Skip to main content
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Hidden complexity – The neglected side of complexity and its implications

  • EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 13, 2015

Abstract

Linguistic complexity is the result of the two motivations of explicitness and economy. Most approaches focus on the explicitness-side of complexity (overt complexity) but there is also an economy-oriented side to it (hidden complexity). The aim of the paper is to introduce hidden complexity and to show how it opens new perspectives on central issues of linguistics. It will discuss the following questions: (i) the implementability of hidden complexity for psycholinguistic experiments, (ii) the evolution of linguistic complexity, (iii) its realisation in creole languages and (iv) its consequences for theories on the architecture of grammar. With this aim, the paper is a programmatic paper with the intention of pointing out ideas for future research.

Funding statement: Note: The research presented in this paper was supported by the Gutenberg Research College of the University of Mainz.

References

Allan, K. 1977. Classifiers. Language 53. 285311.10.1353/lan.1977.0043Search in Google Scholar

Ansaldo, U. & S. Nordhoff. 2009. Complexity and the age of languages. In E. O. Aboh & N. Smith (eds.), Complex processes in new languages, 345363. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.10.1075/cll.35.21ansSearch in Google Scholar

Arcodia, G. F. 2013. Grammaticalization with coevolution of form and meaning in East Asia? Evidence from Sinitic. Language Sciences 40. 148167.10.1016/j.langsci.2013.05.002Search in Google Scholar

Bakker, P., A. Daval-Markussen, M. Parkvall & I. Plag. 2011. Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26. 542.10.1075/jpcl.26.1.02bakSearch in Google Scholar

Baptista, M. 2007. Properties of noun phrases in creole languages. A synthetic comparative exposition. In M. Baptista & J. Guéron (eds.), Noun phrases in Creole languages. A multi-faceted approach, 461470. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.10.1075/cll.31.27bapSearch in Google Scholar

Bisang, W. 2008. Grammaticalization and the areal factor: The perspective of East and mainland Southeast Asian languages. In M. J. López-Couso & E. Seoane (eds.), Rethinking grammaticalization. New perspectives, 1535. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.76.04bisSearch in Google Scholar

Bisang, W. 2009. On the evolution of complexity—Sometimes less is more in East and mainland Southeast Asia. In G. Sampson, D. Gil & P. Trudgill (eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable, 3449. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199545216.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Bisang, W. 2013. Language contact between geographic and mental space. In P. Auer, M. Hilpert, A. Stukenbrock & B. Szmrecsanyi (eds), Linguistic perspectives on space: Geography, interaction, and cognition, 61100. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110312027.61Search in Google Scholar

Bisang, W. 2014a. Overt and hidden complexity—Two types of complexity and their implications. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 50(2). 127143.10.1515/psicl-2014-0009Search in Google Scholar

Bisang, W. 2014b. On the strength of morphological paradigms—A historical account of radical pro-drop. In M. Robbeets & W. Bisang (eds.), Paradigm change in historical reconstruction: The transeurasian languages and beyond, 2360. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.161.07bisSearch in Google Scholar

Bisang, W. 2015. Problems with primary vs. secondary grammaticalization: The case of East and mainland Southeast Asian languages. Language Sciences 47. 132147.10.1016/j.langsci.2014.05.007Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, L.-L. S. & R. Sybesma. 1999. Bare and not so bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30. 509542.10.1162/002438999554192Search in Google Scholar

Culicover, P. W. 2013. Grammar and complexity. Language at the intersection of competence and performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Culicover, P. W. & R. Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Culicover, P. W. & R. Jackendoff. 2006. The simpler syntax hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10(9). 413418.10.1016/j.tics.2006.07.007Search in Google Scholar

Dahl, Ö. 2004. The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.71Search in Google Scholar

Déprez, V. 2007. Implicit determination and plural. In M. Baptista & J. Guéron (eds.), Noun phrases in Creole languages. A multi-faceted approach, 301336. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.10.1075/cll.31.17depSearch in Google Scholar

Evans, N. and S. C. Levinson. 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32. 429448.10.1017/S0140525X0999094XSearch in Google Scholar

Gabelentz, G. von der. 1891. Die Sprachwissenschaft, ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig: T.O. Weigel Nachfolger.Search in Google Scholar

Gerner, M. & W. Bisang. 2008. Inflectional speaker-role classifiers in Weining Ahmao. Journal of Pragmatics 40. 719731.10.1016/j.pragma.2007.11.004Search in Google Scholar

Good, J. 2012. Typologizing grammatical complexities or why creoles may be paradigmatically simple but syntagmatically average. Journal of Creole and Pidgin Languages 27. 147.10.1075/jpcl.27.1.01gooSearch in Google Scholar

Grice, P. H. 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (eds.), Speech acts, 4158. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368811_003Search in Google Scholar

Haiman, J. 2011. Competing motivations. In J. J. Song (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, 148165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199281251.013.0009Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, M., M. S. Dryer, D. Gil & B. Comrie (eds.). 2005. The world atlas of language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, M. and the APiCS Consortium. 2013. Expression of pronominal subjects. In S. M. Michaelis; P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://apics-online.info/parameters/62 (accessed 15 July 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Hawkins, J. A. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. J. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15. 531574.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Y. 1994. The syntax and pragmatics of anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554292Search in Google Scholar

Juola, P. 2008. Assessing linguistic complexity. In M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki & F. Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change, 89108. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.94.07juoSearch in Google Scholar

Kager, R. 1999. Optimality theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511812408Search in Google Scholar

Kusters, W. 2003. Linguistic complexity. The influence of social change on verbal inflection. PhD Dissertation. University of Leiden.Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C. 2000. Presumptive meanings. The theory of generalized conversational implicatures. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Li, M. & P. M. B. Vitányi. 2008. An introduction to Kolmogorov complexity and its applications, 3rd edn. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-49820-1Search in Google Scholar

Li, X. & W. Bisang. 2012. Classifiers in Sinitic languages: From individuation to definiteness-marking. Lingua 122. 335355.10.1016/j.lingua.2011.12.002Search in Google Scholar

Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511605789Search in Google Scholar

McWhorter, J. H. 2001. The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology 5. 125166.10.1515/lity.2001.001Search in Google Scholar

McWhorter, J. H. 2005. Defining Creole. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195166699.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Miestamo, M. 2008. Grammatical complexity in a cross-linguistic perspective. In M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki & F. Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change, 2341. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.94.04mieSearch in Google Scholar

Moscoso del Prado, Fermin. 2011. The universal “shape” of human languages: Spectral analysis beyond speech. Available from Nature Precedings. http://precedings.nature.com/documents/6097/version/210.1038/npre.2011.6097Search in Google Scholar

Mottin, J. 1980. Contes et légendes Hmong Blanc. Bangkok: Don Bosco Press.Search in Google Scholar

Neeleman, A. & K. Szendrői. 2007. Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 38. 671714.10.1162/ling.2007.38.4.671Search in Google Scholar

Parkvall, M. 2008. The simplicity of creoles in a cross-linguistic perspective. In M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki & F. Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change, 265285. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.94.17parSearch in Google Scholar

Partee, B. H., A. ter Meulen & R. E. Wall. 1990. Mathematical methods in linguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Search in Google Scholar

Sinnemäki, K. 2011. Language universals and linguistic complexity. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Modern Languages.Search in Google Scholar

Speas, M. 1994. Null arguments in a theory of economy of projections. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17. 179208.Search in Google Scholar

Trudgill, P. 2011. Sociolinguistic typology. Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-1-13
Published in Print: 2015-12-1

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorials/From the Editors
  3. From the Drawing Board
  4. Phonetics & Phonology
  5. Can we use rendaku for phonological argumentation?
  6. Toward completely automated vowel extraction: Introducing DARLA
  7. Induced speech errors as a tool for language description: a case study from Xong “prenasalized consonants”
  8. Real-time articulatory biofeedback with electromagnetic articulography
  9. Allomorphs of French de in coordination: a reproducible study
  10. Morphology & Syntax
  11. Interactional Construction Grammar
  12. Evidence Based on a dynamic source: Database support for a theory of transitive reciprocals
  13. Three open questions in experimental syntax
  14. The complexity of inflectional systems
  15. Investigating “periphery” from a functionalist perspective
  16. Semantics & Pragmatics
  17. Language structure and social agency: Confirming polar questions in conversation
  18. What can historical linguistics and experimental pragmatics offer each other?
  19. Language Documentation & Typology
  20. Directionals, episodic structure, and geographic information systems: Area/punctual distinctions in Ahtna travel narration
  21. Hidden complexity – The neglected side of complexity and its implications
  22. Semantic typology: New approaches to crosslinguistic variation in language and cognition
  23. Psycholinguistics & Neurolinguistics
  24. Discovering prominence and its role in language processing: An individual (differences) approach
  25. The Influence of Word Retrieval and Planning on Phonetic Variation: Implications for Exemplar Models
  26. Language Acquisition & Language Learning
  27. Second language acquisition and linguistics: A bidirectional perspective
  28. Sociolinguistics & Anthropological Linguistics
  29. An end of egalitarianism? Social evaluations of language difference in New Zealand
  30. Sounding the depths at the confluence of numerosity and language
  31. Connecting linguistic variation and non-linguistic behaviour
  32. Extending ELAN into variationist sociolinguistics
  33. I think your going to like me: Exploring the role of errors in email messages on assessments of potential housemates
  34. Computational & Corpus Linguistics
  35. Data “big” and “small” – Examples from the Australian lexical database
  36. The importance of robust corpora in providing more realistic descriptions of variation in English grammar
  37. Historical Linguistics
  38. A minimalist approach to the emergence of ergativity in Austronesian languages
  39. Cognitive Linguistics
  40. What makes a metaphor an embodied metaphor?
  41. Meaning change in a petri dish: constructions, semantic vector spaces, and motion charts
Downloaded on 26.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingvan-2014-1014/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button