On the comparability of prosodic categories: why ‘stress’ is difficult

References

Bailey, Todd M. 1995. Nonmetrical constraints on stress. Ann Arbor: University of Minnesota dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Baumann, Stefan. 2006. The intonation of givenness: Evidence from German. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783110921205Search in Google Scholar

Beck, David. 2016. Some language-particular terms are comparative concepts. Linguistic Typology 20. 395–402. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0013.Search in Google Scholar

Becker, Laura. 2021. Articles in the world’s languages (Linguistische Arbeiten 577). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Beckman, Mary E. 1986. Stress and non-stress accent. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110874020Search in Google Scholar

Beckman, Mary E. & Jennifer J. Venditti. 2010. Tone and intonation. In William J. Hardcastle & John Laver (eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences, 603–652. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444317251.ch16Search in Google Scholar

Blevins, Juliette. 2004. Evolutionary phonology: The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486357Search in Google Scholar

Bracks, Christoph. 2021. The intonation unit in Totoli. Oceanic Linguistics 60. 103–132. https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2021.0003.Search in Google Scholar

Browman, Catherine P. & Louis Goldstein. 1989. Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology 6. 201–251. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675700001019.Search in Google Scholar

Cutler, Anne. 2005. Lexical stress. In David B. Pisoni & Robert E. Remez (eds.), The handbook of speech perception, 264–289. Malden: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470757024.ch11Search in Google Scholar

Cutler, Anne. 2012. Native listening: Language experience and the recognition of spoken words. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9012.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen. 2016. Thoughts on language-specific and crosslinguistic entities. Linguistic Typology 20. 427–437. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0016.Search in Google Scholar

Féry, Caroline. 2017. Intonation and prosodic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139022064Search in Google Scholar

Goedemans, Rob W. N. & Harry van der Hulst. 2009. StressTyp: A database for word accentual patterns in the world’s languages. In Martin Everaert, Simon Musgrave & Alexis Dimitriadis (eds.), The use of databases in cross-linguistic studies (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 41), 235–282. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110198744.235Search in Google Scholar

Goedemans, Rob W. N. & Harry van der Hulst. 2010. StressTyp data. In Harry van der Hulst, Rob Goedemans & Ellen van Zanten (eds.), A survey of word accentual patterns in the languages of the world, 669–846. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Goedemans, Rob W. N. & Harry van der Hulst. 2014. The separation of accent and rhythm: Evidence from StressTyp. In Harry van der Hulst (ed.), Word stress: Theoretical and typological issues, 119–148. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139600408.006Search in Google Scholar

Goedemans, Rob W. N. & Ellen van Zanten. 2014. No stress typology. In Johanneke Caspers, Yiya Chen, Willemijn F. L. Heeren, Jos J. A. Pacilly, Niels O. Schiller & Ellen van Zanten (eds.), Above and beyond the segments: Experimental linguistics and phonetics, 83–95. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/z.189.07goeSearch in Google Scholar

Goedemans, Rob W. N., Harry van der Hulst & Ellis A. M. Visch. 1996. Stress patterns of the world. Part 1: Background (HIL Publications 2). The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Search in Google Scholar

González, Carolina. 2008. Typological evidence for the separation between stress and foot structure. In Matti Miestamo & Bernhard Wälchli (eds.), New challenges in typology (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 189), 55–76. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110198904.1.55Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, Matthew K. 2002. A factorial typology of quantity insensitive stress. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20. 491–552. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015810531699.10.1023/A:1015810531699Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, Matthew K. 2014. Disentangling stress and pitch-accent: A typology of prominence at different prosodic levels. In Harry van der Hulst (ed.), Word stress, 83–118. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139600408.005Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, Matthew K. 2016. Phonological typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669004.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, Matthew K. & Timo Roettger. 2017. Acoustic correlates of word stress: A cross-linguistic survey. Linguistics Vanguard 3(1). 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2017-0007.Search in Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963/1966. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language, 73–113. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1978. How does a language acquire gender markers? In Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson & Edith Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of human language. Vol. 3: Word structure, 47–82. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2004. The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511616983Search in Google Scholar

Harder, Peter. 2016. Substance(s) and the rise and imposition of structure(s). Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 48. 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2016.1186458.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2018. How comparative concepts and descriptive linguistic categories are different. In Daniël Van Olmen, Tanja Mortelmans & Brisard Frank (eds.), Aspects of linguistic variation (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 324), 83–114. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110607963-004Search in Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce. 1995. Metrical stress theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Heinz, Jeffrey. 2007. The inductive learning of phonotactic patterns. Los Angeles: University of California dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 1997. Deiktikon, Artikel, Nominalphrase: Zur Emergenz syntaktischer Struktur. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783110929621Search in Google Scholar

Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2001. Articles. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals. Vol. 1 (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 20/1), 831–841. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2022. Against trivializing language description (and comparison). Studies in Language 46(1). 133–160. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19090.him.Search in Google Scholar

Himmelmann, Nikolaus P., Meytal Sandler, Strunk Jan & Volker Unterladstetter. 2018. On the universality of intonational phrases in spontaneous speech – a cross-linguistic interrater study. Phonology 35. 207–245. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675718000039.Search in Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. 1977. On the nature of linguistic stress. In Larry M. Hyman (ed.), Studies in stress and accent (Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 4), 37–82. Los Angeles: Dept. of Linguistics, University of Southern California.Search in Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. 1983. Are there syllables in Gokana? In Jonathan Kaye, Hilda Koopman, Dominique Sportiche & André Dugas (eds.), Current approaches to African linguistics, vol. 2, 171–179. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783112420102-012Search in Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. 2006. Word-prosodic typology. Phonology 23(2). 225–257. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675706000893.Search in Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. 2008. Universals in phonology. The Linguistic Review 25(1–2). 83–137. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2008.003.Search in Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. 2009. How (not) to do phonological typology: The case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences 31. 213–238. https://doi.org/10.5070/p74hb059t7.Search in Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. 2011. Does Gokana really have no syllables? Or: what’s so great about being universal? Phonology 28(1). 55–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675711000030.Search in Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. 2012. In defense of prosodic typology: A response to Beckman & Venditti. Linguistic Typology 16. 341–385.10.1515/lity-2012-0014Search in Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. 2015. Does Gokana really have syllables? A postscript. Phonology 32. 303–306. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675715000160.Search in Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. 2017. What (else) depends on phonology? In Nicholas Enfield (ed.), Dependencies in language, 141–158. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. 2018. Positional prominence versus word accent: Is there a difference? In Robert Goedemans, Jeffrey Heinz & Harry van der Hulst (eds.), The study of word stress and accent: Theories, methods and data, 60–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316683101.003Search in Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. & Frans Plank. 2018. Phonological typology (Phonology and Phonetics 23). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110451931Search in Google Scholar

Kaland, Constantijn. 2019. Acoustic correlates of word stress in Papuan Malay. Journal of Phonetics 74. 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2019.02.003.Search in Google Scholar

Kaland, Constantijn. 2020. Offline and online processing of acoustic cues to word stress in Papuan Malay. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 147(2). 731–747. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0000578.Search in Google Scholar

Kaland, Constantijn, Angela Kluge & Vincent J. van Heuven. 2021. Lexical analyses of the function and phonology of Papuan Malay word stress. Phonetica 78(2). 141–168. https://doi.org/10.1515/phon-2021-2003.Search in Google Scholar

Kenesei, István, Robert M. Vago & Anna Fenyvesi. 1998. Hungarian. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Kuznetsova, Natalia. 2018. What Danish and Estonian can show to a modern word-prosodic typology. In Rob Goedemans, Jeffrey Heinz & Harry van der Hulst (eds.), The study of word stress and accent: Theories, methods and data, 102–143. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316683101.005Search in Google Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert. 2008. Intonational phonology, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511808814Search in Google Scholar

Ladefoged, Peter. 1982. A course in phonetics, 2nd edn. Los Angeles: University of California.Search in Google Scholar

Lander, Yury & Peter Arkadiev. 2016. On the right of being a comparative concept. Linguistic Typology 20. 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0014.Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian. 2018. Linguistic concepts and categories in language description and comparison. In Marina Chini & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), Typology, acquisition, grammaticalization studies, 27–50. Milano: Franco Angeli.Search in Google Scholar

Levi, Susannah V. 2005. Acoustic correlates of lexical accent in Turkish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35. 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025100305001921.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Charles N. (ed.). 1976 Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lindström, Eva & Bert Remijsen. 2005. Aspects of the prosody of Kuot, a language where intonation ignores stress. Linguistics 43. 839–870. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2005.43.4.839.Search in Google Scholar

Maskikit-Essed, Raechel & Carlos Gussenhoven. 2016. No stress, no pitch accent, no prosodic focus: The case of Ambonese Malay. Phonology 33. 353–389. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675716000154.Search in Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Edith A. 2016. On linguistic categories. Linguistic Typology 20. 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0015.Search in Google Scholar

Mühlbauer, Jeff. 2006. Pitch as accent in Plains Cree nominals. In H. C. Wolfart (ed.), Actes du 37e Congrès des Algonquinistes, 229–268. Winnipeg: Université du Manitoba.Search in Google Scholar

Odé, Cecilia. 1994. On the perception of prominence in Indonesian. In Cecilia Odé & Vincent J. van Heuven (eds.), Experimental studies of Indonesian prosody (Semaian 9), 27–107. Leiden: Vakgroep Talen en Culturen van Zuidoost-Azië en Oceanië, Leiden University.Search in Google Scholar

Özçelik, Öner. 2017. The foot is not an obligatory constituent of the prosodic hierarchy: “Stress” in Turkish, French and child English. The Linguistic Review 34(1). 157–213. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2016-0008.Search in Google Scholar

Peperkamp, Sharon & Emmanuel Dupoux. 2002. A typological study of stress ‘deafness. In Carlos Gussenhoven & Natasha Warner (eds.), Laboratory phonology 7 (Phonology and Phonetics 4–1), 203–240. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110197105.1.203Search in Google Scholar

Peperkamp, Sharon, Inga Vendelin & Emmanuel Dupoux. 2010. Perception of predictable stress: A cross-linguistic investigation. Journal of Phonetics 38(3). 422–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.04.001.Search in Google Scholar

Riesberg, Sonja, Janina Kalbertodt, Stefan Baumann & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann. 2020. Using Rapid Prosody Transcription to probe little-known prosodic systems: The case of Papuan Malay. Laboratory Phonology 11(1). 1–35. https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.192.Search in Google Scholar

Roettger, Timo & Matthew K. Gordon. 2017. Methodological issues in the study of word stress correlates. Linguistics Vanguard 3(1). 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2017-0006.Search in Google Scholar

Round, Erich R. & Greville G. Corbett. 2020. Comparability and measurement in typological science: The bright future for linguistics. Linguistic Typology 24. 489–525. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2020-2060.Search in Google Scholar

Sluijter, Agaath M. C. & Vincent J. van Heuven. 1996. Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100. 2471–2485. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.417955.Search in Google Scholar

Spike, Matthew. 2020. Fifty shades of grue: Indeterminate categories and induction in and out of the language sciences. Linguistic Typology 24. 465–488. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2020-2061.Search in Google Scholar

Tabain, Marija, Janet Fletcher & Andrew Butcher. 2014. Lexical stress in Pitjatjantjara. Journal of Phonetics 42. 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2013.11.005.Search in Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan & Kalyanamalini Sahoo. 2015. On comparative concepts and descriptive categories, such as they are. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 47. 136–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2015.1115636.Search in Google Scholar

van der Hulst, Harry. 2010. Word accent: Terms, typologies and theories. In Harry van der Hulst, Rob Goedemans & Ellen van Zanten (eds.), A survey of word accentual patterns in the languages of the world, 3–54. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110198966.1.3Search in Google Scholar

van der Hulst, Harry. 2012. Deconstructing stress. Lingua 122. 1494–1521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.08.011.Search in Google Scholar

van der Hulst, Harry. 2017. Phonological typology. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic typology, 39–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316135716.002Search in Google Scholar

van der Hulst, Harry, Rob Goedemans & Ellen van Zanten (eds.). 2010. A survey of word accentual patterns in the languages of the world. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110198966Search in Google Scholar

van Heuven, Vincent J. 2018. Acoustic correlates and perceptual cues of word and sentence stress: Towards a cross-linguistic perspective. In Rob Goedemans, Jeffrey Heinz & Harry van der Hulst (eds.), The study of word stress and accent: Theories, methods and data, 15–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316683101.002Search in Google Scholar

van Heuven, Vincent J. & Vera Faust. 2009. Are Indonesians sensitive to contrastive accentuation below the word level? Wacana, Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya 11. 226–240. https://doi.org/10.17510/wjhi.v11i2.159.Search in Google Scholar

van Heuven, Vincent J. & Ellen van Zanten (eds.). 2007. Prosody in Indonesian languages (LOT Occasional Series 9). Utrecht: LOT.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, Yi. 2020. Syllable is a synchronization mechanism that makes human speech possible. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9v4hr.Search in Google Scholar