Coordinating nominal compounds: Universal vs. areal tendencies
-
Giorgio Francesco Arcodia
Abstract
Coordinating compounds, i.e. complex word forms in which the constituent lexemes are in a coordination relation, may be divided into two classes: hyperonymic, in which the referent of the whole compound is the “sum” of the meanings of the constituent lexemes (Korowai yumdefól ‘(her) husband-wife, couple’; van Enk, Gerrit J., & Lourens de Vries. 1997. The Korowai of Irian Jaya: Their language in its cultural context. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 66), and hyponymic, where the compound designates a single referent having features of all the constituents (English actor-director). It has been proposed that languages choose either type as the one with the “tightest” marking pattern; whereas the crosslinguistic tendency is to have tighter hyperonymic compounds, most languages of Europe rather have tighter hyponymic compounds (Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco, Nicola Grandi, & Bernhard Wälchli 2010. Coordination in compounding. In Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding, 177–198. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins). In this paper, we will test this assumption on noun-noun compounds in a sample of 20 Standard Average European languages and in a balanced sample of 60 non-SAE languages, arguing that the preference for hyperonymic compounds is best explained by the default referential function of nouns; in hyponymic compounds, on the other hand, nouns are used to indicate properties. We will then compare nominal and adjectival coordinating compounds, showing that for the latter the hyponymic compounding pattern is the dominant one, as adjectives are prototypical property-denoting words.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Nicola Grandi for sharing with me many ideas which greatly improved this paper, as well as Caterina Mauri and the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and criticism. I would also like to thank İsa Sari and Alexis Michaud for their help with, respectively, Turkish and Vietnamese data. Needless to say, the usual disclaimers apply.
Appendix. Sources used for the languages in the non-SAE sample
References
Admiraal, Femmy, & Swintha Danielsen. 2014. Productive compounding in Baure (Arawakan). In Swintha Danielsen, Katja Hanss & Fernando Zúñiga (eds.), Word formation in South American languages, 79–112. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.163.05admSuche in Google Scholar
Amoroso, Giovanni, Vincenzo Di Cerbo, & Arturo Maresca. 2009. Diritto del lavoro: Lo Statuto dei Lavoratori e la disciplina dei licenziamenti, Vol. II, 3rd ed. Milan: Giuffrè.Suche in Google Scholar
Antelme, Michel. 2004. Khmer. In Pierre L. J. Arnaud (ed.), Le nom composé: Données sur seize langues, 149–184. Lyon: Presses universitaires de Lyon.Suche in Google Scholar
Appah, Clement K. I. 2009. Compounding in Akan. Paper presented at “Universals and Typology in Word-Formation”, Košice (Slovakia), 18 August.Suche in Google Scholar
Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco. 2010. Coordinating compounds. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(9). 863–873.10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00231.xSuche in Google Scholar
Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco, Nicola Grandi, & Wälchli Bernhard. 2010. Coordination in compounding. In Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding, 177–198. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.311.15arcSuche in Google Scholar
Asher, Ronald E., & T. C. Kumari. 1997. Malayalam. London & New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Awbery, Gwenllian Mair. 2004. Welsh (gallois). In Pierre L. J. Arnaud (ed.), Le nom compose: Données sur seize langues, 303–328. Lyon: Presses universitaires de Lyon.Suche in Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C., & Carlos A. Fasola. 2009. Araucanian: Mapundungun. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 594–608. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2001a. Compounding. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehardt König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language Typology and Language Universals, 695–707. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2001b. Morphological productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486210Suche in Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, & Elisaveta Tarasova. 2013. The meaning link in nominal compounds. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 10(3). 2–18.Suche in Google Scholar
Becker, Thomas. 1992. Compounding in German. Rivista di Linguistica 4(1). 5–36.Suche in Google Scholar
Bernini, Giuliano, & Paolo Ramat. 1996. Negative sentences in the languages of Europe: A typological approach. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar
Bhat, Shankara D. N. 1994. The adjectival category. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.24Suche in Google Scholar
Bhat, Shankara D. N. 2000. Word classes and sentential functions. In Petra M. Vogel & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Approaches to the typology of word classes, 47–64. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110806120.47Suche in Google Scholar
Bisetto, Antonietta, & Sergio Scalise. 2005. Classification of compounds. Lingue e Linguaggio 2. 319–332.Suche in Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2009. Lexical integrity as a morphological universal: A constructionist view. In Sergio Scalise, Elisabetta Magni & Antonietta Bisetto (eds.), Universals of language today, 83–100. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-8825-4_5Suche in Google Scholar
Borg, Albert, & Marie Azzopardi-Alexander. 1997. Maltese. London & New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Brucale, Luisa. 2012. Latin compounds. Probus 24(1). 93–117.10.1515/probus-2012-0005Suche in Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756393.ch19Suche in Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1985. The Pipil language of El Salvador. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110881998Suche in Google Scholar
Ceccagno, Antonietta, & Bianca Basciano. 2009. Sino-Tibetan: Mandarin Chinese. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 478–490. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Chamoreau, Nadine. 2003. Grammaire du Purepecha. Munich: Lincom Europa.Suche in Google Scholar
Chelliah, Shobhana L. 1997. A grammar of Meithei. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110801118Suche in Google Scholar
Cole, Peter. 1985. Imbabura Quechua. London: Croom Helm.Suche in Google Scholar
Court, Christopher A. F. 1985. Fundamentals of Iu Mien (Yao) Grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2004. Bambara. In Pierre L. J. Arnaud (ed.), Le nom compose: Données sur seize langues, 21–46. Lyon: Presses universitaires de Lyon.Suche in Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2000. Parts of speech as language universals and as language-particular categories. In Petra M. Vogel & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Approaches to the typology of word classes, 65–102. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110806120.65Suche in Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Dabašinskienė, Ineta. 2010. Acquisition of compounds in Lithuanian. Baltic Linguistics 1. 51–82.10.32798/bl.435Suche in Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1990. Standard Average European as an exotic language. In Johannes Bechert, Giuliano Bernini & Claude Buridant (eds.), Toward a typology of European languages, 3–8. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110863178.3Suche in Google Scholar
Davies, John. 1981. Kobon. Amsterdam: North Holland.Suche in Google Scholar
Dietz, Klaus. 2015. Historical word-formation in English. In Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds.), Word-formation: An international handbook of the languages of Europe, Vol. III, 1914–1930. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Suche in Google Scholar
Dimmendaal, Gerrit J. 1983. The Turkana language. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110869149Suche in Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 2004. The Jarawara language of Southern Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Donabédian, Anaïd. 2004. Arménien. In Pierre L. J. Arnaud (ed.), Le nom compose: Données sur seize langues, 3–20. Lyon: Presses universitaires de Lyon.Suche in Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1989. Large linguistic areas and language sampling. Studies in Language 13(2). 257–292.10.1075/sl.13.2.03drySuche in Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthews S. 1992. The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68(1). 81–138.10.1353/lan.1992.0028Suche in Google Scholar
Dum-Tragut, Jasmine. 2009. Armenian. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/loall.14Suche in Google Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas J. 2007. A grammar of Lao. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110207538Suche in Google Scholar
Epps, Patience. 2008. A grammar of Hup. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199079Suche in Google Scholar
Everett, Daniel L., & Barbara Kern. 1997. Wari: The Pacaas Novos language of Western Brazil. London & New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Fabri, Ray. 2009. Compounding and adjective-noun compounding in Maltese. In Bernard Comrie, Ray Fabri, Elizabeth Hume, Manwel Mifsud, Thomas Stolz & Martine Vanhove (eds.), Introducing Maltese linguistics, 207–232. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.113.15fabSuche in Google Scholar
Farr, Cynthia J. M., Bomi Terrence Furoke, & James Buyers Farr. 1996. Tafota Baruga grammar notes. https://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/tools-at-lingboard/pdf/Farr_TBGRammarNotes.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar
Forgács, Tamás. 2015. From Old Hungarian to Modern Hungarian. In Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds.), Word-formation: An international handbook of the languages of Europe, Vol. III, 2079–2096. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110375732-029Suche in Google Scholar
Foris, David Paul. 2000. A grammar of Sochiapan Chinantec. Dallas: SIL International.Suche in Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michael. 1984. West Greenlandic. London: Croom Helm.Suche in Google Scholar
Fradin, Bernard. 2009. IE, Romance: French. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 417–435. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 2001. A grammar of Lele. Stanford, CA: CSLI.10.1515/9783110885798Suche in Google Scholar
Franklin, Karl J. 1971. A grammar of Kewa, New Guinea. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Suche in Google Scholar
Franklin, Karl J., Joice Franklin, & Yapua Kirapeasi. 1978. A Kewa dictionary, with supplementary grammatical and anthropological materials. Canberra: Australian National University.Suche in Google Scholar
Gavrilidou, Zoe. 2013. NN combinations in Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics 13(1). 5–29.10.1163/15699846-13130103Suche in Google Scholar
Gensler, Orin D. 2011. Morphological typology of Semitic. In Stefan Weninger (ed.), The Semitic languages: An international handbook, 303–329. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Moutonr.10.1515/9783110251586.279Suche in Google Scholar
Göksel, Asli. 2009. Compounds in Turkish. Lingue e Linguaggio 8(2). 213–235.Suche in Google Scholar
Goldman, Robert P., & Sally J. Sutherland-Goldman. 1999. Devavāṇīpraveśikā, An introduction to the Sanskrit language. 3rd ed. Berkeley, CA: Center for South Asia Studies, University of California.Suche in Google Scholar
Gouesse, Marie-Josèphe. 2004. Le nom compose: Données sur seize langues. In Pierre L. J. Arnaud (ed.), Hongrois, 131–148. Lyon: Presses universitaires de Lyon.Suche in Google Scholar
Grossmann, Maria. 2012. Romanian compounds. Probus 24(1). 147–173.10.1515/probus-2012-0007Suche in Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 2011. Cambodian: Khmer. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/loall.16Suche in Google Scholar
Hardman, Martha J. 2000. Jaqaru. Munich: Lincom Europa.Suche in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2004. Coordinating constructions: An overview. In Martin Haspelmath (ed.), Coordinating constructions, 3–40. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.58.03hasSuche in Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 1999. A grammar of Koyra Chiini. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110804850Suche in Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio. 2003. Compounds. In José Ignacio Hualde & Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds.), A grammar of Basque, 351–362. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110895285.351Suche in Google Scholar
Hutchinson, John P. 1981. The Kanuri language: A reference grammar. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.Suche in Google Scholar
Janhunen, Juha A. 2012. Mongolian. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/loall.19Suche in Google Scholar
Johnson, Heidi Anna. 2000. A grammar of San Miguel Chimalapa Zoque. Austin, TX: University of Texas dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Kageyama, Taro. 2009. Isolate: Japanese. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 512–526. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Kari, Ethelbert Emmanuel. 2004. A reference grammar of Degema. Cologne: Köppe Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar
Kasar, Sündüz Ö. 2004. Le nom composé: Données sur seize langues. In Pierre L. J. Arnaud (ed.), Turc, 269–286. Lyon: Presses universitaires de Lyon.Suche in Google Scholar
Kimball, Geoffrey. 1991. Koasati grammar. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2010. Dvandvas, blocking, and the associative: The bumpy ride from phrase to word. Language 86(2). 302–331.10.1353/lan.0.0216Suche in Google Scholar
Kirtchuk-Halevi, Pablo-I. 2004. Quechua. In Pierre L. J. Arnaud (ed.), Le nom composé. Données sur seize langues, 221–232. Lyon: Presses universitaires de Lyon.Suche in Google Scholar
Lang, Ewald. 1991. Koordinierende Konjunktionen. In Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research, 597–623. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110126969.7.597Suche in Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Nouns and verbs. Language 63(1). 53–94.10.2307/415384Suche in Google Scholar
Larsson, Jenny H. 2002. Nominal compounds in the Baltic languages. Transactions of the Philological Society 100(2). 203–231.10.1111/1467-968X.00097Suche in Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1994. Old English: A historical linguistic companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621000Suche in Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert. 1992. A grammar of contemporary Persian. Costa Mesa, CACosta Mesa, CA: Mazda Publishers.Suche in Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle, & Štekauer Pavol. 2009. Introduction: Status and definition of compounding. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 3–18. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Lini, Lorenzo. 1982. Manuale di conversazione italiano-indonesiano. Bologna: EMI.Suche in Google Scholar
Louali, Naima, & Gérard Philippson. 2004. Tamazight. In Pierre L. J. Arnaud (ed.), Le nom composé. Données sur seize langues, 233–248. Lyon: Presses universitaires de Lyon.Suche in Google Scholar
MacDonald, Lorna. 1990. A grammar of Tauya. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110846027Suche in Google Scholar
Manolessou, Io, & Symeon Tsolakidis. 2009. Greek coordinated compounds: Synchrony and diachrony. Patras Working Papers in Linguistics 1. 23–39.Suche in Google Scholar
Masini, Francesca. 2006. Binomial constructions: Inheritance, specification and subregularities. Lingue e Linguaggio 5. 207–232.Suche in Google Scholar
Mathiassen, Terje. 1997. A short grammar of Latvian. Columbus, OH: Slavica Publishers.Suche in Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina. 2008. Coordination relations in the languages of Europe and beyond. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110211498Suche in Google Scholar
Merlan, Francesca C. 1982. Mangarayi. Amsterdam: North Holland.Suche in Google Scholar
Merlan, Francesca C. 1994. A grammar of Wardaman, a language of the Northern Territory of Australia. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110871371Suche in Google Scholar
Miller, Amy W. 2001. A grammar of Jamul Tiipay. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110864823Suche in Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2009. Iroquoian: Mohawk. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 564–583. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Molomjamts, Jargal, & Andrea Csillaghy. 1998. Introduzione Alla lingua Mongola. Udine: Forum.Suche in Google Scholar
Müller, Peter O. 2015. Historical word-formation in German. In Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds.), Word-formation: An international handbook of the languages of Europe, Vol. III, 1867–1914. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110246254Suche in Google Scholar
Navickaitė-Klišauskienė, Agnė. 2016. Word-formation: An international handbook of the languages of Europe. In Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds.), Latvian, Vol. V, 3107–3124. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110424942-002Suche in Google Scholar
Neef, Martin. 2009. IE, Germanic: German. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 386–399. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Newmark, Leonard, Philip Hubbard, & Peter Prifti. 1982. Standard Albanian: A reference grammar for students. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Nguyen, Dinh Hoa. 1997. Vietnamese. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/loall.9Suche in Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 2011. Ingush grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Niemi, Jussi. 2009. Compounds in Finnish. Lingue e Linguaggio 8(2). 237–256.Suche in Google Scholar
Olsen, Susan. 2014. Zwischen Kern und Peripherie: Untersuchungen zu Randbereichen in Sprache und Grammatik. In Antonio Machicao, Andreas Nolda Priemer & Athina Sioupi (eds.), Coordinative structures in morphology, 269–286. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1524/9783050065335.269Suche in Google Scholar
Olsen, Susan. 2015. Composition. In Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds.), Word-formation: An international handbook of the languages of Europe, Vol. I, 364–385. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110246254-022Suche in Google Scholar
Pandharipande, Rajeshwari. 1997. Marathi. London & New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Polian, Gilles. 2006. Elements de grammaire du Tseltal: Une langue maya du Mexique. Paris: L’Harmattan.Suche in Google Scholar
Puglielli, Annarita. 1998. Dizionario italiano-somalo. Rome: Carocci.Suche in Google Scholar
Radimský, Jan. 2015. Noun+Noun Compounds in Italian: A corpus-based study. České Budějovice: Jihočeská univerzita.Suche in Google Scholar
Rainer, Franz, & Soledad Valera. 1992. Compounding in Spanish. Italian Journal of Linguistics 4(1). 117–142.Suche in Google Scholar
Rainer, Franz, & Claude Buridant. 2015. From Old French to Modern French. In Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds.), Word-formation: An international handbook of the languages of Europe, Vol. III, 1975–2000. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Suche in Google Scholar
Ralli, Angela. 1992. Compounding in modern Greek. Rivista di Linguistica 4(1). 143–174.10.1007/978-94-007-4960-3Suche in Google Scholar
Ralli, Angela. 2013. Compounding in modern Greek. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-4960-3Suche in Google Scholar
Ramat, Paolo. 2005. Per una definizione di ‘parola’. In Paolo Ramat (ed.), Pagine linguistiche, 106–121. Rome: Laterza.Suche in Google Scholar
Rice, Keren. 2009. Athapaskan: Slave. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 542–563. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Richteróva, Klára, Alena Macuróva, & Nováková Radka. 2016. Kinship terminology in Czech Sign Language. In Ulrike Zeshan & Keiko Sagara (eds.), Semantic fields in sign languages: Colour, kinship and quantification, 163–208. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781501503429-005Suche in Google Scholar
Saeed, John. 1999. Somali. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/loall.10Suche in Google Scholar
Sakel, Jeanette. 2004. A grammar of Mosetén. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110915280Suche in Google Scholar
Sanders, Arden, & Joy Sanders. 1994. Kamasau (Wand Tuan) grammar: Morpheme to sentence. https://pnglanguages.sil.org/resources/archives/31072Suche in Google Scholar
Scalise, Sergio, & Antonietta Bisetto. 2009. Classification of compounds. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 49–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Scalise, Sergio, Antonietta Bisetto, & Emiliano Guevara. 2005. Selection in compounding and derivation. In Wolfgang U. Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & Franz Rainer (eds.), Morphology and its demarcations, 97–108. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul, & Fe T. Otanes. 1972. Tagalog reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520321205Suche in Google Scholar
Schonberg, Harold C. 1987. The great pianists: From Mozart to the present. New York: Simon & Schuster.Suche in Google Scholar
Schwarzwald, Ora. 2011. Modern Hebrew. In Stefan Weninger (ed.), The Semitic languages: An international handbook, 523–536. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110251586.523Suche in Google Scholar
Shimada, Masaharu. 2013. Coordinated compounds: Comparison between English and Japanese. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 10(1). 77–96.Suche in Google Scholar
Simpson, Jane. 2009. Pama-Nyungan: Warlpiri. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 609–622. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Smeets, Ineke. 2008. A grammar of Mapuche. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar
Sneddon, James Neil. 1996. Indonesian: A comprehensive grammar. London & New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Soe, Myint. 1999. A grammar of Burmese. Eugene: University of Oregon dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-Min. 1999. The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Štichauer, Pavel. 2009. Compounds in Czech. Lingue e Linguaggio 8(2). 293–314.Suche in Google Scholar
Stifter, David. 2010. Early Irish. In Martin J. Ball & Nicole Müller (eds.), The Celtic languages, 55–115. London & New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Stundžia, Bonifacas. 2016. Lithuanian. In Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds.), Word-formation: An international handbook of the languages of Europe, Vol. V, 3089–3107. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110424942-001Suche in Google Scholar
Tacconi, Temis L. 2014. Towards a characterization of compounding in Maká. In Swintha Danielsen, Katja Hanss & Fernando Zúñiga (eds.), Word formation in South American languages, 33–50. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.163.03tacSuche in Google Scholar
Ten Hacken, Pius. 2000. Derivation and compounding. In Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds.), Morphologie-Morphology, 349–360. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gryuter.10.1515/9783110111286.1.5.349Suche in Google Scholar
Thompson, Laurence C. 1965. A Vietnamese grammar. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Tida, Syuntarô. 2006. A grammar of the Dom language: A Papuan language of Papua New Guinea. Kyoto: University of Kyoto dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Uotila, Eeva. 1980. Asyndeton in the Baltic and Finnic languages: An archaic construction in its typological periphery. Journal of Baltic Studies 11. 86–92.10.1080/01629778000000091Suche in Google Scholar
van Den Berg, Helma. 1995. A grammar of Hunzib: With texts and lexicon. Munich: Lincom.Suche in Google Scholar
van Enk, Gerrit J., & Lourens de Vries. 1997. The Korowai of Irian Jaya: Their language in its cultural context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
van Klinken, Catharina Lumien. 1999. A grammar of the Fehan dialect of Tetun: An Austronesian language of West Timor. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Suche in Google Scholar
Villoing, Florence. 2012. French compounds. Probus 24(1). 29–60.10.1515/probus-2012-0003Suche in Google Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard. 2005. Co-compounds and natural coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276219.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Zamponi, Raoul. 2009. Arawakan: Maipure-Yavitero. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 584–593. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando. 2001. Mapudungun. Munich: Lincom.Suche in Google Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando. 2014. Nominal compounds in Mapudungun. In Swintha Danielsen, Katja Hanss & Fernando Zúñiga (eds.), Word formation in South American languages, 11–32. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.163.02zunSuche in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Original Article
- Coordinating nominal compounds: Universal vs. areal tendencies
- Grammaticalization of subject agreement on evidence from Italo–Romance
- Frequency and serial order
- On the phonemic status of nasalized /h̃/ in Modern Zuberoan Basque
- “Morphological transposition” as the onset of recategorization: The case of luxe in Dutch
- The morphologization of negation constructions in Nalca (Mek, Tanah Papua), or, how nothing easily moves to the middle of a word
- Sonority distance and similarity avoidance effects in Moroccan Judeo-Spanish
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Original Article
- Coordinating nominal compounds: Universal vs. areal tendencies
- Grammaticalization of subject agreement on evidence from Italo–Romance
- Frequency and serial order
- On the phonemic status of nasalized /h̃/ in Modern Zuberoan Basque
- “Morphological transposition” as the onset of recategorization: The case of luxe in Dutch
- The morphologization of negation constructions in Nalca (Mek, Tanah Papua), or, how nothing easily moves to the middle of a word
- Sonority distance and similarity avoidance effects in Moroccan Judeo-Spanish
