Abstract
This article offers a new, transparent method to construe morphosyntactic categories for crosslinguistic research. It avoids the problem of categorial confusion attested in major post-Greenbergian studies in morphosyntactic typology, in particular in probabilistic typological investigations, which tend to mix up semantic and formal criteria and marginalize “statistically insignificant” morphosyntactic variants. These and other problems are avoided by using functional criteria as the starting point in identifying comparable forms and constructions in different languages. Subsequently formal and semantic criteria are employed to arrive at a morphosyntactic category whose members are sufficiently similar in terms of function, form, and meaning.
Abbreviations
- 1/3
1st/3rd person
- acc
accusative
- art
article
- dec
declarative
- dir
direct
- erg
ergative
- gen
genitive
- int
interrogative
- inv
inverse
- nc1
noun class 1
- nc7
noun class 7
- pp1
class 1 pronominal prefix
- refl
reflexive
- rel
relative clause
- s
subject
- sg
singular.
References
Aarts, Bas. 2004. Modelling linguistic gradience. Studies in Language 28. 1‒49.10.1075/sl.28.1.02aarSuche in Google Scholar
Adelaar, K. Alexander & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds.). 2005. The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203821121Suche in Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words: The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Clarendon.Suche in Google Scholar
Banti, Giorgio. 1988. ‘Adjectives’ in East Cushitic. In Marianne Bechhaus-Gerst & Fritz Serzisko (eds.), Cushitic – Oromo: Papers from the International Symposium on Cushitic and Omotic languages, Cologne, January 6‒9, 1986, 205–259. Hamburg: Buske.Suche in Google Scholar
Behaghel, Otto. 1932. Deutsche Syntax: Eine geschichtliche Darstellung, Vol. 4: Wortstellung, Periodenbau. Heidelberg: Winter.Suche in Google Scholar
Blake, Barry J. 1983. Structure and word order in Kalkatungu: The anatomy of a flat language. Australian Journal of Linguistics 3. 143–175.10.1080/07268608308599307Suche in Google Scholar
Bulmer, Ralph. 1967. Why is the cassowary not a bird? A problem of zoological taxonomy among the Karam of the New Guinea highlands. Man 2. 5–25.10.2307/2798651Suche in Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2005. Deriving Greenberg’s universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 315–332.10.1162/0024389054396917Suche in Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language universals and linguistic typology. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra & Alan Timberlake. 1985. Tense, aspect and mood. In Shopen (ed.) 1985, Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 202–258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1990. A conceptual framework for grammatical categories (or: a taxonomy of Propositional Acts). Journal of Semantics 7. 245–279.10.1093/jos/7.3.245Suche in Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2009. Joseph Harold Greenberg. Bibliographic Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences 90. 153–198.Suche in Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2014. Comparing categories and constructions crosslinguistically (again): The diversity of ditransitives. Linguistic Typology 18. 533–551.10.1515/lingty-2014-0021Suche in Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael. 2010. Dealing with diversity: Towards an explanation of NP word order frequencies. Linguistic Typology 14. 253–287.10.1515/lity.2010.010Suche in Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1997. The theory of Functional Grammar. 2nd revised edn. Edited by Kees Hengeveld. 2 vols. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar
Devos, Maud. 2008. A grammar of Makwe. München: Lincom Europa.Suche in Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1992. The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68. 81–138.10.1353/lan.1992.0028Suche in Google Scholar
Elliott, Jennifer R. 2000. Realis and irrealis: Forms and concepts of the grammaticalisation of reality. Linguistic Typology 4. 55–90.10.1515/lity.2000.4.1.55Suche in Google Scholar
Emenanjo, Nolue. 1978. Elements of modern Igbo grammar. Ibadan: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Foley, William A. 1976. Towards a universal typology of the noun phrase. Studies in Language 4. 171–199.10.1075/sl.4.2.02folSuche in Google Scholar
Foley, William A. & Robert D. Van Valin, Jr. 1985. Information packaging in the clause. In Shopen (ed.) 1985, Vol. 1: Clause structure, 282–364.Suche in Google Scholar
García Velasco, Daniel & Jan Rijkhoff. 2008. Introduction. In Daniel García Velasco & Jan Rijkhoff (eds.), The noun phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar, 1–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110205374Suche in Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language (2nd edn.), 73–113. Cambridge: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Hagman, Roy S. 1973. Nama Hottentot grammar. New York: Columbia University doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 2014. Decorative morphology in Khmer. In Jeffrey P. Williams (ed.), The aesthetics of grammar: Sound and meaning in the languages of mainland Southeast Asia, 61‒82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139030489.005Suche in Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth. 1997. An interview with Professor Ken Hale, by Lisa Cheng & Rint Sybesma. Glot International 2(9/10). 1, 26‒28.Suche in Google Scholar
Harnad, Steven. 2005. To cognize is to categorize: Cognition is categorization. In Henri Cohen & Claire Levebvre (eds.), Handbook of categorization in cognitive science, 20–44. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-008044612-7/50056-1Suche in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2007. Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11. 119–132.10.1515/LINGTY.2007.011Suche in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.). 2001. Language typology and language universals: An international handbook, Vol. 1. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110171549.2Suche in Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1983. Word order universals. New York: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1997. Possession: Cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511581908Suche in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Tania Kuteva & Gunther Kaltenböck. 2014. Discourse Grammar, the dual process model, and brain lateralization: Some correlations. Language and Cognition 6. 146–180.10.1017/langcog.2013.3Suche in Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 1989. Layers and operators. Journal of Linguistics 25. 127–157.10.1017/S0022226700012123Suche in Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees, Jan Rijkhoff & Anna Siewierska. 2004. Parts-of-speech systems and word order. Journal of Linguistics 40. 527–570.10.1017/S0022226704002762Suche in Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine & Tania Kuteva. 2011. On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35. 848–893.10.1075/sl.35.4.03kalSuche in Google Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo. 2006. Object-, animacy- and role-based strategies: A typology of object marking. Studies in Language 30. 1–32.10.1075/sl.30.1.02kitSuche in Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Peter Siemund. 2007. Speech act distinctions in grammar. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (2nd edn.), Vol. 1: Clause structure, 276–324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511619427.005Suche in Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1690 [1825]. An essay concerning human understanding. London: Tegg.10.1093/oseo/instance.00018020Suche in Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Machery, Edouard. 2009. Doing without concepts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195306880.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L. 2000. Dependency reversal in noun-attribute constructions: Towards a typology. München: Lincom Europa.Suche in Google Scholar
Malt, Barbara C. 2010. Why we should do without concepts. Mind and Language 25. 622–633.10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01405.xSuche in Google Scholar
Maslova, Elena. 2000. A dynamic approach to the verification of distributional universals. Linguistic Typology 4. 307–333.10.1515/lity.2000.4.3.307Suche in Google Scholar
Miner, Kenneth L. 1986. Noun stripping and loose incorporation in Zuni. International Journal of American Linguistics 52. 242–254.10.1086/466021Suche in Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter. 2008. Functional categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511755026Suche in Google Scholar
Newman, Paul. 1987. Hausa and the Chadic languages. In Bernard Comrie (ed.), The world’s major languages, 705‒723. London: Croom Helm.10.4324/9780203214961-35Suche in Google Scholar
Perkins, Revere D. 1988. The covariation of culture and grammar. In Mark T. Hammond, Edith A. Moravcsik & Jessica R. Wirth (eds.), Studies in syntactic typology, 359–378. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar
Perkins, Revere D. 2001. Sampling procedures and statistical methods. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 2001, 419–434.Suche in Google Scholar
Reboul, Anne. 2001. Foundations of reference and predication. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 2001, 509–522.Suche in Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan. 1990. Toward a unified analysis of terms and predications. In Jan Nuyts, A. Machtelt Bolkestein & Co Vet (eds.), Layers and levels of representation in language theory: A functional view, 165–191. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.13.09rijSuche in Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan. 2002. On the interaction of linguistic typology and Functional Grammar. Functions of Language 9. 209–237.10.1075/fol.9.2.05rijSuche in Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan. 2004. The noun phrase. Expanded paperback edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan. 2008a. Synchronic and diachronic evidence for parallels between noun phrases and sentences. In Folke Josephson & Ingmar Söhrman (eds.), Interdependence of diachronic and synchronic analyses, 13–42. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.103.03rijSuche in Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan. 2008b. On flexible and rigid nouns. Studies in Language 32. 727–752.10.1075/bct.25.11rijSuche in Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan. 2009a. On the (un)suitability of semantic categories. Linguistic Typology 13. 95–104.10.1515/LITY.2009.005Suche in Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan. 2009b. On the co-variation between form and function of adnominal possessive modifiers in Dutch and English. In William B. McGregor (ed.), The expression of possession, 51–106. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110213232.51Suche in Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan. 2010a. Rara and grammatical theory. In Wohlgemuth & Cysouw (eds.) 2010a, 223–240.Suche in Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan. 2010b. Functional categories in the noun phrase: On jacks-of-all-trades and one-trick-ponies in Danish, Dutch and German. Deutsche Sprache 38(2/10). 97–123. Available online at http://pub.ids-mannheim.de/laufend/deusprach/ds10-2.html10.37307/j.1868-775X.2010.02.03Suche in Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan. 2014. Modification as a propositional act. In María de los Ángeles Gómez González, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & Francisco Gonzálvez-García (eds.), Theory and practice in functional-cognitive space, 129–150. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan. 2015. Word order. In James D. Wright (ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd edn.), Vol. 25, 644–656. Oxford: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.53031-1Suche in Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan & Dik Bakker. 1998. Language sampling. Linguistic Typology 2. 263–314.10.1515/lity.1998.2.3.263Suche in Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan, Dik Bakker, Kees Hengeveld & Peter Kahrel. 1993. A method of language sampling. Studies in Language 17. 169–203.10.1075/sl.17.1.07rijSuche in Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan & Johanna Seibt. 2005. Mood, definiteness and specificity: A linguistic and a philosophical account of their similarities and differences. Tidsskrift for Sprogforskning 3. 85–132.10.7146/tfs.v3i2.89Suche in Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan & Eva van Lier (eds.). 2013. Flexible word classes: Typological studies of underspecified parts of speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668441.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1972. The category squish: Endstation Hauptwort. Chicago Linguistic Society 8. 316–328.Suche in Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm. 1998. Proto-Oceanic adjectival categories and their morphosyntax. Oceanic Linguistics 37. 85–119.10.2307/3623281Suche in Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. & Arnold M. Zwicky. 1985. Speech act distinctions in syntax. In Shopen (ed.) 1985, Vol. 1: Clause structure, 155–196.Suche in Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey. 1980. Schools of linguistics: Competition and evolution. London: Hutchinson.10.1515/9781503621282Suche in Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 2001. Scales of nouniness and verbiness. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 2001, 495–509.Suche in Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438Suche in Google Scholar
Sharma, Devidatta D. 1988. A descriptive grammar of Kinnauri. Delhi: Mittal.Suche in Google Scholar
Shopen, Timothy (ed.). 1985. Language typology and syntactic description. 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Suche in Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer L. 2015. Parts of speech in phonology. Presented at the 17th LIPP Symposium “Parts of speech across languages, in acquisition, mind and brain”, München, 6 July 2015. Handout available at http://www.unc.edu/~jlsmith/home/pdf/smith2012_PoS-in-phono_17LIPP-hdt.pdfSuche in Google Scholar
Smith, Linda B. & Larissa K. Samuelson. 1997. Perceiving and remembering: Category stability, variability and development. In Koen Lamberts & David Shanks (eds.), Knowledge, concepts and categories, 161–195. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4071.003.0009Suche in Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung. 2001. Linguistic typology: Morphology and syntax. Harlow: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar
Stassen, Leon. 2011. The problem of cross-linguistic classification. In Jae Jung Song (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, 90–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199281251.013.0006Suche in Google Scholar
van de Velde, Freek. 2007. Interpersonal modification in the English noun phrase. Functions of Language 14. 203–230.10.1075/fol.14.2.05vanSuche in Google Scholar
van de Velde, Freek. 2012. A structural-functional account of NP-internal mood. Lingua 122. 1–23.10.1016/j.lingua.2011.10.007Suche in Google Scholar
van der Voort, Hein. 2004. A grammar of Kwaza. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197280Suche in Google Scholar
van der Voort, Hein. 2006. Construções atributivas em Kwazá. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi: Ciências humanas 1(1). 87–104. Available online at http://www.museu-goeldi.br/editora/humanas/index.html10.1590/S1981-81222006000100007Suche in Google Scholar
Weil, Henri. 1844. De l’ordre des mots dans les langues anciennes comparées aux langues modernes. Paris: Joubert. Translated by C. W. Super as The order of words in the ancient languages compared with that of the modern languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1978.Suche in Google Scholar
Welmers, William E. & Beatrice F. Welmers. 1969. Noun modifiers in Igbo. International Journal of American Linguistics 35. 315–322.10.1086/465076Suche in Google Scholar
Wohlgemuth, Jan & Michael Cysouw (eds.). 2010a. Rethinking universals: How rarities affect linguistic theory. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110220933Suche in Google Scholar
Wohlgemuth, Jan & Michael Cysouw (eds.). 2010b. Rara & rarissima: Documenting the fringes of linguistic diversity. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110228557Suche in Google Scholar
Young, Robert W. & Morgan, William, Sr. 1987. The Navajo language: A grammar and colloquial dictionary. Revised edn. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Suche in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Lexical flexibility in Oceanic languages
- Sampling for variety
- Discussion
- Of categories: Language-particular – comparative – universal
- The challenge of making language description and comparison mutually beneficial
- Crosslinguistic categories, comparative concepts, and the Walman diminutive
- Crosslinguistic categories in morphosyntactic typology: Problems and prospects
- On categorization: Stick to the facts of the languages
- Comparative concepts and language-specific categories: Theory and practice
- Some language-particular terms are comparative concepts
- On the right of being a comparative concept
- On linguistic categories
- Thoughts on language-specific and crosslinguistic entities
- Describing languoids: When incommensurability meets the language-dialect continuum
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Lexical flexibility in Oceanic languages
- Sampling for variety
- Discussion
- Of categories: Language-particular – comparative – universal
- The challenge of making language description and comparison mutually beneficial
- Crosslinguistic categories, comparative concepts, and the Walman diminutive
- Crosslinguistic categories in morphosyntactic typology: Problems and prospects
- On categorization: Stick to the facts of the languages
- Comparative concepts and language-specific categories: Theory and practice
- Some language-particular terms are comparative concepts
- On the right of being a comparative concept
- On linguistic categories
- Thoughts on language-specific and crosslinguistic entities
- Describing languoids: When incommensurability meets the language-dialect continuum