Skip to main content
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Meaning change in a petri dish: constructions, semantic vector spaces, and motion charts

  • EMAIL logo and
Published/Copyright: October 16, 2015

Abstract

This paper explores how the visualization tool of motion charts can be used for the analysis of meaning change in linguistic constructions. In previous work, linguistic motion charts have been used to represent diachronic frequency trends and changes in the morphosyntactic behavior of linguistic units. The present paper builds on that work, but it shifts the focus to the study of semantic change. How can motion charts be used to visualize semantic change over time? In order to answer this question, we draw on semantic vector space modeling to visualize aspects of linguistic meaning. As an analogy to this approach, the title of this paper alludes to a petri dish in which the growth and development of biological microorganisms can be observed. On the basis of diachronic corpus data, we monitor developments in the semantic ecology of a construction. This allows us to observe processes such as semantic broadening, semantic narrowing, or semantic shift. We illustrate our approach on the basis of a case study that investigates the diachrony of an English construction that we call the ‘many a NOUN’ construction.

Funding statement: Funding: Schweizerischer Nationalfonds (SNF) (Grant/Award Number: 100015_149176/1).

References

Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2011. The rise of dative substitution in the history of Icelandic: A diachronic construction grammar approach. Lingua 121(1). 60–79.10.1016/j.lingua.2010.07.007Search in Google Scholar

Boyd, Jeremy K. & Adele E. Goldberg. 2011. Learning what not to say: The role of statistical preemption and categorization in “a”-adjective production. Language 81(1). 1–29.10.1353/lan.2011.0012Search in Google Scholar

Bullinaria, John & Joseph Levy. 2007. Extracting semantic representations from word cooccurrence statistics: A computational study. Behavior Research Methods 39(34). 510–526.10.3758/BF03193020Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2008. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 450+ million words, 1990-present. http://corpus.byu.edu/coca (accessed June 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2010. The Corpus of Historical American English (COHA): 400+ million words, 1810–2009. http://corpus.byu.edu/coha (accessed June 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. & Anatol Stefanowitsch. 2004a. Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9(1). 97–129.10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06griSearch in Google Scholar

Heylen, Kris & Tom Ruette. 2013. Degrees of semantic control in measuring aggregated lexical distances. In L. Borin, A. Saxena & T. Rama (eds.), Approaches to measuring linguistic differences, 361–382. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110305258.353Search in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2011. Dynamic visualizations of language change: Motion charts on the basis of bivariate and multivariate data from diachronic corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16(4). 435–461.10.1075/ijcl.16.4.01hilSearch in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2012a. Die englischen Modalverben im Daumenkino: Zur dynamischen Visualisierung von Phänomenen des Sprachwandels. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 169. 67–82.10.1007/BF03379873Search in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2012b. Diachronic collostructional analysis meets the noun phrase. Studying many a noun in COHA. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 233–244. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0022Search in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. [Studies in English Language] Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139004206Search in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2014. Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530Search in Google Scholar

Perek, Florent. 2014, to appear. Vector spaces for historical linguistics: Using distributional semantics to study syntactic productivity in diachrony. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Baltimore, Maryland USA, June 23–25, 2014 (pp. 309–314). East Stroudsburg, PA: ACL.10.3115/v1/P14-2051Search in Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Ruette, Tom, Dirk Speelman, and Dirk Geeraerts. 2013. Lexical variation in aggregate perspective. In Augusto Soares da Silva (ed.), Pluricentricity: linguistic variation and sociocognitive dimensions, 95–116. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110303643.103Search in Google Scholar

Rosemeyer, Malte. 2014. Auxiliary selection in Spanish. Gradience, gradualness, and conservation. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.155Search in Google Scholar

Sagi, Eyal, Stefan Kaufmann & Brady Clark. 2012. Tracing semantic change with latent semantic analysis. In Justyna Robynson and Kathryn Allan (eds.), Current methods in historical semantics, 161–183. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110252903.161Search in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2). 209–243.10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03steSearch in Google Scholar

Turney, Peter D. & Patrick Pantel. 2010. From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 37. 141–188.10.1613/jair.2934Search in Google Scholar

Van der Maaten, Laurens & Geoffrey Hinton. 2008. Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research 9. 2579–2605.Search in Google Scholar

Visser, Frederikus Th. 1963. An historical syntax of the English Language. vol 1. Syntactical units with one verb. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-6-15
Accepted: 2015-9-21
Published Online: 2015-10-16
Published in Print: 2015-12-1

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorials/From the Editors
  3. From the Drawing Board
  4. Phonetics & Phonology
  5. Can we use rendaku for phonological argumentation?
  6. Toward completely automated vowel extraction: Introducing DARLA
  7. Induced speech errors as a tool for language description: a case study from Xong “prenasalized consonants”
  8. Real-time articulatory biofeedback with electromagnetic articulography
  9. Allomorphs of French de in coordination: a reproducible study
  10. Morphology & Syntax
  11. Interactional Construction Grammar
  12. Evidence Based on a dynamic source: Database support for a theory of transitive reciprocals
  13. Three open questions in experimental syntax
  14. The complexity of inflectional systems
  15. Investigating “periphery” from a functionalist perspective
  16. Semantics & Pragmatics
  17. Language structure and social agency: Confirming polar questions in conversation
  18. What can historical linguistics and experimental pragmatics offer each other?
  19. Language Documentation & Typology
  20. Directionals, episodic structure, and geographic information systems: Area/punctual distinctions in Ahtna travel narration
  21. Hidden complexity – The neglected side of complexity and its implications
  22. Semantic typology: New approaches to crosslinguistic variation in language and cognition
  23. Psycholinguistics & Neurolinguistics
  24. Discovering prominence and its role in language processing: An individual (differences) approach
  25. The Influence of Word Retrieval and Planning on Phonetic Variation: Implications for Exemplar Models
  26. Language Acquisition & Language Learning
  27. Second language acquisition and linguistics: A bidirectional perspective
  28. Sociolinguistics & Anthropological Linguistics
  29. An end of egalitarianism? Social evaluations of language difference in New Zealand
  30. Sounding the depths at the confluence of numerosity and language
  31. Connecting linguistic variation and non-linguistic behaviour
  32. Extending ELAN into variationist sociolinguistics
  33. I think your going to like me: Exploring the role of errors in email messages on assessments of potential housemates
  34. Computational & Corpus Linguistics
  35. Data “big” and “small” – Examples from the Australian lexical database
  36. The importance of robust corpora in providing more realistic descriptions of variation in English grammar
  37. Historical Linguistics
  38. A minimalist approach to the emergence of ergativity in Austronesian languages
  39. Cognitive Linguistics
  40. What makes a metaphor an embodied metaphor?
  41. Meaning change in a petri dish: constructions, semantic vector spaces, and motion charts
Downloaded on 30.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingvan-2015-0013/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button