Home Phonetic transfer in Diné Bizaad (Navajo)
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Phonetic transfer in Diné Bizaad (Navajo)

  • Kayla Palakurthy ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 17, 2022

Abstract

Research on bilingual populations finds that phonetic transfer between languages is common, especially in similar sounds. Yet, phonetic studies that include bilingual speakers of Indigenous languages remain rare. This paper analyzes phonetic transfer in Diné Bizaad (Navajo), a Dene language indigenous to North America. Specifically, I examine the evidence for intergenerational change and convergence with English in the release period durations of Diné affricated stops [kx, tx]. The analysis is based on tokens of Diné [kx, tx] and English [kh, th] extracted from recent interviews with 51 Diné-English bilinguals. Release durations of targeted sounds are measured, compared with earlier analogous measurements, and statistically analyzed to assess age effects. Participants, especially younger speakers, are predicted to produce Diné [kx, tx] with shorter releases than earlier measurements, and with releases that align more with similar English sounds. Data confirm that speakers pronounce Diné [kx], but not [tx], with shorter durations; younger participants also produce [kx] with the shortest releases, and with durations closest to English [kh]. Results suggest that perceptual similarity between velar sounds leads to phonetic convergence, but alveolar sounds are sufficiently distinct to prevent transfer. Together, findings attest to the relevance of minority language contexts to theories of bilingual phonology.


Corresponding author: Kayla Palakurthy, Linguistics, University of California, Davis, CA, USA, E-mail

Award Identifier / Grant number: Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grant/1, Graduate Research Fellowship Program/2014178334, Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences Postdoct

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the National Science Foundation (GRFP 2014178334; DDIG 1713793; SPRF 1907948). Thank you to the Diné participants; to Barsine Benally, Louise Ramone, and Melvatha Chee for their help in recruiting; and to Marianne Mithun, Matthew Gordon, Eric Campbell, and Lorene B. Legah for feedback on earlier versions of this analysis.

Appendix A: Examples of tokens of the relevant sounds

(1)
Diné [tx] [audio-1.wav]
t . [sɪtxaɬ]
sé-tał
1singular.perfective-perfective.kick.it
‘I kicked it.’[4]
(2)
Diné [t] [audio-2.wav]
d á. [sɪta]
sé-dá
1singular.perfective-perfective.sit
‘I sit.’
(3)
English [th] [audio-3.wav]
for some t ime [fəɹ sʌm t h aɪm]
(4)
Diné [kx] [audio-4.wav]
’Atoo’ naa deesh k ááł. [ʔathoːʔ naː tɛːʃkxaːɬ]
’atoo’ n-aa deesh-kááł
stew you-to 1singular.future-future.carry.open.container
‘I will bring you stew.’ (Elsie Whitehorse Walck Interview 00:15:31)[5]
(5)
Diné [k] [audio-5.wav]
g ah [kah]
gah
‘rabbit’ (Elsie Whitehorse Walck Interview 00:08:59)
(6)
English [kh] [audio-6.wav]
of where they c ome from [əv ɰeɪɹ ðeɪ k h ʌm fɹʌm]
(Elsie Whitehorse Walck Interview 00:42:01)

Appendix B: Statistical model output

Table 6:

Random effects output.

Group Name Variance Standard deviation N
Words (Intercept) 102.7 10.13 94
Speaker (Intercept) 229.3 15.14 51
Residual 496.9 22.29
Table 7:

Fixed effects output.

Estimate Standard error df t value
(Intercept) [kx], C_, Following vowel a, Middle-aged, Discourse 99.44 4.46 177.62 22.28
Segment [tx] [tx] 22.91 3.10 66.85 7.38
Phonetic environment Word-initial −15.58 3.39 2,021.42 −4.60
V_V 10.08 2.61 1,469.06 3.86
Age Older −2.92 5.67 90.36 −0.52
Younger −21.43 4.32 897.04 −4.96
Source Words 1.32 2.61 1,922.35 0.50
Following vowel e −5.19 4.02 60.28 −1.29
i 0.51 4.24 58.77 0.12
o 1.38 4.39 103.67 0.32
Segment*Age [tx]:Older −3.26 2.10 2,851.76 −1.55
[tx]:Younger 5.89 2.20 2,844.74 2.68
Age*Source Older:Words −6.62 2.65 2,865.08 −2.50
Younger:Words −0.55 2.88 2,896.20 −0.19
Phonetic environment*Source Word-initial:Words 7.89 3.44 2,485.40 2.30
V_V:Words −5.56 2.97 2,054.81 −1.87
Age*Following vowel Older:e 4.59 2.81 2,852.75 1.63
Younger:e 5.44 3.02 2,851.02 1.80
Older:i 5.29 2.88 2,846.08 1.84
Younger:i 9.07 2.98 2,854.45 3.04
Older:o 4.44 2.85 2,854.09 1.56
Younger:o 11.97 3.06 2,842.52 3.91

References

Babel, Molly. 2009. The phonetic and phonological effects of obsolescence in Northern Paiute. In James Stanford & Dennis Preston (eds.), Variation in Indigenous minority languages, 23–46. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/impact.25.03babSearch in Google Scholar

Baker, Wendy & Pavel Trofimovich. 2005. Interaction of native and second-language vowel systems in early and late Bilinguals. Language and Speech 48(1). 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309050480010101.Search in Google Scholar

Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.Search in Google Scholar

Benally, AnCita & Denis Viri. 2005. Diné bizaad [Navajo language] at a crossroads: Extinction or renewal? Bilingual Research Journal 29(1). 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2005.10162825.Search in Google Scholar

Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2017. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer, version 6.0.29 [Computer program]. Available at: http://www.praat.org/.Search in Google Scholar

Bullock, Barbara & Chip Gerfen. 2004. Phonological convergence in a contracting language variety. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(2). 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728904001452.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle & Martha Muntzel. 1989. The structural consequences of language death. In Nancy Dorian (ed.), Investigating obsolescence: Studies in language contraction and death, 181–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620997.016Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace (ed.). 1980. The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Charles. 2009. Convergence and divergence in language obsolescence. In Manghyu Pak (ed.), Current issues in unity and diversity of languages, 933–952. Seoul: Linguistic Society of Korea.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Charles. 2010. First language phonetic drift during second language acquisition. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley dissertation.10.5070/P794F9Q5V7Search in Google Scholar

Craig, Vincent. 1994. Rita [Live recording]. xXJustinDArealXx’s YouTube channel, 27 September 2010. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YxeJ8HD-FU (accessed 4 April 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Flege, James. 1987. The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics 15. 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0095-4470(19)30537-6.Search in Google Scholar

Flege, James. 1991. Age of learning affects the authenticity of voice-onset time (VOT) in stop consonants produced in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89. 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.400473.Search in Google Scholar

Flege, James. 1995. Two methods for training a novel second-language phonetic contrast. Applied Psycholinguistics 16. 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716400066029.Search in Google Scholar

Flege, James & Wieke Eefting. 1987. Cross-language switching in stop consonant perception and production by Dutch speakers of English. Speech Communication 6. 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(87)90025-2.Search in Google Scholar

Fowler, Carol, Valery Sramko, David Ostry, Sarah Rowland & Pierre Hallé. 2008. Cross language phonetic influences on the speech of French-English bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics 36(4). 649–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2008.04.001.Search in Google Scholar

Goodfellow, Anne. 2005. Talking in context: Language and identity in Kwakwaka’wakw society. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.10.2307/j.ctt80gn0Search in Google Scholar

Guion, Susan. 2003. The vowel systems of Quichua-Spanish bilinguals. Phonetica 60. 98–128. https://doi.org/10.1159/000071449.Search in Google Scholar

House, Deborah. 2002. Language shift among the Navajos. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.10.2307/j.ctv1mgmcpxSearch in Google Scholar

Jacobsen, Kristina. 2017. The sound of Navajo Country: Music, language and Diné belonging. Chapel Hill, NC: UNC Press.10.5149/northcarolina/9781469631868.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kasstan, Jonathan. 2019. Emergent sociolinguistic variation in severe language endangerment. Language in Society 48(5). 685–720. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404519000472.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Tiffany. 2007. “If they want Navajo to be learned, then they should require it in all schools”: Navajo teenagers’ experiences, choices, and demands regarding Navajo language. Wicazo Sa Review 22(1). 7–33. https://doi.org/10.1353/wic.2007.0009.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Tiffany & Daniel McLaughlin. 2001. Reversing Navajo language shift, revisited. In Joshua Fishman (ed.), Can threatened languages be saved? 23–43. Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781853597060-004Search in Google Scholar

Lisker, Leigh & Arthur Abramson. 1964. Cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word 20. 384–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830.Search in Google Scholar

Maclagan, Margaret & Jeannette King. 2007. Aspiration of plosives in Māori: Change over time. Australian Journal of Linguistics 27(1). 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268600601172983.Search in Google Scholar

Mayr, Robert, Jonathan Morris, Ineke Mennen & Daniel Williams. 2017. Disentangling the effects of long-term language contact and individual bilingualism: The case of monophthongs in Welsh and English. International Journal of Bilingualism 21(3). 245–267.10.1177/1367006915614921Search in Google Scholar

McDonough, Joyce. 2003. The Navajo sound system. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-010-0207-3Search in Google Scholar

McDonough, Joyce & Peter Ladefoged. 1993. Navajo stops. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 84. 151–164.Search in Google Scholar

McDonough, Joyce & Valerie Wood. 2008. The stop contrasts of the Athabaskan languages. Journal of Phonetics 36. 427–449.10.1016/j.wocn.2007.11.001Search in Google Scholar

Nagy, Naomi & Alexei Kochetov. 2013. Voice onset time across the generations. In Siemund Peter, Ingrid Gogolin, Monika Schulz & Julia Davydova (eds.), Multilingualism and language diversity in urban areas: Acquisition, identities, space, education, 19–38. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/hsld.1.02nagSearch in Google Scholar

Nance, Claire, McLeod Wilson, Bernadette O’Rourke & Stuart Dunmore. 2016. Identity, accent, aim, and motivation in second language users: New Scottish Gaelic speakers’ use of phonetic variation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20(2). 164–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12173.Search in Google Scholar

Newlin-Łukowicz, Luiza. 2014. From interference to transfer in language contact: Variation in voice onset time. Language Variation and Change 26. 359–385.10.1017/S0954394514000167Search in Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Search in Google Scholar

Reichard, Gladys. 1945. Linguistic diversity amongst the Navaho Indians. International Journal of American Linguistics 11(3). 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1086/463866.Search in Google Scholar

Reichard, Gladys. 1951. Navaho grammar. New York: Augustin.Search in Google Scholar

Sapir, Edward & Harry Hoijer. 1967. The phonology and morphology of the Navaho language (University of California Publications in Linguistics, 50). Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Saville-Troike, Muriel & Lynn McCreedy. 1980. Synchronic variation in Navajo: Regional, social, and developmental evidence from child language (Final project report, 1979–1980). Washington: National Science Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

Singmann, Herik, Ben Bolker, Jake Westfall & Frederik Aust. 2016. afex: Analysis of factorial experiments, version 0.16–1. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=afex.Search in Google Scholar

Sleeper, Morgan. 2020. Contact effects on voice-onset time in Patagonian Welsh. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 50(3). 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002510031800021x.Search in Google Scholar

Spolsky, Bernard. 2002. Prospects for the survival of the Navajo language: A reconsideration. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 33(2). 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.2002.33.2.139.Search in Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah. 2001. Language contact. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Weinreich, Uriel. 1953. Languages in contact. New York: Publications of the Linguistic Circle of New York.Search in Google Scholar

Winter, Bodo. 2019. Statistics for linguistics: An introduction using R. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315165547Search in Google Scholar

Yao, Yao & Charles Chang. 2016. On the cognitive basis of contact-induced sound change: Vowel merger reversal in Shanghainese. Language 92(2). 433–467. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0031.Search in Google Scholar

Young, Robert & William Morgan. 1987. The Navajo language: A grammar and colloquial dictionary. Albuquerque: UNM Press.Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2021-0015).


Received: 2021-01-29
Accepted: 2021-06-15
Published Online: 2022-06-17

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Research Articles
  3. Introduction to sound change in endangered or small speech communities
  4. Where have all the sound changes gone? Phonological stability and mechanisms of sound change
  5. Where have all the sound changes gone? Examining the scarcity of evidence for regular sound change in Australian languages
  6. Cross-dialectal synchronic variation of a diachronic conditioned merger in Tlingit
  7. Vowel harmony in Laz Turkish: a case study in language contact and language change
  8. The evolution of tonally conditioned allomorphy in Triqui: evidence from spontaneous speech corpora
  9. Sound change and gender-based differences in isolated regions: acoustic analysis of intervocalic phonemic stops by Bora-Spanish bilinguals
  10. Place uniformity and drift in the Suzhounese fricative and apical vowels
  11. Flexibility and evolution of cue weighting after a tonal split: an experimental field study on Tamang
  12. The emergence of bunched vowels from retroflex approximants in endangered Dardic languages
  13. The expanding influence of Thai and its effects on cue redistribution in Kuy
  14. Speech style variation in an endangered language
  15. Sound change in Aboriginal Australia: word-initial engma deletion in Kunwok
  16. The dental-alveolar contrast in Mapudungun: loss, preservation, and extension
  17. Sound change or community change? The speech community in sound change studies: a case study of Scottish Gaelic
  18. Phonetic transfer in Diné Bizaad (Navajo)
  19. The evolution of flap-nasalization in Hoocąk
  20. Sound change and tonogenesis in Sylheti
  21. Exploring variation and change in a small-scale Indigenous society: the case of (s) in Pirahã
  22. Rhotics, /uː/, and diphthongization in New Braunfels German
  23. Generational differences in the low tones of Black Lahu
Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingvan-2021-0015/html
Scroll to top button