Abstract
Linguistic complexity is the result of the two motivations of explicitness and economy. Most approaches focus on the explicitness-side of complexity (overt complexity) but there is also an economy-oriented side to it (hidden complexity). The aim of the paper is to introduce hidden complexity and to show how it opens new perspectives on central issues of linguistics. It will discuss the following questions: (i) the implementability of hidden complexity for psycholinguistic experiments, (ii) the evolution of linguistic complexity, (iii) its realisation in creole languages and (iv) its consequences for theories on the architecture of grammar. With this aim, the paper is a programmatic paper with the intention of pointing out ideas for future research.
Funding statement: Note: The research presented in this paper was supported by the Gutenberg Research College of the University of Mainz.
References
Allan, K. 1977. Classifiers. Language 53. 285–311.10.1353/lan.1977.0043Search in Google Scholar
Ansaldo, U. & S. Nordhoff. 2009. Complexity and the age of languages. In E. O. Aboh & N. Smith (eds.), Complex processes in new languages, 345–363. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.10.1075/cll.35.21ansSearch in Google Scholar
Arcodia, G. F. 2013. Grammaticalization with coevolution of form and meaning in East Asia? Evidence from Sinitic. Language Sciences 40. 148–167.10.1016/j.langsci.2013.05.002Search in Google Scholar
Bakker, P., A. Daval-Markussen, M. Parkvall & I. Plag. 2011. Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26. 5–42.10.1075/jpcl.26.1.02bakSearch in Google Scholar
Baptista, M. 2007. Properties of noun phrases in creole languages. A synthetic comparative exposition. In M. Baptista & J. Guéron (eds.), Noun phrases in Creole languages. A multi-faceted approach, 461–470. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.10.1075/cll.31.27bapSearch in Google Scholar
Bisang, W. 2008. Grammaticalization and the areal factor: The perspective of East and mainland Southeast Asian languages. In M. J. López-Couso & E. Seoane (eds.), Rethinking grammaticalization. New perspectives, 15–35. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.76.04bisSearch in Google Scholar
Bisang, W. 2009. On the evolution of complexity—Sometimes less is more in East and mainland Southeast Asia. In G. Sampson, D. Gil & P. Trudgill (eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable, 34–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199545216.003.0003Search in Google Scholar
Bisang, W. 2013. Language contact between geographic and mental space. In P. Auer, M. Hilpert, A. Stukenbrock & B. Szmrecsanyi (eds), Linguistic perspectives on space: Geography, interaction, and cognition, 61–100. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110312027.61Search in Google Scholar
Bisang, W. 2014a. Overt and hidden complexity—Two types of complexity and their implications. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 50(2). 127–143.10.1515/psicl-2014-0009Search in Google Scholar
Bisang, W. 2014b. On the strength of morphological paradigms—A historical account of radical pro-drop. In M. Robbeets & W. Bisang (eds.), Paradigm change in historical reconstruction: The transeurasian languages and beyond, 23–60. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.161.07bisSearch in Google Scholar
Bisang, W. 2015. Problems with primary vs. secondary grammaticalization: The case of East and mainland Southeast Asian languages. Language Sciences 47. 132–147.10.1016/j.langsci.2014.05.007Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, L.-L. S. & R. Sybesma. 1999. Bare and not so bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30. 509–542.10.1162/002438999554192Search in Google Scholar
Culicover, P. W. 2013. Grammar and complexity. Language at the intersection of competence and performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Culicover, P. W. & R. Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Culicover, P. W. & R. Jackendoff. 2006. The simpler syntax hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10(9). 413–418.10.1016/j.tics.2006.07.007Search in Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö. 2004. The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.71Search in Google Scholar
Déprez, V. 2007. Implicit determination and plural. In M. Baptista & J. Guéron (eds.), Noun phrases in Creole languages. A multi-faceted approach, 301–336. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.10.1075/cll.31.17depSearch in Google Scholar
Evans, N. and S. C. Levinson. 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32. 429–448.10.1017/S0140525X0999094XSearch in Google Scholar
Gabelentz, G. von der. 1891. Die Sprachwissenschaft, ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig: T.O. Weigel Nachfolger.Search in Google Scholar
Gerner, M. & W. Bisang. 2008. Inflectional speaker-role classifiers in Weining Ahmao. Journal of Pragmatics 40. 719–731.10.1016/j.pragma.2007.11.004Search in Google Scholar
Good, J. 2012. Typologizing grammatical complexities or why creoles may be paradigmatically simple but syntagmatically average. Journal of Creole and Pidgin Languages 27. 1–47.10.1075/jpcl.27.1.01gooSearch in Google Scholar
Grice, P. H. 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (eds.), Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368811_003Search in Google Scholar
Haiman, J. 2011. Competing motivations. In J. J. Song (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, 148–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199281251.013.0009Search in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M., M. S. Dryer, D. Gil & B. Comrie (eds.). 2005. The world atlas of language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. and the APiCS Consortium. 2013. Expression of pronominal subjects. In S. M. Michaelis; P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber (eds.), Atlas of Pidgin and Creole language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://apics-online.info/parameters/62 (accessed 15 July 2014).Search in Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. J. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15. 531–574.Search in Google Scholar
Huang, Y. 1994. The syntax and pragmatics of anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554292Search in Google Scholar
Juola, P. 2008. Assessing linguistic complexity. In M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki & F. Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change, 89–108. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.94.07juoSearch in Google Scholar
Kager, R. 1999. Optimality theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511812408Search in Google Scholar
Kusters, W. 2003. Linguistic complexity. The influence of social change on verbal inflection. PhD Dissertation. University of Leiden.Search in Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. 2000. Presumptive meanings. The theory of generalized conversational implicatures. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Li, M. & P. M. B. Vitányi. 2008. An introduction to Kolmogorov complexity and its applications, 3rd edn. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-49820-1Search in Google Scholar
Li, X. & W. Bisang. 2012. Classifiers in Sinitic languages: From individuation to definiteness-marking. Lingua 122. 335–355.10.1016/j.lingua.2011.12.002Search in Google Scholar
Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511605789Search in Google Scholar
McWhorter, J. H. 2001. The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology 5. 125–166.10.1515/lity.2001.001Search in Google Scholar
McWhorter, J. H. 2005. Defining Creole. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195166699.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Miestamo, M. 2008. Grammatical complexity in a cross-linguistic perspective. In M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki & F. Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change, 23–41. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.94.04mieSearch in Google Scholar
Moscoso del Prado, Fermin. 2011. The universal “shape” of human languages: Spectral analysis beyond speech. Available from Nature Precedings. http://precedings.nature.com/documents/6097/version/210.1038/npre.2011.6097Search in Google Scholar
Mottin, J. 1980. Contes et légendes Hmong Blanc. Bangkok: Don Bosco Press.Search in Google Scholar
Neeleman, A. & K. Szendrői. 2007. Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 38. 671–714.10.1162/ling.2007.38.4.671Search in Google Scholar
Parkvall, M. 2008. The simplicity of creoles in a cross-linguistic perspective. In M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki & F. Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change, 265–285. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.94.17parSearch in Google Scholar
Partee, B. H., A. ter Meulen & R. E. Wall. 1990. Mathematical methods in linguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Search in Google Scholar
Sinnemäki, K. 2011. Language universals and linguistic complexity. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Modern Languages.Search in Google Scholar
Speas, M. 1994. Null arguments in a theory of economy of projections. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17. 179–208.Search in Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. 2011. Sociolinguistic typology. Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorials/From the Editors
- From the Drawing Board
- Phonetics & Phonology
- Can we use rendaku for phonological argumentation?
- Toward completely automated vowel extraction: Introducing DARLA
- Induced speech errors as a tool for language description: a case study from Xong “prenasalized consonants”
- Real-time articulatory biofeedback with electromagnetic articulography
- Allomorphs of French de in coordination: a reproducible study
- Morphology & Syntax
- Interactional Construction Grammar
- Evidence Based on a dynamic source: Database support for a theory of transitive reciprocals
- Three open questions in experimental syntax
- The complexity of inflectional systems
- Investigating “periphery” from a functionalist perspective
- Semantics & Pragmatics
- Language structure and social agency: Confirming polar questions in conversation
- What can historical linguistics and experimental pragmatics offer each other?
- Language Documentation & Typology
- Directionals, episodic structure, and geographic information systems: Area/punctual distinctions in Ahtna travel narration
- Hidden complexity – The neglected side of complexity and its implications
- Semantic typology: New approaches to crosslinguistic variation in language and cognition
- Psycholinguistics & Neurolinguistics
- Discovering prominence and its role in language processing: An individual (differences) approach
- The Influence of Word Retrieval and Planning on Phonetic Variation: Implications for Exemplar Models
- Language Acquisition & Language Learning
- Second language acquisition and linguistics: A bidirectional perspective
- Sociolinguistics & Anthropological Linguistics
- An end of egalitarianism? Social evaluations of language difference in New Zealand
- Sounding the depths at the confluence of numerosity and language
- Connecting linguistic variation and non-linguistic behaviour
- Extending ELAN into variationist sociolinguistics
- I think your going to like me: Exploring the role of errors in email messages on assessments of potential housemates
- Computational & Corpus Linguistics
- Data “big” and “small” – Examples from the Australian lexical database
- The importance of robust corpora in providing more realistic descriptions of variation in English grammar
- Historical Linguistics
- A minimalist approach to the emergence of ergativity in Austronesian languages
- Cognitive Linguistics
- What makes a metaphor an embodied metaphor?
- Meaning change in a petri dish: constructions, semantic vector spaces, and motion charts
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorials/From the Editors
- From the Drawing Board
- Phonetics & Phonology
- Can we use rendaku for phonological argumentation?
- Toward completely automated vowel extraction: Introducing DARLA
- Induced speech errors as a tool for language description: a case study from Xong “prenasalized consonants”
- Real-time articulatory biofeedback with electromagnetic articulography
- Allomorphs of French de in coordination: a reproducible study
- Morphology & Syntax
- Interactional Construction Grammar
- Evidence Based on a dynamic source: Database support for a theory of transitive reciprocals
- Three open questions in experimental syntax
- The complexity of inflectional systems
- Investigating “periphery” from a functionalist perspective
- Semantics & Pragmatics
- Language structure and social agency: Confirming polar questions in conversation
- What can historical linguistics and experimental pragmatics offer each other?
- Language Documentation & Typology
- Directionals, episodic structure, and geographic information systems: Area/punctual distinctions in Ahtna travel narration
- Hidden complexity – The neglected side of complexity and its implications
- Semantic typology: New approaches to crosslinguistic variation in language and cognition
- Psycholinguistics & Neurolinguistics
- Discovering prominence and its role in language processing: An individual (differences) approach
- The Influence of Word Retrieval and Planning on Phonetic Variation: Implications for Exemplar Models
- Language Acquisition & Language Learning
- Second language acquisition and linguistics: A bidirectional perspective
- Sociolinguistics & Anthropological Linguistics
- An end of egalitarianism? Social evaluations of language difference in New Zealand
- Sounding the depths at the confluence of numerosity and language
- Connecting linguistic variation and non-linguistic behaviour
- Extending ELAN into variationist sociolinguistics
- I think your going to like me: Exploring the role of errors in email messages on assessments of potential housemates
- Computational & Corpus Linguistics
- Data “big” and “small” – Examples from the Australian lexical database
- The importance of robust corpora in providing more realistic descriptions of variation in English grammar
- Historical Linguistics
- A minimalist approach to the emergence of ergativity in Austronesian languages
- Cognitive Linguistics
- What makes a metaphor an embodied metaphor?
- Meaning change in a petri dish: constructions, semantic vector spaces, and motion charts