Scholar

Margetts, Anna & Andrew Margetts. 2012. Audio and video recording techniques for linguistic research. In Nicholas Thieberger (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic fieldwork, 13–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199571888.013.0002Search in Google Scholar

Meyerhoff, Miriam. 2015. Keeping a foot in the door: Variation and language documentation. Paper presented at the conference New Ways of Analyzing Variation, 22–25 October. University of Toronto.Search in Google Scholar

Meyerhoff, Miriam. 2019. Unnatural bedfellows? The sociolinguistic analysis of variation and language documentation. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 49(2). 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2019.1619599.Search in Google Scholar

Nagy, Naomi. 2009. The challenges of less commonly studied languages: Writing a sociogrammar of Faetar. In James N. Stanford & Dennis R. Preston (eds.), Variation in indigenous minority languages, 397–417. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/impact.25.20nagSearch in Google Scholar

Pakir, Anne. 1994. Educational linguistics: Looking to the East. In Alatis James (eds.), Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics, 370–383. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schilling-Estes, Natalie. 1998. Investigating ‘self-conscious’ speech: The performative register in Ocracoke English. Language in Society 27. 53–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500019722.Search in Google Scholar

Tan, Chee Beng. 1988. The Baba of Melaka: Culture and identity of a Chinese Peranakan community in Malaysia. Petaling Jaya: Pelanduk Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 1974. The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wee, Peter. 2013. Memories relieved. Talk presented at In Conversation: All things Peranakan. Singapore: Asian Civilizations Museum.Search in Google Scholar

Wolfram, Walt. 2002. Language death and dying. In Jack K. Chambers, Trudgill Peter & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), Handbook of language change and variation, 764–787. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470756591.ch29Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-03-02
Accepted: 2021-03-03
Published Online: 2022-04-28

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Research Articles
  3. Introduction to sound change in endangered or small speech communities
  4. Where have all the sound changes gone? Phonological stability and mechanisms of sound change
  5. Where have all the sound changes gone? Examining the scarcity of evidence for regular sound change in Australian languages
  6. Cross-dialectal synchronic variation of a diachronic conditioned merger in Tlingit
  7. Vowel harmony in Laz Turkish: a case study in language contact and language change
  8. The evolution of tonally conditioned allomorphy in Triqui: evidence from spontaneous speech corpora
  9. Sound change and gender-based differences in isolated regions: acoustic analysis of intervocalic phonemic stops by Bora-Spanish bilinguals
  10. Place uniformity and drift in the Suzhounese fricative and apical vowels
  11. Flexibility and evolution of cue weighting after a tonal split: an experimental field study on Tamang
  12. The emergence of bunched vowels from retroflex approximants in endangered Dardic languages
  13. The expanding influence of Thai and its effects on cue redistribution in Kuy
  14. Speech style variation in an endangered language
  15. Sound change in Aboriginal Australia: word-initial engma deletion in Kunwok
  16. The dental-alveolar contrast in Mapudungun: loss, preservation, and extension
  17. Sound change or community change? The speech community in sound change studies: a case study of Scottish Gaelic
  18. Phonetic transfer in Diné Bizaad (Navajo)
  19. The evolution of flap-nasalization in Hoocąk
  20. Sound change and tonogenesis in Sylheti
  21. Exploring variation and change in a small-scale Indigenous society: the case of (s) in Pirahã
  22. Rhotics, /uː/, and diphthongization in New Braunfels German
  23. Generational differences in the low tones of Black Lahu
Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingvan-2021-0029/html
Scroll to top button